| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Ewic
Canada121 Posts
I never cared for this guy before because he only all-ins and is extremely bad manner, but now I have zero respect for him and I only hope he has all his accounts banned permanently from Bnet and is banned from all tournaments. What makes it worse is that people could be facing cheaters without even knowing on the ladder. It's ridiculous how things like maphacking are incredibly hard to "prove". Makes me not want to play anymore. Especially in online tournaments with cheaters. | ||
|
iAmJeffReY
United States4262 Posts
On February 14 2012 07:22 vileChAnCe wrote: This guy definitely needed to be shit listed, he also used to host "tournaments" but when you won in the finals you'd still have to beat 3 hand picked players including himself who used stream cheating/maphacking. He'd also spam every single channel to promote his awful tournament. lol it was him, tang, and pride. Spam every channel. Once you won the tourney, to win the $100, you had to play pride/google/tang in a BO3 or something, and beat each of them. Don't know if it was tang, but it definitely was lame. Tang spammed about his coaching but was not part of the whole tournament scheme thing they were running. Google, SCDPride and another guy that I can't remember (think he was in SCD as well) ran them, but not Tang. You're right, it was another SCD guy. Can't remember him, either though. | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
Th0R
Canada359 Posts
| ||
|
ApBuLLet
United States604 Posts
On February 14 2012 07:39 iAmJeffReY wrote: lol it was him, tang, and pride. Spam every channel. Once you won the tourney, to win the $100, you had to play pride/google/tang in a BO3 or something, and beat each of them. Don't know if it was tang, but it definitely was lame. Tang spammed about his coaching but was not part of the whole tournament scheme thing they were running. Google, SCDPride and another guy that I can't remember (think he was in SCD as well) ran them, but not Tang. | ||
|
aintz
Canada5624 Posts
| ||
|
Belha
Italy2850 Posts
On February 12 2012 10:05 Toez wrote: but i think i saw dignitas killer play this account on his stream during a tournament .. Seconded. | ||
|
Talack
Canada2742 Posts
On February 12 2012 10:05 Excludos wrote: I would cancle my 2 stargates too if I knew they had been scouted, as its basically an allin that needs to be..unscouted  Same if he went collosus allin with like 2 robos. Somewhat far fetched, but not impossible. The blink micro in the video in the OP thought doesn't really leave any room for doubt. Thats cheating, and I do believe I've seen that hack around before. Why is blizz so damn slow in banning these guys? =|They are slow because they want to catch as many people as possible. You don't see a hack, let them know it's detectable and then ban immediatley, you gather more information and find out what the flaws in your system are then proceed to ban all offenders at once. That's why in WoW you'd see something like 400,000+ people banned at one time for hacks/programs. | ||
|
SniXSniPe
United States1938 Posts
I hope people don't mix them up, IIRC one of them was a BM cheeser and the other one I never encountered. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
SirRobin
United States269 Posts
| ||
|
NeilSC
114 Posts
| ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:09 Talack wrote: They are slow because they want to catch as many people as possible. You don't see a hack, let them know it's detectable and then ban immediatley, you gather more information and find out what the flaws in your system are then proceed to ban all offenders at once. That's why in WoW you'd see something like 400,000+ people banned at one time for hacks/programs. Blizz has banned 400,000 individuals at the same time before? Damn... that's a pretty epic operation. Hopefully that is in fact what theyre cookin up for SC2 hackers | ||
|
Spieltor
327 Posts
On February 12 2012 09:53 Chriscras wrote: How do hacks like these even exist? Isn't warden supposed to be preventing the types of hacks that actually interface with SC2's data stream? Omg. The all pervasive "warden is god and catches all hacks, they cannot exist". This is exactly what hack producers and users want you to think. Youtube sc2 hacks. there's countless hacks available to ruin the game for people  | ||
|
Adastrom
Canada219 Posts
On February 12 2012 10:07 Abrafred wrote: In my opinion it's the real MC. He clicks on the stalkers so fast and blinks away that the replay doesn't catch it... problem solved. 600 apm ez... Real MC would be ashamed at this bot blink. Im certain that Mc's micro is a LOT better than this hack. | ||
|
Nagano
United States1157 Posts
I played terran back then and long story short he'd always change his build to one that would hardcounter mine. I'm sure I can find the replay somewhere with SC2 gears. I'm not surprised by this at all, now that I think about it. | ||
|
Adastrom
Canada219 Posts
On February 14 2012 07:59 ApBuLLet wrote: Tang spammed about his coaching but was not part of the whole tournament scheme thing they were running. Google, SCDPride and another guy that I can't remember (think he was in SCD as well) ran them, but not Tang. I don't think its Tang. I talked to him and played with him a few times before and he seems like a decent and nice guy. All he ever did was spam his coaching ads etc but I really don't think a uni student like him would make the effort to do all that lol. | ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:17 FallDownMarigold wrote: Blizz has banned 400,000 individuals at the same time before? Damn... that's a pretty epic operation. Hopefully that is in fact what theyre cookin up for SC2 hackers Yeah they mostly ban in waves, because as the guy said before much more effect. | ||
|
BuddhaMonk
781 Posts
On February 12 2012 10:06 TyrantPotato wrote: he obviously just did the fake stargate into collosus feint into 8 gate all in. Yep, the ole "Cancel double stargate, into cancel robo bay into 8 gate blink" build. Standard play :p | ||
|
Spieltor
327 Posts
On February 14 2012 08:09 Talack wrote: They are slow because they want to catch as many people as possible. You don't see a hack, let them know it's detectable and then ban immediatley, you gather more information and find out what the flaws in your system are then proceed to ban all offenders at once. That's why in WoW you'd see something like 400,000+ people banned at one time for hacks/programs. heres my problem with that. if they ban hackers immediately as fast as people start to use their hack, those people immediately lose their time and money. Thats a far better disincentive than "sometime in the future you might get banned". http://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/10/27/procrastination/ this article promotes the same thing. People are BAD at long term investing, e.g. people will readily buy the game, and hack continuously when there's a "chance" of being banned in the future. this is not so if people got banned immediately. It would also force hack makers to come up with new hacks, forcing them to be continuously wasting their time doing that instead of actually using them to ruin the game experience for other people. the point is, hacking should be dealt with immediately, and would do far better for all legitimate players. And to the people that say "large numbers are effective", they can still ban people silently for a month or two, and then at the end of the period say "We banned 400,000 players in the last 2 months". thats eaxctly the same to people as saying "we banned 400,000 people, who've been hacking for months, today.". In the former, they make it clear that people | ||
| ||
|
|
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs TriGGeR
Cure vs SHIN
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
SC Evo Complete
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
