[MSL] NaDa vs Jangbi Quarterfinal C - Page 52
Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
| ||
Sandster
United States4054 Posts
| ||
CDRdude
United States5625 Posts
| ||
dekuschrub
United States2069 Posts
stork is pullin the strings ya know? cheese ftw go nadaaaaa | ||
ambit!ous1
United States3662 Posts
| ||
DoX.)
Singapore6164 Posts
On March 05 2009 20:09 Bifur wrote: Because everyone was praising JangBi as "the best PvT player ever" and so on, so his proxying looks like lame as shit. The main reason why ppl are doing this is coz JB cheesed 1st in games 2 + 3. If Nada cheesed in G2+3 we probably would be seeing much more hate from jangbi fans. But then again if Nada cheesed in games 2 and 3 we wouldn't be having these 4 and 5 ![]() | ||
CDRdude
United States5625 Posts
| ||
GeLaar
2421 Posts
| ||
NotJumperer
United States1371 Posts
| ||
keV.
United States3214 Posts
On March 05 2009 20:12 CDRdude wrote: So last time it was cross positions, this time it's not. Given that Nada won with macro last time, and JangBi has been winning with mostly micro games, does the closer positions favor Jangbi more than it did in the first game? Uhh sorry, we don't answer questions here we just talk about which mother fucker is cheesiest. | ||
zobz
Canada2175 Posts
| ||
Zzoram
Canada7115 Posts
| ||
radadaundandan
Bulgaria3148 Posts
| ||
uNiGNoRe
Germany1115 Posts
On March 05 2009 20:11 TheFoReveRwaR wrote: Jangbi is a gosu toss, completely capable of beating anyone in a straight up game. Stop the cheese bullshit. I think Jangbi started cheesing because he couldn't beat Nada in the straight up first game. | ||
CDRdude
United States5625 Posts
| ||
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
| ||
zobz
Canada2175 Posts
| ||
NotJumperer
United States1371 Posts
| ||
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
On March 05 2009 20:13 uNiGNoRe wrote: I think Jangbi started cheesing because he couldn't beat Nada in the straight up first game. I think you're wrong. | ||
rushz0rz
Canada5300 Posts
On March 05 2009 20:12 GeLaar wrote: Sorry to ask for it again, but is there a running VLC link? check around pg 10 and 11. | ||
| ||