EPTStrategy Forum Highlighting - Page 6
| Forum Index > Community News and Headlines |
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25998 Posts
On February 18 2011 01:36 MangoTango wrote: :O ruh roh, now we know who's a good player and who's just blowing smoke. Nice, thanks for that, TL. First noticed it with Minigun. It might be better to have it slightly more obvious a color change, if possible. This project was literally delayed over a month solely because of colour selection. I'm dead serious. | ||
|
monx
Canada1400 Posts
| ||
|
10or10
Sweden517 Posts
On February 18 2011 01:39 Chill wrote: This project was literally delayed over a month solely because of colour selection. I'm dead serious. If random opinions matter: I think it's perfect, aligns with the rest of the color scheme of tl. I don't have any problems with color vision though. | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
Time to be more active in strategy forum~! On February 18 2011 01:39 Chill wrote: This project was literally delayed over a month solely because of colour selection. I'm dead serious. Haha wow... and here I had assumed 3 months ago that that would be the color to win, simply because it shows up well even on dying monitors and is supercool in general. | ||
|
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
On February 18 2011 01:39 Chill wrote: This project was literally delayed over a month solely because of colour selection. I'm dead serious. You know what, I can believe that. Doesn't mean I can't complain about it though  Then again, not my house, so I'll just shut up and deal with it. Good work though, serves its intended purpose. | ||
|
Superouman
France2195 Posts
| ||
|
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
And for those saying this may lead to people ignoring/bm'ing non-highlighted users, that's obviously up to the individual poster, who can ignore people trying to help them at their own risk. For bm'ers that's what the mods are for  Keep up the good work! | ||
|
SgtSquiglz
United States668 Posts
PS. I like the color choice. Easy to spot without being distracting at all. Really funny to hear that it took a month to decide hahah | ||
|
t3tsubo
Canada682 Posts
| ||
|
Char711
United States862 Posts
On February 17 2011 21:57 Plexa wrote: If we were to implement this at the moment, it wouldn't be useful in most threads due to the small number of users on the highlight list. This is something we will consider once the list has grown more. You mean like the low number of Blizzard community managers and the low number of posts they put on the forums? With the "jump to blue post" button is one of the best features on there? A low number arguably makes the feature even more important so that you can easily sift through all of the posts for it. Edit: Also, overall, good first selection of players! I completely agree with your selection criteria including some activity on the forum in the first place since those people are likely the first ones who will go back to posting on there a lot. Good job, TL! Edit 2: I should note that I'm fine without a jump button; it's just that the logic behind the decision seems flawed. I've been browsing the Strategy forum a bit and am actually quite happy with how the highlighting integrates in. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On February 18 2011 02:12 Char711 wrote: You mean like the low number of Blizzard community managers and the low number of posts they put on the forums? With the "jump to blue post" button is one of the best features on there? A low number arguably makes the feature even more important so that you can easily sift through all of the posts for it. Edit: Also, overall, good first selection of players! I completely agree with your selection criteria including some activity on the forum in the first place since those people are likely the first ones who will go back to posting on there a lot. Good job, TL! The point is that these posters are not the only good advice in the strategy forum, but rather advice that can be trusted upon to be reliable. The vast majority of users have good things to say too. | ||
|
Deadeight
United Kingdom1629 Posts
People want their posts read, they just do. People who have little clue still post advice and being a newb it's pretty hard to discern what is correct advice and what isn't. Thanks a lot TL. | ||
|
leonardus
59 Posts
This system is useful for me when I want to check out some games from sc2casts because every series can be voted by viewers. | ||
|
Jotoco
Brazil1342 Posts
On February 18 2011 01:39 Chill wrote: This project was literally delayed over a month solely because of colour selection. I'm dead serious. LOL? The color is really fine, now. It does highlight it, but does not blow it out of proportion. | ||
|
Char711
United States862 Posts
On February 18 2011 02:25 Jotoco wrote: LOL? The color is really fine, now. It does highlight it, but does not blow it out of proportion. Are you sure? I was kinda hoping for a color scheme based on My Little Pony. . . . | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
To me they both acknowledge a certain recognition, just one is more apparent than the other (and one's strictly for the Strat forum). | ||
|
br0fivE
Canada349 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25998 Posts
On February 18 2011 02:30 Torte de Lini wrote: So what's the difference between quality posters and highlighted users? To me they both acknowledge a certain recognition, just one is more apparent than the other (and one's strictly for the Strat forum). Quality Posters have gone above and beyond in doing something that has helped TL. No one gotten to be a Quality Poster by just posting a lot - they have always gone beyond simply posting. They have stars everywhere in the forum. Highlighted Users are good at the game and post accurate advice. They are only highlighted in the strategy forum. Seems completely different, I'm not sure where the hangup is on the distinction. | ||
|
Darkened
Bulgaria105 Posts
P.S. I'm sorry if it has already been asked but I do not have time to review the whole thread right now. | ||
| ||
