That game was basically a pickup scrim. You don't see tryhard games like that every day in solo queue.

Since NA solo queue don't really take the ladder as seriously all the top pros are all over the place in MMR they don't get matched together nearly as often. That and their streaming hours make it so they don't play at the same time.

Slusher

United States19143 Posts

September 08 2013 17:26 GMT

#1226

the phrase "tryhard" existing is a major part of the NA ladders problem. I fucking hate that word.

Numy

South Africa35471 Posts

September 08 2013 17:32 GMT

#1227

Dam is he done for the night?

RouaF

France4121 Posts

September 08 2013 17:53 GMT

#1228

On September 09 2013 02:32 Numy wrote:
Dam is he done for the night?

Considering its 3am in korea, probably

GhandiEAGLE

United States20754 Posts

September 08 2013 18:06 GMT

#1229

The word Tryhard is typically just an excuse for people who are doing badly, and now it's being thrown around everywhere as thought it were some sort of crime. Kind of like the word gay.

Nos-

Canada12016 Posts

September 08 2013 18:15 GMT

#1230

saying tryhard is apparently the equivalent to saying I'm only losing cause I don't care as much as you do about this game cause I have a better life/wife/job bigger dick than you

Diamond

United States10796 Posts

September 08 2013 18:35 GMT

#1231

Tryhard is the dumbest word in LoL. It'd be funny to try and insult other communities with it.

Call a SC2 player a tryhard and they will go "What, of course I am trying hard, why would I not?" etc

Never got why it's a bad thing to give it your all.

Numy

South Africa35471 Posts

September 08 2013 18:38 GMT

#1232

It's a bit weird that is it in LoL since I feel it kind of comes from dota where the mode most people play isn't the same as competitive play so "tryhard" is basically saying a person is acting like it's competitive when it's not. Also silly there but a little less than in LoL since well solo q is all about rankings and shit.

Nos-

Canada12016 Posts

September 08 2013 18:48 GMT

#1233

all this HTML in the league client

MattBarry

United States4006 Posts

September 08 2013 18:48 GMT

#1234

Riot really needs to make ranked 5s have some dependence on solo queue ranked. A bunch of golds against diamonds isn't very fair (although they did surrender while up 51-10 LOL)

seRapH

United States9830 Posts

September 08 2013 18:53 GMT

#1235

On September 09 2013 03:48 MattBarry wrote:
Riot really needs to make ranked 5s have some dependence on solo queue ranked. A bunch of golds against diamonds isn't very fair (although they did surrender while up 51-10 LOL)

This may be why you're facing the diamonds

iCanada

Canada10660 Posts

September 08 2013 18:56 GMT

#1236

On September 09 2013 03:48 MattBarry wrote:
Riot really needs to make ranked 5s have some dependence on solo queue ranked. A bunch of golds against diamonds isn't very fair (although they did surrender while up 51-10 LOL)

It does.

Your initial ranking is based off of the combined soloqueue rating of all the teams players, then it modified by your placements and accelerated elo period.

I'm willing ot bet those diamonds have just been surrendering all their games, their win-loss is probably like 0-40

obesechicken13

United States10467 Posts

September 08 2013 18:56 GMT

#1237

Then again you do have tryhards in bot games that complain when you let them die
And arams is a grey area where you get people who have smurfs for araming.

Finally, if you're playing with friends and they're just like "yoloswag red build ad tank annie!"
And you're timing buffs and calling objectives you're kinda a tryhard too.

Slusher

United States19143 Posts

September 08 2013 19:28 GMT

#1238

I'm actually pretty "tryhard" in arams >.> I mean I get the game can randomly put you at huge advantages disadvantages, but it really fucking bothers me how many people feel like getting there in time for the first creepwave is optional....