EPTGambit's Cup Season 3 Round 2 - Page 3
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
Game
3191 Posts
| ||
|
GeckoVOD
Germany814 Posts
| ||
|
dr.shrinker
Norway369 Posts
| ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On February 26 2013 03:30 Game wrote: Seems pretty unfair for teams to join and leave as they please round by round for the same exact season of a league. Seems pretty unfair that your team's manager is also running the league. | ||
|
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
Add Fox.Minx(USA Zerg) Fox.White(Chile Protoss) Fox. Reclusive(USA Terran) Fox.Munkie(USA Zerg) Change Fox.hulksmash from Protoss to Terran | ||
|
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
On February 26 2013 03:30 Game wrote: Seems pretty unfair for teams to join and leave as they please round by round for the same exact season of a league. naaah.. I disagree if they pay the fee then why dont let them play ? the more the merrier  | ||
|
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
| ||
|
LRM)nOoNe
United States231 Posts
On February 26 2013 06:39 Shotcoder wrote: Ok just so it's in a thread and not just skype calls Add Fox.Minx(USA Zerg) Fox.White(Chile Protoss) Fox. Reclusive(USA Terran) Fox.Munkie(USA Zerg) Change Fox.hulksmash from Protoss to Terran Done On February 26 2013 04:52 ninazerg wrote: Seems pretty unfair that your team's manager is also running the league. Read the rules. On February 26 2013 03:30 Game wrote: Seems pretty unfair for teams to join and leave as they please round by round for the same exact season of a league. Why? As long as they don't leave mid-round, I don't see any issues. On February 26 2013 01:50 Sayle wrote: From what I understand, wlauncher was Mini's competitor for a while but recently seems to have overtaken them (better AH?), causing most Koreans to switch to it and most foreigners to follow suit. I personally have switched to wlauncher as well (partly because Mini stopped working). Do both players need to be using wlauncher? On February 26 2013 03:25 Sneazel wrote: im back. can i play in this? Yes, join or submit a team. | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On February 26 2013 03:25 Sneazel wrote: im back. can i play in this? We would be more than happy to have you sir. | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On February 26 2013 04:52 ninazerg wrote: Seems pretty unfair that your team's manager is also running the league. Seems pretty unfair that every comment you've made as of recent as a followup to mine has been sorely misguided and incorrect. | ||
|
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
Fox.Shrinker(Protoss) | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On February 26 2013 09:26 Game wrote: Seems pretty unfair that every comment you've made as of recent as a followup to mine has been sorely misguided and incorrect. Whoa, chill, chill. I was just joking, no need to get all bent out of shape. It's all good, yo.  | ||
|
mca64[KDV]
Poland463 Posts
On February 26 2013 03:30 Game wrote: Seems pretty unfair for teams to join and leave as they please round by round for the same exact season of a league. wtf? Someone who took wo in games with Vorti now sayin what is fair and what is not? Top of rudeness -.- | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it. Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission. Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to. | ||
|
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
| ||
|
LRM)nOoNe
United States231 Posts
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams... As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it. Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission. Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to. Okay, updated the rules. On February 26 2013 09:39 Shotcoder wrote: Also Add Fox.Shrinker(Protoss) Done | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On February 26 2013 11:54 Eywa- wrote: This post is directed at the players and the teams... As far as the last part of the rule set concerning administrative decisions on LRM), I will not be accessible to any of you... I don't want any of you to try to contact me, I will not respond. When an issue arises, nOoNe should give the initial ruling in which case, a manager may request that it be escalated if the decision does not please them, nOoNe will appropriately escalate the matter which I will then give a ruling on (LRM may also escalate issues revolving around their own team). When this is completed, nOoNe will post the ruling in the thread and I will acknowledge it. Keep in mind, when an issue is escalated, it is not guaranteed to change and if it does change, it is not guaranteed to change in favour of the party which escalated the issue. Once an issue is sent to myself, the process may not be undone and the team will live with whatever decision may come out of it, there won't be any reverting because the submitting team "withdraws" the submission. Note: This option of escalating a decision is very much a last resort when you have been treated unfairly from an unbiased stand point. People who spam this avenue of over ruling virtually every week will be put on an ignore list where nOoNe will only forward things which, to the best of his knowledge, I may oppose to. Hear that h00ligan? | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
Yeah, h00ligan, you prolific trouble-maker. | ||
|
LRM)nOoNe
United States231 Posts
| ||
|
skzlime
Hungary462 Posts
On February 26 2013 01:28 LRM)nOoNe wrote: Regarding W-Launcher: I know nothing about this launcher, could someone please provide me with some information? . also known as wDetector. much like iccup's launcher, but for fish. has anti-hack and latency changer. compatible with chaos and mini in the sense that multiple players in the same game don't all have to have the same one running. most people on fish now prefer it over the others. i personally still use mini, but will probably change when i can be bothered | ||
| ||
