|
|
On December 16 2011 03:10 SafeAsCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2011 03:02 Eddog wrote:
This guy needs to stop living in the damn past. Can't believe how out of touch people can be with the modern day world This is why politicians should have limits :/ People can be in government for a good 50-70 years, and when 50 years pass, you are NOT still qualified to represent the general public, as most of your generation is dead.
that is wrong though. Internet is not the only thing these people have to work on... something like wall-street stuff it would be great to have a 40 years professional knowledge etc...
idk where im going with this =_=
|
this is just too depressing.. I'm not sure I can continue to watch. These are the leaders of our country and they literally have NO clue what they are talking about. You always hear satirical comedy shows like colbert or daily show poking fun at congress etc., but the scariest, or most funny depending on how you want to look at it, is just to watch an actual session.
This is a shockingly bad 'debate' 'discussion' whatever.
|
i like this Sanchez guy... my guess is he is secretly against the bill and he is pretending to pass it to raise more holes for people to dig into xD
|
On December 16 2011 03:18 crms wrote:
this is just too depressing.. I'm not sure I can continue to watch. These are the leaders of our country and they literally have NO clue what they are talking about. You always hear satirical comedy shows like colbert or daily show poking fun at congress etc., but the scariest, most funny depending on how you want to look at it, is just to watch an actual session.
This is a shockingly bad 'debate' 'discussion' whatever.
I agree, this is embarrassing watching these people who are trying to pass a bill they really have no idea about. They don't know the consequences of this and will never get it. Disgusting debate.
|
Is the guy behind Mr. Watts Destiny?
|
I bet no one even understands what Sanchez is talking about in this courthouse..
|
Seriously, it seems as though most of the people in that building are utterly confused by this. Surely that causes massive red flags that need to be looked at. Are they really going to pass this bill when it seems only a handful of people even understand it thoroughly?
|
|
|
On December 16 2011 03:25 ExileR wrote:
Wow 23 No's to 9 I's O=
Sorry, i'm dumb. What are they voting for right now?
|
They weren't voting on the bill afaik
|
I don't understand any of this, but 23 : 9 against this bill is good from what I do know.
|
On December 16 2011 03:26 Grettin wrote:Sorry, i'm dumb. What are they voting for right now?
An amendment that would exempt a University from blocking foreign infringing websites at the DOJ's request, mirroring the immunity DNS hosts such as GoDaddy currently have under the bill.
On December 16 2011 03:27 57 Corvette wrote:
I don't understand any of this, but 23 : 9 against this bill is good from what I do know.
There are 535 members of Congress. These votes are for amendments.
|
On December 16 2011 03:27 57 Corvette wrote:
I don't understand any of this, but 23 : 9 against this bill is good from what I do know.
AFAIK it was on some kind of amendment?
|
United States23455 Posts
On December 16 2011 03:27 57 Corvette wrote:I don't understand any of this, but 23  against this bill is good from what I do know.
This was against the Polis proposal. It was something about exempting colleges from this SOPA crap.
So no, 23 to 9 is bad.
|
On December 16 2011 03:27 57 Corvette wrote:
I don't understand any of this, but 23 : 9 against this bill is good from what I do know.
You're misunderstanding it. Those were votes to a change of the bill to make it more fair. The people who voted no to that change are more likely those who want this bill as a whole to pass. those who voted yes for the change are the few who don't like the bill as a whole.
In general it looks like the bill will get passed because there isn't enough people against it.
|
On December 16 2011 03:28 psteeleneg wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2011 03:27 57 Corvette wrote:
I don't understand any of this, but 23 : 9 against this bill is good from what I do know. You're misunderstanding it. Those were votes to a change of the bill to make it more fair. The people who voted no to that change are more likely those who want this bill as a whole to pass. those who voted yes for the change are the few who don't like the bill as a whole. In general it looks like the bill will get passed because there isn't enough people against it.
Yeah, it was just a small change in the bill, not the bill entirely. 1 Step at a time.!
|
On December 16 2011 03:27 Fionn wrote:Show nested quote +On December 16 2011 03:27 57 Corvette wrote:I don't understand any of this, but 23 against this bill is good from what I do know. This was against the Polis proposal. It was something about exempting colleges from this SOPA crap. So no, 23 to 9 is bad.
its not bad, it is expected.
|
Canada5565 Posts
|
"I aspire to be a nerd"
>.>
|
On December 16 2011 03:29 Xxio wrote:
"I aspire to be a nerd"
We should get her to play starcraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
