EPT
UEFA Champions League 2010/2011 Thread - Page 5
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
eaT_Mi_Lquid
Germany509 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
SuperArc
Austria7781 Posts
No one wants you here. | ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
eaT_Mi_Lquid
Germany509 Posts
 They didn't have one proper attack the whole game. Is it the lack of fitness ? I hope they can do better vs Basel and Cluj...Yeah, the Streamer was ROma fan obviusly xD , | ||
|
Azza
China650 Posts
| ||
|
imperfect
Canada1652 Posts
maybe i should watch that game instead..; i heard ronaldinho has been showing some of his old-brilliance again ^^ oh what he scored 2. lol | ||
|
eaT_Mi_Lquid
Germany509 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:28 Azza wrote: 6-0 Arsenal, 'We've got Cesc Fabregas, We've got Cesc Fabregas Lalalal Lalala' wow that's typical for Arsenal, scoring much when it doesn't matter xD. Cesc won't be there for long !!!! | ||
Lovedrop
2629 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
| ||
|
eaT_Mi_Lquid
Germany509 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:32 Holgerius wrote: Bad game by Roma. Didn't expect much, didn't get much, so at least I'm not really disappointed. Holgerius, why does Roma have strange jersey numbers ? 94, 77 ? I remember Sampdoria has this too ! Cassano 88 or smth like that. | ||
|
MooCow
1434 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:35 eaT_Mi_Lquid wrote: Holgerius, why does Roma have strange jersey numbers ? 94, 77 ? I remember Sampdoria has this too ! Cassano 88 or smth like that. I think it's because Italian clubs like retiring numbers a lot so that's why everyone has funny numbers. Or maybe they are 8x better than other clubs #11! | ||
|
sixfour
England11062 Posts
| ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:36 MooCow wrote: I think it's because Italian clubs like retiring numbers a lot so that's why everyone has funny numbers. Or maybe they are 8x better than other clubs #11! That's probably a part of the explanation to why there are some weird numbers, ya. Roma has #6 retired for instance. | ||
|
eaT_Mi_Lquid
Germany509 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:37 sixfour wrote: so, if we want to know how rangers/celtic would do in the EPL, rangers would go down as parking the bus for 90 minutes every game won't get you enough points to stay up, and celtic would also go down as arsenal can rape a side better than them 6-0 Football is not transitive man. A > B & B > C != A > C. If Rangers/Celtic would play EPL i expect them to be in the middle of the field. | ||
|
MooCow
1434 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:43 eaT_Mi_Lquid wrote: Football is not transitive man. A > B & B > C != A > C. If Rangers/Celtic would play EPL i expect them to be in the middle of the field. Going by that logic if Rangers could hold United @ Old Trafford then they can get lots of points from the poorer teams in the PL and indeed survive. Arsenal and Liverpool couldn't even do that. I know they played a weaker side etc. | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Freaky[x]
Canada995 Posts
Players wages will go down, players will be sold at lower prices or at least they won't be inflated. Teams won't be able to pay there players through loans. This will be great! As for Rangers and celtic, they would probably be ~8-12 so mid table. They remind me of a sunderland side with no prolific goal scorer which means hard defending, hard tackling, hit and run and long balls. Arsenal today played a crappy team today, there was no real challenge. The problem now is that they face Sunderland on sunday and then Spurs next week for the Carling Cup... let's hope they can get the 2 W's in the next week | ||
|
BeaTeR
Kazakhstan4130 Posts
On September 16 2010 05:28 imperfect wrote: And how's Ibra in AC!? he is fine i guess... | ||
| ||
