[IEM] Gamescom Discussion - Page 134

On August 21 2011 02:41 Orpheos wrote:
i think karth won that game. and lanewick+zil seemed really lackluster from TSM.

On August 21 2011 02:44 Winney1907 wrote:


Two wrongs don't make a right.

On August 21 2011 02:42 Crucifix wrote:

LOL. You shoulda goddamn listen to Phreak @ Dreamhack.

WTF? Not at all... They may be sometimes biased but it surely isn't "painfully biased", it's the exact commentary that someone who likes both teams exactly the same would like to hear

On August 21 2011 02:47 LaNague wrote:
commentators sometimes have bad camerawork and sometimes say stuff that isnt right, but i think they do fine for people that only do this every few months.

On August 21 2011 02:47 Gantzie wrote:
.... wtf... coz staff wants to go home... thousands of people who paid for the event... will miss out the final match of the last semi final?

On August 21 2011 02:46 Humdrum wrote:


Ok? Biased commentating is biased commentating. I'm not sure what your point is.



Come on. Did you not hear how happy they are after every little thing that Fnatic did? I'm not going to argue about it because I don't care enough.

On August 21 2011 02:48 bigjenk wrote:



Prob the venue license and rules. Seems a bit early to be shutting down though.

On August 21 2011 02:52 0123456789 wrote:
Urgot's dmg is underrated. He's like one of those champions that was strong that disappeared.

On August 21 2011 02:50 zulu_nation8 wrote:
i wonder if xpeke got death timer quints, agreed with TSM not necesarily having the worse late game, it just looked like that because they were really behind on farm. Fnatic had soraka who becomes worse as the game goes on and urgot who has way less late game damage than cait. If lee lin and WW got tanky enough they could've withstood the two ap's damage a lot better and dealth more damage on their own.