|
Croatia9362 Posts
On May 18 2013 08:23 L3gendary wrote: The minilauncher download says it will take 2 hours for me and its 4MB, wtf? Anyone have a better link? A mirror link for minilauncher: http://www.mediafire.com/?cinlg49mwmylz50
|
On May 18 2013 17:44 Kiante wrote:] i'd rather have a tournament on a non-ideal server where we dont have to exclude players like Doty, than a tournament on iccup where we have to exclude him. it's pretty simple really.
yea, its simple - we only have 50% of the registrations of the first two qualifiers. so we can make a tournament without one person who get banned for "some reason" or we can exclude 50% of the players who are willing to play, to do it on a "non-ideal server" where some people having latency problems or what ever.
|
Australia7069 Posts
latency is completely peer to peer. The latency between players is exactly the same on ANY server, because the server doesn't host the game, it just facilitates the connection. And if we cede to demands to ban players that iccup has problems with where does it end. What if you were rude to an iccup admin and got banned from iccup, would you be happy being excluded from TLS because of it?
|
i dont remember that i bm someone on bw, so i would be fine with penalty all players who are abusing or bming other people. last qualifier i tryed to report someone bming me half of the game but there is no rule to avoid this behaviour. but its not my decision. when tl decides to do the foreign torunament on fish we can only choose to play or not. it reminds me on the semih case. its painful to see the decreasing bw community have to deal with tl and iccup doing both there own thing. but its probably just my point of view.
edit: would tl change the server if another player like dsaqwe, mazur, lalush or pike had trouble with iccup?
|
On May 18 2013 20:07 EnjoYmE wrote: i dont remember that i bm someone on bw, so i would be fine with penalty all players who are abusing or bming other people. last qualifier i tryed to report someone bming me half of the game but there is no rule to avoid this behaviour. but its not my decision. when tl decides to do the foreign torunament on fish we can only choose to play or not. it reminds me on the semih case. its painful to see the decreasing bw community have to deal with tl and iccup doing both there own thing. but its probably just my point of view.
edit: would tl change the server if another player like dsaqwe, mazur, lalush or pike had trouble with iccup?
If it was for no reason, i think so.
|
On May 18 2013 17:44 Kiante wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2013 16:59 thezanursic wrote: I think the turn out will be REALLY bad with having to play on FISH. Please try to fix whatever happened between the TLS and ICCUP crew so that future events can be held on ICCUP (A ladder stage for the main event would be pretty awesome to!) i'd rather have a tournament on a non-ideal server where we dont have to exclude players like Doty, than a tournament on iccup where we have to exclude him. it's pretty simple really. Honestly getting on fish might seem intimidating to people, but honestly it's really easy. at the end of the day it's just another server. Everything works the same What does ICCUP have against dOTY?
|
Why don't you go like hey ICCUP. Unban dOTY it's in the best interest of both our parties. TLS provides more activity on ICCUP and TLS having more players is also beneficial.
Did you guys try talking it over?
|
Well, well... I thought there were more unreasonable bans on Fish Server than on iCCup... I guess I wasn't right.
|
what's up with bw players' sense of entitlement and willingness to always question authority? although iccup's rigid set of sometimes questionable rules could really use some update. banning the whole event in the middle of its second season qualifiers is quite confusing. why not force only games involving blacklisted players to be played on a different server? since that's essentially just doty (afaik) in this case, it could effortlessly be handled on a case-by-case basis.
|
Australia7069 Posts
On May 19 2013 00:24 skzlime wrote: what's up with bw players' sense of entitlement and willingness to always question authority? although iccup's rigid set of sometimes questionable rules could really use some update. banning the whole event in the middle of its second season qualifiers is quite confusing. why not force only games involving blacklisted players to be played on a different server? since that's essentially just doty (afaik) in this case, it could effortlessly be handled on a case-by-case basis. we tried to do that but iccup refused
|
where do i sign in again? gonna grab a dip
|
Russian Federation66 Posts
|
|
TLADT24917 Posts
On May 19 2013 00:26 Kiante wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 00:24 skzlime wrote: what's up with bw players' sense of entitlement and willingness to always question authority? although iccup's rigid set of sometimes questionable rules could really use some update. banning the whole event in the middle of its second season qualifiers is quite confusing. why not force only games involving blacklisted players to be played on a different server? since that's essentially just doty (afaik) in this case, it could effortlessly be handled on a case-by-case basis. we tried to do that but iccup refused oh that's quite bizzare lol. I would've thought just having the banned player(s) play on another server but everyone else on iccup would've been ok, guess not ><
|
Croatia9362 Posts
On May 19 2013 00:52 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2013 00:26 Kiante wrote:On May 19 2013 00:24 skzlime wrote: what's up with bw players' sense of entitlement and willingness to always question authority? although iccup's rigid set of sometimes questionable rules could really use some update. banning the whole event in the middle of its second season qualifiers is quite confusing. why not force only games involving blacklisted players to be played on a different server? since that's essentially just doty (afaik) in this case, it could effortlessly be handled on a case-by-case basis. we tried to do that but iccup refused oh that's quite bizzare lol. I would've thought just having the banned player(s) play on another server but everyone else on iccup would've been ok, guess not >< They saw that as us bypassing their rules.
|
REMEBER WE PLAY @ FISH!!!!!!!
|
it wasnt even on news and only 54 players lol
|
On May 19 2013 00:38 Powert wrote: which channel? op legacy-1
|
and maybe cause of fish ^^
|
Russian Federation28 Posts
And we can't join op legacy-1. Full. All people must pay for Doty's crimes. That's sad.
|
|
|
|