EPTNBA Playoffs 2010 - Page 49
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13528 Posts
I think they've already planned the end of season trip and can't wait for the game to end. Playoffs have been so disappointing so far this year =/ | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13528 Posts
That is fucking embarrassing for him. | ||
|
Holcan
Canada2593 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14912 Posts
| ||
|
CSN
United States175 Posts
| ||
|
condoriano
United States826 Posts
yall need to see some rajon rondo and get some ROFLLLLL | ||
|
bearbuddy
3442 Posts
| ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
CSN
United States175 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
|
BlueRoyaL
United States2493 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
The Jazz is kind of a sad story. Even with their bigs healthy, the Lakers are just their worst possible match up, probably in the entire league. | ||
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
On May 12 2010 08:03 Jibba wrote: Hawks was always going to happen, they were never a contender. They were just another team that knew how to rack up wins during the regular season due to effort and athleticism. The Jazz is kind of a sad story. Even with their bigs healthy, the Lakers are just their worst possible match up, probably in the entire league. Their injuries really hurt them, but last night really showed some things that typical Jerry Sloan teams aren't known for. A lot of turnovers, a lot of broken plays and just that general lack of fight. There isn't that tenacity for 2nd round close-out game, it was more like what does it matter if we win rather than we can win. It was just bleh to watch a Sloan team do that. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On May 12 2010 08:03 Jibba wrote: Hawks was always going to happen, they were never a contender. They were just another team that knew how to rack up wins during the regular season due to effort and athleticism. The Jazz is kind of a sad story. Even with their bigs healthy, the Lakers are just their worst possible match up, probably in the entire league. The Hawks were a legit contender. They have loads of talent but their team chemistry sucks. They didn't even TRY this post season (except Jamal Crawford. Massive props to him.) | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
On May 12 2010 09:37 Ace wrote: The Hawks were a legit contender. They have loads of talent but their team chemistry sucks. They didn't even TRY this post season (except Jamal Crawford. Massive props to him.) I completely agree. They have a ton of talent across the roster. Maybe not enough big men, but still. They get to the playoffs and turn to mush. | ||
|
Trezeguet
United States2656 Posts
On May 12 2010 09:58 tonight wrote: I completely agree. They have a ton of talent across the roster. Maybe not enough big men, but still. They get to the playoffs and turn to mush. They were never a legit contender. Sure they have the talent and athleticism, but as you said they don't have much team play and they aren't exactly the best shooters in the league. Teams with big men dominate them. They are better than most teams don't get me wrong, but being really good and being a contender for the title are two different things. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
| ||
