[TLS2] Qualifier #3 - Page 3

On May 18 2013 08:23 L3gendary wrote:
The minilauncher download says it will take 2 hours for me and its 4MB, wtf? Anyone have a better link?

On May 18 2013 17:44 Kiante wrote:]
i'd rather have a tournament on a non-ideal server where we dont have to exclude players like Doty, than a tournament on iccup where we have to exclude him. it's pretty simple really.

On May 18 2013 20:07 EnjoYmE wrote:
i dont remember that i bm someone on bw, so i would be fine with penalty all players who are abusing or bming other people. last qualifier i tryed to report someone bming me half of the game but there is no rule to avoid this behaviour. but its not my decision. when tl decides to do the foreign torunament on fish we can only choose to play or not. it reminds me on the semih case.
its painful to see the decreasing bw community have to deal with tl and iccup doing both there own thing. but its probably just my point of view.

edit: would tl change the server if another player like dsaqwe, mazur, lalush or pike had trouble with iccup?

On May 18 2013 17:44 Kiante wrote:

i'd rather have a tournament on a non-ideal server where we dont have to exclude players like Doty, than a tournament on iccup where we have to exclude him. it's pretty simple really.

Honestly getting on fish might seem intimidating to people, but honestly it's really easy. at the end of the day it's just another server. Everything works the same

On May 19 2013 00:24 skzlime wrote:
what's up with bw players' sense of entitlement and willingness to always question authority? although iccup's rigid set of sometimes questionable rules could really use some update. banning the whole event in the middle of its second season qualifiers is quite confusing. why not force only games involving blacklisted players to be played on a different server? since that's essentially just doty (afaik) in this case, it could effortlessly be handled on a case-by-case basis.

On May 19 2013 00:26 Kiante wrote:

we tried to do that but iccup refused

On May 19 2013 00:52 BigFan wrote:

oh that's quite bizzare lol. I would've thought just having the banned player(s) play on another server but everyone else on iccup would've been ok, guess not ><

On May 19 2013 00:38 Powert wrote:
which channel?