Only the losing team enters a new player after each match, the winner remains till he is dethroned, no player may be entered more than once even for the ACE match unlike SPL style.
Location: Fish Server Meet Channel: op Eywa- Start date: November 11th 2011 Time: Fridays and Sundays, 20CET Current Prize Pool: $900
- Free Agency - If your team needs an extra player, look here, contact me about what players you want and I'll hook you up. + Show Spoiler [Player List] +
Nb <> sas Nb.Mazur < New Heartbreak Ridge > sas.Kashu Nb.fLiP < Match Point > sas.Ace Nb.Napoleon < Neo Aztec > sas.Sziky Nb.TerrOr < Icarus > sas.Vorti Nb.dOtY < La Mancha > sas.LocDog Nb defeats sas 4-1 + Show Spoiler [VODs] +
PaiN <> Nb M[PaiN] < Pathfinder > Nb.M0b Elena..[PaiN] < Icarus > Nb.Mazur mUsA[PaiN] < La Mancha > Nb.TerrOr Cute[PaiN] < Neo Aztec > Nb.vAriOus Freeslot < New Heartbreak Ridge > Nb.fLiP Freeslot < Match Point > Nb.v1 Nb defeats PaiN 4-2
LRM <> Gt LRM)OctZerg < Pathfinder > Gt.SneazeL LRM)Choosy < Icarus > Gt.TrutaCz LRM)Kolll < La Mancha > Gt.Michael LRM)Game < Neo Aztec > Gt.Jumper LRM)Pike < New Heartbreak Ridge > Gt.Teacher LRM)Bakuryu < Match Point > Freeslot LRM defeats Gt 4-2 - Score is changed to 4-1 due to Jumper not submitting his replay, Set 6 not needed.
1) Rules Concerning Decisions and Over-Rulings - All teams and players are subject to administrative Discretion. - Eywa- reserves full discretion over all decisions and procedures.
2) Rules Concerning Servers - All games must be played on Fish Server using Mini or Chaos Launcher(Unless otherwise indicated at administrative discretion).
3) Rules Concerning Replays - All replays MUST be submitted to EywaSC@gmail.com by the winning player, failure to do so will result in reversal of the match(Only if opponent manages to send it in before the game is to be casted) otherwise, the set will result in a draw.
4) Rules Concerning Names - All players must use their most known ID, if you are unsure of which ID you should use, you should direct your PM to Eywa- (Exceptions may apply). - All players on a given team must have identical name tags. e.g: sas.Ace, sas.Sziky, LRM)Game, LRM)Kolll.
5) Rules Concerning PP matches - There will be no PP matches unless scheduled a minimum of 24 hours beforehand with Eywa-. - The league commissioner reserves the right to allow and/or deny any PP match applications. - Late applications for a PP match will be handled only if the opposition agrees.
6) Rules Concerning Conflicts/Drops/Miss understandings/Abuse - Any player found abusing in any way will be attributed with a permanent ban from the Gambit's Cup, in addition, the clan war which was abused in will be counted as a loss for the abusing player's team. - If a player disconnects from a game due to internet issues and/or Launcher issues, the player may be re-entered or subbed out. If the player is re-entered and drops a second time, the set will be counted as a loss by W.O. - IP conflicts between players will be handled on a case-to-case basis. - The use of an incorrect map will result in a draw for the set, both players will be banned from their next Nation War.(Rule #8 applies for rigged maps)
7) Rules Concerning Team Leaders - If a team leader cannot make it to a clan war or is to have a delayed arrival, they must inform the commissioner which player is to make the draw. - If a team leader is suspended, they cannot take place in the channel of the Clan War. - Team leaders are responsible to communicate with their players. - League officials reserve the right to communicate directly with players from the team if the task proves easier. If the team leader attempts to interfere with this alternate communication route, they will be subject to suspension. - Only team leaders may communicate with the league commissioner over concerns about the league unless otherwise indicated.
8) Rules Concerning IP - No Korean IP addresses(does not apply to managers so long as they do not participate in league games). - Players may be asked to surrender their IP address to the league commissioner at any time without notice. Refusal to provide will result in indefinite removal from the league.
9) Rules Concerning Roster Changes - There will be no roster changes 24 hours or less before a Clan War and/or PP Set. - Each team will reserve the right for only 2 roster changes between March 1st and 31st. - Each team will reserve the right for only 1 roster change post-March. This roster change cannot be used during the playoffs - There will be no mass migrating of players from one team to another within the Gambit's Cup, you can recruit at will from outside, but any trade/acquisition from other teams within the Gambit's Cup will be reviewed by the league commissioner. - Players with former cases hacking and abuse must contact the league commissioner before being admitted to play in this league. Eywa- reserve the right to refuse these players. - Team Rosters must not exceed 15 players + 3 organizers. - For all additions to the roster, leaders must submit their player along with country and race (Name/Country/Race). All other formats will be ignored.
10) Rules Concerning W.O Timers - The first players must be announced and not afk at 15 past the hour else, league officials reserve the right to grant a W.O to the opposition of the offending team. - After each set, either team will have 5 minutes after the opponent's player is announced to submit their player and have him ready to go into the game. Maximum wait time cannot exceed 10 minutes(if neither team submits for 6 minutes, you'll only have 4 minutes after your opponent submits theirs). - A team cannot prevent more than one set from starting for more than 5 minutes.
11) Rules Concerning BM - No BM in game whatsoever, do not try to do the "I didn't directly bm my opponent". If your chat has bm underlying it, you will be affected by this rule. - (Chat in game at your own risk) - Mandatory gg - All players must type out with "gg". - No offensive gg - An offensive gg will result in the reversal of the set. - No BM or flaming will be tolerated in Official Gambit Cup threads, failure to abide by this rule will result in action taken against the offending team at organizer's discretion. - In channel BM will be moderated by the official Gambit Cup referee which is present at the time of the offense. (Do so at your own risk) - No BM of league officials. 1st offense: 1 week suspension. Further offences: x! weeks of suspension, x = #of offenses. BM offenses will be handled upon report. If you feel your opponent should be disciplined according to this rule, you must report him to eywasc@gmail.com, make the title of your e-mail clear with your intention.
12) Rules Concerning Spoilers Anyone who spoils results from their game and/or clan war will receive a ban from the Gambit's Cup of an undefined duration.
13) If you have any questions about the rules, you must contact Eywa-, not knowing the rules or misinterpreting them is not an excuse.
Any player wishing to participate in the Gambit's Cup Season 2, however does not belong to a team which is participating, you may submit your candidacy through PM to this TL account(Eywa-). Your message must contain the following:
Most known name: iCCup + Fish accounts: High rank: Account with this rank: Current Rank: Account with this rank: Main race:
Once you have filled this out, you will be added to a free agent list, which will be composed of very player who has applied, sorted by rank. By signing up to this, you are making a commitment to the league. If you are picked up by a team, unless there is a good reason for you not to be on this team, you will be drafted onto that team. Failure to comply by this will result in a suspension for the remainder of the season.
If you want to sign your team up, PM me, I'll send you my paypal.
If you're a player without a team, PM me, I'll set you up in the free agent list - which will be added once I get applicants.
FAQ:
What if I don't have enough players? - Join with another team or recruit some. If you're already participating in iCCupCL, you almost have enough as it is. [T/N: if you participate in the Gambit's Cup you are sure to gain interest from players who aren't currently in the league]
Why does it have to be on Fish Server, why not iCCup? - It is on Fish because iCCup did not allow it to be hosted and too many people have complained about the cd-key issue for it to be on any of the battle.net servers.
Who can play in the ACE match? - Anyone on the roster may play in the ace match even if they have already played once in the CW, though they don't have to have played in the first 6 games in order to be eligible. (Applies only for SPL style, SWL style will proceed with the 4th pick of the team who loses game 6 vs the winner of game 6)
From the event(managing and playing) Target Scan Joekim ByuL TTN64 Octopus tO2s From the event(As players, can still manage teams if they really want to contribute..) - All Korean players
I see AoV again, I understand it's good for more teams to participate and boost the prize fund but I am hoping they can field a team for matches this season.
On October 29 2011 08:43 dRaW wrote: I see AoV again, I understand it's good for more teams to participate and boost the prize fund but I am hoping they can field a team for matches this season.
I wonder if you've just been afk the past 2 months before posting this or are simply that naive. Yes AoV had problems last season, they'll be fine this season. I expect they'll be able to take some games off some good teams. ^^ I'd worry about your own team.
Awesome finally the second season cant w8 is there gonna be a youtube channel since the games are cast simultaneously would be nice to have one place for vods
On October 29 2011 09:25 Chuck646 wrote: Awesome finally the second season cant w8 is there gonna be a youtube channel since the games are cast simultaneously would be nice to have one place for vods
Probably, still hasn't been worked out yet. Though creating a youtube channel is ezpz.
On October 29 2011 12:23 reps)Plumbum wrote: i think it would be greater, if payin for next GC will be 100~ from team, or something.
The teams are already contributing heavily to this tournament by playing in it, if anyone wants more money in the prize pool the viewers should make that happen.
Free Agency has been added to the "how to play" section of the thread, any team needing an extra hand should look there. These players have made a commitment to the league and so, don't be afraid to ask about picking one up!
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
Last time I spoke with SneazeL it seemed pretty sure, however I haven't seen him in a while
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
Last time I spoke with SneazeL it seemed pretty sure, however I haven't seen him in a while
Sneazel asked me if we're returning to the team, and sas wants me to play with them. Since I joined sas I am basically going to side with them. Also Nb and sas are no longer together so Nb probably would need flip to play for them as well. Dredredre is indifferent but Gt would be down 2-3 players from last season so maybe Sneazel is looking for more players before confirming (as we did have a few weeks trouble of filling a team)
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
Last time I spoke with SneazeL it seemed pretty sure, however I haven't seen him in a while
Sneazel asked me if we're returning to the team, and sas wants me to play with them. Since I joined sas I am basically going to side with them. Also Nb and sas are no longer together so Nb probably would need flip to play for them as well. Dredredre is indifferent but Gt would be down 2-3 players from last season so maybe Sneazel is looking for more players before confirming (as we did have a few weeks trouble of filling a team)
I actually don't care if you're just that ignorant or if you're trolling. Since this is a thread about an event, I'll respond to this. Gt has already confirmed ---> Notice I added them to the thread?
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
Last time I spoke with SneazeL it seemed pretty sure, however I haven't seen him in a while
Sneazel asked me if we're returning to the team, and sas wants me to play with them. Since I joined sas I am basically going to side with them. Also Nb and sas are no longer together so Nb probably would need flip to play for them as well. Dredredre is indifferent but Gt would be down 2-3 players from last season so maybe Sneazel is looking for more players before confirming (as we did have a few weeks trouble of filling a team)
I actually don't care if you're just that ignorant or if you're trolling. Since this is a thread about an event, I'll respond to this. Gt has already confirmed ---> Notice I added them to the thread?
I think that was uncalled for. KC was just honestly answering a question. no need to be hostile. Great that Gt. will be playing again though. ^_^ Definitely an awesome team.
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
Last time I spoke with SneazeL it seemed pretty sure, however I haven't seen him in a while
Sneazel asked me if we're returning to the team, and sas wants me to play with them. Since I joined sas I am basically going to side with them. Also Nb and sas are no longer together so Nb probably would need flip to play for them as well. Dredredre is indifferent but Gt would be down 2-3 players from last season so maybe Sneazel is looking for more players before confirming (as we did have a few weeks trouble of filling a team)
I actually don't care if you're just that ignorant or if you're trolling. Since this is a thread about an event, I'll respond to this. Gt has already confirmed ---> Notice I added them to the thread?
I think that was uncalled for. KC was just honestly answering a question. no need to be hostile. Great that Gt. will be playing again though. ^_^ Definitely an awesome team.
When someone makes the most ignorant remarks in every possible thread, a slightly hostile response is fine.
On November 02 2011 01:37 mizU wrote: Why are Korean players banned?
Foreign league.
This seemed less than convincing to me. This rule leaves out so many good players (and the entire Specialist Clan) but whatever. Let's see if this GC will be as good as the previous one.
On November 02 2011 01:37 mizU wrote: Why are Korean players banned?
Foreign league.
This seemed less than convincing to me. This rule leaves out so many good players (and the entire Specialist Clan) but whatever. Let's see if this GC will be as good as the previous one.
On November 02 2011 01:37 mizU wrote: Why are Korean players banned?
Foreign league.
This seemed less than convincing to me. This rule leaves out so many good players (and the entire Specialist Clan) but whatever. Let's see if this GC will be as good as the previous one.
Btw is Gt.Hyeon Dayfly?
Less than convincing? -- Might as well handover the money to whatever Korean team decides to sign up.
On October 31 2011 19:55 iG.Zeep wrote: Whoever knew me from back in the day and has a team(that's stable and decent) that needs help with the pay-in and wants to play in this just PM me =P
On October 31 2011 01:30 SouthPark wrote: If Gt. 2 will not be played this season, welcome the opportunity to play for another team invite interested icc: ISL2.SouthPark ^ ^
Wait.. What? Gt isn't going to play?
he said If.. but im wondering about the same thing too. no response from Sneazel yet
Last time I spoke with SneazeL it seemed pretty sure, however I haven't seen him in a while
Sneazel asked me if we're returning to the team, and sas wants me to play with them. Since I joined sas I am basically going to side with them. Also Nb and sas are no longer together so Nb probably would need flip to play for them as well. Dredredre is indifferent but Gt would be down 2-3 players from last season so maybe Sneazel is looking for more players before confirming (as we did have a few weeks trouble of filling a team)
I actually don't care if you're just that ignorant or if you're trolling. Since this is a thread about an event, I'll respond to this. Gt has already confirmed ---> Notice I added them to the thread?
I think that was uncalled for. KC was just honestly answering a question. no need to be hostile. Great that Gt. will be playing again though. ^_^ Definitely an awesome team.
When someone makes the most ignorant remarks in every possible thread, a slightly hostile response is fine.
I replied before you added them, seriously you have been on my nuts for the past month get over yourself.
i can't get it - we have 2 matches on every week or one?
What means week#1 "reps vs AoV" if the schedule is "fridays and sundays"?
i feel like i am stupid
Why AoV have not submitted their roster yet? They can see our list of players, and i cant see their list, they know vs whom to prepare to play and we - dont, thats a bit not fair -_-;
On November 08 2011 16:16 reps)Plumbum wrote: i can't get it - we have 2 matches on every week or one?
What means week#1 "reps vs AoV" if the schedule is "fridays and sundays"?
i feel like i am stupid
Why AoV have not submitted their roster yet? They can see our list of players, and i cant see their list, they know vs whom to prepare to play and we - dont, thats a bit not fair -_-;
Oh shit you're right. I messed up, Friday and Sunday games are now sorted, I'll add the full schedule soon, I apologize for lateness, it's done, but has yet to be written up.
lol, theres no perfect time to play for everyone. friday evening is not good for ppl who play poker, saturday 14 cet is not good for ppl who are doing smth else like me xD
Today was announced as the last day to submit your rosters for the Gambit's Cup. Please do submit your rosters by 20CET. No players submitted afterwards will be able to play in your teams first clan war unless a specific arrangement was made.
On November 10 2011 18:59 Eywa- wrote: Today was announced as the last day to submit your rosters for the Gambit's Cup. Please do submit your rosters by 20CET. No players submitted afterwards will be able to play in your teams first clan war unless a specific arrangement was made.
On November 11 2011 23:55 m0b wrote: Maximum Roster Size: 14 players + 3 Managers 12) Team Rosters must not exceed 15 players + 3 organizers. which one is true ?
That was a mistake due to NW/GC mix up. I thought I had fixed it. Now fixed.
Full Schedule, maps and Playoff Format posted in the OP, please do read over this. Going to be releasing some more Twitch.tv Gambit Cup statements probably at sometime on Monday. Please, leaders keep an eye out for that.
On November 12 2011 18:53 Mazur wrote: a lot of bm in this round...
yes, and it is T_T.
We all should more love each other ;;
btw, in the rules it is said that no bm would be tolerated. Eywa- are you going to make any penalties for bm this week?
I was awfully shocked @ chat in game TTF vs Choosy. Speaking that way does not make BW more colorful. Funny trolling Choosy by calling him Cheesy( like everyone do ) - one is quite another to say "fucking cheeser" and "noob" etc >_<
I still wonder what is going to happen on reps vs AoV CW since there is no roster from AoV oO__..
On November 12 2011 18:53 Mazur wrote: a lot of bm in this round...
yes, and it is T_T.
We all should more love each other ;;
btw, in the rules it is said that no bm would be tolerated. Eywa- are you going to make any penalties for bm this week?
I was awfully shocked @ chat in game TTF vs Choosy. Speaking that way does not make BW more colorful. Funny trolling Choosy by calling him Cheesy( like everyone do ) - one is quite another to say "fucking cheeser" and "noob" etc >_<
I still wonder what is going to happen on reps vs AoV CW since there is no roster from AoV oO__..
I would like you to re-read the rules slightly more carefully, as I said, I will be making an announcement soon, but I have a lot to deal with this weekend which include but not limited to Gambit's Cup, Altitude Nation Wars, English Class reading, Family in town, eat and sleep. So, I'll be writing about that on Monday as noted in the above post I made.
When I can tell you something about AoV and their roster, I will. As for now, I'm just going to have to say - you'll have to wait and see - Until it is announced otherwise, you have a clan war tomorrow which you are expected to attend.
ALSO ALSO:There is rules right ? HTC leave after cw vs lrm and join LRm,. and now i see HTC on the LRM roster.can someone explain me plz ? cuz i want change all my roster seriously i see many things here that i dont like.....
On November 13 2011 00:53 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: ALSO ALSO:There is rules right ? HTC leave after cw vs lrm and join LRm,. and now i see HTC on the LRM roster.can someone explain me plz ? cuz i want change all my roster seriously i see many things here that i dont like.....
Concerning BM The first week of the Twitch.tv Gambit's Cup has gotten off to a great start and everything ran relatively smooth. However, there were issues concerning BM which I had not originally addressed in the rules mostly due to having several ongoing projects/rule sets. Now this is more of a warning message, due to the BM being mostly in game, no player has really committed an offense as such. Though, this calls for a rule change.
Rules concerning BM: - No BM in game whatsoever, do not try to do the "I didn't directly bm my opponent". If your chat has bm underlying it, you will be affected by this rule. - (Chat in game at your own risk) - Mandatory gg - All players must type out with "gg". - No offensive gg - An offensive gg will result in the reversal of the set. 1st offense: 1 week suspension. Further offences: x! weeks of suspension - x = #of offenses.
Rules concerning BM in channel and in the thread have already been addressed by the OP and so are not listed here. All BM offenses are cumulative - After 3 months without an offense, you will restart with a clean slate.
On November 15 2011 03:43 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: yeah the gg rules must be decided by the player not from rules,i remember estro_really not say gg to zero and nothing happen -_-
Mandatory gg seems a bit over the top. People do forget stuff sometimes. However punishing bm and trash talk is fine.
On November 15 2011 09:57 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: and also .in my game vs pike i told him gg..u can ask him
liar! you didn't !
but..
who cares it's simply that someone can forget about posting 'gg' etc.
imo that rule is useless and can get only mess here -.-
are u sure ? i bet my heart that i told u gg.for some reason the rep dont show this.in sayle cast but im sure i say gg wow and i check my autorep.and the rep is not here o---o.but have the game were i show htc icarus map. -.- this is very strange
On November 15 2011 09:57 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: and also .in my game vs pike i told him gg..u can ask him
liar! you didn't !
but..
who cares it's simply that someone can forget about posting 'gg' etc.
imo that rule is useless and can get only mess here -.-
are u sure ? i bet my heart that i told u gg.for some reason the rep dont show this.in sayle cast but im sure i say gg wow and i check my autorep.and the rep is not here o---o.but have the game were i show htc icarus map. -.- this is very strange
there was some kind of problem because after your left it showed disconnect, whatever man, i don't mind about that ;p
I think that schedule must be balanced for everyone, because the situation when every team is asking to put them anywhere is leading to situation where other team is being placed on time and date they do not like. So the best decision in my opinion is making equal friday and sunday playdays for each team.
On November 17 2011 20:06 reps)Plumbum wrote: I think that schedule must be balanced for everyone, because the situation when every team is asking to put them anywhere is leading to situation where other team is being placed on time and date they do not like. So the best decision in my opinion is making equal friday and sunday playdays for each team.
No, the decision is based on who can make it on Friday and who just can't be bothered to make it on Friday or for whom its "inconvenient". Honestly, I don't want sas on Sundays, its one of the worse teams to be there from my perspective, however, they are severely disadvantaged if they played on Fridays. Everyone is complaining about Fridays, when they managed to field a team. Also, I'll look into what you said about balancing the teams who play on Sundays.
I would also like to take this opportunity to discuss Pre-Played Matches. If one of your players has an issue with a given date, you can tell me ahead of time and I'll arrange to have the match PP'd. Now of course, if you want the match to work out, the more time you give me, the better.
Template of what you should have done before you bring your case: Inconvenient Date: Player: Set #: Reason: Availabilities of the player leading up to the CW:
Now, if you give me any less information than that, your request will be entirely disregarded.
Week 2 schedule will remain as is, however, I am going to revise the schedule for week 3 and beyond -> Also May revise a map choice or two based on the new PL maps(However I doubt I'll use all of them).
On November 18 2011 02:29 reps)Plumbum wrote: About maps: i think the best idea is to use new ProLeague maps
Pro7ect is your ace player and he's a Terran --- Feeds nicely into most of the new maps .
I know nothing about new maps balances, i have not even seen them, i just think that new maps - it will really awesome and will make this event a bit closer to korea oo
Hey I didnt find link to official map-pool in the main page. Im curious about NEW HBR map, cuz i know there were many changes in HBR and in iccup is used NEO HBR... so please make map pool to break all doubts
On November 18 2011 06:15 Slavuti4 wrote: Hey I didnt find link to official map-pool in the main page. Im curious about NEW HBR map, cuz i know there were many changes in HBR and in iccup is used NEO HBR... so please make map pool to break all doubts
Hey guys, I'll be updating the results from last week tonight as well as making schedule changes for the remaining weeks leading up to Christmas. I also have something to say concerning last week's problems that were encountered which will be described in the remainder of this post.
Last week, team iFU was displeased with a league ruling which was given to them concerning the third set of their game. Rule #8 was stated to their leadership before their decision was made to re-enter a player following a launcher issue. This resulted in dM- receiving a W.O for set #3. iFU then proceeded into mass BM and left the channel shortly after. Until their position concerning their involvement in the league is made clear, no further disciplinary action will be announced concerning the other offenses committed.
I hope we can continue on with some good manner CWs!
Good Luck to all teams and thanks to all the viewers.
Results are up - Links to stream channels per match = VODs, you can check them there.. and I'll be posting replays as well sometime in the near future :-/ Sorry, haven't put them together yet.
iFU is conserving their spot in the league and so, disciplinary action will be taken against BM offenses from last week's match. As such, iFU.zerggboy, iFU.TTF and iFU.eOnzErG have received a suspension for their next Clan War.
On November 26 2011 05:48 Terrorterran wrote: Why it isn't in the sidebar?
I calendared it too late, no mod had gotten to it I guess. >_> My bad
The format of the All-Star game is probably going to be changed around a bit, standby for changes on that, however it shouldn't immediately affect anyone.
Tie breaker modified due to not making sense in the event of a 3 way tie....
All season schedule and map editing has been done, please note, for the 4 teams who requested Sunday playtime, you weren't able to get all games on Sundays due to other teams requesting Friday + Friday taking priority. sas retained priority for sunday matches being as they were the only team who contacted me about this concern before the start of the season.
New maps will be in use at one time or another, please check schedule for reference.
Btw Sayle in your cast you thought iFU.4yuk was scan, hes actually sc1f.4yuk. Your bw casts are great and very awesome. But I would appreciate you stop accusing my team of harboring a known iccup hacker, and pronounce are team name correctly, its not (IFUUU) its pronounced ( I F U ).
On November 29 2011 04:57 iFU.BMW wrote: Btw Sayle in your cast you thought iFU.4yuk was scan, hes actually sc1f.4yuk. Your bw casts are great and very awesome. But I would appreciate you stop accusing my team of harboring a known iccup hacker, and pronounce are team name correctly, its not (IFUUU) its pronounced ( I F U ).
On November 29 2011 04:57 iFU.BMW wrote: Btw Sayle in your cast you thought iFU.4yuk was scan, hes actually sc1f.4yuk. Your bw casts are great and very awesome. But I would appreciate you stop accusing my team of harboring a known iccup hacker, and pronounce are team name correctly, its not (IFUUU) its pronounced ( I F U ).
On December 01 2011 11:28 Hyeon wrote: If you host awesome/briliant tours, this is what happen eywa, like you know what happened last season. Haha. I hope you expected this and enjoy this
On December 01 2011 11:28 Hyeon wrote: If you host awesome/briliant tours, this is what happen eywa, like you know what happened last season. Haha. I hope you expected this and enjoy this
I compiled each player's stats into Excel. The left side is sorted by win/loss, the right side is also sorted by win/loss but with teams grouped together. Here's the download link: http://www.2shared.com/file/v0Ni73Q-/GC_stats.html
Fun fact: There are only 3 players who have a perfect 3-0 record so far in GC: LRM)Choosy, LRM)Pike, Gt.Teacher. Keep in mind though, that not all players played every week (Sziky for example only played in 2 weeks and is 2-0).
On December 02 2011 23:38 Sayle wrote: I compiled each player's stats into Excel. The left side is sorted by win/loss, the right side is also sorted by win/loss but with teams grouped together. Here's the download link: http://www.2shared.com/file/v0Ni73Q-/GC_stats.html
Fun fact: There are only 3 players who have a perfect 3-0 record so far in GC: LRM)Choosy, LRM)Pike, Gt.Teacher. Keep in mind though, that not all players played every week (Sziky for example only played in 2 weeks and is 2-0).
Lol Sayle you forgot a win for me.. well nvm Nice having this though, thanks for making it.
On December 02 2011 23:38 Sayle wrote: I compiled each player's stats into Excel. The left side is sorted by win/loss, the right side is also sorted by win/loss but with teams grouped together. Here's the download link: http://www.2shared.com/file/v0Ni73Q-/GC_stats.html
Fun fact: There are only 3 players who have a perfect 3-0 record so far in GC: LRM)Choosy, LRM)Pike, Gt.Teacher. Keep in mind though, that not all players played every week (Sziky for example only played in 2 weeks and is 2-0).
hmmm iFU.Must have 3 wins too but looks like the win vs dm dont count
On December 02 2011 23:38 Sayle wrote: I compiled each player's stats into Excel. The left side is sorted by win/loss, the right side is also sorted by win/loss but with teams grouped together. Here's the download link: http://www.2shared.com/file/v0Ni73Q-/GC_stats.html
Fun fact: There are only 3 players who have a perfect 3-0 record so far in GC: LRM)Choosy, LRM)Pike, Gt.Teacher. Keep in mind though, that not all players played every week (Sziky for example only played in 2 weeks and is 2-0).
hmmm iFU.Must have 3 wins too but looks like the win vs dm dont count
There's no score or lineups for you match vs dM so I couldn't add it. Elena, I will fix your score after I add the results from this weekend's matches.
man, don't use stupid microsoft endings that end on x, they are forbidden by law nowadays, so don't use them;P no1 without word 2010 or 2008 or w/e it is can open them>_>'
save as RTS file. Anyway, Can people please update anti-spoilered results in this thread? curious how the games are going down when I can't catch them all T_T
btw. announcement: if any of you good players, lol, want to change team or u arent in any team, and u want to join our team, msg me, because we need few more ppl due to our lack of players
On December 03 2011 22:33 Sneazel wrote: btw. announcement: if any of you good players, lol, want to change team or u arent in any team, and u want to join our team, msg me, because we need few more ppl due to our lack of players
On December 03 2011 22:33 Sneazel wrote: btw. announcement: if any of you good players, lol, want to change team or u arent in any team, and u want to join our team, msg me, because we need few more ppl due to our lack of players
On December 03 2011 22:33 Sneazel wrote: btw. announcement: if any of you good players, lol, want to change team or u arent in any team, and u want to join our team, msg me, because we need few more ppl due to our lack of players
On December 02 2011 23:38 Sayle wrote: I compiled each player's stats into Excel. The left side is sorted by win/loss, the right side is also sorted by win/loss but with teams grouped together. Here's the download link: http://www.2shared.com/file/v0Ni73Q-/GC_stats.html
Fun fact: There are only 3 players who have a perfect 3-0 record so far in GC: LRM)Choosy, LRM)Pike, Gt.Teacher. Keep in mind though, that not all players played every week (Sziky for example only played in 2 weeks and is 2-0).
On December 06 2011 20:39 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: will be nice to make the section of reps. all mixed is not good
I will be re-organizing the thread in the near future. >_> I have lots of things on my to do list. I'll also be replacing the tacky banners over the xmas break, don't have time yet >_>.
On December 10 2011 13:24 Terrorterran wrote: eywa I think I am missing in the list T_T xD
edit: also mazur is 4-1
You didn't Make the list because that's how exel sorted you XD you're tied with fLiP and Teacher I believe. This happened to some players last season as well, if you want to be on the front page, just win another game ;D
Please think about what you say before you do so when speaking in stream chat and please don't whisper the casters while they are doing their work. Anyone who spoils results from their game and/or clan war will receive a ban from the Gambit's Cup of an undefined duration. Best if you don't speak of your clan war whatsoever until its been casted.
Example of a spoiler: You message the caster 2 hours or more into a clan war which originally started as a 0-3 CW that the CW is FUCKING EPIC!
On December 13 2011 23:01 Eywa- wrote: Dear players,
Please think about what you say before you do so when speaking in stream chat and please don't whisper the casters while they are doing their work. Anyone who spoils results from their game and/or clan war will receive a ban from the Gambit's Cup of an undefined duration. Best if you don't speak of your clan war whatsoever until its been casted.
Example of a spoiler: You message the caster 2 hours or more into a clan war which originally started as a 0-3 CW that the CW is FUCKING EPIC!
much ppl doesnt even suppose that they are making such an unwanted spoiler :D just be quiet, dont say anything about CW to the casters and other players
On December 17 2011 01:26 dsaqwe. wrote: hm still no updates from last week ...
To be quite honest, I should have done that last night, though I had forgotten about it because I've hardly had time to even power on my computer all week. So, I'll do it later today during the games for Gambit's Cup played today... I can't do it before then due to preparation for an christmas party. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Since we have all results of gambit, gosucup, nation wars, etc. anyone interested in calculating some foreigner ELO point system? I'm just curious who is close to sziky's level in the foreign scene.
On December 24 2011 12:51 dRaW wrote: Since we have all results of gambit, gosucup, nation wars, etc. anyone interested in calculating some foreigner ELO point system? I'm just curious who is close to sziky's level in the foreign scene.
On December 24 2011 12:51 dRaW wrote: Since we have all results of gambit, gosucup, nation wars, etc. anyone interested in calculating some foreigner ELO point system? I'm just curious who is close to sziky's level in the foreign scene.
On December 24 2011 12:51 dRaW wrote: Since we have all results of gambit, gosucup, nation wars, etc. anyone interested in calculating some foreigner ELO point system? I'm just curious who is close to sziky's level in the foreign scene.
I calculated Sziky and Ace's W% at the end of ISL2, need not say, it wasn't close...
On December 26 2011 22:39 Esc4toN wrote: Well we add almost all games to the ranking we can get
its a lot of hard work! but i think there are a lot of games missing and team updates that need to be made :p
That's also true, but I don't see that leaders of teams are contacting anyone to update anything
And also, there are lots of games that actually doesn't even have results, and lots of leagues and stuff that aren't updated well so we can add them to the base
Let's say here: Everyone who needs something updated about his profile or his team profile, can contact me and we can make it Especially roosters and similar stuff that are for clans...
On January 05 2012 07:55 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: updated man -__-
Everything was updated before I left for the holidays, if you can't look under "Schedule" for one week's worth of schedule then idk what to say. Anyway, that minor update is in, standby for roster updates.
On January 06 2012 04:12 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: where are the reps --__--
They're in my e-mail folder ;d.
looks like have a nice talk with u is mission imposible. not vods and not replays of the last weeks. gl hf( also who care if the reps are in ur email.we need the reps here
On January 06 2012 04:12 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: where are the reps --__--
They're in my e-mail folder ;d.
looks like have a nice talk with u is mission imposible. not vods and not replays of the last weeks. gl hf( also who care if the reps are in ur email.we need the reps here
I see one person being rude here, and it isn't Eywa
On January 06 2012 04:12 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: where are the reps --__--
They're in my e-mail folder ;d.
looks like have a nice talk with u is mission imposible. not vods and not replays of the last weeks. gl hf( also who care if the reps are in ur email.we need the reps here
I won't put any more effort into a reasonable response than you put into a making a reasonable and nicely formulated request.
"NO REPS!?" Does not count as a reasonable manner of speaking afaik.
On January 05 2012 07:55 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: updated man -__-
Everything was updated before I left for the holidays, if you can't look under "Schedule" for one week's worth of schedule then idk what to say. Anyway, that minor update is in, standby for roster updates.
[QUOTE]On January 07 2012 06:33 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: [QUOTE]On January 07 2012 06:21 Eywa- wrote: [QUOTE]On January 07 2012 05:20 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: EPIC punish plz ![/QUOTE] I had told Sayle to spoil the results even before Michael posted that... So punish something that isn't actually a spoiler? ;d Seems lame.[/QUOTE] nvm those rules only work vs ifu. the rest is ok
On January 07 2012 10:53 Hyeon wrote: so fish server was down 30mins before Gambit cup starts, and no updates for 40mins?
Can anyone please tell me what exacltly happened?
One of the leaders of your team was well aware about what was going on so please don't attempt to make a scene because your team ran out of players. All team leaders were made aware of arrangements, there was no need for a public announcement since it didn't affect streams or what not.
Please, get better communication between leaders/players.
On January 07 2012 10:53 Hyeon wrote: so fish server was down 30mins before Gambit cup starts, and no updates for 40mins?
Can anyone please tell me what exacltly happened?
One of the leaders of your team was well aware about what was going on so please don't attempt to make a scene because your team ran out of players. All team leaders were made aware of arrangements, there was no need for a public announcement since it didn't affect streams or what not.
Please, get better communication between leaders/players.
Okay, i just wanted to know what happened. I don't want to "attempt to make a scene" (guess who did? haha)
Nb.dOtY has been suspended for 3 weeks for two separate BM offenses which occurred on Friday during the CW of LRM vs Nb. dOtY was warned after the first suspension and he persisted, so a second offense was attributed. A third offense from this palyer will result in a 6 week suspension.
On January 09 2012 04:25 Eywa- wrote: I'll try to update all the results tonight.
Disciplinary announcement
Nb.dOtY has been suspended for 3 weeks for two separate BM offenses which occurred on Friday during the CW of LRM vs Nb. dOtY was warned after the first suspension and he persisted, so a second offense was attributed. A third offense from this palyer will result in a 6 week suspension.
Um i wont argue here, no sense anyway. But what were the three offenses i did ? I bm'ed Game once. alright sadly i didnt SS he bm'ing me. I bm'ed you once, alright.
On January 09 2012 05:36 Nb.h00ligan wrote: Eywa- i have question : Game tell u ban him for 3 weeks ? Cuz u say on channel doty is banned for NEXT CW only
He bm'd in game after I said that in channel. hence, 1 offense = 1 week, 2nd offense = +2 weeks. Also, @dOtY the 3rd offense was a warning, you don't have 3 yet, but 3rd offense is 6 weeks.
first u was bm cuz we wait u 7 ++ min to talk with game , then u say go or in 2 min u give to lrm w.o i tell u on channel , take care before u loosing control like icc admins few month ago hf
those rules make me crazy. but at the end is not the most important of the life. he is the only admin of the league. he called the channel for gambit, op eywa- so )) .
On January 09 2012 06:20 Nb.h00ligan wrote: first u was bm cuz we wait u 7 ++ min to talk with game , then u say go or in 2 min u give to lrm w.o i tell u on channel , take care before u loosing control like icc admins few month ago hf
No, what you are referring to came after the first bm offense when Game sent me the ss and asked what the call was, I came to TL to double check rules, made the decision and delivered it. I gave you the decision, dOtY refused to enter game, so I set W.O timer. Also, this procedure ensures I don't lose control because if you go nuts you gtfo and it ends there. I just reminded all teams I have spoken with so far about the BM rules so that they don't go out of line.
Player drafting for the Gambit's Cup All-Star game will be done over the next couple weeks. Only the top 4 teams will be eligible for positions in the event.
Standings Updated.
W.Os granted for two remaining teams to play AoV in round 1 due to lack of appearances, if anyone from AoV wants to pick this up in round two please send me a message within next 3 weeks.
On January 11 2012 00:38 Eywa- wrote: Player drafting for the Gambit's Cup All-Star game will be done over the next couple weeks. Only the top 4 teams will be eligible for positions in the event.
What does player drafting mean? Who picks the players for the all-star tournament?
Also, how did LRM become 7-1 in the standings? They were 6-0 last week and lost to Nb so shouldn't it be 6-1 for them?
Edit: Oh I see, you gave wins to LRM and Gt for their 'future' matches against AoV. That's pretty misleading IMO. You should just wait until the actual week of those matches before adding the scores in. Right now, LRM and Nb should be tied 6-1 in the top spot.
On January 11 2012 00:38 Eywa- wrote: Player drafting for the Gambit's Cup All-Star game will be done over the next couple weeks. Only the top 4 teams will be eligible for positions in the event.
What does player drafting mean? Who picks the players for the all-star tournament?
Also, how did LRM become 7-1 in the standings? They were 6-0 last week and lost to Nb so shouldn't it be 6-1 for them?
Edit: Oh I see, you gave wins to LRM and Gt for their 'future' matches against AoV. That's pretty misleading IMO. You should just wait until the actual week of those matches before adding the scores in. Right now, LRM and Nb should be tied 6-1 in the top spot.
Heh, it's not really miss leading... It's the reality of the situation. They have the win. To not put it would make teams think they can pass them when in reality they can't. That's more miss leading imo. Like in sports, if someone has more wins than another team with more games played, they don't wait till even #of games to add them. Of course I see that this situation is a little different, the point of it is I don't want teams to show up every week for a team that's not playing.
Either way teams have to read on the situation, this way they'll just realize they have to read on the situation.
Also, as for All-Star game, I pick players based on performance from top 4 teams. Teams in 1st/2nd get more seeds than 3rd/4th.
On January 12 2012 17:21 reps)Plumbum wrote: Giving any team future win over other team, if they have not played - it is very bad, its disrespect to these teams and to whole event.
It is because AoV isn't showing up for Gambit Cup anymore. Since they ain't playing anymore, Eywa- might as well put in the win already so that those 2 teams don't have to show up for nothing, I don't really see the problem with that.
and they get the extra point ?. also i think this is not fair. this guy mad[aov] play two times vs us. one in aov. and oher in gt. is not a problem for us cuz we win ez but i dont think this change team is good -_-
On January 13 2012 17:22 Mazur wrote: That kind of thing shouldnt happen. Never a plaayer that has interest in an event should be a referee
Huh, foreign BW isn't some large enterprise, how can you expect that I could get someone who would be willing to ref AND has no previous involvement in any way, shape, or form with foreign BW teams?
By that logic not one person in this community should be able to ref.
i am voting for GC#3 at better time for russian federation, cause this time is very very bad for russian teams. or at least winners league style round can be started in a hour or 2 earlier?
Hi eywa-, please remove ass, nbs, krip, hightoss,dominate,musa and darling. And please add MarinE(Poland Terran), JohnStew(Random Norway), 1ukMoon(Canada Terran) and Bizzy(Canada Terran). Thanks.
Closing in on the end of the first round, a total of 7 different teams have a player which performs at GC top 10 standards!
Thread fully updated!
Minor Modification: See rules concerning roster changes. You MUST send your players with country and race in the format that follows (Name/Country/Race).
If any of your players currently aren't flagged, you must do this for them. If they are not flagged by the end of the week I'll send you a warning and if they remain without a flag after that, they will be removed till you re-add them with proper format.
On January 16 2012 11:10 Eywa- wrote: Closing in on the end of the first round, a total of 7 different teams have a player which performs at GC top 10 standards!
Thread fully updated!
Minor Modification: See rules concerning roster changes. You MUST send your players with country and race in the format that follows (Name/Country/Race).
If any of your players currently aren't flagged, you must do this for them. If they are not flagged by the end of the week I'll send you a warning and if they remain without a flag after that, they will be removed till you re-add them with proper format.
Eywa you can remove me from Nb. players list for this tour, dont wanna play on a tournament, where people who you dislike dont get into Allstar league. You said i was banned for 3 weeks, from clanleague. Now you say i'm also banned from that tour. For doing One single bm to both you and game. And not even bad ones.
I would say some nice words to you right now, but i dont wanna get Nb. in trouble so, good luck on your tour please remove my name from it. Thanks!
I don't think anybody wants to stop Eywa- from hosting tournaments, but if he wants to do so on TeamLiquid he has to follow the rules which apply here. And it seems that the admins think that he broke those, so it is only logical that there is a consequence to that. Relax, it's only for a week.
On January 23 2012 19:52 UED_Ace.SL wrote: still only few ppl make tournaments... Get some sponsor then, and add some icccl prizepool.
Oh, you mean how iCCupCL originally was? Silly Ace.
On January 23 2012 22:12 Mango wrote: I don't think anybody wants to stop Eywa- from hosting tournaments, but if he wants to do so on TeamLiquid he has to follow the rules which apply here. And it seems that the admins think that he broke those, so it is only logical that there is a consequence to that. Relax, it's only for a week.
+1 It's not a big deal, he'll just have to update this thread in a few days now
Thanks to everyone who didn't panic during my absence, it's currently 5:20 am and so, I'll be putting off updating the thread till tomorrow. Thank you for your understanding.
On January 26 2012 19:18 Eywa- wrote: Thanks to everyone who didn't panic during my absence, it's currently 5:20 am and so, I'll be putting off updating the thread till tomorrow. Thank you for your understanding.
On January 26 2012 19:18 Eywa- wrote: Thanks to everyone who didn't panic during my absence, it's currently 5:20 am and so, I'll be putting off updating the thread till tomorrow. Thank you for your understanding.
sas.Vorti + iwL-Fenito both are suspended from Week 13 of Gambit's Cup due to the lack of a gg.
Nb.dOtY has left the Twitch.TV Gambit's Cup due to his view that the punishment he was accorded was too severe. dOtY will not be able to re-enter the Gambit's Cup till next season due to the fact that it just creates too much trouble if people always leave and join just because they got upset over a disciplinary ruling.
BM of league officials will no longer be tolerated as it just creates more work and drama, nothing that we need within the community. So, to go along with this I offer all of you "The Gamble", slightly modified from the work of French philosopher Pascal.
Option A) You can believe what Eywa- says and Eywa- is telling the truth. Result A) Fantastic
Option B) You can believe what Eywa- says and Eywa- is lying. Result B) Unfortunate, but no real trouble for you in most cases.
Option C) You can not believe what Eywa- says and Eywa- is telling the truth. Result C) You look like an ass, +you risk getting an infraction.
Option D) You can not believe what Eywa- says and Eywa- is lying Result D) Great, you get to tell everyone I told you so... Oh wait, what does that gain you?
Please note, believing in something doesn't mean you can't investigate, but please do so discretely until you actually yield results.
On January 28 2012 00:57 reps)Plumbum wrote: i am unbanned ;; gL to all teams in round 2 of GC looks like there will be hard battle for 5th and 6th places overall rating : O
Well being as you both should do well in round 2, probably wont be 5th/6th..
"Nb.dOtY has left the Twitch.TV Gambit's Cup due to his view that the punishment he was accorded was too severe. dOtY will not be able to re-enter the Gambit's Cup till next season due to the fact that it just creates too much trouble if people always leave and join just because they got upset over a disciplinary ruling."
That's not true. I left cause you CHANGED the punishment later on.
Please dont make it sound like it was my mistake, thanks EyWa.
Lol Eywa u have no right to say that doty cant re join. That was not in the rules when we started gambit so if u make new rules u have no right to use then against a player that was banned before. If we want we can re add him and thats up to us (doty) NOT YOU
On January 29 2012 04:45 Mazur wrote: Lol Eywa u have no right to say that doty cant re join. That was not in the rules when we started gambit so if u make new rules u have no right to use then against a player that was banned before. If we want we can re add him and thats up to us (doty) NOT YOU
I'm sorry, he has 2 offenses against him + rage quit/bm of the league. I can do whatever I want with him as far as it concerns the league. You on the other hand have no business getting involved in this as clearly stated in the rules.
1) Rules Concerning Decisions and Over-Rulings - All teams and players are subject to administrative Discretion. - Eywa- reserves full discretion over all decisions and procedures.
7) Rules Concerning Team Leaders - If a team leader cannot make it to a clan war or is to have a delayed arrival, they must inform the commissioner which player is to make the draw. - If a team leader is suspended, they cannot take place in the channel of the Clan War. - Team leaders are responsible to communicate with their players. - League officials reserve the right to communicate directly with players from the team if the task proves easier. If the team leader attempts to interfere with this alternate communication route, they will be subject to suspension. - Only team leaders may communicate with the league commissioner over concerns about the league unless otherwise indicated.
On January 28 2012 20:36 dOTY wrote: "Nb.dOtY has left the Twitch.TV Gambit's Cup due to his view that the punishment he was accorded was too severe. dOtY will not be able to re-enter the Gambit's Cup till next season due to the fact that it just creates too much trouble if people always leave and join just because they got upset over a disciplinary ruling."
That's not true. I left cause you CHANGED the punishment later on.
Please dont make it sound like it was my mistake, thanks EyWa.
This doesn't really deserve much attention, but it's quite clear that you knew what you were doing especially given that you were told after your first offense that any other offense would be worse, you went into game and did it again. Of course at the time you didn't care because you planned to quit after the first offense then later you're like... Oh wait, I guess one week wouldn't have been so bad because I still want to play... Maybe I should pretend that I was innocent/didn't know what was coming or threaten to quit BW? Yeah... Tragic story, I don't buy any of it, you brought it upon yourself, the ruling was never changed, it was just added onto when you committed your second offense.
You're welcome to come back next season if you so choose, but I'm not going to take any more of your bs this season.
zzzzz.i really not want help u guys.but we have the same enemy so... The best option is follow rules.and not talk much with the owner of this league.cuz we all know who he is -__-.
On January 28 2012 20:36 dOTY wrote: "Nb.dOtY has left the Twitch.TV Gambit's Cup due to his view that the punishment he was accorded was too severe. dOtY will not be able to re-enter the Gambit's Cup till next season due to the fact that it just creates too much trouble if people always leave and join just because they got upset over a disciplinary ruling."
That's not true. I left cause you CHANGED the punishment later on.
Please dont make it sound like it was my mistake, thanks EyWa.
This doesn't really deserve much attention, but it's quite clear that you knew what you were doing especially given that you were told after your first offense that any other offense would be worse, you went into game and did it again. Of course at the time you didn't care because you planned to quit after the first offense then later you're like... Oh wait, I guess one week wouldn't have been so bad because I still want to play... Maybe I should pretend that I was innocent/didn't know what was coming or threaten to quit BW? Yeah... Tragic story, I don't buy any of it, you brought it upon yourself, the ruling was never changed, it was just added onto when you committed your second offense.
You're welcome to come back next season if you so choose, but I'm not going to take any more of your bs this season.
I was talking about me not beeing able to play the allstars tour, and you know i was refering to that. Not the 3 weeks i dont give a shit, my team did fine without me the 3 weeks so i never did mind, nor do i know. I accepted the 3 weeks, but not you not letting me play the tour, just because you dont like me. I never have acted like i was innocent, i bm'ed game and i dont regret it 1% . Its just you changing things as you like, so it works out for you, and against the people you dislike. Well have fun with your ego tour, as previously said, just dont talk shit about the reasons why i left it.
P.S. I didnt quit BW, just your stupid tourney, dont feel like you can make me quit this game honey :D.
Guys, it's only season 2 so there must be un-admitable rules. As ICCup admin i know it's hard to make rules or make decisions. My advice is you guys just drop it(like what eywa said). Eywa's trying to do something awesome for bw community.
Sorry to tell you this, but you guys should admit admins' decisions. The most important thing is you lose chances to play vs High rankers. Frankly it's hard to find players on iCCup not because of timezone. Users not familiar with korean are usually play on iCCup.
Sorry eywa, if you feel i'm trolling here(i'm a bit drunken).
As i already said a thousand times, it is about him changing rules, just so he can piss off people he dislikes. I accept any, already existing rules, and punishments obviously, i "kinda" deserved the 3 weeks (Game deserved punishment too, sadly i forgot we are still on fourth grade where we screenshot someone saying asshole to each other - after our history). Nothing more though and he knows it. It's just game obviously told him to do so... as always. I can only imagine EYwA sitting at home: " God this doty dude been so disrespectful, i mean i am EYwA i am the boss of this, what i say is word!!! I am important in this, i gonna get my revenge, just gonna ban him longer then originally said lololololo me so evil Broodwar Admin"
But good god, if he needs it, he needs it. I honestly do not mind. Just wont be part of it anymore.
By the way guys, my computer is somewhat unstable at the moment, my power source doesn't consistently work and so... I really am having a hard time with all of this, especially replays(which nation wars replays were promised up until my computer went on the fritz)... So... I'm going to only be able to get on whenever it decides to boot up... ._.
I apologize an advance for any potentially slow updates(not likely though because I'll just write it up then c/p).
Hey, I'd like to add that replays sent through sendspace.com will no longer be accepted, use either 2shared or e-mail attachments.
No one from AoV has contacted me about the team, so they will still be getting W.O'd without a required showing from the opposition.
iFU.AlfiO would have played in the All-Star weekend had he not otherwise been banned, so his ban takes over week 12 rather than 13.
I won't have access to my computer today, currently due to location, so, I will still moderate things from teamliquid to the best of my capabilities, though I don't see how anything will go too drasically wrong today (Winner's style, only one team ever has to present their player at a time). If there is an issue with the clan war, shoot my a PM with screen shot and short explanation, I'll get back to you within 5 minutes. Also, please no spoiler of the game result inside the replay's name... They will be directly forwarded to Sayle.
On February 04 2012 01:53 Sayle wrote: Eywa you put the wrong time on the calendar. The cast is supposed to start at 21 CET but the calendar says 20 CET :/
Yeah... ;-/ just noticed, though it was 21CET ._. I need to double check everything especially with this pad, I don't have a mouse..
GC Top 10 recalculated entirely (incase I made some mistakes originally on stats)... Each BoX from the All-Star counted for 1 game, so series win = +1 win, Series loss = +1 loss.
On February 05 2012 00:52 Choosy wrote: maybe its time, for change SCBW for SC2 Without Sayle will be so bad
Does it? Sayle is just a caster, he doesn't hold/organize all the tournaments we've been getting since a year now. Tourneys and challenge will still be there, and it's not like he's the only caster in the foreign scene.
I'm pleased to announce that we have a new caster for TGC Fridays, the casts will begin at 2130CET and all the action will be brought to you by none other than L_Master!
dM, your team has a lot of players without flags, any player without a flag will be removed at the end of next week (Sunday). Please send me flags/races please.
Hm too bad LRM WOd dM look @ 2 gambit cup series in a row all won by protoss. iwL/gt at least has some zerg winners but unfortunately that ended in WOs too T_T. I wanted to see michael pwn some, but I guess he was too busy in the Random Invitational.
On February 05 2012 07:41 Eywa- wrote: I'm pleased to announce that we have a new caster for TGC Fridays, the casts will begin at 2130CET and all the action will be brought to you by none other than L_Master!
dM, your team has a lot of players without flags, any player without a flag will be removed at the end of next week (Sunday). Please send me flags/races please.
Awesome :D it's good to see new casters, Sayle needs to rest.
On February 06 2012 10:55 Sum41 wrote: i want to see more gosucup, this winners league format is really entertaining, when someone all kills or reverse all kill, it is exciting :D
I really like winners league too ;d but its Gambit's Cup!!
On February 06 2012 09:23 dRaW wrote: Hm too bad LRM WOd dM look @ 2 gambit cup series in a row all won by protoss. iwL/gt at least has some zerg winners but unfortunately that ended in WOs too T_T. I wanted to see michael pwn some, but I guess he was too busy in the Random Invitational.
I don't understand how LRM + dM has to do with protoss kills, Bakuryu + Choosy + CaStrO wanted to allkill dM o,o
On February 06 2012 10:55 Sum41 wrote: i want to see more gosucup, this winners league format is really entertaining, when someone all kills or reverse all kill, it is exciting :D
I really like winners league too ;d but its Gambit's Cup!!
Barring GosuGamers naming their league GosuCup, Gambit's Cup is technically a "gosu cup."
On February 06 2012 09:23 dRaW wrote: Hm too bad LRM WOd dM look @ 2 gambit cup series in a row all won by protoss. iwL/gt at least has some zerg winners but unfortunately that ended in WOs too T_T. I wanted to see michael pwn some, but I guess he was too busy in the Random Invitational.
I don't understand how LRM + dM has to do with protoss kills, Bakuryu + Choosy + CaStrO wanted to allkill dM o,o
On February 06 2012 10:55 Sum41 wrote: i want to see more gosucup, this winners league format is really entertaining, when someone all kills or reverse all kill, it is exciting :D
I really like winners league too ;d but its Gambit's Cup!!
Barring GosuGamers naming their league GosuCup, Gambit's Cup is technically a "gosu cup."
I mean that LRM got like no protoss, so we're gonna see games without protoss winning at least. Maybe some nice Pike vs Cryoc rematch.
On February 06 2012 09:23 dRaW wrote: Hm too bad LRM WOd dM look @ 2 gambit cup series in a row all won by protoss. iwL/gt at least has some zerg winners but unfortunately that ended in WOs too T_T. I wanted to see michael pwn some, but I guess he was too busy in the Random Invitational.
I don't understand how LRM + dM has to do with protoss kills, Bakuryu + Choosy + CaStrO wanted to allkill dM o,o
On February 06 2012 11:40 Eywa- wrote:
On February 06 2012 10:55 Sum41 wrote: i want to see more gosucup, this winners league format is really entertaining, when someone all kills or reverse all kill, it is exciting :D
I really like winners league too ;d but its Gambit's Cup!!
Barring GosuGamers naming their league GosuCup, Gambit's Cup is technically a "gosu cup."
I mean that LRM got like no protoss, so we're gonna see games without protoss winning at least. Maybe some nice Pike vs Cryoc rematch.
On February 06 2012 09:23 dRaW wrote: Hm too bad LRM WOd dM look @ 2 gambit cup series in a row all won by protoss. iwL/gt at least has some zerg winners but unfortunately that ended in WOs too T_T. I wanted to see michael pwn some, but I guess he was too busy in the Random Invitational.
I don't understand how LRM + dM has to do with protoss kills, Bakuryu + Choosy + CaStrO wanted to allkill dM o,o
On February 06 2012 10:55 Sum41 wrote: i want to see more gosucup, this winners league format is really entertaining, when someone all kills or reverse all kill, it is exciting :D
I really like winners league too ;d but its Gambit's Cup!!
Barring GosuGamers naming their league GosuCup, Gambit's Cup is technically a "gosu cup."
=O fuck i'm a so fail human being ! xD Gambit Cup :D
On February 07 2012 03:31 Tarmak_mk wrote: dsaqwe do i told him about ur dt drop? why u want to be fun when u said u was inactive too, u all inactive 2 hours:S
Hmm, I was inactive 1month but I was playing a lot this week so it's not that bad only my macro sucked. I played well and was lucky in some situations, I don't think anyone was saying you told him about dt drop we were just joking about it we know you are manner.
On February 07 2012 05:32 gutshot wrote: Nononono guys. Alfio is clearly the best player at the moment maybe in the history. Please get some respect for him.
On February 07 2012 11:21 dRaW wrote: Is it too late to add players to roster for wL season?
- Each team will reserve the right for only 2 roster changes between March 1st and 31st. - Each team will reserve the right for only 1 roster change post-March. This roster change cannot be used during the playoffs
On February 07 2012 11:21 dRaW wrote: Is it too late to add players to roster for wL season?
- Each team will reserve the right for only 2 roster changes between March 1st and 31st. - Each team will reserve the right for only 1 roster change post-March. This roster change cannot be used during the playoffs
Yeah it doesn't mention pre March, so I guess it's unlimited until then. Thanks.
On February 07 2012 11:21 dRaW wrote: Is it too late to add players to roster for wL season?
- Each team will reserve the right for only 2 roster changes between March 1st and 31st. - Each team will reserve the right for only 1 roster change post-March. This roster change cannot be used during the playoffs
Yeah it doesn't mention pre March, so I guess it's unlimited until then. Thanks.
[2012-02-06 오전 12:12:21] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hi [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: Hi Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: this is Gt.Hyeon [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: aka iccup.dayfly [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: reason why i try to contact you is tonight, 4hrs later there's gambit cup iWL vs Gt Also, there's UED random tournament in 3hrs. on that tour, 4 Gt players are invited and gag's invited too. I don't think Gt can play tonight. can we postpone the match? [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: I already tried to contact slavuti4 [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but seems he's afk [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): Slavuti4 will be online about after 2 hours. Maybe ok, i think, we can pp our CW today on next day. [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): But wait, i answer iwl-players [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: tell me when you finish answering [2012-02-06 오전 12:32:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: o_o [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg you there? [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: we have one player who can play on tonight's gambit cup [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: he said he's going to all-kill (rofl) [2012-02-06 오전 12:44:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: no offense. [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: Also, whole Gt players are not able to pass round 1. So, if that guy lose there would be back-ups [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we agree on pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:24] Hyeon Gook Cho: To summerize it, LET's PLAY TONIGHT'S GAMBIT CUP [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we can play on next week [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but we solve when some later [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:44] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hm) [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we should play :3 [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: you know, on weekdays [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: there won't be many players [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:09] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): i think, we can only [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:31] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): maybe on wednesday [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm. [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:38] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we just play it? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: only gag is invited to random tour [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:50] Hyeon Gook Cho: right? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:55] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): yes [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but u wanna pp today ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:14] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah, that's what i thought [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: but that one guy [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: told me that he can all-kill -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: dunno if he really can [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i should respect him [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: so.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we can play o,o [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:03] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): it's bo1 ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:11] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): he can lose from all-in [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: totally.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: can you give me 3mins? [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:35] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should talk to him again -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we play on weekends? [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: like Saturday [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): why not? maybe we can [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: but [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: i don't know if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: maybe eywa's going to. [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: So if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: Why don't we play on 11th Feb, 2012? [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:46] Hyeon Gook Cho: on 2000 CET? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:23] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): can we answer about date and time maybe tomorow? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: so you agree the PP? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): YES [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:40] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:45] Hyeon Gook Cho: SWEET! [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): u can say to Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:56] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): about pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: nope [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:19] Hyeon Gook Cho: i was banned for two days [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: i can't send pm [2012-02-06 오전 1:03:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: you sent pm? [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok, but later [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: mkay. [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should go to bed [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: it's 1am here :3 [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): good night [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks! [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: c ya!
I'm not blaming Kiborg, but i also should have contacted you with skype or w/e. My fault too.
[2012-02-06 오전 2:58:11] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: hello slav [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: you there? [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:22] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: hi [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Slava slavuti4: i just went bed [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: oh, sorry [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:35] Slava slavuti4: [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:37] Slava slavuti4: about cw [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:40] Slava slavuti4: Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i have to talk this now [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:42] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: we were supposed to postpone the game [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:01] Slava slavuti4: yea [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: weren't we? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: but why did they play it? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa didnt allow us to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:36] Slava slavuti4: Eywa asked me at 19:30 cet why we not in chanel [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:44] Slava slavuti4: i told him about pp [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:55] Slava slavuti4: but he said nobody told him [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:00] Slava slavuti4: and teams cant do such things [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: :O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:06] Slava slavuti4: so he forced us to play [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:10] Slava slavuti4: he brought Sneazel [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:16] Slava slavuti4: and he played with Trutacz [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: you mean teams cant decide to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:21] Slava slavuti4: not my faul [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:25] Hyeon Gook Cho: even if there's agreement? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:27] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:30] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:35] Slava slavuti4: Eywa is a boss [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: no way. [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Slava slavuti4: so [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: kiborg told me that he's going to pm to eyea [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa but seems he didnt [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:02] Slava slavuti4: eywa was offline [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:04] Slava slavuti4: all day [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Slava slavuti4: i wanted either [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Hyeon Gook Cho: tl.net pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: anyway i should have sent pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:20] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: not your team's fault [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: im not pushing you [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:35] Slava slavuti4: i just came in 1 hour before cw [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Slava slavuti4: and KIBORG said itis ooed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Hyeon Gook Cho: but reason why im pissed is [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:45] Slava slavuti4: pped [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:54] Slava slavuti4: so i relaxed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: rule says if there's agreement [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:07] Hyeon Gook Cho: we can postpone [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: dunno [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: So, what i'm asking to you is [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:23] Slava slavuti4: ye [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: if eywa allows, can we re-match? [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:46] Slava slavuti4: sure [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:51] Slava slavuti4: but score 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:52] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay, thanks. [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Slava slavuti4: kk [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: start from 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:05] Slava slavuti4: np [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: i mean iwl2 gt1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:09] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:20] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks i'll contact eywa then. [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:24] Slava slavuti4: cu [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:27] Slava slavuti4: gn [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:30] Hyeon Gook Cho: bye!
According to the PP rules,
5) Rules Concerning PP matches - There will be no PP matches unless scheduled a minimum of 24 hours beforehand with Eywa-. - The league commissioner reserves the right to allow and/or deny any PP match applications. - Late applications for a PP match will be handled only if the opposition agrees.
We(kiborg/hyeon) made agreement 3hrs before CW starts, so it still is activated. Also we agreed to play from 2(iWL) - 1(Gt) on this.
On February 07 2012 21:31 Hyeon wrote: Also, i've been banned from TL.net so i couldn't post here. Here's the full convo log between iWL-Kiborg(iWL trusted member) and Gt.Hyeon(me)
[2012-02-06 오전 12:12:21] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hi [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: Hi Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: this is Gt.Hyeon [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: aka iccup.dayfly [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: reason why i try to contact you is tonight, 4hrs later there's gambit cup iWL vs Gt Also, there's UED random tournament in 3hrs. on that tour, 4 Gt players are invited and gag's invited too. I don't think Gt can play tonight. can we postpone the match? [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: I already tried to contact slavuti4 [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but seems he's afk [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): Slavuti4 will be online about after 2 hours. Maybe ok, i think, we can pp our CW today on next day. [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): But wait, i answer iwl-players [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: tell me when you finish answering [2012-02-06 오전 12:32:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: o_o [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg you there? [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: we have one player who can play on tonight's gambit cup [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: he said he's going to all-kill (rofl) [2012-02-06 오전 12:44:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: no offense. [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: Also, whole Gt players are not able to pass round 1. So, if that guy lose there would be back-ups [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we agree on pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:24] Hyeon Gook Cho: To summerize it, LET's PLAY TONIGHT'S GAMBIT CUP [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we can play on next week [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but we solve when some later [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:44] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hm) [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we should play :3 [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: you know, on weekdays [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: there won't be many players [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:09] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): i think, we can only [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:31] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): maybe on wednesday [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm. [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:38] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we just play it? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: only gag is invited to random tour [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:50] Hyeon Gook Cho: right? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:55] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): yes [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but u wanna pp today ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:14] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah, that's what i thought [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: but that one guy [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: told me that he can all-kill -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: dunno if he really can [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i should respect him [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: so.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we can play o,o [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:03] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): it's bo1 ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:11] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): he can lose from all-in [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: totally.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: can you give me 3mins? [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:35] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should talk to him again -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we play on weekends? [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: like Saturday [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): why not? maybe we can [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: but [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: i don't know if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: maybe eywa's going to. [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: So if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: Why don't we play on 11th Feb, 2012? [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:46] Hyeon Gook Cho: on 2000 CET? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:23] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): can we answer about date and time maybe tomorow? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: so you agree the PP? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): YES [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:40] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:45] Hyeon Gook Cho: SWEET! [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): u can say to Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:56] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): about pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: nope [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:19] Hyeon Gook Cho: i was banned for two days [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: i can't send pm [2012-02-06 오전 1:03:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: you sent pm? [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok, but later [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: mkay. [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should go to bed [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: it's 1am here :3 [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): good night [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks! [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: c ya!
I'm not blaming Kiborg, but i also should have contacted you with skype or w/e. My fault too.
[2012-02-06 오전 2:58:11] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: hello slav [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: you there? [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:22] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: hi [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Slava slavuti4: i just went bed [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: oh, sorry [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:35] Slava slavuti4: [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:37] Slava slavuti4: about cw [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:40] Slava slavuti4: Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i have to talk this now [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:42] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: we were supposed to postpone the game [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:01] Slava slavuti4: yea [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: weren't we? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: but why did they play it? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa didnt allow us to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:36] Slava slavuti4: Eywa asked me at 19:30 cet why we not in chanel [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:44] Slava slavuti4: i told him about pp [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:55] Slava slavuti4: but he said nobody told him [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:00] Slava slavuti4: and teams cant do such things [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: :O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:06] Slava slavuti4: so he forced us to play [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:10] Slava slavuti4: he brought Sneazel [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:16] Slava slavuti4: and he played with Trutacz [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: you mean teams cant decide to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:21] Slava slavuti4: not my faul [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:25] Hyeon Gook Cho: even if there's agreement? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:27] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:30] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:35] Slava slavuti4: Eywa is a boss [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: no way. [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Slava slavuti4: so [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: kiborg told me that he's going to pm to eyea [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa but seems he didnt [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:02] Slava slavuti4: eywa was offline [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:04] Slava slavuti4: all day [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Slava slavuti4: i wanted either [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Hyeon Gook Cho: tl.net pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: anyway i should have sent pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:20] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: not your team's fault [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: im not pushing you [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:35] Slava slavuti4: i just came in 1 hour before cw [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Slava slavuti4: and KIBORG said itis ooed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Hyeon Gook Cho: but reason why im pissed is [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:45] Slava slavuti4: pped [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:54] Slava slavuti4: so i relaxed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: rule says if there's agreement [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:07] Hyeon Gook Cho: we can postpone [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: dunno [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: So, what i'm asking to you is [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:23] Slava slavuti4: ye [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: if eywa allows, can we re-match? [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:46] Slava slavuti4: sure [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:51] Slava slavuti4: but score 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:52] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay, thanks. [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Slava slavuti4: kk [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: start from 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:05] Slava slavuti4: np [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: i mean iwl2 gt1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:09] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:20] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks i'll contact eywa then. [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:24] Slava slavuti4: cu [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:27] Slava slavuti4: gn [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:30] Hyeon Gook Cho: bye!
According to the PP rules,
5) Rules Concerning PP matches - There will be no PP matches unless scheduled a minimum of 24 hours beforehand with Eywa-. - The league commissioner reserves the right to allow and/or deny any PP match applications. - Late applications for a PP match will be handled only if the opposition agrees.
We(kiborg/hyeon) made agreement 3hrs before CW starts, so it still is activated. Also we agreed to play from 2(iWL) - 1(Gt) on this.
Can we continue playing on this SAT 2000CET?
EDIT : mobile error :<
Did you ignore the rule just above the one you put in bold? I have never allowed the relocation of an entire clan war so no, Gt loses 4-1. The fact that you didn't even run it by me means you knew you were doing something incorrect but you expect that "oh if I don't tell Eywa- he'll be forced to apply it."
no problem dsaqwe/draw just dont continue this bm....we all not want to do that im pretty sure. btw we prepared for match vs zerg not even played a games zvp pvp....we thought sziky coming :S and dinot and ace too....
On February 08 2012 03:15 Tarmak_mk wrote: no problem dsaqwe/draw just dont continue this bm....we all not want to do that im pretty sure. btw we prepared for match vs zerg not even played a games zvp pvp....we thought sziky coming :S and dinot and ace too....
hm I was not being bm, just a joke I was not even there at the time.
On February 07 2012 21:31 Hyeon wrote: Also, i've been banned from TL.net so i couldn't post here. Here's the full convo log between iWL-Kiborg(iWL trusted member) and Gt.Hyeon(me)
[2012-02-06 오전 12:12:21] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hi [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: Hi Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: this is Gt.Hyeon [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: aka iccup.dayfly [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: reason why i try to contact you is tonight, 4hrs later there's gambit cup iWL vs Gt Also, there's UED random tournament in 3hrs. on that tour, 4 Gt players are invited and gag's invited too. I don't think Gt can play tonight. can we postpone the match? [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: I already tried to contact slavuti4 [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but seems he's afk [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): Slavuti4 will be online about after 2 hours. Maybe ok, i think, we can pp our CW today on next day. [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): But wait, i answer iwl-players [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: tell me when you finish answering [2012-02-06 오전 12:32:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: o_o [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg you there? [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: we have one player who can play on tonight's gambit cup [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: he said he's going to all-kill (rofl) [2012-02-06 오전 12:44:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: no offense. [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: Also, whole Gt players are not able to pass round 1. So, if that guy lose there would be back-ups [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we agree on pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:24] Hyeon Gook Cho: To summerize it, LET's PLAY TONIGHT'S GAMBIT CUP [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we can play on next week [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but we solve when some later [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:44] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hm) [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we should play :3 [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: you know, on weekdays [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: there won't be many players [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:09] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): i think, we can only [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:31] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): maybe on wednesday [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm. [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:38] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we just play it? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: only gag is invited to random tour [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:50] Hyeon Gook Cho: right? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:55] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): yes [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but u wanna pp today ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:14] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah, that's what i thought [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: but that one guy [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: told me that he can all-kill -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: dunno if he really can [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i should respect him [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: so.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we can play o,o [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:03] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): it's bo1 ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:11] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): he can lose from all-in [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: totally.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: can you give me 3mins? [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:35] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should talk to him again -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we play on weekends? [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: like Saturday [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): why not? maybe we can [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: but [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: i don't know if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: maybe eywa's going to. [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: So if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: Why don't we play on 11th Feb, 2012? [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:46] Hyeon Gook Cho: on 2000 CET? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:23] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): can we answer about date and time maybe tomorow? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: so you agree the PP? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): YES [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:40] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:45] Hyeon Gook Cho: SWEET! [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): u can say to Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:56] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): about pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: nope [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:19] Hyeon Gook Cho: i was banned for two days [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: i can't send pm [2012-02-06 오전 1:03:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: you sent pm? [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok, but later [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: mkay. [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should go to bed [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: it's 1am here :3 [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): good night [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks! [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: c ya!
I'm not blaming Kiborg, but i also should have contacted you with skype or w/e. My fault too.
[2012-02-06 오전 2:58:11] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: hello slav [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: you there? [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:22] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: hi [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Slava slavuti4: i just went bed [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: oh, sorry [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:35] Slava slavuti4: [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:37] Slava slavuti4: about cw [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:40] Slava slavuti4: Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i have to talk this now [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:42] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: we were supposed to postpone the game [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:01] Slava slavuti4: yea [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: weren't we? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: but why did they play it? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa didnt allow us to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:36] Slava slavuti4: Eywa asked me at 19:30 cet why we not in chanel [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:44] Slava slavuti4: i told him about pp [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:55] Slava slavuti4: but he said nobody told him [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:00] Slava slavuti4: and teams cant do such things [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: :O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:06] Slava slavuti4: so he forced us to play [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:10] Slava slavuti4: he brought Sneazel [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:16] Slava slavuti4: and he played with Trutacz [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: you mean teams cant decide to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:21] Slava slavuti4: not my faul [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:25] Hyeon Gook Cho: even if there's agreement? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:27] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:30] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:35] Slava slavuti4: Eywa is a boss [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: no way. [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Slava slavuti4: so [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: kiborg told me that he's going to pm to eyea [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa but seems he didnt [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:02] Slava slavuti4: eywa was offline [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:04] Slava slavuti4: all day [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Slava slavuti4: i wanted either [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Hyeon Gook Cho: tl.net pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: anyway i should have sent pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:20] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: not your team's fault [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: im not pushing you [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:35] Slava slavuti4: i just came in 1 hour before cw [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Slava slavuti4: and KIBORG said itis ooed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Hyeon Gook Cho: but reason why im pissed is [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:45] Slava slavuti4: pped [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:54] Slava slavuti4: so i relaxed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: rule says if there's agreement [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:07] Hyeon Gook Cho: we can postpone [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: dunno [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: So, what i'm asking to you is [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:23] Slava slavuti4: ye [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: if eywa allows, can we re-match? [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:46] Slava slavuti4: sure [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:51] Slava slavuti4: but score 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:52] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay, thanks. [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Slava slavuti4: kk [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: start from 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:05] Slava slavuti4: np [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: i mean iwl2 gt1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:09] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:20] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks i'll contact eywa then. [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:24] Slava slavuti4: cu [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:27] Slava slavuti4: gn [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:30] Hyeon Gook Cho: bye!
According to the PP rules,
5) Rules Concerning PP matches - There will be no PP matches unless scheduled a minimum of 24 hours beforehand with Eywa-. - The league commissioner reserves the right to allow and/or deny any PP match applications. - Late applications for a PP match will be handled only if the opposition agrees.
We(kiborg/hyeon) made agreement 3hrs before CW starts, so it still is activated. Also we agreed to play from 2(iWL) - 1(Gt) on this.
Can we continue playing on this SAT 2000CET?
EDIT : mobile error :<
Did you ignore the rule just above the one you put in bold? I have never allowed the relocation of an entire clan war so no, Gt loses 4-1. The fact that you didn't even run it by me means you knew you were doing something incorrect but you expect that "oh if I don't tell Eywa- he'll be forced to apply it."
Okay, first of all, I know it's my fault that i didn't contact you. My bad.
But 3games have already been played. So it's not i'm asking postpone whole Match now. Can we go on the rest match from 1-2?
The rule which i made bold, it only applies to SPL style(still weird for me the pp rule in that style), doesn't it? We can't set pp match in SWL style, like before CW starts i say "it will be 2-3 and let's make it postponed."
If you are not going to allow us to play rest of the matches, at least make the reasonable PP rules which can also be applied to SWL style just like what you made with BM rules.
On February 07 2012 21:31 Hyeon wrote: Also, i've been banned from TL.net so i couldn't post here. Here's the full convo log between iWL-Kiborg(iWL trusted member) and Gt.Hyeon(me)
[2012-02-06 오전 12:12:21] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hi [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: Hi Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: this is Gt.Hyeon [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: aka iccup.dayfly [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: reason why i try to contact you is tonight, 4hrs later there's gambit cup iWL vs Gt Also, there's UED random tournament in 3hrs. on that tour, 4 Gt players are invited and gag's invited too. I don't think Gt can play tonight. can we postpone the match? [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: I already tried to contact slavuti4 [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but seems he's afk [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): Slavuti4 will be online about after 2 hours. Maybe ok, i think, we can pp our CW today on next day. [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): But wait, i answer iwl-players [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: tell me when you finish answering [2012-02-06 오전 12:32:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: o_o [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg you there? [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: we have one player who can play on tonight's gambit cup [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: he said he's going to all-kill (rofl) [2012-02-06 오전 12:44:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: no offense. [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: Also, whole Gt players are not able to pass round 1. So, if that guy lose there would be back-ups [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we agree on pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:24] Hyeon Gook Cho: To summerize it, LET's PLAY TONIGHT'S GAMBIT CUP [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we can play on next week [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but we solve when some later [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:44] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hm) [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we should play :3 [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: you know, on weekdays [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: there won't be many players [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:09] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): i think, we can only [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:31] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): maybe on wednesday [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm. [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:38] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we just play it? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: only gag is invited to random tour [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:50] Hyeon Gook Cho: right? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:55] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): yes [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but u wanna pp today ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:14] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah, that's what i thought [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: but that one guy [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: told me that he can all-kill -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: dunno if he really can [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i should respect him [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: so.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we can play o,o [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:03] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): it's bo1 ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:11] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): he can lose from all-in [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: totally.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: can you give me 3mins? [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:35] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should talk to him again -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we play on weekends? [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: like Saturday [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): why not? maybe we can [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: but [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: i don't know if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: maybe eywa's going to. [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: So if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: Why don't we play on 11th Feb, 2012? [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:46] Hyeon Gook Cho: on 2000 CET? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:23] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): can we answer about date and time maybe tomorow? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: so you agree the PP? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): YES [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:40] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:45] Hyeon Gook Cho: SWEET! [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): u can say to Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:56] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): about pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: nope [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:19] Hyeon Gook Cho: i was banned for two days [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: i can't send pm [2012-02-06 오전 1:03:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: you sent pm? [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok, but later [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: mkay. [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should go to bed [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: it's 1am here :3 [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): good night [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks! [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: c ya!
I'm not blaming Kiborg, but i also should have contacted you with skype or w/e. My fault too.
[2012-02-06 오전 2:58:11] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: hello slav [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: you there? [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:22] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: hi [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Slava slavuti4: i just went bed [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: oh, sorry [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:35] Slava slavuti4: [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:37] Slava slavuti4: about cw [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:40] Slava slavuti4: Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i have to talk this now [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:42] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: we were supposed to postpone the game [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:01] Slava slavuti4: yea [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: weren't we? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: but why did they play it? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa didnt allow us to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:36] Slava slavuti4: Eywa asked me at 19:30 cet why we not in chanel [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:44] Slava slavuti4: i told him about pp [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:55] Slava slavuti4: but he said nobody told him [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:00] Slava slavuti4: and teams cant do such things [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: :O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:06] Slava slavuti4: so he forced us to play [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:10] Slava slavuti4: he brought Sneazel [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:16] Slava slavuti4: and he played with Trutacz [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: you mean teams cant decide to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:21] Slava slavuti4: not my faul [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:25] Hyeon Gook Cho: even if there's agreement? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:27] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:30] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:35] Slava slavuti4: Eywa is a boss [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: no way. [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Slava slavuti4: so [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: kiborg told me that he's going to pm to eyea [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa but seems he didnt [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:02] Slava slavuti4: eywa was offline [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:04] Slava slavuti4: all day [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Slava slavuti4: i wanted either [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Hyeon Gook Cho: tl.net pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: anyway i should have sent pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:20] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: not your team's fault [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: im not pushing you [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:35] Slava slavuti4: i just came in 1 hour before cw [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Slava slavuti4: and KIBORG said itis ooed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Hyeon Gook Cho: but reason why im pissed is [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:45] Slava slavuti4: pped [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:54] Slava slavuti4: so i relaxed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: rule says if there's agreement [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:07] Hyeon Gook Cho: we can postpone [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: dunno [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: So, what i'm asking to you is [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:23] Slava slavuti4: ye [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: if eywa allows, can we re-match? [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:46] Slava slavuti4: sure [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:51] Slava slavuti4: but score 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:52] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay, thanks. [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Slava slavuti4: kk [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: start from 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:05] Slava slavuti4: np [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: i mean iwl2 gt1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:09] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:20] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks i'll contact eywa then. [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:24] Slava slavuti4: cu [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:27] Slava slavuti4: gn [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:30] Hyeon Gook Cho: bye!
According to the PP rules,
5) Rules Concerning PP matches - There will be no PP matches unless scheduled a minimum of 24 hours beforehand with Eywa-. - The league commissioner reserves the right to allow and/or deny any PP match applications. - Late applications for a PP match will be handled only if the opposition agrees.
We(kiborg/hyeon) made agreement 3hrs before CW starts, so it still is activated. Also we agreed to play from 2(iWL) - 1(Gt) on this.
Can we continue playing on this SAT 2000CET?
EDIT : mobile error :<
Did you ignore the rule just above the one you put in bold? I have never allowed the relocation of an entire clan war so no, Gt loses 4-1. The fact that you didn't even run it by me means you knew you were doing something incorrect but you expect that "oh if I don't tell Eywa- he'll be forced to apply it."
Okay, first of all, I know it's my fault that i didn't contact you. My bad.
But 3games have already been played. So it's not i'm asking postpone whole Match now. Can we go on the rest match from 1-2?
The rule which i made bold, it only applies to SPL style(still weird for me the pp rule in that style), doesn't it? We can't set pp match in SWL style, like before CW starts i say "it will be 2-3 and let's make it postponed."
If you are not going to allow us to play rest of the matches, at least make the reasonable PP rules which can also be applied to SWL style just like what you made with BM rules.
There's nothing to be done about PP in SWL style, quite frankly, it's impossible, however being as you need 2 less players to complete a full line up and I wouldn't allow more than 1 or 2 PPs previously, I really don't see the issue. The score of Gt vs iwL is final, done, over. 4-1, you would have had enough players had you not told them it was postponed in the first place. Only one of your players ended up having the random tour prevent them from playing...
On February 07 2012 21:31 Hyeon wrote: Also, i've been banned from TL.net so i couldn't post here. Here's the full convo log between iWL-Kiborg(iWL trusted member) and Gt.Hyeon(me)
[2012-02-06 오전 12:12:21] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hi [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: Hi Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: this is Gt.Hyeon [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: aka iccup.dayfly [2012-02-06 오전 12:12:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: reason why i try to contact you is tonight, 4hrs later there's gambit cup iWL vs Gt Also, there's UED random tournament in 3hrs. on that tour, 4 Gt players are invited and gag's invited too. I don't think Gt can play tonight. can we postpone the match? [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: I already tried to contact slavuti4 [2012-02-06 오전 12:13:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but seems he's afk [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): Slavuti4 will be online about after 2 hours. Maybe ok, i think, we can pp our CW today on next day. [2012-02-06 오전 12:15:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): But wait, i answer iwl-players [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:16:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: tell me when you finish answering [2012-02-06 오전 12:32:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: o_o [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg you there? [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: we have one player who can play on tonight's gambit cup [2012-02-06 오전 12:43:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: he said he's going to all-kill (rofl) [2012-02-06 오전 12:44:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: no offense. [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: Also, whole Gt players are not able to pass round 1. So, if that guy lose there would be back-ups [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we agree on pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:24] Hyeon Gook Cho: To summerize it, LET's PLAY TONIGHT'S GAMBIT CUP [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:27] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): we can play on next week [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but we solve when some later [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:44] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): hm) [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we should play :3 [2012-02-06 오전 12:45:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: you know, on weekdays [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: there won't be many players [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:09] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): i think, we can only [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:31] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): maybe on wednesday [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm. [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:38] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we just play it? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: only gag is invited to random tour [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:50] Hyeon Gook Cho: right? [2012-02-06 오전 12:46:55] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): yes [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): but u wanna pp today ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:14] Hyeon Gook Cho: well [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah, that's what i thought [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: but that one guy [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: told me that he can all-kill -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: dunno if he really can [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i should respect him [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: so.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:47:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i think we can play o,o [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:03] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): it's bo1 ) [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:11] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): he can lose from all-in [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:21] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: totally.. [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:31] Hyeon Gook Cho: can you give me 3mins? [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:35] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should talk to him again -_- [2012-02-06 오전 12:48:39] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: Kiborg [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:34] Hyeon Gook Cho: why don't we play on weekends? [2012-02-06 오전 12:52:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: like Saturday [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): why not? maybe we can [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:05] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: but [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: i don't know if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: maybe eywa's going to. [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: So if we can set the date [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: Why don't we play on 11th Feb, 2012? [2012-02-06 오전 12:53:46] Hyeon Gook Cho: on 2000 CET? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:23] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): can we answer about date and time maybe tomorow? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:26] Hyeon Gook Cho: hm [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: so you agree the PP? [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:38] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): YES [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:40] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:45] Hyeon Gook Cho: SWEET! [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:54] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): u can say to Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 12:56:56] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): about pp [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: nope [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:19] Hyeon Gook Cho: i was banned for two days [2012-02-06 오전 12:57:23] Hyeon Gook Cho: i can't send pm [2012-02-06 오전 1:03:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: you sent pm? [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:20] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok, but later [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: mkay. [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:44] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:47] Hyeon Gook Cho: i should go to bed [2012-02-06 오전 1:05:49] Hyeon Gook Cho: it's 1am here :3 [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:02] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): ok [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:07] Dima(iP.SRKIBORG): good night [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks! [2012-02-06 오전 1:06:10] Hyeon Gook Cho: c ya!
I'm not blaming Kiborg, but i also should have contacted you with skype or w/e. My fault too.
[2012-02-06 오전 2:58:11] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: hello slav [2012-02-06 오전 9:56:28] Hyeon Gook Cho: you there? [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:22] Slava slavuti4: yo [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Hyeon Gook Cho: hi [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:27] Slava slavuti4: i just went bed [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: oh, sorry [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:35] Slava slavuti4: [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:37] Slava slavuti4: about cw [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:40] Slava slavuti4: Eywa [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:41] Hyeon Gook Cho: but i have to talk this now [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:42] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 9:57:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: we were supposed to postpone the game [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:01] Slava slavuti4: yea [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:03] Hyeon Gook Cho: weren't we? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:13] Hyeon Gook Cho: but why did they play it? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa didnt allow us to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:36] Slava slavuti4: Eywa asked me at 19:30 cet why we not in chanel [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:44] Slava slavuti4: i told him about pp [2012-02-06 오전 9:58:55] Slava slavuti4: but he said nobody told him [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:00] Slava slavuti4: and teams cant do such things [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:01] Hyeon Gook Cho: :O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:06] Slava slavuti4: so he forced us to play [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:10] Slava slavuti4: he brought Sneazel [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:16] Slava slavuti4: and he played with Trutacz [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: you mean teams cant decide to postpone? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:18] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:21] Slava slavuti4: not my faul [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:25] Hyeon Gook Cho: even if there's agreement? [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:27] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:30] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:32] Hyeon Gook Cho: lol [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:35] Slava slavuti4: Eywa is a boss [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Hyeon Gook Cho: no way. [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:36] Slava slavuti4: so [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:53] Hyeon Gook Cho: kiborg told me that he's going to pm to eyea [2012-02-06 오전 9:59:59] Hyeon Gook Cho: eywa but seems he didnt [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:02] Slava slavuti4: eywa was offline [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:04] Slava slavuti4: all day [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Slava slavuti4: i wanted either [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:09] Hyeon Gook Cho: tl.net pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:16] Hyeon Gook Cho: anyway i should have sent pm [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:20] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:22] Hyeon Gook Cho: not your team's fault [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:33] Hyeon Gook Cho: im not pushing you [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:35] Slava slavuti4: i just came in 1 hour before cw [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Slava slavuti4: and KIBORG said itis ooed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:43] Hyeon Gook Cho: but reason why im pissed is [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:45] Slava slavuti4: pped [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:54] Slava slavuti4: so i relaxed [2012-02-06 오전 10:00:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: rule says if there's agreement [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:07] Hyeon Gook Cho: we can postpone [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: dunno [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:13] Slava slavuti4: o_O [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:18] Hyeon Gook Cho: So, what i'm asking to you is [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:23] Slava slavuti4: ye [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:40] Hyeon Gook Cho: if eywa allows, can we re-match? [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:46] Slava slavuti4: sure [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:51] Slava slavuti4: but score 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:52] Hyeon Gook Cho: okay, thanks. [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Hyeon Gook Cho: yeah [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:55] Slava slavuti4: kk [2012-02-06 오전 10:01:58] Hyeon Gook Cho: start from 2-1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:05] Slava slavuti4: np [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:08] Hyeon Gook Cho: i mean iwl2 gt1 [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:09] Slava slavuti4: y [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:20] Hyeon Gook Cho: thanks i'll contact eywa then. [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:24] Slava slavuti4: cu [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:27] Slava slavuti4: gn [2012-02-06 오전 10:02:30] Hyeon Gook Cho: bye!
According to the PP rules,
5) Rules Concerning PP matches - There will be no PP matches unless scheduled a minimum of 24 hours beforehand with Eywa-. - The league commissioner reserves the right to allow and/or deny any PP match applications. - Late applications for a PP match will be handled only if the opposition agrees.
We(kiborg/hyeon) made agreement 3hrs before CW starts, so it still is activated. Also we agreed to play from 2(iWL) - 1(Gt) on this.
Can we continue playing on this SAT 2000CET?
EDIT : mobile error :<
Did you ignore the rule just above the one you put in bold? I have never allowed the relocation of an entire clan war so no, Gt loses 4-1. The fact that you didn't even run it by me means you knew you were doing something incorrect but you expect that "oh if I don't tell Eywa- he'll be forced to apply it."
Okay, first of all, I know it's my fault that i didn't contact you. My bad.
But 3games have already been played. So it's not i'm asking postpone whole Match now. Can we go on the rest match from 1-2?
The rule which i made bold, it only applies to SPL style(still weird for me the pp rule in that style), doesn't it? We can't set pp match in SWL style, like before CW starts i say "it will be 2-3 and let's make it postponed."
If you are not going to allow us to play rest of the matches, at least make the reasonable PP rules which can also be applied to SWL style just like what you made with BM rules.
There's nothing to be done about PP in SWL style, quite frankly, it's impossible, however being as you need 2 less players to complete a full line up and I wouldn't allow more than 1 or 2 PPs previously, I really don't see the issue. The score of Gt vs iwL is final, done, over. 4-1, you would have had enough players had you not told them it was postponed in the first place. Only one of your players ended up having the random tour prevent them from playing...
Yeah, it's your Gambit cup, so i'll just drop it.
But here's what you should know.
1. I talked to trutacz that we should postpone. We(trut/me) had agreed but you called and forced Sneazel/Trutacz to play. You didn't know we(Gt/iWL) had agreed, so it's okay you to force them to play.
2. Who can know only three of our players ended up the random tour early? That's why i asked to postpone.
maybe call someone noob is bm. but i imagine the feeling of alfio. he is playing sc2 for months.come cw and win so ez. so is clear that the rest are noobs for him
and be happy that you get 3 wins cause sziky was in other tour so he couldnt all-kill 4-0 in 20 mins... but not only sziky, ace was in that tour and dinot not here, sky not here, me / kashu / kidcanada inactive......................
Hell Eywa, If you want to talk about bm actions I suggest you look at those shown by LocDog on several games vs iFU not only did he accuse my player of cheating and flame him in front of many on stream, but while playing alfio, he stallled out his game for which my player asked him to leave locdogs actions have now been turned back on my team.which is a joke. and take eye on this. locdog stay on the game not for bad gg timing.just for save time. and this is not fair.imo this get punish too.he also confirm in the rep
1) eOnzErG, your own player told AlfiO to cool it in game because he knew that there would be a suspension.
2) eOnzErG, LocDog's chat was in some language I don't understand... I don't even know what he was saying.
3) ZerGgBoY, LocDog tells me the same thing, it's not about who I like and who I don't it's about making a fair judgement.
4) It's nearly impossible to moderate stalling a game and bad GG timing, though I agree with LocDog's case, it was obviously stalling, however... There is no rule against it, it's the first time it's ever happened. If it becomes a real problem you will see it dealt with.
5) AlfiO, all of your posts got nuked before I could check them out, so... I'll just go with the assumption that they were nice comments and avoid further implications with the rules...
6) This case is closed, you can leave more comments if you like, but they will not be responded to unless they are bm in which case you will be subject to rule application.
guys have some respect for the organizer of the event plz. eywa is making fair and unbiased judgements, despite the lack of fair and unbiased criticism hes receiving. If certain people would open their association clouded eyes theyd see that.
I don't understand this. Someone bm'ed and is pissed because eywa applied the rules? To all the people complaining:
I have a neutral opinion on eywa- but he is the fucking admin, and the fucking rules say he can do whatever the fuck he wants. He could ban alfio and lockdog from tourney, just because he fucking wants it. Don't like it? go find another league. When you signed up you accepted that all decisions where eywa-'s discretion.
On February 09 2012 10:36 GoTuNk! wrote: I don't understand this. Someone bm'ed and is pissed because eywa applied the rules? To all the people complaining:
I have a neutral opinion on eywa- but he is the fucking admin, and the fucking rules say he can do whatever the fuck he wants. He could ban alfio and lockdog from tourney, just because he fucking wants it. Don't like it? go find another league. When you signed up you accepted that all decisions where eywa-'s discretion.
+1 just about everything I wanted to say follow the rules or get the hell out its not really hard
On February 09 2012 13:09 sCriv wrote: looooool the drama in BW these days is quite incredible. People need to chill and realise its just a game they're playing...
Huh... I don't understand what you mean by this, the commissioner/organization of any league from any sport/game is criticized on every decision... You can't go out and say "Oh BW drama". League decisions + responses don't create much drama realistically.
On February 09 2012 18:28 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: so no punishment for locdog for not saying 'gg'! why u punish other guys then?! eywa tell me locdog is ur (boy)friend ? cause its really strange ...
LRM)Pig aka me is running the league, and LocDog is Eywa's boyfriend. Got it. Anything other constructive input, you highly intellectual being?
omg, why ifu team is always crying? u cant play and shut up? Its not ur league, if u want be admin make ur league and make ur rules. If u dont want play go away and stop cry
On February 09 2012 21:22 Choosy wrote: omg, why ifu team is always crying? u cant play and shut up? Its not ur league, if u want be admin make ur league and make ur rules. If u dont want play go away and stop cry
On February 09 2012 21:10 dsaqwe. wrote: ahhh im sorry i made ifu nerds cry kekekek, its just a game, just a game... and ifu,NerDDBoY i did "GG" ...
relax
On February 09 2012 23:20 Tarmak_mk wrote: can i ask for any admin to cut off this? and getting some action like 2 weeks ban or something...we all cross the lines
On February 11 2012 12:25 iFU.BMW wrote: L_Master very nice cast today, really excited to watch more of your streamed cw games and isl3. Keep up the good work !
Thanks for the kind words sir!
I should mention I am always open to any and all feedback and criticisms, after all you can't get better if you don't know what your doing wrong. Whether it's better obsing, redundancy, boringness, awkward pauses, whatever let me know so I can have things to work on.
On February 11 2012 13:42 dRaW wrote: yeah was good streams, unfortunately iwL.gag spoiled their clanwar for whatever reason-_-
I forgot to add the rules concerning spoilers when I re-organized the rules ... So I don't think it would be fair if I banned him being as it wasn't written in the OP, anyhow... Added it.
On February 11 2012 13:42 dRaW wrote: yeah was good streams, unfortunately iwL.gag spoiled their clanwar for whatever reason-_-
I forgot to add the rules concerning spoilers when I re-organized the rules ... So I don't think it would be fair if I banned him being as it wasn't written in the OP, anyhow... Added it.
On February 13 2012 07:07 yellowsmile wrote: modesty 3 kills, u missed modesty vs dm white btw also, when are vods for modesty vs lml and white?^^
There was no one responding to me online + no other replays, so just assumed it was done after set 1 ;d. Realized after that it wasn't. Never got Set 3, I'll double check though.
Just found it. Yeah, sorry for the lack of a cast for those games... didn't think it was still going on till I got the replays - Hacklebeast was already in Gt vs sas.
Being as I messed up the PaiN vs dM clan war, it was requested that I cast modesty's games... Anyhow, I fixed my Microphone problems and I'll get on to cast it tomorrow at... 21CET... 3pm EST
On February 13 2012 14:32 Eywa- wrote: Being as I messed up the PaiN vs dM clan war, it was requested that I cast modesty's games... Anyhow, I fixed my Microphone problems and I'll get on to cast it tomorrow at... 21CET... 3pm EST
I will be home Friday if we need spare stream/caster, but I can't invite others into my cast so if you want to accompany me in a cast then you need to invite me into your stream.
On February 21 2012 17:48 Hyeon wrote: So playing vs AoV doesn't count or what?
AoV left this league like 5 weeks ago or something... No team gets to play them anymore, which is why some clans will have a clanwar less then others during the season. At the end it will get evened out though since all teams will have 'played' AoV. While it is a bit irritating to judge the scores that way, there isn't really another way to handle the dropping out of a clan.
On February 21 2012 17:48 Hyeon wrote: So playing vs AoV doesn't count or what?
AoV left this league like 5 weeks ago or something... No team gets to play them anymore, which is why some clans will have a clanwar less then others during the season. At the end it will get evened out though since all teams will have 'played' AoV. While it is a bit irritating to judge the scores that way, there isn't really another way to handle the dropping out of a clan.
Hey guys, I wont be able to be here today due to irl commitments... So, please play nice . If there is any dispute, just send in screen shots and what not. If there is a drop, it will be reviewed at a later time, just play on!
Make sure to clearly name replays "X vs Y" and name the email "Team 1 vs Team 2 Set Z". If there are W.Os, send an e-mail notice.
On February 25 2012 02:04 Eywa- wrote: Hey guys, I wont be able to be here today due to irl commitments... So, please play nice . If there is any dispute, just send in screen shots and what not. If there is a drop, it will be reviewed at a later time, just play on!
Make sure to clearly name replays "X vs Y" and name the email "Team 1 vs Team 2 Set Z". If there are W.Os, send an e-mail notice.
On February 25 2012 02:04 Eywa- wrote: Hey guys, I wont be able to be here today due to irl commitments... So, please play nice . If there is any dispute, just send in screen shots and what not. If there is a drop, it will be reviewed at a later time, just play on!
Make sure to clearly name replays "X vs Y" and name the email "Team 1 vs Team 2 Set Z". If there are W.Os, send an e-mail notice.
I need to have some input in this post since I just don't want Twitch.TV's GC to be stuck on 666 posts. @ ^ L_Master I really wish you could've casted, was some good CWs this week.
stream having technical difficulties... will resume @http://ko.twitch.tv/zaraki1234 shortly. My net is not stable enough to support any decent quality.
On February 28 2012 06:01 Bakuryu wrote: no lrm vs pain cast? (or was i too stupid to see that i was already casted...)
was casted on my stream.
Also, @FAQ..
Q: Are you a stoner? A: No, I talk like a stoner, look like a stoner, not a stoner... :-/ I get that from everyone I meet irl too.
Also, iwL-funNy, 2 week suspension, 2nd bm offense. Thread will be updated asap... have a couple midterms due this week + school application, so... If I get enough done today, I'll update thread.
On February 28 2012 06:01 Bakuryu wrote: no lrm vs pain cast? (or was i too stupid to see that i was already casted...)
was casted on my stream.
Also, @FAQ..
Q: Are you a stoner? A: No, I talk like a stoner, look like a stoner, not a stoner... :-/ I get that from everyone I meet irl too.
Also, iwL-funNy, 2 week suspension, 2nd bm offense. Thread will be updated asap... have a couple midterms due this week + school application, so... If I get enough done today, I'll update thread.
thx, i hate my typos.... "that it was already casted"
ifu.trrr is an unknown, he just been laddering a lot this season, he's from bulgaria Terran player B- ~ level. This isn't bm, just confirming he's not some smurf,etc.
On February 28 2012 14:39 Hyeon wrote: 1. What's the playoff/final format? is it SPL or SWL? 2. Are the all matches vs AoV counted as 4-0?
edit:grammartically wrong
1. SPL 2. no
1. no offense but you just decided to do it with SPL or have you announced before? 2. then what? AoV is 0-18 and got 4 wins and 72(18 x 4) loses.
1. No change from last season 2. Does it matter if everyone gets 2pts or 3 from AoV? Just ends up showing more shit on the standings, besides... Complete W.O CW doesn't count for 3 pts...
On February 29 2012 07:38 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: no aka's thats his main on iccup u can look at our team roster http://www.iccup.com/teams/2.html
So his main account has no past seasons, yet is B rank? o_o I'm just looking for some aka's that actually have some games on them... if they're available.
On February 28 2012 14:39 Hyeon wrote: 1. What's the playoff/final format? is it SPL or SWL? 2. Are the all matches vs AoV counted as 4-0?
edit:grammartically wrong
1. SPL 2. no
1. no offense but you just decided to do it with SPL or have you announced before? 2. then what? AoV is 0-18 and got 4 wins and 72(18 x 4) loses.
1. No change from last season 2. Does it matter if everyone gets 2pts or 3 from AoV? Just ends up showing more shit on the standings, besides... Complete W.O CW doesn't count for 3 pts...
About AoV's issue, nah, it really doesn't matter but was wondering why LRM/sas/pain played 12 games. I heard it's because of vs AoV matches. When is it going to be added or updated?
On February 28 2012 14:39 Hyeon wrote: 1. What's the playoff/final format? is it SPL or SWL? 2. Are the all matches vs AoV counted as 4-0?
edit:grammartically wrong
1. SPL 2. no
1. no offense but you just decided to do it with SPL or have you announced before? 2. then what? AoV is 0-18 and got 4 wins and 72(18 x 4) loses.
1. No change from last season 2. Does it matter if everyone gets 2pts or 3 from AoV? Just ends up showing more shit on the standings, besides... Complete W.O CW doesn't count for 3 pts...
About AoV's issue, nah, it really doesn't matter but was wondering why LRM/sas/pain played 12 games. I heard it's because of vs AoV matches. When is it going to be added or updated?
I already explained this to you on the previous page I think. Just wait untill the end of the season and be amazed that all teams have the same amount of clanwars played.
On February 28 2012 14:39 Hyeon wrote: 1. What's the playoff/final format? is it SPL or SWL? 2. Are the all matches vs AoV counted as 4-0?
edit:grammartically wrong
1. SPL 2. no
1. no offense but you just decided to do it with SPL or have you announced before? 2. then what? AoV is 0-18 and got 4 wins and 72(18 x 4) loses.
1. No change from last season 2. Does it matter if everyone gets 2pts or 3 from AoV? Just ends up showing more shit on the standings, besides... Complete W.O CW doesn't count for 3 pts...
About AoV's issue, nah, it really doesn't matter but was wondering why LRM/sas/pain played 12 games. I heard it's because of vs AoV matches. When is it going to be added or updated?
I already explained this to you on the previous page I think. Just wait untill the end of the season and be amazed that all teams have the same amount of clanwars played.
At that time(when you answered), i really didn't care with AoV things because nothing seemed wrong for me. But now, both Gt and LRM) have chance to be #1, so that's why i'm asking why LRM played only 12 games. that's why i can't be amazed now. thanks anyway, i'll check the previous pages.
On February 28 2012 14:39 Hyeon wrote: 1. What's the playoff/final format? is it SPL or SWL? 2. Are the all matches vs AoV counted as 4-0?
edit:grammartically wrong
1. SPL 2. no
1. no offense but you just decided to do it with SPL or have you announced before? 2. then what? AoV is 0-18 and got 4 wins and 72(18 x 4) loses.
1. No change from last season 2. Does it matter if everyone gets 2pts or 3 from AoV? Just ends up showing more shit on the standings, besides... Complete W.O CW doesn't count for 3 pts...
About AoV's issue, nah, it really doesn't matter but was wondering why LRM/sas/pain played 12 games. I heard it's because of vs AoV matches. When is it going to be added or updated?
I already explained this to you on the previous page I think. Just wait untill the end of the season and be amazed that all teams have the same amount of clanwars played.
At that time(when you answered), i really didn't care with AoV things because nothing seemed wrong for me. But now, both Gt and LRM) have chance to be #1, so that's why i'm asking why LRM played only 12 games. that's why i can't be amazed now. thanks anyway, i'll check the previous pages.
1) You're at even games now 2) LRM is in first place 3) I am sorry for no update, I have hardly even had the time to play a game of BW myself due to excessive work load in the past 2 weeks... 4) I have a lab due today and 2 midterms due tomorrow. I'll try to get the updates all done tonight.
On March 01 2012 02:25 PiKe wrote: no aka and he makes B-/B ? good joke : )
C'mon guys, seriously? Iccup level is a joke now, I can get to B+ without hotkeys. He just plays a lot and has many games this season, aka or not he's maxing @ B with 45-50% winrate so it's not a big deal.
On March 01 2012 02:25 PiKe wrote: no aka and he makes B-/B ? good joke : )
C'mon guys, seriously? Iccup level is a joke now, I can get to B+ without hotkeys. He just plays a lot and has many games this season, aka or not he's maxing @ B with 45-50% winrate so it's not a big deal.
O_o Did you just say that it's not a big deal having ONLY the team leaders of iFU know who the player is while EVERYONE else, including the league organization is oblivious to this?
On March 01 2012 02:25 PiKe wrote: no aka and he makes B-/B ? good joke : )
C'mon guys, seriously? Iccup level is a joke now, I can get to B+ without hotkeys. He just plays a lot and has many games this season, aka or not he's maxing @ B with 45-50% winrate so it's not a big deal.
O_o Did you just say that it's not a big deal having ONLY the team leaders of iFU know who the player is while EVERYONE else, including the league organization is oblivious to this?
On March 01 2012 02:25 PiKe wrote: no aka and he makes B-/B ? good joke : )
C'mon guys, seriously? Iccup level is a joke now, I can get to B+ without hotkeys. He just plays a lot and has many games this season, aka or not he's maxing @ B with 45-50% winrate so it's not a big deal.
O_o Did you just say that it's not a big deal having ONLY the team leaders of iFU know who the player is while EVERYONE else, including the league organization is oblivious to this?
Just saying his aka is going to be a complete unknown... probably C+ or B- or old inactive user... I've known him as Trrr for past 2 season.
On March 01 2012 02:25 PiKe wrote: no aka and he makes B-/B ? good joke : )
C'mon guys, seriously? Iccup level is a joke now, I can get to B+ without hotkeys. He just plays a lot and has many games this season, aka or not he's maxing @ B with 45-50% winrate so it's not a big deal.
O_o Did you just say that it's not a big deal having ONLY the team leaders of iFU know who the player is while EVERYONE else, including the league organization is oblivious to this?
Just saying his aka is going to be a complete unknown... probably C+ or B- or old inactive user... I've known him as Trrr for past 2 season.
Funny, his under two different trrrr aka's he's only been registered for 2 seasons. Then he was B rank. If that isn't the Disney version of BW, then I don't know what Sayle is singing for.
On March 01 2012 02:25 PiKe wrote: no aka and he makes B-/B ? good joke : )
C'mon guys, seriously? Iccup level is a joke now, I can get to B+ without hotkeys. He just plays a lot and has many games this season, aka or not he's maxing @ B with 45-50% winrate so it's not a big deal.
O_o Did you just say that it's not a big deal having ONLY the team leaders of iFU know who the player is while EVERYONE else, including the league organization is oblivious to this?
Please stop discussing, Trrrr he is no longer in iFU... Game is probably right about him being a smurf since he has collected everyone's IP Addresses..
On March 02 2012 18:16 reps)Plumbum wrote: no updates during 6 days is dissapointing spot.
In North America, most colleges and universities had/have midterms this week before Spring Break. Granted, Eywa was effected by that and I'm sure that there will be additional expenditure of time and effort past this week for all leagues run by North Americans, specifically Gambit's Cup.
On March 03 2012 02:26 dRaW wrote: I would cast but I am studying for exam as well might not even be able to play. Also, Canadian internet bandwidth sucks ^^
gonna cast or not ?. cuz is u not go cast ur post is useless
Sorry for noob question - what does a "shoutout" mean here? (it gives 1pt apparently) Is it like all-kill? ... Oh, I guess it's this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shutout -- preventing opposing team from scoring, ok.
Sorry for being so out of it today, especially with the minimap but with the casting in general. Was running on like 5 days of < 3hrs of sleep each day. T_T
On March 03 2012 16:47 RMuSt wrote: thx for vods, but caster need to look at minimaps sometimes;
Yes. I agree 100%.
As I mentioned before:
Sorry for being so out of it today, especially with the minimap but with the casting in general. Was running on like 5 days of < 3hrs of sleep each day. T_T
Master, there is no final game in the VOD reps vs lrm, only 6 games instead of 7.
Oh, snap. I know what happened...twitch likes to go part 2 after 2 hours. I'll do a re-upload with it corrected when I return home tomorrow. Thanks for letting me know about the problem!
yea, seems like LRM got SO because but PaiN won their CW at week 14th 3;0 and they dont have any +1pts from SO all the other SO's are allright i think. but u need to update the scores from yesterday (week 18th)
On March 05 2012 15:46 Sneazel wrote: yea, seems like LRM got SO because but PaiN won their CW at week 14th 3;0 and they dont have any +1pts from SO all the other SO's are allright i think. but u need to update the scores from yesterday (week 18th)
My mistake, I had added it on a couple other versions of the standings but I sometimes forget to save and start over.
dM- is now mathematically eliminated from the Twitch.TV Gambit's Cup. Please note, you are still required to show up to clan wars against dM-, you will not receive Walk Over automatically as they will still be playing.
As we are nearing the playoffs, I would like to point out that all the rules will be enforced at their fullest extent, there will be no lenience even though it may affect playoff results. Please respect the rules and to be safe, just don't talk to your opposition at all, not in game, not in channel.
Playoff times are subject to change for quality and viewership optimization.
CW scores updated.
iFU.ZerGgBoY - 1 Week suspension. Reason: Spoiled Replays - It was said before the clan war that anyone spoiling replays upon send would be suspended due to myself not being able to collect them and the casters not wanting to be spoiled. A specific format was given to avoid spoilers. ZerGgBoY sent and explicitly labelled the winner of the sets.
Sort of strange how a 1-0 is the same effect as a 4-0... seems like you shouldn't let a team play if they have less than 3 players or something like that. You can say "oh yeah he can all kill" but if the team itself isn't even committed to show, they shouldn't get that leniency anyway. Especially, no offense, when a team is getting bonus points off team pain who is way down on the list when other teams don't get that luxury of winning 4-0 with only 1 win.
On March 07 2012 04:53 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: hi eywa. add iFU.Must leader and remove gogna from team. remove iFU.Heaven and add iFU.eXnet zerg germany and iFU.Cryoc terran germany
- Each team will reserve the right for only 2 roster changes between March 1st and 31st.
iFU has used up all of their roster changes now that these changes are in place. Please send confirmation from Cryoc.
On March 07 2012 05:05 dRaW wrote: Sort of strange how a 1-0 is the same effect as a 4-0... seems like you shouldn't let a team play if they have less than 3 players or something like that. You can say "oh yeah he can all kill" but if the team itself isn't even committed to show, they shouldn't get that leniency anyway. Especially, no offense, when a team is getting bonus points off team pain who is way down on the list when other teams don't get that luxury of winning 4-0 with only 1 win.
What you're saying is beyond bias because it would only affect LRM)... It's not fair either that other teams have a chance for 4-0 against the bottom two teams while they do not. There will be a rule change next season concerning the point season because it's impossible to factor walk overs into the equation and so, until we can get a reliable bunch of teams, I can't operate it this way, however, it's perfectly reasonable that, given the current dynamics of the league, LRM) gets 3 points for that win. I think I may just start handing out negative points for Walk Overs next season or something... It's still up in the air. However, that is not this season and this season, the rules stand as is.
Both the green and yellow teams advance to the playoffs, so everything is still possible for all those clans! Even though we should start winning some more :p
On March 08 2012 04:23 Mango wrote: Both the green and yellow teams advance to the playoffs, so everything is still possible for all those clans! Even though we should start winning some more :p
Yeah If you don't start winning iwL sure as hell will be trying to!
On March 08 2012 04:23 Mango wrote: Both the green and yellow teams advance to the playoffs, so everything is still possible for all those clans! Even though we should start winning some more :p
That doesn't change the fact that the collection-of-players-formally-known-as-pain are still in gambit cup and will be your opponents. It does not affect gambit cup at all.
That doesn't change the fact that the collection-of-players-formally-known-as-pain are still in gambit cup and will be your opponents. It does not affect gambit cup at all.
After further review of the playoff system, I find myself questioning team's efforts. I don't understand why anyone would fight to be in 1st or 2nd when someone in 6th place could just as easily win the entire league, defeating almost 6 months of regular season's practicality.
On March 09 2012 18:18 Game wrote: After further review of the playoff system, I find myself questioning team's efforts. I don't understand why anyone would fight to be in 1st or 2nd when someone in 6th place could just as easily win the entire league, defeating almost 6 months of regular season's practicality.
Well that is inherent to a playoff system ofcourse. While I do prefer a system in which the 1st at the end of a season is the winner based on the fact that they have shown the best average performance, the playoff system does add in extra suspense to the end of the season with all or nothing matches. And since this is a playoff format we can only hope the suspense proves itself worthy after such a long season! But I never really understood the american preference towards playoffs though tbh :p
On March 09 2012 18:18 Game wrote: After further review of the playoff system, I find myself questioning team's efforts. I don't understand why anyone would fight to be in 1st or 2nd when someone in 6th place could just as easily win the entire league, defeating almost 6 months of regular season's practicality.
It is kind of true, perhaps I should have just invested less into the season and gone for longer playoffs because its a style that I like much to what Mango pointed out. It's really hard for me to compromise on the playoffs though being as last season, the playoffs were by far the best clan wars of all the Gambit's Cup... So, you could probably see a reduction in the seeding next season and more playoff action... As of yet, I'm unsure about how I want to configure it, but there will be some major format changes.
On March 10 2012 07:35 Mazur wrote: its really anoying that thers no link to the stream ...
There's one in the OP and one of the TL sidebar under the event... What more do you want? O_O
I want you to personally message me the stream link, with an explanation of the cast format. While you're at it, with all of your big sponsor monies, I insist that you send me a microwavable bag of popcorn from Canadia. I want to see if they use syrup instead of butter.
(Vote): iwL.executor is a Sayle alt account (Vote): Stasised overlord can't detect (Vote): Dark archons spells are amazing (Vote): Clumping guardians is bad (Vote): Protoss lategame is bullshit (Vote): Please can we have Jumper vs Dewalt back ? (Vote): All of the above
On March 10 2012 10:35 corumjhaelen wrote: Finally, 1h11...
Poll: What did you learn today ?
All of the above (10)
91%
Please can we have Jumper vs Dewalt back ? (1)
9%
iwL.executor is a Sayle alt account (0)
0%
Stasised overlord can't detect (0)
0%
Dark archons spells are amazing (0)
0%
Clumping guardians is bad (0)
0%
Protoss lategame is bullshit (0)
0%
11 total votes
Your vote: What did you learn today ?
(Vote): iwL.executor is a Sayle alt account (Vote): Stasised overlord can't detect (Vote): Dark archons spells are amazing (Vote): Clumping guardians is bad (Vote): Protoss lategame is bullshit (Vote): Please can we have Jumper vs Dewalt back ? (Vote): All of the above
On March 13 2012 15:20 reps)Plumbum wrote: Eywa, fast updates give at least of 25% interest of watching this league.
true, also why iFu.BMW saying cute is quitter? poor guy wins 2 games and has his sets reversed...
If he was a real man, he would have won 4 games so that Eywa could reverse AK him!
Well if he won all 4 and didn't send in reps, that would have indeed happened. The rules aren't bias to any given amount of kills.
Apologies, just found Cute's e-mail... I was looking for it and couldn't figure out that he sent in his replays, but in fact he did... I asked him to send them and he never replied saying that he did. Sorry for the confusion.
Announcement
Starting in the playoffs, each player will be required to send in their own replays from a valid e-mail address, coaching staff will no longer be permitted to send in the replays for their players. If this proves impossible, exceptions may be arranged, however, they will probably have higher inconvenience. This new technique will be act as a counter abuse agent.
On March 14 2012 05:14 dRaW wrote: This is no good... Only reason I got my reverse all kill was thanks to zergboy sending in the replays since I was unable to do so... hahaha
Playoffs =/= winners league
Also, if an alternative needs to be arranged, something can be worked out..
all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
so wise oo
So unwise. This is a pay to play league, unless reps) is going to pay their cover, I suggest you don't make outlandish statements like that again. Edit: More importantly, Nb would've beaten PaiN, and the remaining 2 teams who would've played them are contending for 6th place, which automatically balances it out.
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
3 Clan Wars = Reset results that were done over the past 18 weeks!? O_O, other teams have given up equal or greater W.O counts than 3 being Gt (partial W.Os) and dM. Should 4-0ing either of those teams be discredited as well? I already know you're not a huge fan of this point system and I have already said it's going to be changed for next season (if applicable).
Edit: And by no means was PaiN at any point an easy team to 4-0... With Cute and Modesty at the last Clan War, I don't see how any team could easily 4-0 that..
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
3 Clan Wars = Reset results that were done over the past 18 weeks!? O_O, other teams have given up equal or greater W.O counts than 3 being Gt (partial W.Os) and dM. Should 4-0ing either of those teams be discredited as well? I already know you're not a huge fan of this point system and I have already said it's going to be changed for next season (if applicable).
Edit: And by no means was PaiN at any point an easy team to 4-0... With Cute and Modesty at the last Clan War, I don't see how any team could easily 4-0 that..
You mean 2-0*? Since 2-0 counts as 4-0 for some strange reason with WOs...
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
so wise oo
So unwise. This is a pay to play league, unless reps) is going to pay their cover, I suggest you don't make outlandish statements like that again. Edit: More importantly, Nb would've beaten PaiN, and the remaining 2 teams who would've played them are contending for 6th place, which automatically balances it out.
There is no reason to be an asshole to express your disagreement. You would have an easier time getting things done if you could keep urself cool (i.e Eywa-'s reply)
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
so wise oo
So unwise. This is a pay to play league, unless reps) is going to pay their cover, I suggest you don't make outlandish statements like that again. Edit: More importantly, Nb would've beaten PaiN, and the remaining 2 teams who would've played them are contending for 6th place, which automatically balances it out.
There is no reason to be an asshole to express your disagreement. You would have an easier time getting things done if you could keep urself cool (i.e Eywa-'s reply)
I wasn't being an asshole, I was making a modest suggestion about a blatantly unguided statement. I'm also not the organizer of this league (i.e Eywa-).
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
so wise oo
So unwise. This is a pay to play league, unless reps) is going to pay their cover, I suggest you don't make outlandish statements like that again.
So your saying reps) didn't pay the entry fee? if thats the case then they shouldn't collect any prize money.
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
so wise oo
So unwise. This is a pay to play league, unless reps) is going to pay their cover, I suggest you don't make outlandish statements like that again.
So your saying reps) didn't pay the entry fee? if thats the case then they shouldn't collect any prize money.
On March 14 2012 07:33 reps)Plumbum wrote: all games vs PaiN should be recounted as WO's and points rearranged due to this. cause team that are unlucky playing vs loosing teams in the end have disadvantage.
so wise oo
So unwise. This is a pay to play league, unless reps) is going to pay their cover, I suggest you don't make outlandish statements like that again.
So your saying reps) didn't pay the entry fee? if thats the case then they shouldn't collect any prize money.
Had any team not paid their entry fee, they wouldn't be playing by now... Or at all for that matter.
All i wanted to say is that "SO rule" is full of shit IMO.
and dont tell me that i say that only cause reps has zero SO's. xd
Cause its a bit random, when some teams get 3 pts playing vs low teams and some teams get only WO's which is 2 pts.
And there is nothing you can do about it, since its up to low team to come or not to come w/ full LU.
wow, why i am complainting since my team is going to make it to playoffs? Obv nothing could be done to running season, but i am just thinking in text and suggesting you all to think about SO's and WO's in GC season 3.
On March 14 2012 19:03 reps)Plumbum wrote: All i wanted to say is that "SO rule" is full of shit IMO.
and dont tell me that i say that only cause reps has zero SO's. xd
Cause its a bit random, when some teams get 3 pts playing vs low teams and some teams get only WO's which is 2 pts.
And there is nothing you can do about it, since its up to low team to come or not to come w/ full LU.
wow, why i am complainting since my team is going to make it to playoffs? Obv nothing could be done to running season, but i am just thinking in text and suggesting you all to think about SO's and WO's in GC season 3.
GoTuNk benchs a lot, Dave, don't fuck w/ him.
IMO shut out is good and all but the problem I have with it is when a team only has 1 or 2 players they shouldn't even be allowed to play, it should be auto forfeit because 1-2 wins for the OTHER team counts as all kill... ShutOut just another way to show how dominant your team is, but like you said we need some way to balance it.
eywa- u want each player send u reps during CW ? u must be crazy ....
its fucking hard to bring players for cw and orga them to start game... and almost impossible to make them all send rep (with a proper names) after a game... BW IS DIEING IF U THINK ALL WORLD PLAYS BW AND THERE IS A LOT OF PLAYERS/TEAMS YOU ARE WRONG!
plz fuck dont make teamleaders work more hard... its much easier to join game of my teammate dl his rep... rename it properly and send it myself...
PLZ stop inventing shit!...
i still not find playoff rules... but if i think they are trash too... cause i read here and see top6 teams play in playoffs ???????!!!!! can u plz explain me why we play this league for so long ???? if my team could go top6 and relax waiting playoff ???????
On March 15 2012 02:22 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: hmmm. Can someone explain me the amazing of this league ?.( i dont care about prize) I have to relax every cw of this league. i have to talk nice with the staff.i have to be another person while play this league.I also got mad every cw.and dunno whats more.The rules are trash.they just favored one team and rest fuck up so... plz someone tell me whats good about this league
This league is prolly the best team foreign tourney ever done. Seems enough to me.
On March 15 2012 02:22 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: hmmm. Can someone explain me the amazing of this league ?.( i dont care about prize) I have to relax every cw of this league. i have to talk nice with the staff.i have to be another person while play this league.I also got mad every cw.and dunno whats more.The rules are trash.they just favored one team and rest fuck up so... plz someone tell me whats good about this league
What? So you don't like this league because you have to be professional in order to earn money? Please, give more input.
Don't want to re-quote but I agree with GoTuNk, this league is amazing.
On March 15 2012 02:22 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: hmmm. Can someone explain me the amazing of this league ?.( i dont care about prize) I have to relax every cw of this league. i have to talk nice with the staff.i have to be another person while play this league.I also got mad every cw.and dunno whats more.The rules are trash.they just favored one team and rest fuck up so... plz someone tell me whats good about this league
What? So you don't like this league because you have to be professional in order to earn money? Please, give more input.
Don't want to re-quote but I agree with GoTuNk, this league is amazing.
This league IS awesome..
the only league that actually matters now and it brings alot of excitement and good games
On March 15 2012 02:01 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: eywa- u want each player send u reps during CW ? u must be crazy ....
its fucking hard to bring players for cw and orga them to start game... and almost impossible to make them all send rep (with a proper names) after a game... BW IS DIEING IF U THINK ALL WORLD PLAYS BW AND THERE IS A LOT OF PLAYERS/TEAMS YOU ARE WRONG!
plz fuck dont make teamleaders work more hard... its much easier to join game of my teammate dl his rep... rename it properly and send it myself...
PLZ stop inventing shit!...
i still not find playoff rules... but if i think they are trash too... cause i read here and see top6 teams play in playoffs ???????!!!!! can u plz explain me why we play this league for so long ???? if my team could go top6 and relax waiting playoff ???????
Okay, there's a lot of noise going on here, I don't want to reply to each individually because I don't want to call anyone out for anything.
First off, the replays don't have to be anti-spoilered on a week which I'm present = the naming difficulties are a moot point.
Secondly, I have said alternatives can be arranged if needed, however, they're not going to be any more convenient than the current procedure. This is the absolute easiest possible way I have found to get this done (from the player's perspective), every other alternative is easier for me, more work on you guys, so if you want to look into this, you all have my contact info and we can discuss it.
Also, I know people may not know what to do and how to do when it comes to e-mail, but I don't really care, just create the e-mail for them and tell them how to compose, attach, send... It's not that hard to learn. I will know if they sent it or you did (leaders), so don't try to cheat this system because you will have your set reversed.
Finally, I know nothing is perfect in this league, it's difficult to accommodate to so many different people and cultures within the time that I have at my disposal, the season is on its first big run, I would only expect it to get better from here (this being I don't really count season 1 as a good test of the foundations).
as plumbum said! many players in our teams dont even know what is e-mail! so if u wanna ruin our teams keep going eywa-...
i dont see this necessary for players to send e-mails... u can always check apm/eapm/hotkeys to check if someone smurfed in game... and this fucking emails are nth....
stop being idiot... u are really pissing me off tard!
On March 15 2012 06:51 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: as plumbum said! many players in our teams dont even know what is e-mail! so if u wanna ruin our teams keep going eywa-...
i dont see this necessary for players to send e-mails... u can always check apm/eapm/hotkeys to check if someone smurfed in game... and this fucking emails are nth....
stop being idiot... u are really pissing me off tard!
- No BM or flaming will be tolerated in Official Gambit Cup threads, failure to abide by this rule will result in action taken against the offending team at organizer's discretion.
Due to being on the road today (so that I can be home for ISL3 tomorow), I won't be able to make it to the clan war today. Since it's winner's league there should be no issue with player selection. Anything else will be reviewed after the fact, just make sure you screen shot anything important. Just use 1, 2, 3 shout method for first player.
the scene? its because there were lag/disc issues with several games, including + Show Spoiler +
kolll vs eeic9 or w/e his name is. They were actually replaced by trutacz and bakuryu because it was unable to be resolved, and so: choosy < sneazel pike > sneazel pike < michael kolll > michael kolll - eeic9? bakuryu < trutacz me > trutacz me < eeic9? gt won 4-3
yea Pike was lagging so much too, i just played it out because i didn't wanna waste more time(wasted 20 min or so already) nor take the freewin but players should always check to see if they have proper condition to play without any lag.
On March 17 2012 15:59 gutshot wrote: yea Pike was lagging so much too, i just played it out because i didn't wanna waste more time(wasted 20 min or so already) nor take the freewin but players should always check to see if they have proper condition to play without any lag.
Kol disced 2times and then he didnt back to fish to play vs eeic09 so nOoNe asked me if i want to take wo. i decided to play without wo, but LRM) and Gt must put next player. btw. thanks for manner CW, it was hard because of some problems^^
Kol disced 2times and then he didnt back to fish to play vs eeic09 so nOoNe asked me if i want to take wo. i decided to play without wo, but LRM) and Gt must put next player. btw. thanks for manner CW, it was hard because of some problems^^
On March 21 2012 01:17 Game wrote: Being that it's 1 week out of the playoffs, why is iFU above LRM) in 3rd when LRM) beat iFU?
Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head
LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU.
But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious)
On March 21 2012 01:17 Game wrote: Being that it's 1 week out of the playoffs, why is iFU above LRM) in 3rd when LRM) beat iFU?
Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head
LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU.
But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious)
same number of points same number of wins ifu has 57 set wins, lrm has 52 therefor ifu is ahead. head to head is the very last tie breaker.
On March 21 2012 01:17 Game wrote: Being that it's 1 week out of the playoffs, why is iFU above LRM) in 3rd when LRM) beat iFU?
Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head
LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU.
But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious)
same number of points same number of wins ifu has 57 set wins, lrm has 52 therefor ifu is ahead. head to head is the very last tie breaker.
It was originally first until I considered the possibility of three way ties. So yes, Hacklebeast is correct.
On March 21 2012 01:17 Game wrote: Being that it's 1 week out of the playoffs, why is iFU above LRM) in 3rd when LRM) beat iFU?
Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head
LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU.
But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious)
same number of points same number of wins ifu has 57 set wins, lrm has 52 therefor ifu is ahead. head to head is the very last tie breaker.
Still makes no sense because we have a higher win percentage, meaning we finish our opponents rather than drag on CW's, and also beat them. Regardless of ELO, logic is slapping me in the face right now.
On March 21 2012 01:17 Game wrote: Being that it's 1 week out of the playoffs, why is iFU above LRM) in 3rd when LRM) beat iFU?
Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head
LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU.
But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious)
same number of points same number of wins ifu has 57 set wins, lrm has 52 therefor ifu is ahead. head to head is the very last tie breaker.
Still makes no sense because we have a higher win percentage, meaning we finish our opponents rather than drag on CW's, and also beat them. Regardless of ELO, logic is slapping me in the face right now.
Edit: 64-61% is what I mean by higher win %
Basically means iFU is ahead because they have played more CWs...
On March 21 2012 03:03 hacklebeast wrote: I now can't tell whether you are trying to understand what the rules are, or if you are trying to explain why the rules are deficient.
Ruh Roh, not the rules that are wrong... seems I forgot to give LRM set wins for 2 W.O CWs... I realized this when thinking about how it was logical and it wasn't not because of the rules, but because LRM's win total wasn't right. 12 wins = 48 SW and 4 losses all in game 7 = 12 SW.
^ When I thought about their losses I realized LRM has near the most amount of possible set wins. ;; So I recalculated.
This puts LRM ahead of iFU. Going to recalculate everyone's set wins before playoffs (This may mean that iwL still has a chance with a sweep depending if reps) totals are correct. Going to try to get that done today if possible actually.
Random point: this league is so good. Look at the win/loss/points/statistics balance. No team in the top 4 has under 60% win or over 67%, and all extremely similar records. The 5th and 6th team both bear arguably the top 2 players, and many other top players outside of Korea and are 11-5 and 10-6 with mid to high 50% statistics. When is GC3 mang?
On March 21 2012 16:33 Sinedd wrote: so wait... there are only 6 teams participating cause other just stopped ? or is this already some kind of a playoff stage ?
The teams in black are mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. I believe dM and iWL are participating in the final two weeks of the regular season.
On March 21 2012 16:33 Sinedd wrote: so wait... there are only 6 teams participating cause other just stopped ? or is this already some kind of a playoff stage ?
The teams in black are mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. I believe dM and iWL are participating in the final two weeks of the regular season.
To ensure maximal quality of games, quarterfinal match "A" (3rd <> 6th) has been rescheduled to 1 hour before the previously announced time. If there is any issue with this time for any player from these teams, an arrangement will be made with due notice. Please note, this is not a sign that league dates and times can be moved around freely, this specific request has been in place since three months ago.
On March 25 2012 00:48 reps)Plumbum wrote: fuck, LRM not #3 pls -.-
If iFU beats LRM and Nb beats iwL, then iFU finishes third if iFU beats LRM and Nb doesn't beat iwL (Nb wins 1 or less sets), then sas finishes third if iFU beats LRM and Nb doesn't beat iwL (Nb wins 2 or more sets), then Nb finishes third if iFU sweeps LRM and Nb sweeps iwL, then iFU finishes third if iFU sweeps LRM and Nb doesn't sweep iwL (Nb wins 1 or less sets), then sas finishes third if iFU sweeps LRM and Nb doesn't sweep iwL (Nb wins 2 or more sets), then Nb finishes third
Same conditions to if you swap LRM and iFU = 12 different outcomes, 2 of which LRM finish third in (though they are likely possibilities)
1. GT 2. If (ifu>lrm 4-0) then (ifu) else (If (nb>iwl) then (nb), else (winner of lrm vs ifu)) 3. if (nb<iwl with 2 or 3 wins) then (nb) else (if (nb<iwl or ifu>lrm 4-0) then (sas), else (winner of lrm vs ifu)) 4. if (nb<iwl with less than 2 wins) then (nb) else (sas) 5. loser of ifu vs lrm 6. reps
so everyone in the bottom 5 could play everyone else opening round in the playoffs except sas vs nb, or iwl vs lrm. Set scores only matter if nb loses with either 2 or 3 wins, or if ifu sweeps lrm.
Nb has 2 less wins than iFU, if iFU sweeps LRM) they will be above Nb, changing the entire outcome of the playoff arrangement. I'm highly anticipating Eywa's recalculation of everything so it's all more clear.
On March 29 2012 18:46 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: Imagine guys. if we got interview before cw. and after cw on gambit cup ^_^. Will be really fun champion league style
You sure you'll want to have an interview after playing LRM)?
On March 29 2012 18:46 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: Imagine guys. if we got interview before cw. and after cw on gambit cup ^_^. Will be really fun champion league style
You sure you'll want to have an interview after playing LRM)?
hmmm is not about lrm. but gonna be fun the reaction of losser team in the interview
It's been attempted, players and leaders are too hard to get hold of after their games, no one likes to do interviews for some reason and most don't have microphones and what not.
i also dont know why caster are so... bored . only cuz im not good at english. but i my self if i have to wait for reps. i put the two logos of teams. Nb vs LRm and talk about rivalry. talk about stats. talk about key players. drama. etc. those litle things made the cast more interesting and u can see clear work in in the cast
On March 30 2012 04:48 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i also dont know why caster are so... bored . only cuz im not good at english. but i my self if i have to wait for reps. i put the two logos of teams. Nb vs LRm and talk about rivalry. talk about stats. talk about key players. drama. etc. those litle things made the cast more interesting and u can see clear work in in the cast
That's good feedback. I would say this should be done regardless if they have to wait for replays or not.
On March 30 2012 04:48 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i also dont know why caster are so... bored . only cuz im not good at english. but i my self if i have to wait for reps. i put the two logos of teams. Nb vs LRm and talk about rivalry. talk about stats. talk about key players. drama. etc. those litle things made the cast more interesting and u can see clear work in in the cast
On March 30 2012 04:48 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i also dont know why caster are so... bored . only cuz im not good at english. but i my self if i have to wait for reps. i put the two logos of teams. Nb vs LRm and talk about rivalry. talk about stats. talk about key players. drama. etc. those litle things made the cast more interesting and u can see clear work in in the cast
Those little things don't last for a 4 hour cast.
this make me think. whats better. quantity or quality . imagine 1 cw x day. with a gosu intro of gambit. with a great description of the team. with stats . win loss Ace players And while u do this u already got reps. and just cast . make 13 hours of cast is just a thing of one day. is not really cool.anyway i gonna stop this cuz. im moving in the wrong way
On March 30 2012 04:48 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: i also dont know why caster are so... bored . only cuz im not good at english. but i my self if i have to wait for reps. i put the two logos of teams. Nb vs LRm and talk about rivalry. talk about stats. talk about key players. drama. etc. those litle things made the cast more interesting and u can see clear work in in the cast
Those little things don't last for a 4 hour cast.
this make me think. whats better. quantity or quality . imagine 1 cw x day. with a gosu intro of gambit. with a great description of the team. with stats . win loss Ace players And while u do this u already got reps. and just cast . make 13 hours of cast is just a thing of one day. is not really cool.anyway i gonna stop this cuz. im moving in the wrong way
Casting 2 clan wars is not THAT much higher volume than 1... It's not like we're talking ISL here.
On March 30 2012 08:52 FyRe_DragOn wrote: i like this idea eon..bw drama can be positive too lol
Yeah but it'd be hard to get any leader besides myself on cam and mic at the same time after a CW just to be like "well that fucking sucked -_-". BW drama is actually very good, there are certain people who only care about foreign BW because of it (obviously a minority).
I'd really be all for this. Can each team throw out the names of 3 players, coaches or managers who have microphones and would be available for pre-game and post game interviews? If you guys can do this, we can get everyone set up before the playoffs, test and what not so that we don't run into issues on day of.
I'm all for what Eywa said, but I meant more of casters doing some background check. This teams played 3 times, score went XX, sziky did an all kill, bla bla. Then moving on to maps, like first map is outlier so no terrans, etc.
Kinda what they do in proleague I guess? I'm sure all teams will be up for post game win interviews lol.
On March 30 2012 12:12 GoTuNk! wrote: I'm all for what Eywa said, but I meant more of casters doing some background check. This teams played 3 times, score went XX, sziky did an all kill, bla bla. Then moving on to maps, like first map is outlier so no terrans, etc.
Kinda what they do in proleague I guess? I'm sure all teams will be up for post game win interviews lol.
I don't think people want the cast to be delayed anymore than is necessary. I mean if it was of proleauge quality, sure. But I don't have proleague's player data/ wealth of games to refer back to/ fancy graphics/background music/two other people to talk with.
So then I can try to get that information out during the opening builds, but it's harder than it looks. I don't know who the first players are until the viewer does, because everything is anti-spolered, so I would have to go off of memory. And having to remember a new set of 40 records (which I have to calculate myself because we don't have a tlpd) for the 4 teams I will be casting that day is unrealistic. I tend to talk about team records and their general standings in the beginning, but that takes about 30 seconds and doesn't change for the rest of the set.
As for the maps... I cast aztec 10 times a week. It's a three player map, it's bad for terran, there is a small ramp that people get trapped trying to go up, and the reverse ramp is a bitch. I can't say that 10 times a week though. If I was casting Un'gorto crater or bakojomi then sure, I would have fun things to say. But it's the same maps every week that everyone already knows. I can say a little about it, but I try not to say too much for the same reason I don't explain why bio is bad vP: because everyone already knows, and it would get horribly repetitive if I talked about it every time there was a tvp (actually, considering how few terrans there are, maybe that was a bad example )
It also doesn't help that the majority of my gambit cup matches this month have been me filling in for lmaster last minute, so I didn't have time to prepare anything magical anyway.
As for the interviews, I don't think pregame interviews a a good idea. Again, people want to just get to the starcraft, and They won't have much to say. As for post game ones, maybe, but I'm a bit skeptical. Logistics will be a nightmare. Not everyone speaks English as well as you gotunk. A lot of the best players don't have mics. By the time the cast ends, it will be like 1 am for Europe, so odds are a lot of them won't stick around till the end to be interviewed. If there were no problems, it could be cool, but assuming there will be no problems is a giant leap.
I'm not opposed to improving my casts, but there are a lot of things that make casting harder than is initially apparent. If you have practical ways to implement these ideas, I'd be glad to hear them, but I haven't figured out a way yet.
I think all you can do is get more general data since you don't have immediate access to graph charts unless you had them somewhere on a side-tab (assuming someone formulated them)
i.e total win % for that m.u in Gambit on that map, and past CW history between the two playing teams.
iFU.AlfiO takes his third BM offense of the season and receives a 6 CW suspension. This suspension will drag on into the next season of the Gambit's Cup if applicable. Applies to playoffs as well.
On March 31 2012 03:42 Eywa- wrote: For iFU Please note, I won't be doing this every time you guys shout out abuse...
Considering the local time on your PC shows 2.23PM and that means the post of Game was less than 24hours before that and guessing that this screenshot was made after the CW started, this roster change wasn't done 24hours before the CW and hence not applicable by rules?
On March 31 2012 03:42 Eywa- wrote: For iFU Please note, I won't be doing this every time you guys shout out abuse...
Considering the local time on your PC shows 2.23PM and that means the post of Game was less than 24hours before that and guessing that this screenshot was made after the CW started, this roster change wasn't done 24hours before the CW and hence not applicable by rules?
edit: yeah I thought same
9) Rules Concerning Roster Changes - There will be no roster changes 24 hours or less before a Clan War and/or PP Set.
but you know, if the result stands whereas in other clanwar such as Gt vs LRM in which jumper won and was in the cast had his game reversed because he didn't send in the replay (when he could have at any time if asked) something a little shady going down. I mean it's down to administration choice at the end, but at least please be consistent otherwise on the other people's end it looks like the league is fixed.
On March 31 2012 03:42 Eywa- wrote: For iFU Please note, I won't be doing this every time you guys shout out abuse...
Considering the local time on your PC shows 2.23PM and that means the post of Game was less than 24hours before that and guessing that this screenshot was made after the CW started, this roster change wasn't done 24hours before the CW and hence not applicable by rules?
Hmmm... You're actually right. CaStrO was added 23 hours, 30 minutes before the SS was taken, a fact that I had not really taken into account. However, he had not played till 4 sets later which means it was well over 24 hours before his game. In fact, you're trying to stir something up when the leader of the opposing team didn't even care enough to say anything about that 1/2 hour... Honestly, yeah, the rule was bent to the smallest extent, something that has been performed to a larger extent for such teams as dM, AoV, reps) and Nb. So, I mean, please don't go try and stir up dirt when it's hypocritical to do so (Some of these add-on were performed hours before the clan war. So, if you want to say it was wrong to do so, I really couldn't care less, I rather see games than no games (doesn't apply to LRM's case obviously), but given the ss is 1/2 hour before the 24 hour mark... I really don't see how that is a case for you to go on (1/2 hour off the start of the first game...).
tl;dr? You're not the leader of iFU, the leaders of iFU all had this at their disposal long before CaStrO came out onto the playing field, not one of them complained.
On March 31 2012 03:42 Eywa- wrote: For iFU Please note, I won't be doing this every time you guys shout out abuse...
Considering the local time on your PC shows 2.23PM and that means the post of Game was less than 24hours before that and guessing that this screenshot was made after the CW started, this roster change wasn't done 24hours before the CW and hence not applicable by rules?
edit: yeah I thought same
9) Rules Concerning Roster Changes - There will be no roster changes 24 hours or less before a Clan War and/or PP Set.
but you know, if the result stands whereas in other clanwar such as Gt vs LRM in which jumper won and was in the cast had his game reversed because he didn't send in the replay (when he could have at any time if asked) something a little shady going down. I mean it's down to administration choice at the end, but at least please be consistent otherwise on the other people's end it looks like the league is fixed.
Please finish your plate before you come posting here, you're not even a team leader, you're not on any of the teams you have named, you have no idea how stuff happens. I have always asked team leaders to send in their replays if they've been missing, teams which this apply to are Gt, iwL and Nb. I'll go out and ask for replays, in the case you're talking about, SneazeL had no case for Jumper and Jumper posted later apologizing.
I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
Totally 23.383333 hours before the CW. Honestly this debate is pointless as can be.
actually no, it isn't, since eywa himself admitted that the rules were bent, even if to the smallest extent. i think you should just quote 1) and be done with it, really no need for these bullshit explanations. 1) Rules Concerning Decisions and Over-Rulings - All teams and players are subject to administrative Discretion. - Eywa- reserves full discretion over all decisions and procedures. there, i doubt any remaining team will withdraw from the league in protest lol. can we just move on now please
On April 02 2012 05:06 myrtleturtle wrote: When does cast today start?
No cast today.
ok thank you ^^
edit: why is there no cast today anyway?
I didn't want to cast it. Combination of the only game being played today has no standings on overall results, and because I already did an unexpected gambit cup cast on Friday.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
Just be honest as LML pointed out YOUR OWN RULING states; within 24 hours of the CLANWAR not the specific set, seriously man you get defensive when you can't even back up your side of the argument, you clearly made a mistake and there are definitely inconsistencies. The fact that I was unrelated or not a team leader has nothing to do with this, just a cheap deflect of yourself to save face. In the end, this seriously puts a lot of stress on the scene as there has been way too much shady schemes going down and accusations, everyone is a dodger of these responsibilities when we should just take them head on.
edit: I will also add your remarks for "DRAMA" spoilers is pretty insulting to iFu, you are the final decision maker for every incident so might as well be professional about it since it shouldn't affect your judgement.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
Totally 23.383333 hours before the CW. Honestly this debate is pointless as can be.
If you were on the other end I AM 100% POSITIVE that there would at least be more administrative concern. We don't care if the organizers are bias but as least keep consistency.
On April 02 2012 02:07 skzlime wrote: actually no, it isn't, since eywa himself admitted that the rules were bent, even if to the smallest extent. i think you should just quote 1) and be done with it, really no need for these bullshit explanations. 1) Rules Concerning Decisions and Over-Rulings - All teams and players are subject to administrative Discretion. - Eywa- reserves full discretion over all decisions and procedures. there, i doubt any remaining team will withdraw from the league in protest lol. can we just move on now please
You are wiser than us, but it's still frustrating to have to see this so often.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
Just be honest as LML pointed out YOUR OWN RULING states; within 24 hours of the CLANWAR not the specific set, seriously man you get defensive when you can't even back up your side of the argument, you clearly made a mistake and there are definitely inconsistencies. The fact that I was unrelated or not a team leader has nothing to do with this, just a cheap deflect of yourself to save face. In the end, this seriously puts a lot of stress on the scene as there has been way too much shady schemes going down and accusations, everyone is a dodger of these responsibilities when we should just take them head on.
edit: I will also add your remarks for "DRAMA" spoilers is pretty insulting to iFu, you are the final decision maker for every incident so might as well be professional about it since it shouldn't affect your judgement.
You really are going to use a 37 minute window of time to try to call him an unprofessional, bad, and cheating organizer? Holy shit you're dumber than I ever could've thought.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
Totally 23.383333 hours before the CW. Honestly this debate is pointless as can be.
You're entitled to your opinion, which is generally wrong.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
Just be honest as LML pointed out YOUR OWN RULING states; within 24 hours of the CLANWAR not the specific set, seriously man you get defensive when you can't even back up your side of the argument, you clearly made a mistake and there are definitely inconsistencies. The fact that I was unrelated or not a team leader has nothing to do with this, just a cheap deflect of yourself to save face. In the end, this seriously puts a lot of stress on the scene as there has been way too much shady schemes going down and accusations, everyone is a dodger of these responsibilities when we should just take them head on.
edit: I will also add your remarks for "DRAMA" spoilers is pretty insulting to iFu, you are the final decision maker for every incident so might as well be professional about it since it shouldn't affect your judgement.
You really are going to use a 37 minute window of time to try to call him an unprofessional, bad, and cheating organizer? Holy shit you're dumber than I ever could've thought.
The decision was made extremely quickly without a second thought, if LRM was on the other end of that definitely there would at least be some review and I bet we'd see some changes being made afterwards. Also, if any other person not including yourself or eywa can honestly disagree with me then I would agree with your side of the argument(actually excluding noOne although he normally seems neutral) but seems like you guys go hand in hand every time these occurrences happen. [[ note: seems like the problems always are with LRM, surprise? ]]
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
Just be honest as LML pointed out YOUR OWN RULING states; within 24 hours of the CLANWAR not the specific set, seriously man you get defensive when you can't even back up your side of the argument, you clearly made a mistake and there are definitely inconsistencies. The fact that I was unrelated or not a team leader has nothing to do with this, just a cheap deflect of yourself to save face. In the end, this seriously puts a lot of stress on the scene as there has been way too much shady schemes going down and accusations, everyone is a dodger of these responsibilities when we should just take them head on.
edit: I will also add your remarks for "DRAMA" spoilers is pretty insulting to iFu, you are the final decision maker for every incident so might as well be professional about it since it shouldn't affect your judgement.
You really are going to use a 37 minute window of time to try to call him an unprofessional, bad, and cheating organizer? Holy shit you're dumber than I ever could've thought.
The decision was made extremely quickly without a second thought, if LRM was on the other end of that definitely there would at least be some review and I bet we'd see some changes being made afterwards. Also, if any other person not including yourself or eywa can honestly disagree with me then I would agree with your side of the argument(actually excluding noOne although he normally seems neutral) but seems like you guys go hand in hand every time these occurrences happen. [[ note: seems like the problems always are with LRM, surprise? ]]
I know of no problems with LRM), and for further forum use, you should probably source issues before attempting to defame and entire team's integrity you silly little child.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
Just be honest as LML pointed out YOUR OWN RULING states; within 24 hours of the CLANWAR not the specific set, seriously man you get defensive when you can't even back up your side of the argument, you clearly made a mistake and there are definitely inconsistencies. The fact that I was unrelated or not a team leader has nothing to do with this, just a cheap deflect of yourself to save face. In the end, this seriously puts a lot of stress on the scene as there has been way too much shady schemes going down and accusations, everyone is a dodger of these responsibilities when we should just take them head on.
edit: I will also add your remarks for "DRAMA" spoilers is pretty insulting to iFu, you are the final decision maker for every incident so might as well be professional about it since it shouldn't affect your judgement.
Let's be honest here, you're once again commenting on a topic that is totally irrelevant to you which you were not present for and you know nothing about... Nothing out of the ordinary so far.
As far as the case itself, iFU's claim was that CaStrO was added at the very beginning of the clan war. Which I denied and thus, I was not wrong, their claim was false. A screen shot was then presented to them well over an hour before CaStrO played. What does this mean? iFU's leadership either didn't care or was too ignorant to pay attention to their own clan war, either way, this is not a problem of mine. Seriously DraW, your post history in this thread is somewhat terrible and you have no real facts to back up what you're saying aside from "gossip".
Realistically, if I were to have applied the rules to their fullest extent many other things would have taken place, in fact, iFU would likely not be fielding a full line up next Saturday if I did. Let's be real here, yes, I'm trying to run a professional league, yes, I bend the rules at least once per week, but there is no favoritism to which these rules get bent towards, in fact, the rules have been bent more for iFU than for any other team (that being BM rules).
Your creating drama here accomplishes nothing, seriously... It's a blatant attempt to destroy solid foundation whether that was your mindset or not, I cannot tell, but the comment does no more than that.
On April 01 2012 18:36 LML wrote: I am not trying to stir up dirt.. it's just that you try to bash the iFU leaders with a screenshot and the manner in which you posted it, when the screenshot clearly shows exactly what they have been complaining about.
On a sidenote, Game's post was 23h, not 23.5h before the CW, and the rule also says "24hours or less before a CW", not an individual set in which a player might be used.
And the CW started at the time of the ss.
iFU complained because they thought CaStrO was added at the time of the first game.
Just be honest as LML pointed out YOUR OWN RULING states; within 24 hours of the CLANWAR not the specific set, seriously man you get defensive when you can't even back up your side of the argument, you clearly made a mistake and there are definitely inconsistencies. The fact that I was unrelated or not a team leader has nothing to do with this, just a cheap deflect of yourself to save face. In the end, this seriously puts a lot of stress on the scene as there has been way too much shady schemes going down and accusations, everyone is a dodger of these responsibilities when we should just take them head on.
edit: I will also add your remarks for "DRAMA" spoilers is pretty insulting to iFu, you are the final decision maker for every incident so might as well be professional about it since it shouldn't affect your judgement.
Let's be honest here, you're once again commenting on a topic that is totally irrelevant to you which you were not present for and you know nothing about... Nothing out of the ordinary so far.
As far as the case itself, iFU's claim was that CaStrO was added at the very beginning of the clan war. Which I denied and thus, I was not wrong, their claim was false. A screen shot was then presented to them well over an hour before CaStrO played. What does this mean? iFU's leadership either didn't care or was too ignorant to pay attention to their own clan war, either way, this is not a problem of mine. Seriously DraW, your post history in this thread is somewhat terrible and you have no real facts to back up what you're saying aside from "gossip".
Realistically, if I were to have applied the rules to their fullest extent many other things would have taken place, in fact, iFU would likely not be fielding a full line up next Saturday if I did. Let's be real here, yes, I'm trying to run a professional league, yes, I bend the rules at least once per week, but there is no favoritism to which these rules get bent towards, in fact, the rules have been bent more for iFU than for any other team (that being BM rules).
Your creating drama here accomplishes nothing, seriously... It's a blatant attempt to destroy solid foundation whether that was your mindset or not, I cannot tell, but the comment does no more than that.
No idea why you are still explaining anything to one single person who is clearly attempting to create drama. His posts going without warning thus far is simply a miracle. Remember, you're talking to the guy who made this thread with his troll buddies.
i am not posting here or i get ban immediately... as it always happen!
but i just state 1 thing. my team is pissed of misjudging and the fact that all rules work for ifu only and never for lrm). this fact is noticed by all. ur long posts doesnt change this fact!
so we wont participate next season for sure if smth wont change... (how can smth change if orgas and lrm)game go hand by hand as sas.draw already said)
eleminating our best player iFU.Alfio with lagger peruvian Castro(that was not even allowed to play) from playoffs is seriously GG to my team. Bad thing that whole bw community know that peruvians lag... and Castro lags worse then koreans(that are banned from this league).
my team will decide soon if we boycott the playoffs or not! but we already up to do this!
i dont ask eywa- to change smth about our cw vs lrm) .... i dont care we lost ... np!
but atleast make the playoffs look entertaining and worth to watch... let my player iFU.Alfio play. He already sad about his BM and wont act like this anymore.
if u gonna make next season of gambit please include peruvians to the list of banned countries. i dont try to be racist. seriously. but YOU ALL know that playing them is like playing chess not bw.
On April 02 2012 08:14 Eywa- wrote: reps)gag has been added to the reps) roster, thus, also removed from iwL's roster. This is the final roster change permitted for reps).
WHY THE FUCK YOU MAKE ROSTER CHANGES IN MY TEAM W/O ASKING ME ????????????? + Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2012 08:14 Eywa- wrote: reps)gag has been added to the reps) roster, thus, also removed from iwL's roster. This is the final roster change permitted for reps).
WHY THE FUCK YOU MAKE ROSTER CHANGES IN MY TEAM W/O ASKING ME ????????????? + Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2012 08:00 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: i am not posting here or i get ban immediately... as it always happen!
but i just state 1 thing. my team is pissed of misjudging and the fact that all rules work for ifu only and never for lrm). this fact is noticed by all. ur long posts doesnt change this fact!
so we wont participate next season for sure if smth wont change... (how can smth change if orgas and lrm)game go hand by hand as sas.draw already said)
eleminating our best player iFU.Alfio with lagger peruvian Castro(that was not even allowed to play) from playoffs is seriously GG to my team. Bad thing that whole bw community know that peruvians lag... and Castro lags worse then koreans(that are banned from this league).
my team will decide soon if we boycott the playoffs or not! but we already up to do this!
i dont ask eywa- to change smth about our cw vs lrm) .... i dont care we lost ... np!
but atleast make the playoffs look entertaining and worth to watch... let my player iFU.Alfio play. He already sad about his BM and wont act like this anymore.
if u gonna make next season of gambit please include peruvians to the list of banned countries. i dont try to be racist. seriously. but YOU ALL know that playing them is like playing chess not bw.
i dont give a fuck about Alfio and other bm members of iFU, BUT i'd like to confirm that ZB is absolutely right about that Peruvian players lag a lot. Its like 90% players from Peru lags VERY hard. So that is the spot to be discussed, imo.
Shotcoder i would like to see if u stay calm and manner when u lose to a less skilled guy cause of lag in an important match of the league. u eat it and say "gg". all okey! i am really happy to lose to a 'gosu guy'! can i pay u for lessons in bw?
On April 03 2012 02:53 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: Shotcoder i would like to see if u stay calm and manner when u lose to a less skilled guy cause of lag in an important match of the league. u eat it and say "gg". all okey! i am really happy to lose to a 'gosu guy'! can i pay u for lessons in bw?
Staying calm and BMing are two different things, Alfio should learn to type gg and then go BM to team members instead of in game where he gets a ban for it. It's irresponsible as a player and a teammate since he knew the play offs were coming.
I have yet to be suspended from any GC since I was AoV or dM this season...so I dont know what you're talking about.
Yea you can pay me for lessons...I doubt you'll learn anything useful.