EPTA question to other Radiohead fans: - Page 4
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
mrmin123
Korea (South)2971 Posts
On June 14 2006 00:58 BroOd wrote: Maybe my versions of Fog are different than yours. The first one I have is off of the Knives Out B-Sides, just called Fog. The second is during an early live recording, and it's called Alligators in New York Sewers. Yes, Fog and Fog (Again) (also known as Alligators in New York Sewers) are two different songs. The song Alligators in New York Sewers was debuted on 2000 at the Israel show as the solo piano version. Then the electronic/guitar version you're talking about, renamed Fog, was on the Knives Out Single and Amnesiacs B-Sides. The live recorded version was then renamed as Fog (Again) and released on the Go To Sleep Single and the Com Lag 2 + 2 = 5 EP. I prefer the Fog (Again) / live version of the song much more, because it features the piano  | ||
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
I'm listening to Fog (Again) (live) right now! | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
mrmin123
Korea (South)2971 Posts
On June 14 2006 01:09 zulu_nation8 wrote: mrmin can you recommend me some new music im bored with all mine Well, what are you in the mood for? What type of music? | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
i have about 300, but maybe you have some i dont? | ||
|
mrmin123
Korea (South)2971 Posts
On June 14 2006 01:13 BroOd wrote: mrmin tell me more radiohead songs i should find. i have about 300, but maybe you have some i dont? Have you checked out the Towering Above The Rest collection? If you have that, there isn't much else I could recommend to you  Or you could check out the bootlegs of the 2006 Tour and listen to the new songs... | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
i'm glad you ignored the rest of whats been going on lol it hasn't been pretty.. and i only really wanted to talk to you in the first place. i'm going to address your two points in reverse order, firstly i'd like to correct myself, because while i feel classical music is more worthy of indepth anaylsis i still think it's a trivial pursuit to do so, and so i'd like to rescind my original comment to that regard. i hear ya about being passionate for a thing, and it's a touchy thing for me to criticize. who am i to tell you what you should or should not be passionate about. i guess my main beef with it is, you see threads with passionate metal fans and they are bickering amongst themselves, and arguing over what appears to be quite trivial matters, ie which metal band is best or which sub-metal genre is best, and i ask myself, what good is this doing anybody? or i see food threads (not on this forum) where people are obsessed with seemingly trivial details of their food. i just cant help but advocate that people take a more flexible, non-committed approach to things. anyways i am sorry if i am putting a negative into this thread, but i do not regret sparking dialogue on this matter. | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On June 14 2006 01:15 mrmin123 wrote: Have you checked out the Towering Above The Rest collection? If you have that, there isn't much else I could recommend to you Or you could check out the bootlegs of the 2006 Tour and listen to the new songs... I don't have it, but would like to know where I could get it. | ||
|
Zeto
United States2290 Posts
On June 14 2006 01:17 zulu_nation8 wrote: ive realized after all my experience with indie rock that i can never find anything similar to arcade fire or broken social scene because theyre almost like one hit wonders and their albums were inspired by unique circumstances, i dont like wolf parade or sunset rubdown i think theyre passionate with no real emotion and it sounds really bombastic. all i want now is just an album that has a lot more in itself and is worth repeated listens, i dont care what type of music, i just want something good, but preferably something along the lines of good experimental indie rock with smart ambiguous lyrics and a lot of guitars have you tried giving a listen to "The Mars Volta"? It has a couple of "At the Drive-In"'s former members. Though it's a bit emo in the lyrics, the music makes up for it more than enough. | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Zeto
United States2290 Posts
| ||
|
mrmin123
Korea (South)2971 Posts
On June 14 2006 01:18 a-game wrote: mrmin: i'm glad you ignored the rest of whats been going on lol it hasn't been pretty.. and i only really wanted to talk to you in the first place. i'm going to address your two points in reverse order, firstly i'd like to correct myself, because while i feel classical music is more worthy of indepth anaylsis i still think it's a trivial pursuit to do so, and so i'd like to rescind my original comment to that regard. i hear ya about being passionate for a thing, and it's a touchy thing for me to criticize. who am i to tell you what you should or should not be passionate about. i guess my main beef with it is, you see threads with passionate metal fans and they are bickering amongst themselves, and arguing over what appears to be quite trivial matters, ie which metal band is best or which sub-metal genre is best, and i ask myself, what good is this doing anybody? or i see food threads (not on this forum) where people are obsessed with seemingly trivial details of their food. i just cant help but advocate that people take a more flexible, non-committed approach to things. anyways i am sorry if i am putting a negative into this thread, but i do not regret sparking dialogue on this matter. First, I am going to have to ultimately agree with you as to the whole arguing about what band/genre/style/whateverthefuck is better. You really can't argue about these things since music is entirely objective and I doubt your best arguments can get a metalhead to listen to Debussy (unless said metalhead is extremely open-minded, which would be good). Such arguments ultimately have no point and is a fat waste of time. I think the best one could do is describe the music, and hope the other party takes interest, listens to it, and likes it on their own accord. Second, I'm not sure about what you mean by a 'more flexible, non-committed approach.' When describing things like music I can't help but feel committed, although I think one could be very flexible in such things. In my opinion, when music is described it should 1. describe what it sounds like, since music is an audible form of media, and 2. describe what you feel. Now, to me, observations like 'what it sounds like' and 'what feelings it stirs up/conveys' requires a certain amount of committment. Flexibility, on the other hand, depends on how you want to convey such descriptions, of which it is limitless. Of course, I could be understanding you completely wrong. Please correct me. My apologies if I am making little sense - I've been studying animal biology and organic chemistry for the last... 20 hours or so, on and off. I want to stab my eye out :D | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
| ||
