This is a great feature and I hope that eventually we will have modified K value for winning more prestigious matches like OSL or MSL finals over simple qualification games.

TranceStorm

1616 Posts

September 10 2007 21:33 GMT

#22

On September 11 2007 06:19 GrandInquisitor wrote:
If I had known you guys were doing this I would have suggested Glicko-2, a modification of ELO ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glicko_rating_system ) instead; it's what's used on XBox Live and allows for Ratings Uncertainty and volatility and measures like that, making it in general far more accurate than plain vanilla ELO

Yeah, alot of other rated games now use Glicko instead of ELO nowadays.

Wizard

Poland5055 Posts

September 10 2007 22:07 GMT

#23

W0w sweet...

LordofAscension

United States589 Posts

September 10 2007 22:22 GMT

#24

Very very awesome work. I'm impressed.

~LoA

OrderlyChaos

United States1115 Posts

September 10 2007 22:26 GMT

#25

Very nice addition. I'm liking these new features :D

Last Romantic

United States20667 Posts

September 10 2007 22:29 GMT

#26

BoxeR and YellOw tied?

;P

TheFoReveRwaR

United States10657 Posts

September 10 2007 22:38 GMT

#27

For current rating that wouldn't be suprising at all

Orome

Switzerland11984 Posts

September 10 2007 23:19 GMT

#28

Glicko is not objectively better than ECO, they both have their up- and downsides.

Another great addition PoP, <3!

Jyvblamo

Canada13788 Posts

September 10 2007 23:21 GMT

#29

Heh, the top ~20 or so players are all also on the Kespa top 30.

Very nice feature for TLPD. ^.^

IPS.ZeRo

Germany1142 Posts

September 10 2007 23:23 GMT

#30

yellows peak was higher than boxers, thats quite surprising.

fuglyfrog

United States521 Posts

September 10 2007 23:36 GMT

#31

Isn't there a problem with inflation when comparing the peak ELO of players from different eras?

edit: I've heard that the Chessmetric system is supposed to be the best at calculating the relative historical rating of players.

Also, there's a fomula for factoring in the overall strength of the tournament into the ratings.

GrandInquisitor

New York City13113 Posts

September 11 2007 00:00 GMT

#32

Glicko is pretty much universally considered better than ELO; it's basically admitting that ratings are wildly variable in certain cases.

It's a pain to describe, though, and it's kind of more complicated. Check http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/glicko/glicko.doc/glicko.html out (the original glicko webpage), and just think whether or not it's worth it. I think it is; others might not.

Eatme

Switzerland3919 Posts

September 11 2007 00:25 GMT

#33

Aaah thats a great thing to add. You guys rule.
I really like ELO and stats.

Waves

Australia185 Posts

September 11 2007 01:55 GMT

#34

Another great feature. I'm really impressed with all the work on this site.

I'll add my voice to those calling for Glicko2, if it's not too much trouble.

SuperJongMan

Jamaica11586 Posts

September 11 2007 02:03 GMT

#35

You guys make progaming so much.