EPTStarCraft: Remastered Graphics Comparisons - Page 3
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
seopthi
393 Posts
| ||
|
lxginverse
Monaco1506 Posts
| ||
|
p1oneer
Latvia50 Posts
| ||
|
GiveMeCake
148 Posts
On March 26 2017 15:10 seopthi wrote: BW and SC:R are fully compatible, so if someone doesn't like the remastered graphics can still play on the ladder using the free 1.18 against others with the hd version That doesn't make sense since you can zoom out on the remastered version so it would be an unfair advantage. I'm not saying you're wrong, but where did you get that info from? | ||
|
Chris_Havoc
United States600 Posts
On March 26 2017 15:21 GiveMeCake wrote: That doesn't make sense since you can zoom out on the remastered version so it would be an unfair advantage. I'm not saying you're wrong, but where did you get that info from? Read the last question in the remastered interview. Q: Are there any plans to make BW and SC:R compatible? If gameplay is designed to be identical between both games, can players choose to play BW and SC:R and play against each other? Would replays be playable in both graphic modes? A: Players will be able to connect and play, watch replays, or share saved games seamlessly between free Brood War, and the SC:R upgrade. It’s all the same client! Each player and observer in the game can opt to play in standard or high def individually, and you can switch instantly and seamlessly at the press of a button right inside the game or while watching a replay. | ||
|
Piste
6180 Posts
| ||
|
Diaresta
United States597 Posts
| ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
Now I need a Diablo 2 HD. | ||
|
Keeemy
Finland7855 Posts
| ||
|
Lunareste
United States3596 Posts
Rip my little amphibian friends | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10233 Posts
Minerals are too bright imo Sunken colonies look awkward on creep, we'll have to see what creep colonies and spores look too Zerglings are ugly, look like a failed abortion version of the winged-zergling version in HotS BCs look anorexic Tanks feel too different from the old one and elongated in non-siege mode and too clunky in siege mode | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4356 Posts
On March 26 2017 15:21 GiveMeCake wrote: That doesn't make sense since you can zoom out on the remastered version so it would be an unfair advantage. I'm not saying you're wrong, but where did you get that info from? It's in the interview. It seems like they're keeping the same viewpoint for BWHD just with widescreen.This zoom out stuff is only for observer mode? Someone confirm? | ||
|
gngfn
United States1726 Posts
e: Note that this was also the case in BW, but it was a lot less noticeable because the units had much less fine detail. | ||
|
Uvantak
Uruguay1381 Posts
| ||
|
reminisce12
Australia318 Posts
| ||
|
Halolo
Germany8 Posts
On March 26 2017 15:56 reminisce12 wrote: looks fake and hand drawn... xD ~~ HYPEEEEEEE | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On March 26 2017 15:56 reminisce12 wrote: looks fake and hand drawn... I think that's what they literally had to do to update the graphics. The original 3D models that were used to render the old sprites may no longer be available so it's likely that they had to hand-draw new sprites on top of the old ones. The hand-draw remastered portraits may be more debatable, but I think Blizzard is using talented artists like Mr--Jack so I have some hopes that they'll turn out well. | ||
|
EnderSword
Canada669 Posts
On March 26 2017 15:56 reminisce12 wrote: looks fake and hand drawn... As opposed to using a real photograph of a Mutalisk? | ||
|
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On March 26 2017 16:22 EnderSword wrote: As opposed to using a real photograph of a Mutalisk? You made my day. | ||
|
necrosexy
451 Posts
| ||
| ||
