|
|
On April 09 2012 09:39 SpiritoftheTunA wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 09:37 UniversalSnip wrote:On April 09 2012 09:35 Lancer723 wrote:On April 09 2012 09:33 UniversalSnip wrote: sloppiest game from both teams. and dan dinh's analysis is so full of shit, it's ridiculous.
"tsm has a much worse late game team comp" later: "I feel in the late game tsm has a much better pick off comp and this gives them the late game advantage"
Pretty sure he said that CLG had the better teamfighting comp but TSM had the better comp for picking people off. He said a lot of stuff, most of which contradicted something else he said nah you're being too harsh he was pretty consistent because he was right about clg's lategame comp being better... if clg could properly tank for vayne (i.e. cho and shiv werent gimped all game), vayne kills much faster than ashe does...
TSM's late game is ridiculous, he was just throwing nonsense out. Ashe is as good as vayne at six items even though she does less damage, and vlad/soraka/ryze late game are all among the best in their roles.
|
Wooo casters got switched! :D
Edit - I meant switched from Hatperson casting, which was announced initially.
I guess "switched" would be the wrong word.
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/BOxqd.png)
FUCK YOU DIGNITAS D:<
hopefully Kayle can't hyper carry.
|
On April 09 2012 09:41 triangle wrote: Wooo casters got switched! :D What? It's still Dan + RedBaron
|
CLG was never strong enough to team fight and since their tanks never were on par with TSM's damage, they had no chance. Pretty much the only thing they could've done was catch a carry with anivia wall and then get a 5v4. They didn't have a hard initiate and Ryze and Ashe were both too fed for SV/HSGG to deal with.
I don't really like having cho + anivia since it seems like you have very low damage. In any event, they should really ban Ryze.
|
I like phreak, he pays attention and actually enjoys the game
|
|
On April 09 2012 09:37 UniversalSnip wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 09:35 Lancer723 wrote:On April 09 2012 09:33 UniversalSnip wrote: sloppiest game from both teams. and dan dinh's analysis is so full of shit, it's ridiculous.
"tsm has a much worse late game team comp" later: "I feel in the late game tsm has a much better pick off comp and this gives them the late game advantage"
Pretty sure he said that CLG had the better teamfighting comp but TSM had the better comp for picking people off. He said a lot of stuff, most of which contradicted something else he said Yeah, not a huge fan of the analysis style of casting, that's probably why I don't like Dan's commentary. Most of us know what's going on, we don't need you to tell us that being up 3 dragons is a good thing or that their ashe/ryze comp is going to try and pick someone off...
|
I personally think that Ashe is far better than Vayne at 6 items, it's not all about the dmg, her utility and especially AoE and the stun are gigantic and clearly outshine Vaynes singletarget damage at closerange, especially when Ryze is an amazing counter to her and she can't avoid getting close enough after which Ryze just does QWQEQ and whoops Vayne died
|
CLG's lategame if equally farmed was better imo CLG actually never got to fight on their own terms, even ignoring the fact that hotshot was very underfarmed relative to vlad, as every fight started with an ashe arrow or off of somebody getting caught the relative CC that the two teams have in an AoE is incomparable, and vlad / udyr cannot dive successfully on vayne / anivia together as they complement each other's weaknesses very well
|
On April 09 2012 09:36 LaM wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 09:35 Chrispy wrote: Man I did not like that one guy who is not Dan Dinh casting. All he did was ask questions.
GG though. Story of this weekend lol. Just awful. No play by play. Just one retarded dude asking the same questions over and over and Dan going "I feel like" back to him. have to mute it lol Honestly, if Red Baron tried to give analysis, he'd just be flamed anyway and people would be posting LKET DAN SPKEAK!
RB isn't a great caster, but he's just taking a play from the old Husky/JP/DJWheat casting playbook of ask the pro co-caster or get wrecked by the community. That being said...he asked a lot of questions (JP level of questions) and Dan's analysis was not very good, he contradicted himself a lot of times when speaking about team comps.
|
On April 09 2012 09:42 HazMat wrote:+ Show Spoiler +FUCK YOU DIGNITAS D:< hopefully Kayle can't hyper carry.
haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha.
Most annoying comp, 101.
|
hotshot, PLEASE build bveil this time.
|
|
On April 09 2012 09:42 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 09:37 UniversalSnip wrote:On April 09 2012 09:35 Lancer723 wrote:On April 09 2012 09:33 UniversalSnip wrote: sloppiest game from both teams. and dan dinh's analysis is so full of shit, it's ridiculous.
"tsm has a much worse late game team comp" later: "I feel in the late game tsm has a much better pick off comp and this gives them the late game advantage"
Pretty sure he said that CLG had the better teamfighting comp but TSM had the better comp for picking people off. He said a lot of stuff, most of which contradicted something else he said Yeah, not a huge fan of the analysis style of casting, that's probably why I don't like Dan's commentary. Most of us know what's going on, we don't need you to tell us that being up 3 dragons is a good thing or that their ashe/ryze comp is going to try and pick someone off... The only pro who ever taught me stuff while commentating was Jatt. Other than that anyone who has hit 1800+ doesn't need them cuz they just spout "obvious" stuff.
|
|
DL Graves?? I hope he's practiced with him enough.
|
|
On April 09 2012 09:44 Two_DoWn wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 09:42 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:On April 09 2012 09:37 UniversalSnip wrote:On April 09 2012 09:35 Lancer723 wrote:On April 09 2012 09:33 UniversalSnip wrote: sloppiest game from both teams. and dan dinh's analysis is so full of shit, it's ridiculous.
"tsm has a much worse late game team comp" later: "I feel in the late game tsm has a much better pick off comp and this gives them the late game advantage"
Pretty sure he said that CLG had the better teamfighting comp but TSM had the better comp for picking people off. He said a lot of stuff, most of which contradicted something else he said Yeah, not a huge fan of the analysis style of casting, that's probably why I don't like Dan's commentary. Most of us know what's going on, we don't need you to tell us that being up 3 dragons is a good thing or that their ashe/ryze comp is going to try and pick someone off... The only pro who ever taught me stuff while commentating was Jatt. Other than that anyone who has hit 1800+ doesn't need them cuz they just spout "obvious" stuff.
1800+ rather too high for them imoimo.
|
On April 09 2012 09:44 Two_DoWn wrote:Show nested quote +On April 09 2012 09:42 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:On April 09 2012 09:37 UniversalSnip wrote:On April 09 2012 09:35 Lancer723 wrote:On April 09 2012 09:33 UniversalSnip wrote: sloppiest game from both teams. and dan dinh's analysis is so full of shit, it's ridiculous.
"tsm has a much worse late game team comp" later: "I feel in the late game tsm has a much better pick off comp and this gives them the late game advantage"
Pretty sure he said that CLG had the better teamfighting comp but TSM had the better comp for picking people off. He said a lot of stuff, most of which contradicted something else he said Yeah, not a huge fan of the analysis style of casting, that's probably why I don't like Dan's commentary. Most of us know what's going on, we don't need you to tell us that being up 3 dragons is a good thing or that their ashe/ryze comp is going to try and pick someone off... The only pro who ever taught me stuff while commentating was Jatt. Other than that anyone who has hit 1800+ doesn't need them cuz they just spout "obvious" stuff. Majority of people watching probably haven't even hit 1600.
|
|
|
|