My tears of joy!
STOP "PROTECT IP (S. 968)/SOPA (HR. 3261)" - Page 34
Forum Index > General Forum |
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
My tears of joy! | ||
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
| ||
DeltaBravo
United States119 Posts
| ||
Duravi
United States1205 Posts
| ||
ExileR
United States89 Posts
| ||
Khyrandor
Czech Republic158 Posts
| ||
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
| ||
![]()
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
Ryuu314
United States12679 Posts
On December 16 2011 06:16 DeltaBravo wrote: At first I was appalled that this bill even exists, but after listening to the proceedings in the livestream debate it seems that this bill is going to go no where, with sound minds like Mr. Chaffetz against the bill and bumbling uninformed people like Mr. Watts for, I think the internet is safe. fixed? didnt chaffetz said he wanted to vote no? | ||
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
On December 16 2011 06:16 Khyrandor wrote: Well didn't she find on the Twitter too then? And now wasting much more time... It was the comment that he's being purposely disrespectful. | ||
driftme
United States360 Posts
On December 16 2011 06:17 zarepath wrote: The thing is, she WAS boring, and she hasn't said anything at all relating to SOPA. And by tweeting it, he's shown to be smarter than that guy who can't use the internet. And the fact that she SAW it on twitter makes it clear that she's doing whatever horrible thing she thinks that HE was doing by, gasp, using the internet while talking about killing it. she was probably notified of it by her staff | ||
NB
Netherlands12045 Posts
http://www.reddit.com/r/SOPA/comments/ne9i7/the_word_offensive_is_offensive/ | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
I am hugely against this bill. It is a massive move against internet freedom that seems to only be in-motion due to greed. This needless regulation will be virtually impossible to enforce but more importantly, doing so would be a frivolous use of manpower. China has a very similar to what this would be and its internet policies are well... a joke to be quite honest. I truly hope to see this shut down and hope that you will be apart of the reason. Thank you for your time. At least word it properly: I am strongly against this bill. It is a massive move against internet freedom that seems only to be in motion due to greed. This needless regulation will be virtually impossible to enforce, but more importantly, doing so would be a frivolous use of manpower. In China, there is a similar law, and their internet policies are... well, a joke, to be quite hones. I truly hope to see this shut down and hope that you will be a part of the reason why. Thank you for your time. | ||
DeltaBravo
United States119 Posts
On December 16 2011 06:17 Ryuu314 wrote: fixed? didnt chaffetz said he wanted to vote no? Yes, vote no on the bill, thus he's against the bill, whereas Watts wants the bill to be passed | ||
ManaFortress
Sweden23 Posts
On December 16 2011 06:13 pettter wrote: You seriously overestimate the powers and competence of Anon. Get ready to torify ALL the connections. Actually, Anon are probably consists of atleast some very competent people. it is probably you that are underestimating them. | ||
BlackJack
United States10180 Posts
On December 16 2011 06:18 NB wrote: hey, its good if they drag this out. The longer the bill be processed, the more likely we will have a hearing therefore gain more votes. http://www.reddit.com/r/SOPA/comments/ne9i7/the_word_offensive_is_offensive/ what is that about? I missed it | ||
driftme
United States360 Posts
| ||
Serpico
4285 Posts
| ||
driftme
United States360 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285713¤tpage=33#655 | ||
| ||