| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
hacklebeast
United States5090 Posts
On March 19 2012 09:20 dRaW wrote: hm I couldn't make todays cw anyone have spoilered results^^? + Show Spoiler + zaraki>largo zaraki<dewaltt sziky>dewaltt sziky>pro7ect sziky>gotunk cryoc>gag cryoc<executor must>executor must>funny must>fenito | ||
|
PiKe
Poland181 Posts
| ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
On March 19 2012 19:53 PiKe wrote: i'm sexy and i know it cleaned up ur room? | ||
|
Mazur
Poland481 Posts
| ||
|
PiKe
Poland181 Posts
i changed it, i'm too sexy for cleaning | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
are you rich? On March 20 2012 02:32 Mazur wrote: Still no updates :/ slowpoke update style is the only thing i dislike in EVIL BW ADMIN aka Eywa. | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
| ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
iwL is eliminated from possibility of obtaining a playoff position. | ||
|
Nb.h00ligan
Bulgaria147 Posts
 | ||
|
reps)Plumbum
Russian Federation484 Posts
Its not an AK obv. | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On March 21 2012 00:01 reps)Plumbum wrote: Why LRM)NoOne is in All-Kill list? He did not AK iwL, he won 3 players and then LRM took WO. Its not an AK obv. He would've allkilled had iwL had a player. | ||
|
Sneazel
Poland152 Posts
if yes, then its AllKill  | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
| ||
|
iFU.ZerGgBoY
Russian Federation62 Posts
why half teams played 17 cw's half played 16 .... wtf is going on ? | ||
|
Mazur
Poland481 Posts
On March 21 2012 01:10 Sneazel wrote: took wo because of no players by iwL team? if yes, then its AllKill I've had the same situation ; ) I think that Eywa just made a mistake : > | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On March 20 2012 23:18 Nb.h00ligan wrote: Eywa- u miss Mazur allkill vs dm- Yep, sorry, going to add that. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On March 21 2012 01:29 iFU.ZerGgBoY wrote: eywa one day fix amount of cw's played by teams ?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why half teams played 17 cw's half played 16 .... wtf is going on ? 2 days left, PaiN and AoV make it so 4 teams should have 1 games left, 4 should have 2. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On March 21 2012 01:17 Game wrote: Being that it's 1 week out of the playoffs, why is iFU above LRM) in 3rd when LRM) beat iFU? Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU. | ||
|
Game
3191 Posts
On March 21 2012 02:35 Eywa- wrote: Tie breaker proceedure 1) Wins 2) Sets Won 3) Sets Lost 4) Head to head LRM has 2 CWs left whereas iFU only has one, if LRM beats iFU again, they will be ahead of iFU. But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious) | ||
|
hacklebeast
United States5090 Posts
On March 21 2012 02:41 Game wrote: But for the time being, strictly for aesthetic purposes, LRM) should be ahead of iFU given the only CW having gone 4-2, correct? (not saying to fix it if I am indeed right, just curious) same number of points same number of wins ifu has 57 set wins, lrm has 52 therefor ifu is ahead. head to head is the very last tie breaker. | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
