|
On May 23 2012 22:24 Katsuge wrote: Hoping for flash to beat bogus and action to beat jangbi..cmon osl make my fanboy dream come true!
Wouldn't a tiebreaker with two KT players hurt the team a lot? Considering they already have to play two games with BW/SC2 and then spend even more time on BW to practice plus actually find time to play the tiebreakers itself...
|
Just watched the VODs unspoilered (except Zero's which is not up yet).
Wow, what a great night of BW! Even the ZvZ's are great! Shine vs Soulkey was sick!!!!
And I watched that center engagement of Fantasy vs Rush over and over, and I was like WTF how a 20 supply deficit becomes a 10 supply advantage?!
P.S. So sad there's no LR thread for KT vs Ace, but happy for the results!
|
Wow guys seems like i gotta check out those ZvZ's!
|
On May 23 2012 21:14 Sawamura wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 21:13 baubo wrote: Wow, Shine once again trolling us in the OSL. His ZvZ really is superb though. Very good decision-making despite somewhat of a disadvantage following the first failed attack. How is superior skill in ZvZ is trolling -_-
Because it doesn't require Hydras?
|
Estonia4644 Posts
MY LIQUIBET ITS SINKING ;;;
|
On May 23 2012 22:45 HighTemper wrote: Just watched the VODs unspoilered (except Zero's which is not up yet).
Wow, what a great night of BW! Even the ZvZ's are great! Shine vs Soulkey was sick!!!!
And I watched that center engagement of Fantasy vs Rush over and over, and I was like WTF how a 20 supply deficit becomes a 10 supply advantage?!
P.S. So sad there's no LR thread for KT vs Ace, but happy for the results! There is. But in the sc2 forum
|
On May 23 2012 22:28 sharkie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 22:24 Katsuge wrote: Hoping for flash to beat bogus and action to beat jangbi..cmon osl make my fanboy dream come true! Wouldn't a tiebreaker with two KT players hurt the team a lot? Considering they already have to play two games with BW/SC2 and then spend even more time on BW to practice plus actually find time to play the tiebreakers itself... Wouldnt hurt them considering that could both adavance and most likely put on other sides of the bracket
|
hmm... not really surprising results, if you think about it.
|
3/4 Oh why do I pull for the rookies =/ Rush why you let me down
|
On May 24 2012 02:42 Iplaythings wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 22:28 sharkie wrote:On May 23 2012 22:24 Katsuge wrote: Hoping for flash to beat bogus and action to beat jangbi..cmon osl make my fanboy dream come true! Wouldn't a tiebreaker with two KT players hurt the team a lot? Considering they already have to play two games with BW/SC2 and then spend even more time on BW to practice plus actually find time to play the tiebreakers itself... Wouldnt hurt them considering that could both adavance and most likely put on other sides of the bracket
You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash.
|
On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though.
|
On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though.
If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3
|
On May 24 2012 10:07 Caihead wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though. If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3
Yes! epic endless three way tie :D.
|
On May 24 2012 10:14 empty.bottle wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 10:07 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though. If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3 Yes! epic endless three way tie :D. No. You don't want that.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=120125
|
Japan11285 Posts
Something is not right, all the games are recommended....
|
On May 24 2012 00:15 fusefuse wrote: MY LIQUIBET ITS SINKING ;;;
Pretty much me right now. Was doing great until day 3 and day 4 of the round of 16....
|
On May 24 2012 10:18 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 10:14 empty.bottle wrote:On May 24 2012 10:07 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though. If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3 Yes! epic endless three way tie :D. No. You don't want that. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=120125
But effort did make it out of that into the Ro8 to eventually win over Flash in an epic 3-2 in the finals...
|
On May 24 2012 11:08 Caihead wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 10:18 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On May 24 2012 10:14 empty.bottle wrote:On May 24 2012 10:07 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though. If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3 Yes! epic endless three way tie :D. No. You don't want that. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=120125 But effort did make it out of that into the Ro8 to eventually win over Flash in an epic 3-2 in the finals... Has nothing to do with the unepic 3-way endless tiebreakers, which was what my post was about. It was just a cute little blast to the past. Be careful what you wish for, and all that.
|
On May 24 2012 12:24 MountainDewJunkie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 11:08 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:18 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On May 24 2012 10:14 empty.bottle wrote:On May 24 2012 10:07 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though. If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3 Yes! epic endless three way tie :D. No. You don't want that. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=120125 But effort did make it out of that into the Ro8 to eventually win over Flash in an epic 3-2 in the finals... Has nothing to do with the unepic 3-way endless tiebreakers, which was what my post was about. It was just a cute little blast to the past. Be careful what you wish for, and all that.
Group C was epic =3
|
On May 24 2012 12:29 Caihead wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2012 12:24 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On May 24 2012 11:08 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:18 MountainDewJunkie wrote:On May 24 2012 10:14 empty.bottle wrote:On May 24 2012 10:07 Caihead wrote:On May 24 2012 10:00 Azriel wrote:On May 24 2012 09:38 Caihead wrote: You know, there's a possibility that Action would make it out of this group rather than Flash. Yeah, it's still up in the air. Poor Bogus appears screwed though. If Action loses to Jangbi and Bogus wins over flash then it's 3-0, 1-2 x3 Yes! epic endless three way tie :D. No. You don't want that. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=120125 But effort did make it out of that into the Ro8 to eventually win over Flash in an epic 3-2 in the finals... Has nothing to do with the unepic 3-way endless tiebreakers, which was what my post was about. It was just a cute little blast to the past. Be careful what you wish for, and all that. Group C was epic =3 You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
|
|
|
|