EPTReally? What if i say the word bottle(clip name)? :D
General Discussion - Page 3128
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
Really? What if i say the word bottle(clip name)? :D | ||
|
Belisarius
Australia6233 Posts
Really? Because it's Juggernaut's line. "Jug-or-not"? Not even close to the game's best line, imo, but still... | ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.specialtybottle.com/images/ProductImages/individuals/gallon/jug1f.jpg) Does it matter if I put this (rune) in my jug or not. I do hate to be that guy that explains jokes  | ||
|
icystorage
Jollibee19350 Posts
| ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
![[image loading]](https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/7208_512738332114942_1896138042_n.jpg) Zenith picked up by Steelseries Ice3x don't give a fuck. | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
On June 19 2013 21:53 PassiveAce wrote: not even trying to hold the headphones up straight. tsktsktsk They are too heavy from all the fucks he gave  | ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
| ||
|
Fwizzz
Philippines4420 Posts
| ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
On June 19 2013 22:19 Erasme wrote: iceiceice wants food not silly headphones.. those headphones give him the food he wants. (hopefully) | ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
On June 19 2013 21:27 Belisarius wrote: Really? Because it's Juggernaut's line. "Jug-or-not"? Not even close to the game's best line, imo, but still... For some reason, I love this line, even though I never play clockwork: http://www.dota2wiki.com/images/4/49/Ratt_respawn_18.mp3 | ||
|
pedrlz
Brazil5234 Posts
| ||
|
xsevR
United States324 Posts
It's not that big of deal to me but I feel it's a little silly not to include some kind of concede. There's already a de-facto concede in the game when A) the game is free B) they give out dozens of accounts to everyone C) they don't care how many accounts you make. I look at it like this: would you rather have one player deciding the game is over or a team/majority? I just remember being able to concede in TDA/HoN and it really didn't create the "omg firstblood concede" attitude everyone is afraid of. In fact, it's already a common occurence to see someone abandon after feeding first blood or a couple kills, or even if their teammates are feeding. i think of it like this: when you're beating that stack do you want them to concede to you or just have one player abandon? At least a concede feels like more of a win. | ||
|
Fwizzz
Philippines4420 Posts
| ||
|
teapoted
United Kingdom24425 Posts
On June 19 2013 23:43 xsevR wrote: This has been talked to death in numerous threads.Sorry if I missed it already but what does everyone think of "Erik Johnson: Why Valve will never introduce concede" from PC gamer? It's not that big of deal to me but I feel it's a little silly not to include some kind of concede. There's already a de-facto concede in the game when A) the game is free B) they give out dozens of accounts to everyone C) they don't care how many accounts you make. I look at it like this: would you rather have one player deciding the game is over or a team/majority? I just remember being able to concede in TDA/HoN and it really didn't create the "omg firstblood concede" attitude everyone is afraid of. In fact, it's already a common occurence to see someone abandon after feeding first blood or a couple kills, or even if their teammates are feeding. i think of it like this: when you're beating that stack do you want them to concede to you or just have one player abandon? At least a concede feels like more of a win. | ||
|
ReignSupreme.
Australia4123 Posts
On June 19 2013 23:43 xsevR wrote: Sorry if I missed it already but what does everyone think of "Erik Johnson: Why Valve will never introduce concede" from PC gamer? It's not that big of deal to me but I feel it's a little silly not to include some kind of concede. There's already a de-facto concede in the game when A) the game is free B) they give out dozens of accounts to everyone C) they don't care how many accounts you make. I look at it like this: would you rather have one player deciding the game is over or a team/majority? I just remember being able to concede in TDA/HoN and it really didn't create the "omg firstblood concede" attitude everyone is afraid of. In fact, it's already a common occurence to see someone abandon after feeding first blood or a couple kills, or even if their teammates are feeding. i think of it like this: when you're beating that stack do you want them to concede to you or just have one player abandon? At least a concede feels like more of a win. Team's can already concede, if all 5 leave within 4mins from first leaver then there is no abandon given. | ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
Alliance @theAllianceGG 4m We hath finished the creation of our in-game pennant! Coming soon to a @DOTA2 store near you. | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
TheEmulator
28103 Posts
| ||
| ||
