EPTOn December 15 2013 14:52 zulu_nation8 wrote:
how does cruzer's shyv get outcsd by wickd's malph who tp'd twice and built trifroce
how does cruzer's shyv get outcsd by wickd's malph who tp'd twice and built trifroce
wickd>cruzer, that's why.
[LCS] Battle of the Atlantic, Part I - Page 51
| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
wickd>cruzer, that's why. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 15 2013 14:59 SagaZ wrote: makes sense on Q centric ezreal, Q doesn't crit, also loves cdr and penetration it was response to his BC on Sivir, not Ez. On Ez it's fine, though I prefer it on blue build ez, over triforce ez | ||
|
SagaZ
France3460 Posts
on sivir it makes sense too, thing with sivir is a) her natural attack speed growth sucks so as is not as effective and b) the as steroid on the passive of her ult is absolutely gigantic, as long as her w is active, so cdr is really gud it is a build that relies on the synergie between sivir's W and R | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
the worst part about it, was there were no teamfights to make use of the olaf + sivir synergy. | ||
|
SagaZ
France3460 Posts
I think he respected the enemy tankline enough to acknowledge he was not killing them anytime soon, with or without crit, and therefore the extra damage done with bounces to the rest of the enemy team was better. If you listen to other top adc this sentiment of "adc being useless cause tanks are invincible" is kind of a trend these days. More aoe, tower damage, utility and survivability but losing single target damage, sounds good imo | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 15 2013 15:25 SagaZ wrote: this is a difference of interpretation about the role in general I think I think he respected the enemy tankline enough to acknowledge he was not killing them anytime soon, with or without crit, and therefore the extra damage done with bounces to the rest of the enemy team was better. If you listen to other top adc this sentiment of "adc being useless cause tanks are invincible" is kind of a trend these days. More aoe, tower damage, utility and survivability but losing single target damage, sounds good imo She has same amount of utility with or without black cleaver in game 1, where no one on her team did any AD damage. Game 2, olaf and lee sin were other AD, both of which build tons of tank, and only olaf does actual damage, which is mostly true. Not to mention, majority of the game olaf was always splitpushing, therefore BC utility only for lee sin. The only reason invincible tanks exist is because you build shit like BC, rather than double your damage with crit. | ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
but ok good PR | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On December 15 2013 16:02 AsnSensation wrote: Dunno why Alliance apologized, the point of this entire tournament is to be the EU vs NA hype and trashtalk lol, I would only be offended if this would be offending if this was a real tournament match. but ok good PR imo it was the best pr move. there's only positives for doing it. Everyone who thought it was BM, some will accept apology. Everyone thought that it was in good fun, won't think any less of Alliance. | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On December 15 2013 16:02 AsnSensation wrote: Dunno why Alliance apologized, the point of this entire tournament is to be the EU vs NA hype and trashtalk lol, I would only be offended if this would be offending if this was a real tournament match. but ok good PR Yeah i was thinking the same thing had to be a PR reason. This trashtalk and showboating is excactly what riot themselfs wanted in this tournament. If only they were not so dumb to show that Scarra puppy losing face, for some reason ppl started complaining then even though when Dignitas loses he's always got that face  | ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35165 Posts
On December 15 2013 12:09 schmutttt wrote: Man dig look horrible. Get on them to get relegated next split, they have one player who could be considered top 4 in his position in NA. They do? | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Qtpie is still a quality ADC, alliance pretty much had a party at bot lane and scarra/crumbzz/cruzer were never invited. | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
On December 15 2013 17:16 Fusilero wrote: Qtpie is still a quality ADC, alliance pretty much had a party at bot lane and scarra/crumbzz/cruzer were never invited. Are you kidding, Crumbzz was the main party attraction at Bot, and was hugged to death repeatedly. The others were so busy trying to catch up farm, and felt they lacked funds to party. | ||
|
Dan HH
Romania9156 Posts
On December 15 2013 09:03 Sakray wrote: Weird I recently saw somewhere that it was 4 french 1 swiss :o Anyway, SHC still throwed hardcore and that sucks. I think you're confusing SHC with STO. They're the ones with that composition but got eliminated in the promotion group stage. | ||
|
Aeromi
France14461 Posts
 | ||
|
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
| ||
Flicky
England2669 Posts
On December 15 2013 21:17 Lysanias wrote: After watching these games to me, SK seems by far the weakest team in LCS. I guess they have some time to grow if Nyph does not go to Alliance, but still i have yet to see a single solid game by all members of SK so far. I know they're not a top level team, but watch their absolutely destruction of TheRed from WePlay. SK actually have a lot of promise I think. Svenskeren is top 3 jungler in Europe (Diamond, Cyanide, Svenskeren - Hopefully Shook joins that list soon) and Nyph has been playing amazingly recently, just not in those games. CandyPanda has picked up and if the current champion meta continues, Fredy will do fine. It's basically down to Jesiz getting champs he can play. The team just need to get some momentum and keep it. Coming down from 0-2 is a good sign. This split is going to be really good. SK are a better team than SHC, but it's still heartbreaking to watch teams go out. | ||
|
UmberBane
Germany5450 Posts
| ||
|
Lylat
France8575 Posts
On December 15 2013 17:16 Fusilero wrote: Qtpie is still a quality ADC, alliance pretty much had a party at bot lane and scarra/crumbzz/cruzer were never invited. Lol second game Crumbz never left bot lane.. On December 15 2013 21:17 Lysanias wrote: After watching these games to me, SK seems by far the weakest team in LCS. I guess they have some time to grow if Nyph does not go to Alliance, but still i have yet to see a single solid game by all members of SK so far. We've yet to see how new LD is doing, I don't have much hope though | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On December 15 2013 21:17 Lysanias wrote: After watching these games to me, SK seems by far the weakest team in LCS. I guess they have some time to grow if Nyph does not go to Alliance, but still i have yet to see a single solid game by all members of SK so far. You have just not seen LD yet lol. Granted we have all not seen them, but it is hard to imagine tehy will do well. | ||
| ||
also aAa back then already proved that (and I'm obviously talking linak/soaz/yellow aAa's not shlaya's :D)
