|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
United States42520 Posts
On March 30 2022 02:44 NewSunshine wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2022 02:36 Zambrah wrote:On March 30 2022 02:17 lestye wrote:On March 27 2022 09:05 Nick_54 wrote:On March 25 2022 12:01 lestye wrote: The lesser of evil is still evil….but at least one party isnt run by a cargo cult trying to subvert democracy. I think he answer is to primary the fuck out of democrats you dont like. I don’t think a politician failing to deliver because we’re under the weight of the filibuster is the same thing as a party run by a bunch of zealot homophobes who don’t believe in science or climate change. Yeah the filibuster has nothing to do with the broken student loan forgiveness promise. Not racing to the polls to support that. If its a close vote or if they lose maybe it will push the dems further left or help some better candidates rise up. Yeah, I'll concede this. I don't know what kind of political calculus Biden is doing. Like is he in the pocket of the loan ppl? I have to hope that he'll be forced to do it before midterms, since thats the only big flashy thing he can do right now since Congress sucks. Biden was one of the major forces behind making sure student loan debt couldnt be discharged in bankruptcy. I wasn't aware of that. It makes his campaign promise to forgive student debt ring pretty hollow. Not really. The only thing better than students being on the hook for repayments forever is the government being responsible for repayments.
|
That was in 1976. It is extremely possible for someone's perspective to change over the course of 40 years. Especially when the situation is extremely different. And the whole idea of re-election. Even if Biden fundamentally hates the youth, if he wants to be re-elected, it is kind of mandatory.
|
Does he care about being re-elected though? Are Democrats at large even in touch enough to know what to do to get elected?
Democrats have been stuck in the Clinton era for a long time, and the only lesson Ive seen them learn in my lifetime has been about Trump, and the lesson they took from that was the Trump Bad strategy which I dont see being particularly helpful in these coming years.
|
On March 30 2022 02:55 Zambrah wrote: Does he care about being re-elected though? Are Democrats at large even in touch enough to know what to do to get elected?
Democrats have been stuck in the Clinton era for a long time, and the only lesson Ive seen them learn in my lifetime has been about Trump, and the lesson they took from that was the Trump Bad strategy which I dont see being particularly helpful in these coming years.
I mean he ran for president for some reason I guess? I can only assume he wants to avoid the shame of single term president.
|
I feel like the Democrats basically begged him to, he didnt really strike me as being all that interested in actually being president. Maybe a crowning jewel on a long and shitty political career, I guess? I don't take him for being all that invested in actually being president though.
Also hes going to be over 80 by the time hes up for reelection so hopefully the US stops its streak of electing Oldest Ever Presidents.
|
Well he kicked things off by saying he planned on being a 1-term president, so he'll probably run for re-election lol. I dunno, he might stick to it, at his age he'd probably die from the stress alone.
|
Who else they gonna run at this point, Democrats have a startling lack of charisma in their potential presidential candidates. At least Joe Biden has name recognition, not that I think it carries him against any vaguely charismatic Republican psychopath
Tbh I think we’re just going to have to buckle up for some Republican ownership of government until Democrats leadership die of old age. Or live forever and get re-elected well into senility like Feinstein.
|
On March 30 2022 02:48 Mohdoo wrote: That was in 1976. It is extremely possible for someone's perspective to change over the course of 40 years. Especially when the situation is extremely different. And the whole idea of re-election. Even if Biden fundamentally hates the youth, if he wants to be re-elected, it is kind of mandatory. Yeah.... and my understanding was that people declaring bankruptcy like day 1 after graduation was a serious loophole back then. I get that.
But yeah, hopefully he'll get desperate enough he'll keep his promise. Americans Will Always Do the Right Thing — After Exhausting All the Alternatives
|
Northern Ireland24999 Posts
|
On March 29 2022 20:40 Erasme wrote:Show nested quote +On March 29 2022 13:01 Doc.Rivers wrote:On March 29 2022 12:07 Husyelt wrote: Everything else is insiuations and conspiracies until proven otherwise. In other words it's not a story. The ultimate test is to assume that Hunter is Don Jr and Joe is Don Sr, and then consider what your opinion would be, given the facts: 1. Hunter reserved 10% for the "big guy" in his foreign business dealings. 2. NYT authenticated the emails and stated that Hunter never referred to Joe by name but instead referred to him as Hunter's "guy." 3. Hunter and Joe shared bank accounts. That is the evidence that's available. Personally I'm very interested in whatever comes of the DOJ's ongoing criminal investigation of Hunter, but I can understand wjy left leaning people would want the story buried. So, once again, you don't have anything but a 'lost' usb and russian claims to back up yours ? You don't want to put don jr and Hunter side by side btw, it's really not the argument you think it is. One is a crybaby and a crook who loves being in the limelight fellating his father for an ounce of aknowledgment while the other ... benefitted from his fathers name ... and does coke and hookers ... Wait isn't that don jr still ?
Not to belabor the subject, since it is apparently a sensitive one, but ill just respond to this USB stick point since people seem to think it is a slam dunk. The emails have been authenticated, and we know what they say. So it does not matter that at one point the emails were on a USB stick that got lost.
The point of my "test" was just to show that if the parties were flipped, but the evidence was the same, I'll bet your conclusion would flip.
User was warned for this post.
|
On March 30 2022 02:17 lestye wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2022 09:05 Nick_54 wrote:On March 25 2022 12:01 lestye wrote: The lesser of evil is still evil….but at least one party isnt run by a cargo cult trying to subvert democracy. I think he answer is to primary the fuck out of democrats you dont like. I don’t think a politician failing to deliver because we’re under the weight of the filibuster is the same thing as a party run by a bunch of zealot homophobes who don’t believe in science or climate change. Yeah the filibuster has nothing to do with the broken student loan forgiveness promise. Not racing to the polls to support that. If its a close vote or if they lose maybe it will push the dems further left or help some better candidates rise up. Yeah, I'll concede this. I don't know what kind of political calculus Biden is doing. Like is he in the pocket of the loan ppl? I have to hope that he'll be forced to do it before midterms, since thats the only big flashy thing he can do right now since Congress sucks. Hes in the pocket of the loan people insomuch as the economy is in the pocket of the big loan people. Student loans are the new mortgage for the stock market and is used to prop up a lot of investment banks margin trading. if that all suddenly gets paid out in cash to the holders by the government the market will go insane a bit.
Not having interest on loans anymore seems like a compromise both sides could live with. restarting the payments are never going to happen as long as the democrats are in power.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Most student loans are owned by the federal government, so thankfully the fallout of a SLABS (student loan asset backed securities) crisis is limited primarily to the fact that it's going to be a writeoff that will probably make its way to the national debt. The few private loan SLABS are not a MBS-sized problem just because there's not enough of them to have that kind of impact. Student loan servicers lose their loan refinancing franchise, which is one of the more realistic reasons I saw why a bunch of them are closing up shop. But for the most part - the government owns the debt obligation here.
Given that we've largely decided to ignore the national debt problem as a whole, I'm inclined to think Biden's desire to restart student loans is based primarily on boomer logic. Pausing loans like this was absolutely going to leave a mess in its wake but the cat's out of the bag now so you can't really just turn back.
|
|
On March 30 2022 03:00 Zambrah wrote: I feel like the Democrats basically begged him to, he didnt really strike me as being all that interested in actually being president. Maybe a crowning jewel on a long and shitty political career, I guess? I don't take him for being all that invested in actually being president though.
Also hes going to be over 80 by the time hes up for reelection so hopefully the US stops its streak of electing Oldest Ever Presidents. Even Democrats wanted someone besides Biden (he lost the first 3 primaries), they only rallied around him after it was clear no one else could stop Bernie.
EDIT: Somewhat unrelated, Democrats have been steadily behind Republicans (Dems are typically ahead) for months on the generic congressional polls so it looks like Democrats are going to lose 2022 badly.
|
|
On March 30 2022 03:33 lestye wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2022 02:48 Mohdoo wrote: That was in 1976. It is extremely possible for someone's perspective to change over the course of 40 years. Especially when the situation is extremely different. And the whole idea of re-election. Even if Biden fundamentally hates the youth, if he wants to be re-elected, it is kind of mandatory. Yeah.... and my understanding was that people declaring bankruptcy like day 1 after graduation was a serious loophole back then. I get that. But yeah, hopefully he'll get desperate enough he'll keep his promise. Americans Will Always Do the Right Thing — After Exhausting All the Alternatives
You should know that it was 2005 when Biden broke ranks to help Republicans pass the law that took away the ability to discharge private student loans through bankruptcy.
I'm unclear on why you think it was a serious loophole back then?
|
|
On March 30 2022 07:05 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On March 30 2022 03:33 lestye wrote:On March 30 2022 02:48 Mohdoo wrote: That was in 1976. It is extremely possible for someone's perspective to change over the course of 40 years. Especially when the situation is extremely different. And the whole idea of re-election. Even if Biden fundamentally hates the youth, if he wants to be re-elected, it is kind of mandatory. Yeah.... and my understanding was that people declaring bankruptcy like day 1 after graduation was a serious loophole back then. I get that. But yeah, hopefully he'll get desperate enough he'll keep his promise. Americans Will Always Do the Right Thing — After Exhausting All the Alternatives You should know that it was 2005 when Biden broke ranks to help Republicans pass the law that took away the ability to discharge private student loans through bankruptcy. I'm unclear on why you think it was a serious loophole back then? Idk, my understanding was that a ton of students strategically declared bankruptcy right after graduating so thats one of the reasons why they amended it. I'm not sure if thats 1) accurate or 2) justification for the 1978, 1998 or 2005 changes to the Bankruptcy code.
|
I 100% would have declared bankruptcy if I could have.
|
Well, it was also more possible to put yourself through school without having to work 2 or 3 jobs at the same time and completely fuck over your work-life balance, so the entire landscape of the problem looks different to us now.
|
|
|
|