EPTedit: grammar
Greedy People... - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Ramsing
Canada233 Posts
edit: grammar | ||
|
Highways
Australia6106 Posts
Also comments from NY Post http://www.nypost.com/seven/01302009/news/regionalnews/survivors_gilt_152720.htm | ||
|
iD.NicKy
France767 Posts
On February 02 2009 20:01 MyLostTemple wrote: glad to see this post was made by a typical oversimplifying super-categorizing stereotyping Australian typical taste less reply by MyLostTemple | ||
|
JudgeMathis
Cuba1286 Posts
| ||
|
rushz0rz
Canada5300 Posts
| ||
|
Choros
Australia530 Posts
| ||
|
Elric
United Kingdom1327 Posts
If it was the airline's fault in any way, then fine, I could understand a lot more.. But.. it was fucking birds. Inc, makes a good point about people being able to claim millions over spilt coffee. But just because a spasticated precedent exists doesn't mean it should be followed...  | ||
|
rushz0rz
Canada5300 Posts
On February 02 2009 20:26 Choros wrote: Americans are known for trying to sue for everything cmon guys some of you even said you would sue yourself "easy money". In Australia we have legislation today where we cant sue even if it is appropriate as a reactionary response to American sue excesses....(also corruption :\) Does it actually say "as a reactionary response to American sue excesses" in the legislation? If it does.... that's kind of sad. In Canada we have nothing like that, although it is different, and people often confuse our legal system with the Americans. Our torts are never nearly as generous. | ||
|
Vex
Ireland454 Posts
epic thread, i think the compensations really low. a 150 passanger crash over here and you'd be looking at government bankruptsy  !!Fucking geese ROFL :D | ||
|
deathgod6
United States5064 Posts
"Anyway what about the poor geese...do their relatives get a free upgrade too? Honk!" XD | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
In Canada we have nothing like that, Yes we do. Andrews case trio which set out rules on quantum of damages for torts claims set a maximum value, at 100,000$ in 1971 (74? don't remember), adjusted upward for inflation. | ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + only if i make it out safe though | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
What did the pilot get for being such a badass? They should write him an 8k check for every life he saved. | ||
|
rushz0rz
Canada5300 Posts
On February 02 2009 20:41 L wrote: Yes we do. Andrews case trio which set out rules on quantum of damages for torts claims set a maximum value, at 100,000$ in 1971 (74? don't remember), adjusted upward for inflation. I meant there is nothing in our precedents or legislation that says "because of American suing excess." | ||
|
SirGlinG
Sweden933 Posts
I got life and 200 dollars. | ||
|
LordWeird
United States3411 Posts
| ||
|
renegade_zerg
Korea (South)525 Posts
| ||
|
BlackJack
United States10574 Posts
| ||
|
MuR)Ernu
Finland768 Posts
On February 02 2009 19:37 choboPEon wrote: haha, this is a joke, right? a not-so-subtle troll! Well, you can't deny that its typical for americans to sue the shit out of everyone, and trying to get money out of everythign really. Of course they somewhat deserve it since they could even have died and they probably will have some sort of flight phobia now >_< | ||
|
OhThatDang
United States4685 Posts
| ||
| ||
