EPT[R&S] Gambit's Cup Round 1 - Page 43
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
trutaCz
Poland686 Posts
| ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
| ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6807 Posts
 | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
(interesting possible point of view xdddd) okay, reps plays vs LRM 1st and then vs CN. If reps loses 0-4 to LRM, we simply have no motivation to play vs CN and we will "make" 0-4 vs CN too. And now again LRM and CN are in same position, and what then? Another ties? if reps loses x-4 to lrm, we again have no motivation to play vs CN. The only possible variant is when 1st team, who plays us, loses 3-4 to reps. This means that next match both teams - reps and 2nd will have enough motivation to play. example:D LRM 4-0 reps. -> reps 0-4 CN -> CN = LRM -> ???? :D LRM 4-1/4-2/4-3/ reps. -> reps 0-4 CN -> LRM<CN, CN qualifies. LRM CANT WIN us, if they want to live, they MUST lose to us and only 3-4. LRM 3-4 reps. Thats it! now both, reps and cn are fighting for their lives. obviously 1st team, has a great disadvantage in this spot. ah no LOL. And for LRM there is not point to lose 3-4, cause if they lose 3-4, and reps wins CN, they will not qualify :D:D:D roflmao. So looks like that 1st team, which plays reps, cant qualify ANYWAY :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ROFLMAOOO xD so complicated  This situation is so funny xDDDDDD | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
| ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On October 01 2012 06:18 reps)Plumbum wrote: interesting spot! :D (interesting possible point of view xdddd) okay, reps plays vs LRM 1st and then vs CN. If reps loses 0-4 to LRM, we simply have no motivation to play vs CN and we will "make" 0-4 vs CN too. And now again LRM and CN are in same position, and what then? Another ties? if reps loses x-4 to lrm, we again have no motivation to play vs CN. The only possible variant is when 1st team, who plays us, loses 3-4 to reps. This means that next match both teams - reps and 2nd will have enough motivation to play. example:D LRM 4-0 reps. -> reps 0-4 CN -> CN = LRM -> ???? :D LRM 4-1/4-2/4-3/ reps. -> reps 0-4 CN -> LRM<CN, CN qualifies. LRM CANT WIN us, if they want to live, they MUST lose to us and only 3-4. LRM 3-4 reps. Thats it! now both, reps and cn are fighting for their lives. obviously 1st team, has a great disadvantage in this spot. ah no LOL. And for LRM there is not point to lose 3-4, cause if they lose 3-4, and reps wins CN, they will not qualify :D:D:D roflmao. So looks like that 1st team, which plays reps, cant qualify ANYWAY :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ROFLMAOOO xD so complicated This situation is so funny xDDDDDD ...genius-ception | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On October 01 2012 06:18 reps)Plumbum wrote: interesting spot! :D (interesting possible point of view xdddd) okay, reps plays vs LRM 1st and then vs CN. If reps loses 0-4 to LRM, we simply have no motivation to play vs CN and we will "make" 0-4 vs CN too. And now again LRM and CN are in same position, and what then? Another ties? if reps loses x-4 to lrm, we again have no motivation to play vs CN. The only possible variant is when 1st team, who plays us, loses 3-4 to reps. This means that next match both teams - reps and 2nd will have enough motivation to play. example:D LRM 4-0 reps. -> reps 0-4 CN -> CN = LRM -> ???? :D LRM 4-1/4-2/4-3/ reps. -> reps 0-4 CN -> LRM<CN, CN qualifies. LRM CANT WIN us, if they want to live, they MUST lose to us and only 3-4. LRM 3-4 reps. Thats it! now both, reps and cn are fighting for their lives. obviously 1st team, has a great disadvantage in this spot. ah no LOL. And for LRM there is not point to lose 3-4, cause if they lose 3-4, and reps wins CN, they will not qualify :D:D:D roflmao. So looks like that 1st team, which plays reps, cant qualify ANYWAY :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ROFLMAOOO xD so complicated This situation is so funny xDDDDDD + Show Spoiler [Due to Season results thus far] + If reps) forfeits, LRM) Advance If LRM) forfeits, winner of reps) vs CN advance If CN forfeits, winner of LRM) vs reps) advance If CN and LRM) are tied, LRM) Advance | ||
|
hacklebeast
United States5090 Posts
| ||
|
yellowsmile
United States293 Posts
reason 1: the lag issue between cn and lrm mostly is brought by cn team reason 2:lrm has better record i dont think it is necessary to involve more team at this point and make this complicated so far i am saying this objectively, although i am chinese. | ||
|
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
On October 01 2012 04:36 trutaCz wrote: Oh if you aren't going to turn back the decision there's no sense of my words, just only want to add some fact that always when someone lagged he was punished for it, it happens since always. I don't agree with that we were unable to play against them because the fact is they were unable, because their players were laggy. I feel cheated. I think this is funny that a Polish player is complaining about lag. Edit: I dont think it's fair to just "let" LRM) advance because of lag. I don't remember many players from the other teams complaining about lag. | ||
|
yellowsmile
United States293 Posts
On October 01 2012 07:28 Shotcoder wrote: I think this is funny that a Polish player is complaining about lag. Edit: I dont think it's fair to just "let" LRM) advance because of lag. I don't remember many players from the other teams complaining about lag. that is why i put reason 2. however, if we arrange all 8 teams to make a vote for which is the most lag team, i am 200% sure cn will be the champion. | ||
|
mca64[KDV]
Poland463 Posts
On October 01 2012 04:28 reps)Plumbum wrote: ...Why every other team was able to play vs CN and LRM cant?.... Probally Europa can play without big lag, America not. What LRM's line up looks like? Mostly amercians players? | ||
|
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
On October 01 2012 07:32 yellowsmile wrote: that is why i put reason 2. however, if we arrange all 8 teams to make a vote for which is the most lag team, i am 200% sure cn will be the champion. It's still not fair at all, LRM vs China is a deciding match for play offs. You can't just overlook this decision. Advancing sets a precedent that you can blame lag and receive a free win. | ||
|
mca64[KDV]
Poland463 Posts
On October 01 2012 07:28 Shotcoder wrote: I think this is funny that a Polish player is complaining about lag. Edit: I dont think it's fair to just "let" LRM) advance because of lag. I don't remember many players from the other teams complaining about lag. yes its funny, cause im pretty sure he can play without lag with CN, like reps members. | ||
|
ne4aJIb
Russian Federation3209 Posts
On October 01 2012 07:34 mca64[KDV] wrote: Probally Europa can play without big lag, America not. What LRM's line up looks like? Mostly amercians players? Mostly zergs xDD | ||
|
yellowsmile
United States293 Posts
| ||
|
mca64[KDV]
Poland463 Posts
| ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
On October 01 2012 07:05 Eywa- wrote: + Show Spoiler [Due to Season results thus far] + If reps) forfeits, LRM) Advance If LRM) forfeits, winner of reps) vs CN advance If CN forfeits, winner of LRM) vs reps) advance If CN and LRM) are tied, LRM) Advance This decision isn't ironclad either... reps plays LRM, they lose 4-2, hence no chance for PO. They play CN and DROP ALL SETS, i.e lose on purpose (how will you determine if they don't play to their potential? what if they just had a "bad day") seems like reps can still screw any team if they lose the first game... | ||
|
iFU.BMW
United States144 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
ZaRaki_
Spain126 Posts
just trying to fix this cuz we are suffering for this too, and no hate for reps, plumbaki u know i love u (happy birthday) | ||
| ||
