On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
Since you are listed as sponsor, may I ask if the money is already there, or do you still collect it?
On February 26 2013 01:28 LRM)nOoNe wrote: Regarding W-Launcher:
I know nothing about this launcher, could someone please provide me with some information? .
also known as wDetector. much like iccup's launcher, but for fish. has anti-hack and latency changer. compatible with chaos and mini in the sense that multiple players in the same game don't all have to have the same one running. most people on fish now prefer it over the others.
i personally still use mini, but will probably change when i can be bothered
I brought up the wLauncher issue during the ASL2, but apparently, nobody paid any attention to that. I said Koreans were switching over to wLauncher, and now the whole server uses wLauncher. I mean, for Pete's sake, it's a Korean server built for Koreans, and not meant to be foreigner-friendly.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
Since you are listed as sponsor, may I ask if the money is already there, or do you still collect it?
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams...
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it.
Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission.
Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to.
Thats good Eywa~ Stick with sponsoring and dont make decisions, which will surely improve the league! Even with the very slight bias of LRM)Noone, I'm sure he will still manage things better than you! Looking forward for gc3 round 2
EPT
waiting for the official announcement now.
