EPTMarge Simpson on Playboy Cover [Possible NSFW] - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Frits
11782 Posts
| ||
|
Code
Canada634 Posts
| ||
|
ilovejonn
Canada2548 Posts
and bart and lisa and the dog and the cat | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21248 Posts
| ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
|
Loser777
1931 Posts
| ||
|
zizou21
United States3683 Posts
| ||
|
BalliSLife
1339 Posts
| ||
|
captainwaffles
United States1050 Posts
| ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
|
Piste
6184 Posts
On October 19 2009 06:39 Mastermind wrote: this is just dumb. who would buy playboy to see these photos? I'm pretty sure there are plenty of other photos too  | ||
|
Oxygen
Canada3581 Posts
On October 19 2009 03:38 Badjas wrote: This is tagged NSFW? How about NSFSM (Not Suitable For Sane Minds)? | ||
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
| ||
|
Teejing
Germany1360 Posts
| ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
On October 19 2009 06:43 Piste wrote: I'm pretty sure there are plenty of other photos too God I hope not... The Simpsons are one of few shows on TV that still doesn't make me acchieve boner. On October 19 2009 07:03 Teejing wrote: it is fake isnt it? It's not fake. | ||
|
Steelflight-Rx
United States1389 Posts
+ Show Spoiler [comparison] + ![[image loading]](http://z.about.com/d/animatedtv/1/0/4/m/simp2006_Marge_f.jpg) -OR- ![[image loading]](http://www.thundersquee.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ts-leela.jpg) | ||
JWD
United States12607 Posts
a) there's no such thing as "possibly NSFW". If it might be Not Safe For Work, it is Not Safe For Work. b) [NSFW] tags don't do any good if they are late enough in the title of a thread that you don't see them in the sidebar. For example: "Pictures of my trip to the zoo [NSFW]" does not fly. | ||
|
ilj.psa
Peru3081 Posts
| ||
|
Assymptotic
United States552 Posts
| ||
|
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
| ||
| ||
