Korean&Japanese

On March 10 2005 02:44 Waxangel wrote:
it would be nice if we could understand his posts

On March 10 2005 02:48 Schnake wrote:


Let's try to interpret it! Basically,he wants our opinion on KOR-JAP issues, which includes a dispute about an island (?). =)

On March 10 2005 02:51 Waxangel wrote:
well I know what he means, but I'd rather see him squirm trying to make himself understandable

On March 10 2005 02:51 Waxangel wrote:
well I know what he means, but I'd rather see him squirm trying to make himself understandable

On March 10 2005 04:31 jjun212 wrote:
Alot of asian countries hate Japan for what they did during WWII..

Well... mainyl only 2, China and Korea but some people have gotten over the fact, that it is the past and its a new generation of people living in both socities and have gotten over it. And Korea/Japan share some attributes like the food, customs, style etc..

Still... there are some people who are unwilling to let this go and continue to hold a grudge against the Japanese

On March 10 2005 06:55 Yuljan wrote:
germans werent fucked up in the west, but their occupation of russia wasnt very nice.

On March 10 2005 02:52 Luhh wrote:

Yes, let's let the Germans settle the dispute. They have a way of taking care of country border related issues...

On March 10 2005 02:54 FrozenArbiter wrote:

I think he is a she actually, but I can't remember if he/she answered when someone asked him/her if it was his/her picture in said persons profile!

On March 10 2005 05:12 FrozenArbiter wrote:

The filipino people aren't too fond of japan either I bet

On March 10 2005 04:28 Waxangel wrote:
that's true

japan and korea are fighting over control of some rocks between them

simple

On March 10 2005 04:31 jjun212 wrote:
Alot of asian countries hate Japan for what they did during WWII..

Well... mainyl only 2, China and Korea but some people have gotten over the fact, that it is the past and its a new generation of people living in both socities and have gotten over it. And Korea/Japan share some attributes like the food, customs, style etc..

Still... there are some people who are unwilling to let this go and continue to hold a grudge against the Japanese

On March 10 2005 03:08 haduken wrote:
Well, The Japanese government don't just do this to Korea, they also are claiming soverign over "diao yu dao" island which isn't so far away from the islands of Taiwan. Frankly it is disgusting, but neither our government or "Taiwan" is doing anything about it for some reason. I hope Korea will win this dispute and teach the Japanese government that they are not the number one in Asia.

On March 10 2005 12:25 CyuntiyuL wrote:
Damn, since it was one of jangsh's topics I was hoping he would post some pictures of a hot korean pop star.

On March 10 2005 13:12 Ack1027 wrote:]
Korea and Japan share many attributes like food, customs, martial arts, pottery, etc because the majority of it was stolen by the Japanese and modified. I.E. Karate, their type of Kimchi, among other things.

On March 10 2005 13:35 ssidengi wrote:



hmm... no?? sorry T-T

On March 10 2005 13:52 Final Heaven wrote:

Korea didnt invent these things . Customs , martial arts , pottery ... all came from China .
Chinese culture has a very great Influence in this area .

On March 10 2005 13:52 Final Heaven wrote:

Korea didnt invent these things . Customs , martial arts , pottery ... all came from China .
Chinese culture has a very great Influence in this area .

On March 10 2005 11:24 Final Heaven wrote:
you guys have to pay attention to China . Chinese always want to conquer all country around them !!!!!!!!!!!!!

On March 10 2005 12:22 Final Heaven wrote:
dont worry Japan doesnt have any army
wat about North Korea ? :D

On March 10 2005 13:52 Final Heaven wrote:

Korea didnt invent these things . Customs , martial arts , pottery ... all came from China .
Chinese culture has a very great Influence in this area .

On March 16 2005 18:06 Ack1027 wrote:



Taekwondo, traditional clothing, and special pottery [ Among other things ] belongs solely to Korea.
I agree that China does/did have a great influence on Asia but it doesn't change the fact that things like culture, food, customs, ideals were stolen by Japanese.

On March 10 2005 13:52 Final Heaven wrote:

Korea didnt invent these things . Customs , martial arts , pottery ... all came from China .
Chinese culture has a very great Influence in this area .

On March 10 2005 02:51 Waxangel wrote:
well I know what he means, but I'd rather see him squirm trying to make himself understandable

On March 10 2005 02:52 Luhh wrote:

Yes, let's let the Germans settle the dispute. They have a way of taking care of country border related issues...

On March 16 2005 18:36 FrozenArbiter wrote:

Tae Kwon Do was VERY influenced by japanese karate (whiiiich of course was heavily influenced by chinese martial arts, which in turn were even more so influenced by indian martial arts.. and they were influenced by GREECE MARTIAL ARTS like pankratium through Alexander the Great.. yeah), please do not say otherwise.
If you want to be proud of korean martial arts, be proud of taek kyon, ssirum etc

Haedong kumdo is supposedly pretty korean as well.

On March 16 2005 18:42 FrozenArbiter wrote:

India influenced you.
Greece influenced India.
Greece was influenced by whoever.
Korea influenced you.
You influenced Korea.
You influenced Japan.
EDIT: So as to not start a gigantic flame war: Japan influenced you
Japan influenced Korea
Korea influenced Japan

*Phew*

Countries will influence eachother. I think us nordic countries should start up shit about who invented what and influenced who the most =[

Yes, horrible shit happened, yes an apology wouldn't be wrong, no you can't beat up japanese tourists ()!!!

On March 10 2005 02:46 chicken` wrote:
hihi ohh this is so cute ><!

On March 16 2005 20:03 Yin wrote:
next thing u know...

Nuclear Launch Detected

On March 10 2005 13:55 Final Heaven wrote:


she is so ugly . I believe there are much better korean star

On March 16 2005 19:19 Ack1027 wrote:


Ssirum is wrestling...

OMGGREEK!?!?!

On March 16 2005 19:50 mrmin123 wrote:


you stole our primordial soup.

On March 10 2005 14:43 haduken wrote:


... When have we ever conquered anything except for our own?

On March 17 2005 04:07 Polis wrote:


Haw do u define your own? China is occupating Tibet, some history of Tibet:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet

On March 17 2005 04:27 haduken wrote:


You can say that we toke over the land. Contray to what you believe, our presence there actually helped the region by disbalancing what was a tyranic tribal system and introducing modern sociology etc. If you know anything about the regional issues, you would know that the history of Tibet are so interwebed with my nation that they were indopted into the borders as early as Tang dynasty.

On March 17 2005 05:36 Polis wrote:


http://www.freetibet.org/info/facts/fact3.html -some of china modern sociology, system in Tibet wasn't tyranic there are no reports of breking human laws in any internashional organisation as far i cnow.

http://www.freetibet.org/info/facts/fact15.html Tibet is very old country that have distinct cultural, religious, linguistic and ethnic identity. Tibet lands belong to China becose of union that was before 10th sentury betwen 2 suverent countries? Or maybe becose it was occupited by Mongolians: "Tibet and China both came under the political influence of the Mongols far from indicates unification of the two countries, though. Northern Burma, North Vietnam, Korea and large areas of Siberia were likewise all part of the vast Mongol Empire, yet none are claimed by Beijing today."?

If we fallow that standarts there should be war in europe becose every country would want to take their "own".

China is occupaiting country that was suverent, China is not respecting human laws in Tibet. According to your standarts of "owning" there should be war in europe becose every countr could claim that part or hole of other country/s belongs to them.

On March 17 2005 06:23 0_0 wrote:


"freetibet.org" I'm sure thats such an unbiased source eh?

On March 17 2005 05:43 derBonobo wrote:
do south koreans & japanese actually like each other or not?

On March 17 2005 09:53 FrozenArbiter wrote:

NO?

On March 17 2005 12:31 Final Heaven wrote:
why why you guys complaining about Tibet's freedom anyway ? Remember that Americans took over their land from the Indians as well .

On March 17 2005 12:47 Polis wrote:


It was centuries ago, not many Indians left nad u can't say that America is represing Indians now, and yes it don't mean that Americans wasn't represing Indians back then.
If now some country would use black man as slaves u would say: why u complaing, America had black slaves too?
If someting bad hapend in history it don't give anybady permishon to do the same.
China agresion whos in 1949 there are many peaceful ways to suport Tibet, making olimpic in China is not one of them.

On March 17 2005 13:13 0_0 wrote:
You can give the land back to them? They have Indian nations. The entire United States was built on stolen land. Just because they did it doesn't mean it can't be undone, you just don't want it undone.

On March 17 2005 13:13 0_0 wrote:
You can give the land back to them? They have Indian nations. The entire United States was built on stolen land. Just because they did it doesn't mean it can't be undone, you just don't want it undone.

On March 17 2005 13:26 Polis wrote:


1)But that would be against all the Americans that live now in America and that didn't even exist when that was happening.
2)America is not represing Indians.

According to your logic if Germany would took over France or Poland they should not be stoped becose Americans took over America from Indians.

On March 17 2005 14:34 0_0 wrote:


I'm not saying that. I'm saying you and the US government are setting double standards. If you're going to take away Tibet, you might as well as cut up the USA, after all, they're on other people's land too. Yes, it would be "against" all the Americans that live in the USA now, but it was their choice to come right? Not repressing the Native Americans? Keeping them pent up in little "reservations," taking their land, thats not repression?

On March 17 2005 15:14 haduken wrote:
We are not barbarians. There were always fags who claim we beat and killed Tibetans. The truth is we only execute the criminals because even as today the region is very chaotic. Chinese who migrant there could find themselves drag out of their beds at night and killed. The irony is, most of the Chinsese there are earning just as hard living as most Tibetans, most of them are teachers or builders.

I remember people were bitching how the Chinese government is torturing and humilating the fa lun gong followers. What the government did is simply arrest them and let them go later and detain the extreme ones because they were crazy enough to set themselves on fire. I don't care what title you give to that fag dalailama, the fact is, if he returns to tibet, he would live like a fucking king while sucking up his people's blood.
When i was back in China to visit my grandmother, i went to the Multi culture musemue in Shanghai. They still had features that displayed how during the old regime, Tibetan tribal leaders would skin his disobiedent servant alive as a way for luxury. And back in the old regime, the people of Tibet would have to make yearly or monthly offerings to their local monks, people who doesn't offer would recieve a undesireable fate.
I bet they didn't show that in your websites huh?

I already posted that America is not represing Indians NOW, u cnow whot TIME is? I had allready writen that there are ppl born in USA who have nothing to do whit represing on Indians and who have kids, so those kids should now pay for whot happeng in America centuries ago? Don't tell me that those are not obvious diferents, and i am not saing that this is not a problem but puting a = betvien those 2 situations is not fair becose of whot i had writen.

On March 17 2005 16:23 0_0 wrote:



You're missing my point. The Indians aren't being physically repressed or militarily, but the USA still has their land, they're pent up in their little reservations and Indians are still in the bottom portion of the workforce. And no, its not an obvious difference because its not different.

On March 17 2005 16:08 haduken wrote:
Because this shtiz stop happening when we took over.

On March 17 2005 16:08 haduken wrote:
If you talk to any normal Chinese person, he would tell you that the Fa Lun Gong is retarded. Their leader is living the good life in America while his followers can starving themselves to death.

On March 17 2005 16:08 haduken wrote:
Because this shtiz stop happening when we took over. No, you are wrong. Nobody respects Dalailama, they just treat him like some novelty monk. Yeah right, when Dalailama came to Melbourne, he dinned and slept at Hilton hotel and went shopping 3 days straight, sure he is a good leader. UN didn't do shits 50 years ago and they are sure not doing anything now, of course they are not going to tell you how Tibetans practically fuck themselves over in an never ending cult retardation.

On March 17 2005 16:39 Polis wrote:


"The Indians aren't being physically repressed or militarily" "And no, its not an obvious difference because its not different". You had answered yourself.

On March 17 2005 13:13 0_0 wrote:
You can give the land back to them? They have Indian nations. The entire United States was built on stolen land. Just because they did it doesn't mean it can't be undone, you just don't want it undone.

On March 17 2005 15:14 haduken wrote:
We are not barbarians. There were always fags who claim we beat and killed Tibetans. The truth is we only execute the criminals because even as today the region is very chaotic. Chinese who migrant there could find themselves drag out of their beds at night and killed. The irony is, most of the Chinsese there are earning just as hard living as most Tibetans, most of them are teachers or builders.

I remember people were bitching how the Chinese government is torturing and humilating the fa lun gong followers. What the government did is simply arrest them and let them go later and detain the extreme ones because they were crazy enough to set themselves on fire. I don't care what title you give to that fag dalailama, the fact is, if he returns to tibet, he would live like a fucking king while sucking up his people's blood.
When i was back in China to visit my grandmother, i went to the Multi culture musemue in Shanghai. They still had features that displayed how during the old regime, Tibetan tribal leaders would skin his disobiedent servant alive as a way for luxury. And back in the old regime, the people of Tibet would have to make yearly or monthly offerings to their local monks, people who doesn't offer would recieve a undesireable fate.
I bet they didn't show that in your websites huh?

On March 17 2005 16:51 0_0 wrote:


The Chinese government isn't spreading disease or whatever those settlers did to the Indians, they're keeping the calm. They aren't phyiscally abusing or killing any Tibetan civilians. If they were to leave I'm sure the Dali Lama would come back and set up his own theocracy and start abusing his power. Haven't you ever heard the phrase "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely?"

On March 17 2005 16:23 0_0 wrote:
Yeah, Fa Lun Gong is fucking crazy... I don't understand why the usa supports this sort of crap. Alot of members of the Fa Lun Gong are really fanatical. There are tons of cases of mass suicide, killings of family members, and other ridiculous crap. In one case, a guy's wife interrupted his meditation or whatever the hell they do, and he stabbed her to death with a kitchen knife and then calmly went back to praying. What the hell is that?

Anyways, if you think about it, why would the Chinese government allow Buddhism or Hinduism but pick on Fa Lun Gong/the Tibetans for no reason?



You're missing my point. The Indians aren't being physically repressed or militarily, but the USA still has their land, they're pent up in their little reservations and Indians are still in the bottom portion of the workforce. And no, its not an obvious difference because its not different.

On March 17 2005 16:52 FrozenArbiter wrote:

Yeah, let's give the few hundred thousand (I dunno, less/more?) natives an entire fucking continent!
Because tibet is just as huge as the states, and would cause just as much damage should it be returned, and it happened just as long ago.

Get some perspective please

On March 17 2005 17:22 0_0 wrote:


That's the "morally" right thing to do, and we're arguing about moral correctness here right? Whether its morally okay for China to keep occupying Tibet.

On March 17 2005 17:22 0_0 wrote:


That's the "morally" right thing to do, and we're arguing about moral correctness here right? Whether its morally okay for China to keep occupying Tibet.

On March 17 2005 17:22 0_0 wrote:


That's the "morally" right thing to do, and we're arguing about moral correctness here right? Whether its morally okay for China to keep occupying Tibet.

On March 17 2005 12:27 Final Heaven wrote:

during WW 2 Japanese soilders raped thousands of Chineses and Korean women . Thats why until now the hatred still remain .

On March 18 2005 03:59 BinaryStar wrote:
So what China needs to do is slaugter most of the Tibetans and wait a few hundred years. Then they'd be okay .

On March 18 2005 15:08 derBonobo wrote:


hm, why does that hatred still remain? i´m from austria and during WW2 most ppl here were like "hail hitler!" and "yay forced labour!", but nowadays there is no hatred because of that. it´s a thing of the past and meanwhile ppl get along well with each other. it makes little difference what nation you belong to here, nobody cares.

On March 18 2005 15:08 derBonobo wrote:


hm, why does that hatred still remain? i´m from austria and during WW2 most ppl here were like "hail hitler!" and "yay forced labour!", but nowadays there is no hatred because of that. it´s a thing of the past and meanwhile ppl get along well with each other. it makes little difference what nation you belong to here, nobody cares.

On March 18 2005 15:20 FrozenArbiter wrote:

Yeah and tibet needs to be renamed china (no one remembers the SLIGHT size differance).