On July 30 2008 02:51 Tinithor wrote:
Sea LOST?!?!?! To some complete no name? Come ON... oh well atleast Bisu delivered the required 2-0 stomping.

That guy isn't a no name.. he is a very good gamer obviously.

arb

Noobville14624 Posts

July 29 2008 19:00 GMT

#22

Dream.t)M18M Next bonjwa,Is there vods for this?

meathook

1288 Posts

July 29 2008 19:11 GMT

#23

On July 30 2008 04:00 arb wrote:
Dream.t)M18M Next bonjwa

Ha ha ha ha!

,Is there vods for this?

Yes, please. Shouldn't there also be reps?

Masse

Sweden11 Posts

July 29 2008 19:24 GMT

#24

when reps out?:D

BlackStar

Netherlands3029 Posts

July 29 2008 19:44 GMT

#25

Never saw WCG nationals reps. Doesn't Kespa manage it? WCG worldwide can't force Kespa/WCG Korea to release reps.

AdamBanks

Canada996 Posts

July 29 2008 19:58 GMT

#26

On July 30 2008 03:56 {88}iNcontroL wrote:

Show nested quote +

That guy isn't a no name.. he is a very good gamer obviously.

Obviously you missed the point. We know anyone playing in wcg korea at this stage is skillfull however one would have to favor sea to win that match (unless they have some info about the gamers i don't possess). Its still an upset

sea hwaiting ~

iNcontroL

USA29048 Posts

July 29 2008 20:06 GMT

#27

OBVIOUSLY YOU MISSED MY POINT

Being a relatively lesser known gamer does NOT make you a "no-namer" just because you are paired with a "big name."

The label "no-namer" carries a lot of weight. And that player happens to be very famous.. and as you could probably tell it is well deserved.

AdamBanks

Canada996 Posts

July 29 2008 21:34 GMT

#28

On July 30 2008 05:06 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
OBVIOUSLY YOU MISSED MY POINT

Being a relatively lesser known gamer does NOT make you a "no-namer" just because you are paired with a "big name."

The label "no-namer" carries a lot of weight. And that player happens to be very famous.. and as you could probably tell it is well deserved.

Famous?

A show of hands how many people have this guy's cheerful on their desk?
Anyway for the sake of this agruement we will just refer to this person as a "lesser-known-namer'' as opposed to a no-namer in order to appease inc.

BlackStar

Netherlands3029 Posts

July 29 2008 21:54 GMT

#29

On July 30 2008 03:56 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
That guy isn't a no name.. he is a very good gamer obviously.

Isn't he an amateur? That means he isn't even a no name pro.

Also, I don't see how the two are related.

So has this guy played any televised matches? Has he qualified for any leagues? Or vs who did he lose in the qualifiers?

This guy probably is your stereotype no namer. Until yesterday.

tonytongji

67 Posts

July 29 2008 22:27 GMT

#30

On July 30 2008 01:59 anch wrote:
wtf, where is Flash or Jaedong.
My assumption, coachs being hardass and want to focus on GOM??
There better be seed in this, I dont even see Stork here rofl.

http://news.replays.net/page/20080725/1389605.html
its in chinese but basically it shows that flash,jaedong,lux and stork are the 4 seeds...

also the chinese results r in as well (both F91 and pj r out?):
http://news.replays.net/page/20080725/1389512.html

meathook

1288 Posts

July 29 2008 22:28 GMT

#31

On July 30 2008 06:34 AdamBanks wrote:

Show nested quote +

Actually, to people who are paying some sort of attention, Dream.t)M18M should be a name that rings a bell. Most ppl who regularly watch top reps, have probably come across the name at some point. Well, at least I know I have and I am not even a protoss player.

Anyway, there are three funny VODS of Kal v BByong games on tube:

+ Show Spoiler [Game 1] +

+ Show Spoiler [Game 2] +

+ Show Spoiler [Game 3] +

AdamBanks

Canada996 Posts

July 29 2008 22:42 GMT

#32

Show me the cheerfull.

edit: 'Comming across' a gamer in a vod or rep does not make that player a known player.

iNcontroL

USA29048 Posts

July 29 2008 22:58 GMT

#33

jesus fucking christ you are establishing some kind of demand for a definitive definition for ambiguous descriptions. The fact is he is not a fucking no namer. People who follow korean BW know who this guy is. He is one of the two amatuers to qualify for WCG korea amongst the top 30 kespa. Beyond that he has been famous for quite a long time having many of his replays on the top replay websites in korea displaying his prowess. HE IS NOT some NO NAMER. Which is the fucking point I made. You are demanding cheerfulls and arguing semantics to try and force some kind of conclusion.. sorry buddy you are just flat wrong. And I'd feel bad for taking the REAL easy side of this argument if you weren't such a flaming waste of space.

AdamBanks

Canada996 Posts

July 29 2008 23:11 GMT

#34

I thought that we could agree he's a lesser-known-name??

I've got the easier agruement as most people will agree that they had heard and seen little to nothing of this player. I'm not going to get into agruement (or continue one)with you because its not really worth the effort. However, i would like to suggest that you refrain from getting so upset over a simple disagreement as its really not worth the emotional strain this topic is causing you.

Bait me if you must, but this will be the end of the discussion from my half.

iNcontroL

USA29048 Posts

July 29 2008 23:17 GMT

#35

On July 30 2008 05:06 {88}iNcontroL wrote:
OBVIOUSLY YOU MISSED MY POINT

Being a relatively lesser known gamer does NOT make you a "no-namer" just because you are paired with a "big name."

The label "no-namer" carries a lot of weight. And that player happens to be very famous.. and as you could probably tell it is well deserved.

Do you even read posts you respond to or do you just kinda go with your gut feeling? Cause that feeling isn't serving you well evidently..

bluemanrocks

United States304 Posts

July 29 2008 23:33 GMT

#36

you guys are fighting over nothing. neither of you are "flat out wrong" or "flat out right". adam banks was saying he was beaten by a no namer in the sense that dream doesnt have the biggest, baddest, or much of a reputation. yes, people may know who he is, but that doesnt always mean much. he also was referring to previously, as in, not including this, so his showing of skill through beating sea is an odd if drawn out point to make. that being said, people DO know him, so if you want to take it literally then no he isnt a "no namer". you are both arguing semantics, when really, either way, does it even matter? if this person is called a no-namer or not, he beat sea, and it is likely that he is pretty good, seeing as sea is, himself, an established progamer

that being said, i was just as dissapointed with kal's loss as with sea's, and going to agree with whoever lol'd at the july>rock rivalry

iNcontroL

USA29048 Posts

July 29 2008 23:38 GMT

#37

I'm fine with arguing semantics when I qualify it with "no-namer" carries a lot of weight. Something that goes unrefuted. If I call you a faggot for holding hands with your father you might object because that term carries a LOT more weight than anything that can fairly be implied by your clasping of hands with the familial patriarch.

Nice attempt at swooping in here as some kind of judicator of truth. |

I honestly feel a lot of you don't read posts and just kinda scan em. If that is the case you need to indicate as much because it would clean up a LOT of these arguments ie you'd be ignored fairly quickly.

Gregsen

Germany667 Posts

July 30 2008 00:16 GMT

#38

Oh god. I wanna see NaDa in cologne. I want it so bad. It's like 30 minutes away from me.

I'll be praying!!!