Are you sexist? - Page 6

On December 22 2004 03:00 badteeth wrote:
Men judge women almost exclusively on looks(fertility), while women judge men largely on the presence of intellect and accomplishments. Evolution has gone on for a long time and has shaped both men and women in their prospective roles.

Baal that's just wrong. Both men and women are just playing their roles in relationships. They're just doing what they were made for, and saying one role is more important than the other completely denies the fact that both men and women are here together to create the next generation.

I don't know why you say women are capable of loving deeper, maybe you're projecting a bit?

On December 22 2004 09:03 badteeth wrote:


Men don't fuck ugly women, no matter how intelligent they may be. Women won't have sex with men before they form an emotional bond with them, ie judge their intelligence and character.

On December 22 2004 15:33 loztdignity wrote:
BS. Society influence. Im a feminist, and proud of it, damnit.

On December 22 2004 16:14 n00bsaibot wrote:
ive never seen so many virgins discussing how a woman thinks in my life.

On December 22 2004 16:14 n00bsaibot wrote:
ive never seen so many virgins discussing how a woman thinks in my life.

On December 22 2004 14:22 baal wrote:


No im not projecting, women are more emotional than men, as simple as that, i think they usually love deeper, just see the statistics about "love" suicides and you will see women do it way more often because they dont have a cold head like we do.

And i do not believe genetic is the one to blame for the actual roles, yes women wanting to be atractive is their genetic role in a stage of their lifes but its not excuse to make it their entire life, since they are 13y/o little girls trying to act mature and they are 60y/o carving for youth once again, i think society is the one to blame of our actual roles.

On December 22 2004 19:42 Teroru wrote:


if i cry when u punch me, do i feel more pain, or do i have less pain tolerance?

If you rip off my favourite teddy bears head, and i shoot you, does it mean i have more love for my teddy bears than any1 else?

Just because someone is too weak to realize that they can survive without someone, doesn't mean they 'love deeper'. Regardless of sex.

---------------

While i believe women and men are equal, i believe it is not uncommon for females to act inferior. I cannot stand irrationally emotional people. Hence, i'm far more likely to get along with men than women.

I have several women who i love dearly. That does not change the fact that i do not talk to them when i need advice, nor do i ever tell them a secret.

On December 22 2004 22:26 baal wrote:


sophist biatch, you dont have to twist my examples to prove your points.

The women is more emotional, they can hate, love, fear, percieve and feel more than what a man usually does, that doesnt mean a man can feel, but usually our brain stands in the way of our emotions while they totally take over women.

For example, men are more violent than women thats our instinc as males, but a ive seen a lot of fights with broken lips and stuff who ends with both guys drinking a beer, and have you ever seen 2 girls fighting, if they had the strenght they would punch to death the other girls its pretty weird to see girls totally loosing it, without the violence instinct we do, its pure hate >

On December 22 2004 22:37 badteeth wrote:


It's not the ability to have more emotions, but the inability to control these emotions you're describing.

On December 22 2004 22:29 ComunistHobo wrote:
Its all human nature. I think the only thing that stops women from reigning supreme is a psychological barrier thats been strengthen since the beginning of mankind. For centuries, the men provide and the women comfort.

Cave men used to hunt while the Cave Chic would do what ever, making babies or making food or what not. Even today its the same. The men get spots at places like harvard and what not, go on to get a docterage or become entrepenuers (sp?) while the women stay at the house and do what ever, not "bringing home the bacon", they cook it.

Now since we have had millions of years of this, I think it would have some kind of effect in the humans evolution. Im pretty sure women will eventually start out doing men. Society just needs to accept it before it can happen.

Women having mood swings and what not is just their "women problem". I think estrogen has a little effect in it aswell. You cant say though that an entire group of people are inferior just because they get cranky every now and then.

On December 22 2004 22:48 baal wrote:
I agree that the current roles we have now are because we are physically stronger, but i dont think women will out do men, atleast not as far as we can picture the future, who knows if they will evolve into ultralisks and kill us all men