If the streams goes down, the Youtube Vod gets the same viewer numbers as the streams, and as the VoD is avaiable under the same URL, the script that created this graph counts the viewers of the vod.
General Discussion - Page 3150
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
If the streams goes down, the Youtube Vod gets the same viewer numbers as the streams, and as the VoD is avaiable under the same URL, the script that created this graph counts the viewers of the vod. | ||
|
Talron
Germany7651 Posts
| ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
| ||
|
Talron
Germany7651 Posts
| ||
|
hfglgg
Germany5372 Posts
On June 22 2013 16:57 PrinceXizor wrote: Like i said if there was something inherently different with the stream or streaming culture of League of legends, you would expect the graph to look fundamentally different during non peak hours than dota 2/sc2 during non peak hours. the graph of LoL looks like the X axis shifted upward roughly 20k-25k units NOT fundamentally different in its shape. The explanations for that are a larger base of people (AKA people are inherently more likely to idle if they watch league than other games, or an artificial boost of some kind). but yeah the first one is the simpler explanation and i'd have to do quite abit of research to ever come to the conclusion of the second option, and even then i'd have to have an audit or riot and all their publicity firms in order to prove/disprove that they were involved in such a thing. so TL;DR that data look weird, but dunno why, and can't say why without vastly more data. league of legends has a really really really big player stream culture. if it wasnt for riot pushing esport, player stream were easily much more popular than tournament streams. i think what we see there is the baseline of lol streamviewers who are fanboys of certain players and just watch the team 24/7. the community is completly different to dota/sc2 were basicly no one cares for playerstreams and everyone watches the tournaments. | ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:32 Talron wrote: Oh, I must have skipped that, when reading the changelog. Well, that explains everything. http://dev.dota2.com/showthread.php?t=92055 | ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
| ||
|
Ramong
Denmark1706 Posts
| ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:39 Yoshi- wrote: According to the new filter function I posted 56 of the 3150 pages Only 11 pages here :\ | ||
|
Incze
Romania2058 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:31 739 wrote: I'm pretty sure it should, especially after the buff everything triggers corrosive skin of viper. Enemy morphling once created a copy of me (viper) and I made the mistake of hitting it. That was painful | ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
| ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:51 Yoshi- wrote: Does it result in an infinite loop until either dies? just like double blademail does right? xD | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34507 Posts
On March 11 2012 02:23 Firebolt145 wrote: I can't decide what skillbuild to go with the new Invoker changes. QE is probably the strongest now (the one that Dendi goes) but it just feels so boring. Although QW isn't as faceroll anymore it's still amazingly powerful. I have always enjoyed WE very much but it seems pretty weak. Maybe start with an extra bracer or something? HMM. | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:54 PrinceXizor wrote: just like double blademail does right? xD Double blademail doesn't do that, coz it crashed wc3 when it did | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:57 Qbek wrote: Double blademail doesn't do that, coz it crashed wc3 when it did But 5 heroes with blade mail attacking a spectre does. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:57 Qbek wrote: Double blademail doesn't do that, coz it crashed wc3 when it did was being facetious but i guess it went over your head ![]() | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
On June 22 2013 18:58 PrinceXizor wrote: was being facetious but i guess it went over your head ![]() Well when you end a joke with "right?" it is really hard to see when it isn't complete idiocy | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On June 22 2013 19:00 Qbek wrote: Well when you end a joke with "right?" it is really hard to see when it isn't complete idiocy attempted to show it with the face. | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
I'm just saying i feel the woosh was justified. Still waiting on confirmation of infinite loop, I think it should be patched out if it does coz it's kinda too silly (it would trigger from the replicate attacking if it works like I think it does) | ||
| ||
