EPTUS Politics Mega-thread - Page 5755
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
LightSpectra
United States2656 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States44026 Posts
On June 03 2026 00:49 oBlade wrote: What do you suppose would have happened had Trump actually vetoed the files containing the smoking gun of rape which you alone found? For one, you’d be here telling us that actually it’s precisely because he vetoed them that he’s clearly innocent. After all, a guilty man would try to appear innocent by releasing them. Only an innocent man wouldn’t care. | ||
|
Billyboy
1769 Posts
On June 03 2026 01:25 dyhb wrote: I don't for a second believe that unknown Democratic donors are so powerful as to prevent the disclosure of legitimate and incriminating evidence of Trump rape in the context of Epstein during the Biden administration. Are you serious? That is because you are talking about just releasing files about Trump, and I’m talking about releasing them all. Some new version of Dems that is populist like Trump might do such a thing, but the previous Dems would not do something so partisan. They kept them shelved because the impacted so many. Hell maybe there is intelligence reasons, or protecting victims or who knows. Which is all why they didn’t campaign on releasing them, Trump and his MAGAts were so “clean” they were doing to release them all. And instead once they got the keys it has been a huge fight to release anything. You’re what about the Dems game doesn’t work when it wasn’t something they campaigned about at all, let alone their big promise. And it is not working as a distraction when you try to bring it up. | ||
|
oBlade
United States6182 Posts
On June 03 2026 02:50 KwarK wrote: For one, you’d be here telling us that actually it’s precisely because he vetoed them that he’s clearly innocent. After all, a guilty man would try to appear innocent by releasing them. Only an innocent man wouldn’t care. The question was already answered. It would go back to Congress. For me personally, once the overwhelming majority of both houses of Congress came back voting to release the files anyway, despite the Republicans getting no credit because it was all part of Biden's master plan, I'd just look at the evidence. Same as now. Look at the evidence. Then seeing there's no smoking guns, and it's impossible to prove a nonspecific negative, I'd move on. Especially I'd make sure even if I believed X or Y in the Epstein files was a child rapist, I wouldn't go around calling anyone who wasn't cheering the immediate lynching of X and Y a rape apologist. I'd grow up connect the dots and come to the realization "Oh, this person isn't against lynching X and Y because they like defending child rapists, it's the exact opposite, it's because they don't think there's any evidence X or Y is a child rapist." | ||
| ||
