EPTOfficial 'what is Dota anymore' discussion - Page 935
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
| ||
|
Kirsed
9380 Posts
On March 18 2015 23:35 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: they just dont understand anything that isnt white and christian as fuk (and arguably they dont really understand themselves, only what it looks and feels like to be them) also no there's nothing similar to kashiwa daisuke he's a singularity last.fm claims that these artists are similar: http://www.last.fm/music/KASHIWA Daisuke/ similar but without even listening i bet they're totally wrong this is unrelated but related in that its japanese and pretty far removed from mainstream genres + Show Spoiler + Thank you. | ||
|
goody153
44284 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:31 Comeh wrote: Yeah, we definitely have better rights than you guys - but we are still 2 steps behind Europe in most things. How bad are you guys compared to EU ? i mean i'm drooling whenever i hear that in some countries on EU get paid by the govt. when they go to school(sweden i think) rofl while some of the kids here like age 5-10 usually has to walk around the city selling food and stuff just to be able to survive and go to school. In some sad cases they are the most motivated kids and they don't even get to finish highschool sometimes. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:32 BluemoonSC wrote: the problem with un-unionized labor is that there's always some asshole out there willing to do more than you for less money no, the problem with un-unionized labour is that it permits companies to essentially dictate employment terms to their employees. Dictatorships aren't benevolent often enough for that to be okay, despite all the tragedies of unions. | ||
|
Furikawari
France2522 Posts
| ||
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:35 Sn0_Man wrote: no, the problem with un-unionized labour is that it permits companies to essentially dictate employment terms to their employees. Dictatorships aren't benevolent often enough for that to be okay, despite all the tragedies of unions. which goes hand in hand with what I said bc if you don't like it, they'll just fire you and find someone else to do the same things that you do, except fall in line. | ||
|
dismiss
United Kingdom3341 Posts
| ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:35 Sn0_Man wrote: no, the problem with un-unionized labour is that it permits companies to essentially dictate employment terms to their employees. "but you can always work somewhere else! the labor market always corrects itself!" | ||
|
goody153
44284 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:37 dismiss wrote: Where's goody from that he has worse rights than gamburgers, Liberia? not sure if we are worse than Liberia cause idk about liberia Philippines SEA doto | ||
|
dismiss
United Kingdom3341 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:33 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: clearly eugenics is the answer to stop poor needy people from overbreeding Actually the Tory government here wants to cut financial aid to people on social benefits if they have over x children. :D | ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:38 dismiss wrote: Actually the Tory government here wants to cut financial aid to people on social benefits if they have over x children. :D our government kinda does that too. because we pretty much dont give any financial aid period hAHA ;\ | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
leave your wife for me creams | ||
|
Kirsed
9380 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:38 dismiss wrote: Actually the Tory government here wants to cut financial aid to people on social benefits if they have over x children. :D Not to be a horrible person but that makes sense as long as it isn't retroactive. | ||
|
goody153
44284 Posts
Is it Gosi ? you mean Gosi, right ? | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
*sigh* if only gosi-senpai would notice me | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:40 kirsed wrote: Not to be a horrible person but that makes sense as long as it isn't retroactive. wouldn't that incentivize the parents and kids to take more odd jobs for questionable pay, further lowering the standard of what employers have to do for their employees? i mean maybe it'd just slowly kill them off but like i feel its desperate situations that need bandaging, not exacerbating, even if the bandaging itself is unsavory, lest the wounds fester and infect the rest of the populace. i could be wrong though. | ||
|
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
ha ha its funny that this can be interpreted two ways ha ha kill me | ||
|
dismiss
United Kingdom3341 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:40 kirsed wrote: Not to be a horrible person but that makes sense as long as it isn't retroactive. Generally speaking, in case you start a sentence with "Not to be X" on the interwebs, you are being just that. :D Why shouldn't poor people be allowed to have kids? Especially in a society that has to cope with severe aging of its populace already. It's stupid, short sighted and amoral in every single which way. | ||
|
Kirsed
9380 Posts
On March 19 2015 00:42 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: wouldn't that incentivize the parents and kids to take more odd jobs for questionable pay, further lowering the standard of what employers have to do for their employees? i mean maybe it'd just slowly kill them off but Eh probably. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
| ||
