EPTTarget Carrier =
open terrain
Goliaths outnumber Carrier
attacking
Just attack intercepters =
Near base/turrets
defending
closed terrain
carrier outnumber goliath
Are there additional factors / improvements to these ?
goliath vs carrier
| Forum Index > Brood War Strategy |
|
kdog3683
United States916 Posts
Target Carrier = open terrain Goliaths outnumber Carrier attacking Just attack intercepters = Near base/turrets defending closed terrain carrier outnumber goliath Are there additional factors / improvements to these ? | ||
|
gumbum8
United States721 Posts
| ||
|
guMmiwormz
United States312 Posts
im probably wrong though :O | ||
|
numLoCK
Canada1416 Posts
| ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
also why did you make this thread in the strategy section? blog worthy imo | ||
|
kdog3683
United States916 Posts
On July 10 2009 13:14 HeavOnEarth wrote: well sometimes carriers force goliaths to spread out and cover multiple areas This is the most vague piece of advice I've ever heard. And it makes so much sense. Why group 3 groups of 12 goliath together when you can seperate them over 3 areas vs 8-9 carriers. ya! And is gol vs carrier not worthy of strategy lol? I would think you are a troll if not for the fact that I've seen you post before. | ||
|
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
who the hell goes carriers these days anyway? ;P | ||
|
anch
United States5457 Posts
When there are outnumber of Carriers you target the Carrier. There is no ending killing 32+++ interceptors while they can produce more interceptors. When T has more goliath force, cars should be running away. chasing them would be a possibility, unless they fly over cliffs. then T should just a-move killing whatever possible.the more interceptor you kill the more useless carriers get, and it forces them to use 25x mineral if they want to keep using carriers. added, Jangbi vs Flash on destination. JB went carriers. The cliffs and back door were like hell to Flash. | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
On July 10 2009 13:37 kdog3683 wrote: This is the most vague piece of advice I've ever heard. And it makes so much sense. Why group 3 groups of 12 goliath together when you can seperate them over 3 areas vs 8-9 carriers. ya! And is gol vs carrier not worthy of strategy lol? I would think you are a troll if not for the fact that I've seen you post before. this is a shitty thread, gol vs carrier is perfectly fine in strategy, you just put little to zero effort in making this thread [ ] labeled correctly [x] no replay [x] no screenshots [x] never used search function to find the other threads relating to goliath vs carrier http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=60175 | ||
|
Durak
Canada3685 Posts
[ ] labeled correctly [x] no replay [x] no screenshots [x] never used search function to find the other threads relating to goliath vs carrier | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
| ||
|
pat965
Canada274 Posts
I'm trying desperately to delete this post. Sorry :/ | ||
|
Archaic
United States4024 Posts
On July 10 2009 14:55 HeavOnEarth wrote: i don't know what you're talking about ;p I think I can infer what you did there  . | ||
|
HeavOnEarth
United States7087 Posts
 shh | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66358 Posts
AND you are ahead in economy | ||
| ||
