EPT[old] playrep v1.1 release - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Meh
Sweden458 Posts
| ||
|
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
| ||
|
Response
United States1936 Posts
On March 03 2008 04:16 GoSuPlAyEr wrote: when i try to enable it says conflicting sc path can anyone help me with why this happens? what am i doing wrong? | ||
|
gemo
China4 Posts
'conflicting sc path' means the path of SC you are running is different from the path of SC in the Windows Registry. For CD version, reinstall it at all; for HD version, just run the setup.exe in the path of SC you are running. to Evilmonkey: playrep v1.1 supports 2 or 3 people use at one time. to skindzer: What's mean for 'featured threads'? to Drowsy: Please teach me native English, thanks. I love English. And, Is there anyone good at both English and Korean? Could you post it in Korean-bbs? | ||
|
D[a]M[e]i[N]
American Samoa3 Posts
 | ||
|
Avius
Iraq1796 Posts
| ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
On March 04 2008 10:40 gemo wrote: to GoSuPlAyEr: 'conflicting sc path' means the path of SC you are running is different from the path of SC in the Windows Registry. For CD version, reinstall it at all; for HD version, just run the setup.exe in the path of SC you are running. Changing the path can also be done in the Settings-Tab of Chaoslauncher or manually in the registry. | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
masami.sc thinks this program is "stupid" | ||
Daigomi
South Africa4316 Posts
On March 04 2008 10:40 gemo wrote: to GoSuPlAyEr: 'conflicting sc path' means the path of SC you are running is different from the path of SC in the Windows Registry. For CD version, reinstall it at all; for HD version, just run the setup.exe in the path of SC you are running. to Evilmonkey: playrep v1.1 supports 2 or 3 people use at one time. to skindzer: What's mean for 'featured threads'? And, Is there anyone good at both English and Korean? Could you post it in Korean-bbs? gemo: I've asked HonestTea if he could post it on the Korean forums. I (or HonestTea himself) will let you know if something happens. As for featured threads, they are simply threads that get placed in a different forum. These threads are always threads of a high quality, or contain something very useful, so skindzer asked the site moderators why this hasn't been placed in the featured threads forum yet. This program looks amazing! | ||
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
| ||
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6771 Posts
OMFG. | ||
|
Daigomi
South Africa4316 Posts
At the very least it will allow you to recreate those famous battles you've always wanted to try out, which sounds like a lot of fun. It coud even be used to practise certain situations, like save a game from a good point at the start where both players have expanded. That way you can practise mid game macro or whatever. This program has so many posibillities! | ||
|
LG)Sabbath
Argentina3024 Posts
| ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
| ||
|
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
On March 05 2008 09:12 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: The only issue I can think of in Clan Wars is that, when the players join the replay in order to resave it, they'll both be able to see all of the other persons units and buildings (secret expos as an example) that existed at the point that someone dropped hmm i guess u could make the players turn off vision of both players. But that's not enforcible over bnet so i guess it's only useful in organised live events like korean leagues. | ||
|
gemo
China4 Posts
On March 05 2008 09:12 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: The only issue I can think of in Clan Wars is that, when the players join the replay in order to resave it, they'll both be able to see all of the other persons units and buildings (secret expos as an example) that existed at the point that someone dropped I think it's on problem. When a game drop happens, for example, July vs Bisu, there is 3 possibility: 1 They both think that the situation at drop-point seems all square, so they can play off a match or use playrep to continue the rep. 2 July consider he had have a crucial advantage already. And Bisu had agree with he. So the result is determinate. 3 July consider he had have a crucial advantage already, he won't play off a match. But the problem is that Bisu hadn't agree with he, sitll he thinks he got chance. In this case, the best way is use playrep. | ||
|
comabreaded
United States2166 Posts
| ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27149 Posts
| ||
| ||
