|
Current registrations: 71 + Show Spoiler [Registered Teams] + 1. Caltech 2. Harvey Mudd 3. UNC Chapel Hill 4. Carnegie Melon 5. Waterloo 6. Rutgers 7. UCI 8. Uvic 9. UCSD 10. Northwest Florida 11. Augustana College 12. MIT 13. UCR 14. Yale 15. Cal Poly 16. North Texas 17. GTech 18. Purdue 19. UMich 20. Cornell 21. UCD 22. UBC 23. UCF 24. UofT 25. South Dakota 26. GMU 27. Harvard 28. ASU 29. Hampshire 30. OSU 31. Princeton 33. Rice 34. McMaster 35. UGA 36. Mount Allison 37. Oberlin 38. University of Illinois 39. Tufts 40. Northwestern 41. USC 42. Berkeley 43. Stonybrook 44. York University 45. Virginia Tech 46. Case 47. UCLA *you're registering, bitches. 48. Duke 49. UWO 50. Binghamton 51. Carelton 52. U Wash 53. Dalhouise 54. Stanford 55. Michigan State 56. U Tennessee 57. McGill 58. Emory 59. Valparaiso U 60. Ottawa 61. Texas A&M 62. U Maryland 63. Ryerson 64. U Chicago 65. Oregon State 66. U Florida 67. Georgia State 68. Northern Illinois 69. RPI 70. Utah Valley 71. Lewis and Clark 72. UC Merced
Yea buddies. It's time to start registering for the 3rd CSL Season. Expect a start date of mid-February. Signups will run through the end of January. Looking for specific information, read the rest of this post!
Who Can Participate ANY college or university located in the United States or Canada. If your team participated in the previous CSL Season, you will have to re-register. If you did not participate last season, now is your chance to sign up.
Eligibility Your team will need to have at least four (4) players in order to participate, and a coordinator (the coordinator can be one of the four players). Unlike last season, you must be currently attending the school in order to participate on the CSL team. We are not allowing mercenary players this season.
How to Register Please send an email to: cstarleague@gmail.com with the following information:
1. Your team (school) name 2. Your team tag (can be different from school name) 3. Coordinator's name, ICCUP nick, and email address (must be a valid university address) 4. Number of players 5. "I have read and understand the rules" (rules are located: here) + Show Spoiler +The rules have currently not been updated for the new season, expect this in the next week or so. However, they will be largely the same except for the mercenary rule, which will be eliminated.
Questions? If you have any questions, please feel free to send me a pm here on TL.net, or email me at cstarleague@gmail.com.
Registration will run from now until January 30th, 2010 @ midnight PST
+ Show Spoiler +
|
can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks
|
On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks
lolwat.
|
*edit* oops didn't read carefully enough. We got a bunch of new players in between this season and the last one, though they're mostly D-
FOR NOW.
|
yes.we have no way of knowing who still wants to participate / if a team has died off, etc. to account for this, everyone must re-register.
it takes 30 seconds.
|
Hrmm. I don't suppose it particularly matters how GOOD you are to play in this, am I right? I figure I could just gather a few guys who like playing starcraft here and there and join up in the league? We'd be the only college so far in Florida, so I think it'd be interesting ;P
|
On January 13 2010 15:05 XThunderyX wrote: Hrmm. I don't suppose it particularly matters how GOOD you are to play in this, am I right? I figure I could just gather a few guys who like playing starcraft here and there and join up in the league? We'd be the only college so far in Florida, so I think it'd be interesting ;P go for it!
On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks I raise you 2 cents
|
On January 13 2010 15:05 XThunderyX wrote: Hrmm. I don't suppose it particularly matters how GOOD you are to play in this, am I right? I figure I could just gather a few guys who like playing starcraft here and there and join up in the league? We'd be the only college so far in Florida, so I think it'd be interesting ;P
yes - there is no skill requirement. many of the teams are in fact quite bad... there are quite a few teams that only have D / D- / D+ players... it's all about having fun playing BW.
|
Sweet! Sounds good, I'll have to scrounge up a few players then. Now, do I have to actually start a club or something for this? Because where I live to be honest all the gamers are either reclusive or none existant, so getting something up at the school may be hard..
|
Alright, new season has started. I encourage more random players this season.
|
Sounds great, trying to create a team at my school as we speak! Just need one more to make the minimum...
|
On January 13 2010 15:20 XThunderyX wrote: Sweet! Sounds good, I'll have to scrounge up a few players then. Now, do I have to actually start a club or something for this? Because where I live to be honest all the gamers are either reclusive or none existant, so getting something up at the school may be hard..
Nah, you don't need to be official with your school to be official with us. It might help to be part of a gaming club (for money, reserving rooms, etc.) but we don't consider that at all. I know the people from Rutgers rarely see each other in person (or at least, last I heard) but they're still a solid team.
|
Korea (South)11570 Posts
Anyone from Radford University? I hate being the only person playing SC at my school, can't even play this season, and i'm not bout to drop out to play for NRCC.
|
On January 13 2010 15:40 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 15:20 XThunderyX wrote: Sweet! Sounds good, I'll have to scrounge up a few players then. Now, do I have to actually start a club or something for this? Because where I live to be honest all the gamers are either reclusive or none existant, so getting something up at the school may be hard.. Nah, you don't need to be official with your school to be official with us. It might help to be part of a gaming club (for money, reserving rooms, etc.) but we don't consider that at all. I know the people from Rutgers rarely see each other in person (or at least, last I heard) but they're still a solid team. Heh, cool. Sounds good then, you should have a team representing Northwest Florida College soon enough! (btw, if you're reading this and from NWF, you should TOTALLY message me ;P)
|
|
On January 13 2010 15:14 Sunyveil wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks I raise you 2 cents call. how do you want to divide the sponsorship name? doberne-zhang sounds pretty horrendous... maybe we should name it in honor of wei-guo lololol
|
|
For number of players, that's approximate correct?
|
Let's do new divisions, yo.
|
On January 13 2010 16:28 Jumperer wrote: can a community college joins in?
Yup. any US/CA college can join.
On January 13 2010 16:57 Snipinpanda wrote: For number of players, that's approximate correct?
huh? What do you mean? The minimum players that a team must have is 4, no less. not approximate o.O.
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
Should schedule some out of division games.
|
by the way, when does this start? My school isn't back in session until the second week of february.
|
On January 13 2010 23:07 Sunyveil wrote: by the way, when does this start? My school isn't back in session until the second week of february.
Can't really say until we have the schools all sorted out. Probably the 13th or 20th though?
|
On January 13 2010 23:53 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 23:07 Sunyveil wrote: by the way, when does this start? My school isn't back in session until the second week of february. Can't really say until we have the schools all sorted out. Probably the 13th or 20th though? of february I am assuming
|
Let's try to break 70 teams this season please
|
xeris school of design FTW
|
On January 14 2010 00:56 Nal_rAwr wrote: xeris school of design FTW xeris college of arts and sciences imo
|
On January 13 2010 22:48 DarthThienAn wrote:Yup. any US/CA college can join. Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 16:57 Snipinpanda wrote: For number of players, that's approximate correct? huh? What do you mean? The minimum players that a team must have is 4, no less. not approximate o.O.
Ah, sorry.
On January 13 2010 14:50 Xeris wrote:1. Your team (school) name 2. Your team tag (can be different from school name) 3. Coordinator's name, ICCUP nick, and email address (must be a valid university address) 4. Number of players 5. "I have read and understand the rules" (rules are located: here)
Is that an approximate estimate?
|
I think i've found enough for a case team! About 5 possibles and I'm in contact with a sc group on campus now.
|
Is the map pool going to shift? Maybe rotate in a little Fighting Spirit or something?
|
A new challenger appears!
Purdue Hwaiting!
|
On January 14 2010 00:04 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 23:53 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 13 2010 23:07 Sunyveil wrote: by the way, when does this start? My school isn't back in session until the second week of february. Can't really say until we have the schools all sorted out. Probably the 13th or 20th though? of february I am assuming
yeah of course haha.
On January 14 2010 00:54 monkxly wrote: Let's try to break 70 teams this season please
agreeeed.
On January 14 2010 04:26 Snipinpanda wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 22:48 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 13 2010 16:28 Jumperer wrote: can a community college joins in? Yup. any US/CA college can join. On January 13 2010 16:57 Snipinpanda wrote: For number of players, that's approximate correct? huh? What do you mean? The minimum players that a team must have is 4, no less. not approximate o.O. Ah, sorry. Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 14:50 Xeris wrote:1. Your team (school) name 2. Your team tag (can be different from school name) 3. Coordinator's name, ICCUP nick, and email address (must be a valid university address) 4. Number of players 5. "I have read and understand the rules" (rules are located: here) Is that an approximate estimate?
Ah, excellent question in that case. The wording was confusing. And yea, as close as you can get. It's just a guideline that we might consider for divisions and eligibility as well (some schools don't realize they need 4 =P)
On January 14 2010 05:18 Severedevil wrote: Is the map pool going to shift? Maybe rotate in a little Fighting Spirit or something?
Most likely. I was thinking about FS and some of the other new maps now that they're public, but the admins will decide together.
|
On January 13 2010 22:49 T.O.P. wrote: Should schedule some out of division games.
Dude =P. Exhibition. I think I was managing them all season, although some schools didn't respond and such so it wasn't as great as it could have been. I think that making out of division games optional is better though - some schools prefer the bye week as rest/extra team practice.
Teams that wanna exhibition are always welcome to, just needed to email me back when they had byes.
|
Any players from Carleton U (that is, Carleton U located in the city of Ottawa, not the other one in the west) interested in making a team? I know a couple of people already who've expressed interested, but we need at least one more.
|
I'm confused about the Exceptions rule because it said (this season only) and I am not sure if that pertains to the 2nd or 3rd season.
Also UCF students contact me if you are reading this!
|
If you go to GMU PM mah, we will be playing this season. ^_^;;
|
Why are lineups unannounced? I think it would be more fun to have a MU to prepare for ^^
|
On January 14 2010 06:56 Whiplash wrote: I'm confused about the Exceptions rule because it said (this season only) and I am not sure if that pertains to the 2nd or 3rd season.
Also UCF students contact me if you are reading this!
The rules page is old, still for last season. Like it says in the OP, the "mercenaries" rule, or combining with schools when your school doesn't have enough players for its own team, is no longer in effect. All players on your team must currently attend your school. This is for the 3rd season.
On January 14 2010 06:58 LuckyFool wrote: If you go to GMU PM mah, we will be playing this season. ^_^;;
GMU? George Mason? lol.
|
Just re-registered GT. This sucks though because our best Protoss player graduated
|
United States10774 Posts
|
|
On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:
GMU? George Mason? lol. yeah. lol u.
|
Hey, anyone at Brock University in Ontario (don't know if there are others) want to join the most casual team in the history of ever email me at sb08yu@brocku.ca
|
Dam, wish I had of gone to Uni or a college so I could play SC.. I instead went into the trades to make lots and lots of moneh.
|
On January 14 2010 08:06 annYeong(o11) wrote: Hey, anyone at Brock University in Ontario (don't know if there are others) want to join the most casual team in the history of ever email me at sb08yu@brocku.ca Salv goes to Brock
|
On January 14 2010 07:19 OneOther wrote: tanman?
yea
|
If you got to UofT(Toronto) and are interested in playing for the CSL team, please pm me.
|
United States47024 Posts
On January 14 2010 06:50 DarthThienAn wrote: Most likely. I was thinking about FS and some of the other new maps now that they're public, but the admins will decide together. Might it go to a vote?
Maybe not for all of them, but a community vote for the oddball/old-school map (e.g. RoV) could be interesting.
|
Oh god here we go again...
|
Just registered our team via email, thanks!
|
On January 14 2010 08:06 annYeong(o11) wrote: Hey, anyone at Brock University in Ontario (don't know if there are others) want to join the most casual team in the history of ever email me at sb08yu@brocku.ca
Lmao, I can't believe someone else from BrockU goes to TL. I emailed you.
|
No one at my college plays. =/
I wish I could join UBC or something lol
|
can a high school somehow join? Lol
|
On January 14 2010 11:29 YPang wrote: can a high school somehow join? Lol no u big dum dum gladstone!!! :D
|
|
WHY DOES NOONE ELSE AT RMC BUT ME PLAY THIS FUCKING GAME
|
The map pool will change ofc. Any college/university in USA or Canada (includes community colleges). !
You need a MINIMUM of 4 players.
|
i really want to see a more... unique map pool. last season used almost exclusively generally balanced maps, but i feel like a map pool that included something like match point and ultimatum and el nino would be very interesting
|
On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks do it!
i would really like it if the maps were the same as the iccup motw that week, so players would be able to practice on iccup a lot easier
|
On January 14 2010 11:45 majesty.k)seRapH wrote:i really want to see a more... unique map pool. last season used almost exclusively generally balanced maps, but i feel like a map pool that included something like match point and ultimatum and el nino would be very interesting 
Read: "I want maps favored for specific races, not balanced maps." lol.
o.o. The map pool will obviously change. We'll throw in some new maps and take some old ones out.
On January 14 2010 11:59 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks do it! i would really like it if the maps were the same as the iccup motw that week, so players would be able to practice on iccup a lot easier
The map pool was decided at the beginning of the season and rotated so that each map is played the same amount of times total (or close).
|
anyone from Algonquin college?
|
On January 14 2010 12:13 DarthThienAn wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 14 2010 11:45 majesty.k)seRapH wrote:i really want to see a more... unique map pool. last season used almost exclusively generally balanced maps, but i feel like a map pool that included something like match point and ultimatum and el nino would be very interesting  Read: "I want maps favored for specific races, not balanced maps." lol. o.o. The map pool will obviously change. We'll throw in some new maps and take some old ones out. On January 14 2010 11:59 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks do it! i would really like it if the maps were the same as the iccup motw that week, so players would be able to practice on iccup a lot easier The map pool was decided at the beginning of the season and rotated so that each map is played the same amount of times total (or close).[ also we should keep in mind when ICCUP season ends on the CSL calendar
thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_>
|
On January 14 2010 11:45 majesty.k)seRapH wrote:i really want to see a more... unique map pool. Last season used almost exclusively generally balanced maps, but i feel like a map pool that included something like Match Point and Ultimatum and el nino would be very interesting 
I also think we should try some newer maps. I really like both Odd-Eye and Ultimatum, but rarely get a chance to watch games on them, let alone play them myself. I think they should definitely be considerations for the Season 3 map pool.
Also, anyone who has interest in joining the Ohio State team, PM me or anyone else on the team, we'd love to have more players.
|
On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 12:13 DarthThienAn wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 14 2010 11:45 majesty.k)seRapH wrote:i really want to see a more... unique map pool. last season used almost exclusively generally balanced maps, but i feel like a map pool that included something like match point and ultimatum and el nino would be very interesting  Read: "I want maps favored for specific races, not balanced maps." lol. o.o. The map pool will obviously change. We'll throw in some new maps and take some old ones out. On January 14 2010 11:59 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks do it! i would really like it if the maps were the same as the iccup motw that week, so players would be able to practice on iccup a lot easier The map pool was decided at the beginning of the season and rotated so that each map is played the same amount of times total (or close).[ also we should keep in mind when ICCUP season ends on the CSL calendar thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_>
ffs get rid of HBR
I really like the new maps. Even though Protoss gets a 14 nex for free on FS.
|
Let's go teams! More registrations.
|
On January 14 2010 13:19 Sunyveil wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote:On January 14 2010 12:13 DarthThienAn wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 14 2010 11:45 majesty.k)seRapH wrote:i really want to see a more... unique map pool. last season used almost exclusively generally balanced maps, but i feel like a map pool that included something like match point and ultimatum and el nino would be very interesting  Read: "I want maps favored for specific races, not balanced maps." lol. o.o. The map pool will obviously change. We'll throw in some new maps and take some old ones out. On January 14 2010 11:59 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2010 14:54 d3_crescentia wrote: can I get my name as sponsor if I give you $20 bucks do it! i would really like it if the maps were the same as the iccup motw that week, so players would be able to practice on iccup a lot easier The map pool was decided at the beginning of the season and rotated so that each map is played the same amount of times total (or close).[ also we should keep in mind when ICCUP season ends on the CSL calendar thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_> ffs get rid of HBR I really like the new maps. Even though Protoss gets a 14 nex for free on FS.
lol what. what's wrong with hbr?
|
Korea (South)11570 Posts
On January 14 2010 13:35 Xeris wrote: Let's go teams! More registrations.
make me an honorary mercenary!
|
Anyone from RCC here, I'd be willing to join a team but I don't think I could be a 'useful member' in the sense that all I can do is play games, I can't coordinate much thanks to my fulltime job 
Oh and an apology out to all the RCC people who PMed me randomly a few months ago that I dodged, I was playing WoW and felt guilty and scared
|
id like to register a team but i only know of 2 other players at my university, how should i go about finding a 4th to have enough people for a team?
|
On January 14 2010 11:31 KimchiFriedRice wrote: UBC anyone? i would LOVE to see this. UVic will demolish any team UBC comes up with
|
On January 14 2010 13:38 baronsb wrote: id like to register a team but i only know of 2 other players at my university, how should i go about finding a 4th to have enough people for a team?
Posters, listservs, word of mouth. You can specifically target things like the cos department, the Korean Student Association, etc... (they might feel a little stereotyped/offended).
We already have around 5 completely new schools keep them coming!
|
On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote: thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_> that's too new don't listen to suny, get hbr back in there...great map, gets better with 2.2 and hasnt tornado not been used very much? oh and plasma instead of hitchhiker =)
|
Yeah, I've found the new HBR a lot harder to play than the old one for PvT in particular... I'm losing a lot more on it than I did the old one so maybe it's balaced? 
I would like to see FS for sure though.
|
On January 14 2010 15:02 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote: thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_> that's too new don't listen to suny, get hbr back in there...great map, gets better with 2.2 and hasnt tornado not been used very much? oh and plasma instead of hitchhiker =) no plasma T_T all the zergs will cry so hard
maybe we should look at it in terms of getting rid of maps? RoV should go and be switched with another old/flavor map and I think God's Garden and NeoMedusa should be switched out
personally I like FS (easily my most favorite of the newer maps) and I'd really like to see Athena II come back; really liked that map
|
On January 14 2010 14:26 hazelynut wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 13:38 baronsb wrote: id like to register a team but i only know of 2 other players at my university, how should i go about finding a 4th to have enough people for a team? Posters, listservs, word of mouth. You can specifically target things like the cos department, the Korean Student Association, etc... (they might feel a little stereotyped/offended). We already have around 5 completely new schools  keep them coming! i meant like on tl, can i make a post or something somewhere asking for people from my school, sorry that wasnt clear, it just seems like an easier way to find people
|
oh, in that case, i suggest making a blog. you can also check out the TL college location threads, which is pretty up to date as far as i know.
|
United States47024 Posts
On January 14 2010 15:02 duckett wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote: thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_> that's too new don't listen to suny, get hbr back in there...great map, gets better with 2.2 and hasnt tornado not been used very much? oh and plasma instead of hitchhiker =) Plasma is not "old school" enough to be the "old school" map.
Monty Hall, IMO.
|
there are so many blogs up now with [CSL+] school name recruiting! go for it
|
|
On January 14 2010 17:24 stalife wrote: can i join UBC team?
If you're a student there I'd assume there wouldn't be a problem?
|
On January 14 2010 16:37 TheYango wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 15:02 duckett wrote:On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote: thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_> that's too new don't listen to suny, get hbr back in there...great map, gets better with 2.2 and hasnt tornado not been used very much? oh and plasma instead of hitchhiker =) Plasma is not "old school" enough to be the "old school" map. Monty Hall, IMO.
YES.
|
With Purdue joining, that makes five Big Ten schools. It would be awesome if one of the divisions could be just the Big Ten schools, but we probably need another team or two for that to be viable. Anyone from Penn State, Michigan State, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota or Iowa want to start a team? It could be your shot at a Big Ten Championship! (After all, I'm sure its been hard on every other school with us winning the past five in football. )
|
On January 15 2010 01:29 TestSubject893 wrote:With Purdue joining, that makes five Big Ten schools. It would be awesome if one of the divisions could be just the Big Ten schools, but we probably need another team or two for that to be viable. Anyone from Penn State, Michigan State, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota or Iowa want to start a team? It could be your shot at a Big Ten Championship! (After all, I'm sure its been hard on every other school with us winning the past five in football.  )
Ooh, low blow ^_^;
But yeah, that would be pretty cool. How are divisions decided anyway? From what I recall last season there was some attempt at dividing up the powerhouse teams so there would only be a few really stacked teams in each division... I personally feel our division was fairly evenly matched up, so props.
|
On January 15 2010 00:34 Snipinpanda wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 16:37 TheYango wrote:On January 14 2010 15:02 duckett wrote:On January 14 2010 12:54 d3_crescentia wrote: thinking maps should be FS, MoonGlaive and Matchpoint and Tornado for 'standard' and HITCHHIKER for older map >_> that's too new don't listen to suny, get hbr back in there...great map, gets better with 2.2 and hasnt tornado not been used very much? oh and plasma instead of hitchhiker =) Plasma is not "old school" enough to be the "old school" map. Monty Hall, IMO. YES. NO.
|
On January 14 2010 07:33 LuckyFool wrote: yeah. lol u. man a friend of mine from mason said there was a B- player that goes there and i told him that was BS. stop making me look bad.
|
On January 15 2010 02:40 redtooth wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 07:33 LuckyFool wrote:On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:
GMU? George Mason? lol. yeah. lol u. man a friend of mine from mason said there was a B- player that goes there and i told him that was BS. stop making me look bad.
If luckyfool's b- then im a b pvt'er. lololol. jk luck ;]
|
On January 15 2010 09:36 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 02:40 redtooth wrote:On January 14 2010 07:33 LuckyFool wrote:On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:
GMU? George Mason? lol. yeah. lol u. man a friend of mine from mason said there was a B- player that goes there and i told him that was BS. stop making me look bad. If luckyfool's b- then im a b pvt'er. lololol. jk luck ;]
Luckyfool is the only person who learns something from a backwards slide in ranks.
|
Hopefully you guys dont include old maps, it is annoying trying to practice for it.
|
On January 15 2010 09:36 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 02:40 redtooth wrote:On January 14 2010 07:33 LuckyFool wrote:On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:
GMU? George Mason? lol. yeah. lol u. man a friend of mine from mason said there was a B- player that goes there and i told him that was BS. stop making me look bad. If luckyfool's b- then im a b pvt'er. lololol. jk luck ;] I'm sure you could make B if you went DT every OTHER game instead of every game kekeke
|
On January 15 2010 11:41 AoN.DimSum wrote:Hopefully you guys dont include old maps, it is annoying trying to practice for it. 
qft
I think just using the current PL map pool would be absolutely wonderful :D
This is the first time in FOREVER where every single map in PL is quick-well balanced, and there are no shades of twilights or gods gardens.
|
On January 14 2010 07:03 Ideas wrote:Just re-registered GT. This sucks though because our best Protoss player graduated 
??? I'm still here -_-
|
On January 15 2010 13:14 Nogardeci89 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 07:03 Ideas wrote:Just re-registered GT. This sucks though because our best Protoss player graduated  ??? I'm still here -_-
lol one more semester?
|
|
On January 15 2010 09:36 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 02:40 redtooth wrote:On January 14 2010 07:33 LuckyFool wrote:On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:
GMU? George Mason? lol. yeah. lol u. man a friend of mine from mason said there was a B- player that goes there and i told him that was BS. stop making me look bad. If luckyfool's b- then im a b pvt'er. lololol. jk luck ;] LOOOOL. My TvP is actually better than B- on average it's my TvZ that always keeps me stuck around mid/high B- hehehe.
On January 15 2010 11:35 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote:Luckyfool is the only person who learns something from a backwards slide in ranks. 
I do? what makes u say that. I went from nearly B in TSL to C in 2 days and this season I've already gone from B- to low C+ in a day lmao.
|
On January 15 2010 13:33 scintilliaSD wrote:Man, NJIT doesn't have a Starcraft team or anyone who plays SC  I wish I could join the Rutgers team 
im pretty sure someone said that before...someone is from njit
EDIT: i found it, it was Raithed
|
legit map pool plz, nothing too crazy, keep it fun to play
loving how people are bragging about their ranks, remember what happened last time?
If u don't, ask UCSD
|
man A+ trash talkers, sup?
although UVic is like olympic rank
|
On January 15 2010 13:46 monkxly wrote: legit map pool plz, nothing too crazy, keep it fun to play
loving how people are bragging about their ranks, remember what happened last time?
If u don't, ask UCSD
I was just joking with Lucky about how one of his friends thought I was like B ^_^ lolol.
|
Is there anyone from Ryerson in Toronto that plays? I'd be interested to join/make a team but I don't know anyone that plays sc here.
|
|
|
On January 15 2010 16:51 randomKo_Orean wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 13:58 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 15 2010 13:46 monkxly wrote: legit map pool plz, nothing too crazy, keep it fun to play
loving how people are bragging about their ranks, remember what happened last time?
If u don't, ask UCSD I was just joking with Lucky about how one of his friends thought I was like B ^_^ lolol. luckyfool is a damn good player and I wouldnt want to face him :<
Just take away his sleep. It works well. =D
|
Anyone from Ryerson University?
is it possible to join other school team near my school(UofT)? lol
|
On January 15 2010 14:31 z01 wrote: Is there anyone from Ryerson in Toronto that plays? I'd be interested to join/make a team but I don't know anyone that plays sc here.
On January 15 2010 18:31 StrongMan wrote: Anyone from Ryerson University?
Assuming you are not the same person with two accounts, the answer to both of these questions is apparently yes. Your posts were only 3 posts and 4 hours apart....
|
On January 15 2010 18:31 StrongMan wrote: Anyone from Ryerson University?
is it possible to join other school team near my school(UofT)? lol
On their website it says it is possible, unless we find 2 more people from Ryerson.
|
On January 16 2010 03:27 z01 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 18:31 StrongMan wrote: Anyone from Ryerson University?
is it possible to join other school team near my school(UofT)? lol On their website it says it is possible, unless we find 2 more people from Ryerson. no mercs this season
|
On January 16 2010 03:27 z01 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 18:31 StrongMan wrote: Anyone from Ryerson University?
is it possible to join other school team near my school(UofT)? lol On their website it says it is possible, unless we find 2 more people from Ryerson.
Read the OP =[. Where it says that that rule is being abolished.
|
UNC Chapel Hill has joined :D
Any lurkers happen to be here?
|
On January 16 2010 04:21 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 03:27 z01 wrote:On January 15 2010 18:31 StrongMan wrote: Anyone from Ryerson University?
is it possible to join other school team near my school(UofT)? lol On their website it says it is possible, unless we find 2 more people from Ryerson. Read the OP =[. Where it says that that rule is being abolished.
Ah your right. I just read the websites rules instead, which of course are not updated yet. :p
|
United States10774 Posts
yue are you signing us up
|
Anyone attending Old Dominion want to start a team with me?
|
Anyone else go to Brock U in Ontario?
|
just blog for your school it worked for me haha :D
|
Any Texas Tech students browsing? We need 1 more!~!~!
|
Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T
|
On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this.
|
On January 16 2010 08:38 selboN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this.
That depends on exactly what CSU is. I presume this is California State University? What is your school like? ie. how often do the different campuses interact with each other / how closely are they related. Applying as a freshman, is it to a specific campus? Is the application for CSU one application, and then you pick which school you want to apply for? Or do you apply for each one separately? How much do the different campuses distinguish from each other? How are they geographically? How likely is it that you would meet someone from another campus and become good friends with them?
With 23 campuses, I'd imagine that you guys aren't that closely related, and so, not really eligible to be a joint team, but answer the questions and we'll see.
|
On January 16 2010 09:34 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 08:38 selboN wrote:On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this. That depends on exactly what CSU is. I presume this is California State University? What is your school like? ie. how often do the different campuses interact with each other / how closely are they related. Applying as a freshman, is it to a specific campus? Is the application for CSU one application, and then you pick which school you want to apply for? Or do you apply for each one separately? How much do the different campuses distinguish from each other? How are they geographically? How likely is it that you would meet someone from another campus and become good friends with them? With 23 campuses, I'd imagine that you guys aren't that closely related, and so, not really eligible to be a joint team, but answer the questions and we'll see. The only thing that links the campuses is the fact that they're CSUs. When you apply you apply to each individual campus. The schools in SoCal are obviously closer knit because of their location than the campuses farther north, other than that they're mostly independent, as far as I can tell. The campuses are spread throughout California (map: http://www2.assist.org/images/csu_map.gif ). I know lots of people from the campuses closest to me, but the same goes for the UCs closest to me.
I guess we don't meet the requirements though. Sad, I was hoping to get a chance to participate =[
|
are we supposed to get an e-mail back with a successful registration?
|
god is there anyone from university of rochester, or any rochester school?!?!?!
|
an up to date list of the schools currently registered would help
|
no, but I've got yours. just assume that if you sent an email and actually included all the information your registration was successful
|
+ Show Spoiler [Registered Teams] + 1. Caltech 2. Harvey Mudd 3. UNC Chapel Hill 4. Carnegie Melon 5. Waterloo 6. Rutgers 7. UCI 8. Uvic 9. UCSD 10. Northwest Florida 11. Augustana College 12. MIT 13. UCR 14. Yale 15. Cal Poly 16. North Texas 17. GTech 18. Purdue 19. UMich 20. Cornell 21. UCD 22. UBC 23. UCF 24. UofT 25. South Dakota 26. GMU 27. Harvard 28. ASU 29. Hampshire 30. OSU 31. Princeton 32. Carelton 33. Rice 34. McMaster
|
On January 16 2010 14:09 Xeris wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Registered Teams] + Caltech Harvey Mudd UNC Chapel Hill Carnegie Melon Waterloo Rutgers UCI Uvic UCSD Northwest Florida Augustana College MIT UCR Yale Cal Poly North Texas GTech Purdue UMic Cornell UCD
lol where's princeton?
|
our coordinator - and the rest of us! - are dying by finals. we'll be in the running with a last minute registration
|
Hey, there's a guy who's interested in joining our csl team. He goes to OSU, but goes to a regional campus elsewhere in the state instead of the main campus. Is he allowed to join?
|
No, you basically have to be on the same campus... the same way he couldn't play on your football team
|
On January 17 2010 04:52 Nightmarjoo wrote: Hey, there's a guy who's interested in joining our csl team. He goes to OSU, but goes to a regional campus elsewhere in the state instead of the main campus. Is he allowed to join?
so is that like Penn State or Cal States? If so... I don't think that really qualifies because the campuses really aren't related in anything other than name.
|
where's george mason? i thought you guys were joining?
|
On January 15 2010 13:41 LuckyFool wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2010 11:35 vx70GTOJudgexv wrote:Luckyfool is the only person who learns something from a backwards slide in ranks.  I do? what makes u say that. I went from nearly B in TSL to C in 2 days and this season I've already gone from B- to low C+ in a day lmao.
The "From X to Y I learned" thread XD
BTW, nice country. lol.
|
Hey anyone out there from Clark University that might be interested in getting out hats in the ring on this one
|
On January 17 2010 08:18 Xeris wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2010 04:52 Nightmarjoo wrote: Hey, there's a guy who's interested in joining our csl team. He goes to OSU, but goes to a regional campus elsewhere in the state instead of the main campus. Is he allowed to join? so is that like Penn State or Cal States? If so... I don't think that really qualifies because the campuses really aren't related in anything other than name. I don't know if it's like penn or cal at all, but I guess the campus is pretty independant from main campus, though all the funding is the same. Mostly it means if he doesn't join the OSU team, he's out of csl entirely because OSU Mansfield campus certainly isn't big enough to host a seperate team. It's not like he's an ex-progamer we're trying to slip in either, he's in the coach-pupil league (as a pupil). It's basically IS OSU, just an expansion of the school. You wouldn't say your expansion in another main of the map is a different player than you in a sc game, it's the same thing, especially if you started making new gates and new tech there!
|
|
On January 16 2010 16:37 tnt_titan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 14:09 Xeris wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Registered Teams] + Caltech Harvey Mudd UNC Chapel Hill Carnegie Melon Waterloo Rutgers UCI Uvic UCSD Northwest Florida Augustana College MIT UCR Yale Cal Poly North Texas GTech Purdue UMic Cornell UCD
I'm not seeing UNC-CH either  lol where's princeton?
|
On January 19 2010 01:39 ms291052 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 16:37 tnt_titan wrote:On January 16 2010 14:09 Xeris wrote:+ Show Spoiler [Registered Teams] + Caltech Harvey Mudd UNC Chapel Hill Carnegie Melon Waterloo Rutgers UCI Uvic UCSD Northwest Florida Augustana College MIT UCR Yale Cal Poly North Texas GTech Purdue UMic Cornell UCD
I'm not seeing UNC-CH either  lol where's princeton? see above response
|
On January 19 2010 01:36 Xeris wrote: hum diddles.
reply to my email about individual tournament noob!
clazz vs jaeyun
|
On January 17 2010 08:21 redtooth wrote: where's george mason? i thought you guys were joining? tag debating atm. rofl we'll register don't worry. :D
|
On January 17 2010 12:16 Nightmarjoo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2010 08:18 Xeris wrote:On January 17 2010 04:52 Nightmarjoo wrote: Hey, there's a guy who's interested in joining our csl team. He goes to OSU, but goes to a regional campus elsewhere in the state instead of the main campus. Is he allowed to join? so is that like Penn State or Cal States? If so... I don't think that really qualifies because the campuses really aren't related in anything other than name. I don't know if it's like penn or cal at all, but I guess the campus is pretty independant from main campus, though all the funding is the same. Mostly it means if he doesn't join the OSU team, he's out of csl entirely because OSU Mansfield campus certainly isn't big enough to host a seperate team. It's not like he's an ex-progamer we're trying to slip in either, he's in the coach-pupil league (as a pupil). It's basically IS OSU, just an expansion of the school. You wouldn't say your expansion in another main of the map is a different player than you in a sc game, it's the same thing, especially if you started making new gates and new tech there!
Actually it doesn't sound impossible. We really have to assess the situation though. Typically, we'd want the team to be as close geographically as possible. Can you explain the reason why he's on a different campus? Like, why does OSU have separate campuses? And how separated is OSU in terms of the campuses? If the OSU sports teams don't draw from all of the different campuses, then I'd lean toward no. If OSU has one big team, however, I'd lean toward allowing that person on the team.
On January 19 2010 02:26 LuckyFool wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2010 08:21 redtooth wrote: where's george mason? i thought you guys were joining? tag debating atm. rofl we'll register don't worry. :D
lol, thats not exactly the most important part of registration but okay =p.
|
it's important to us cuz we can't create accounts until we agree on something... hahaha we finally agreed on something though so I guess I'll be sending in registration soon.
|
|
On January 19 2010 02:36 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2010 12:16 Nightmarjoo wrote:On January 17 2010 08:18 Xeris wrote:On January 17 2010 04:52 Nightmarjoo wrote: Hey, there's a guy who's interested in joining our csl team. He goes to OSU, but goes to a regional campus elsewhere in the state instead of the main campus. Is he allowed to join? so is that like Penn State or Cal States? If so... I don't think that really qualifies because the campuses really aren't related in anything other than name. I don't know if it's like penn or cal at all, but I guess the campus is pretty independant from main campus, though all the funding is the same. Mostly it means if he doesn't join the OSU team, he's out of csl entirely because OSU Mansfield campus certainly isn't big enough to host a seperate team. It's not like he's an ex-progamer we're trying to slip in either, he's in the coach-pupil league (as a pupil). It's basically IS OSU, just an expansion of the school. You wouldn't say your expansion in another main of the map is a different player than you in a sc game, it's the same thing, especially if you started making new gates and new tech there! Actually it doesn't sound impossible. We really have to assess the situation though. Typically, we'd want the team to be as close geographically as possible. Can you explain the reason why he's on a different campus? Like, why does OSU have separate campuses? And how separated is OSU in terms of the campuses? If the OSU sports teams don't draw from all of the different campuses, then I'd lean toward no. If OSU has one big team, however, I'd lean toward allowing that person on the team. The regional campuses aren't that independant from the main campus. The regionals mostly have fairly common courses that students need, basic and general prerequisites, though I believe you can graduate without ever going to main campus. They're mostly designed for students who can't afford to go to main campus to easily transfer later to main campus, which is what most students who go to regionals do or plan to do. I'm pretty positive the regional campuses don't have their own sports teams, but don't know for sure cuz I'm not interested in their sports in the least bit.
|
up to 33 schools, let's keep it rockin
|
On January 19 2010 02:36 DarthThienAn wrote: If the OSU sports teams don't draw from all of the different campuses, then I'd lean toward no. If OSU has one big team, however, I'd lean toward allowing that person on the team.
On January 17 2010 04:53 azndsh wrote: No, you basically have to be on the same campus... the same way he couldn't play on your football team
Regional campuses at The Ohio State University not only do not have their own sports teams, but students who attend these campuses are permitted to walk-on to the main campus teams.
All of the regional campuses are within about an hour and a half drive of the Columbus campus, and only a few agriculture degrees can be attained without attending main campus.
|
On January 19 2010 02:48 littlechava wrote: luckyfool[gm]
free[gm]? lol.
|
On January 19 2010 02:48 littlechava wrote: luckyfool[gm] wow that'd be amazing haha.
|
|
On January 19 2010 13:33 Lightswarm wrote: is McMaster registered?
yes
|
If it's not too much trouble, can you update the opening post with a list of registered teams?
|
imo different divisions but still stay in the same time zones sounds fun so people can play different teams from last sesaon.
btw anyone from UC Riverside can PM me or PH for info about our team.
|
On January 20 2010 10:40 JiYan wrote: imo different divisions but still stay in the same time zones sounds fun so people can play different teams from last sesaon.
btw anyone from UC Riverside can PM me or PH for info about our team.
imo divisions decided when we have all the schools registered, and then we'll do figure it out - 80% chance of different divisions. 1 school off = lots of schools shifted as a result. ^^.
|
United States1654 Posts
On January 16 2010 08:38 selboN wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this.
I third this notion.
|
On January 16 2010 10:28 littlechava wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 09:34 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 16 2010 08:38 selboN wrote:On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this. That depends on exactly what CSU is. I presume this is California State University? What is your school like? ie. how often do the different campuses interact with each other / how closely are they related. Applying as a freshman, is it to a specific campus? Is the application for CSU one application, and then you pick which school you want to apply for? Or do you apply for each one separately? How much do the different campuses distinguish from each other? How are they geographically? How likely is it that you would meet someone from another campus and become good friends with them? With 23 campuses, I'd imagine that you guys aren't that closely related, and so, not really eligible to be a joint team, but answer the questions and we'll see. The only thing that links the campuses is the fact that they're CSUs. When you apply you apply to each individual campus. The schools in SoCal are obviously closer knit because of their location than the campuses farther north, other than that they're mostly independent, as far as I can tell. The campuses are spread throughout California (map: http://www2.assist.org/images/csu_map.gif ). I know lots of people from the campuses closest to me, but the same goes for the UCs closest to me. I guess we don't meet the requirements though. Sad, I was hoping to get a chance to participate =[
Honestly, I don't think this is possible. 23 schools is a whole lot, and to draw from a pool of "almost 450,000 students" would be incredibly unfair. Long Beach itself has 30k undergrads (Collegeboard), and that is 5-7x the normal population of most colleges (just rough estimation, not including grad). Based on this, you shouldn't really be having trouble pulling together a team - you just need to find the people who play Starcraft. 30k people, there's gotta be at least 4 people who play SC.
I imagine other CSU schools are in similar situations (although a little less), but I think if we allowed you guys to combine, then it wold simply be too unfair.
On January 20 2010 12:12 Sigrun wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 08:38 selboN wrote:On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this. I third this notion.
Edit: Answered.
|
i wonder what the tournament format will be this season. east vs west again?
|
I'm glad that CSU has had their situation considered by an administrator, but I'm afraid the posts about OSU's regional campus may have been overlooked. Has any member of the staff had a chance to look over our case yet? I figure our situation is a lot different than CSU's because almost all the students at the regional campuses plan on moving to main campus after a year or two.
|
Just registered University of Central Florida [UCF]
If ANY UCF players are unaware that we were putting together a CSL team and want to join please contact me IMMEDIATELY so I can add you to the roster.
|
On January 20 2010 14:10 ApotheosisX wrote: i wonder what the tournament format will be this season. east vs west again?
North vs South? P
|
On January 20 2010 16:05 JiYan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2010 14:10 ApotheosisX wrote: i wonder what the tournament format will be this season. east vs west again? North vs South?  P
That wouldn't be as practical for time zones... unless we split like. 4 north divisions (1 for each time zone) and 4 south divisions (same). Or something like that. Dunno yet.
|
Can we pool together nearby Universities? I go to the University of Denver which is a fairly small private school. Anyone from the University of Colorado/ at Boulder play sc? Or KU/K-state?
I wanna be a collegiate e-athlete!
|
Anyone go to USP? lolol I know the answer is like 99.9% no!
|
On January 20 2010 14:53 TestSubject893 wrote: I'm glad that CSU has had their situation considered by an administrator, but I'm afraid the posts about OSU's regional campus may have been overlooked. Has any member of the staff had a chance to look over our case yet? I figure our situation is a lot different than CSU's because almost all the students at the regional campuses plan on moving to main campus after a year or two.
Hey I made a post about this ><. The reason why I don't immediately respond is that I think it's better that all of the administrators talk to each other first to come up with a unanimous decision before saying it in the thread, so that we're not all contradicting each other. We usually agree, but it's a just-in-case thing on my part. Most of what I've said so far is just my personal opinion, but I usually try to research the matter first.
Regarding OSU, I can give you my opinion: It's much more likely for you guys to have players from other campuses than CSU, simply because OSU only draws from 5 or so campuses, and the populations of those campuses isn't as large as CSU's campuses. I'd lean toward yes for this but I think I need some more information first.
I've told hazelynut though, so she should be looking into the thread soon. We just all have finals this week that's why ^_^. Just be patient, player registration will still be open for 3-4 weeks more I think. It's the team registration that matters at the moment.
In the meantime, feel free to answer the questions I asked the CSU people:
On January 16 2010 09:34 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2010 08:38 selboN wrote:On January 16 2010 08:33 littlechava wrote: Would it be possible to create a team for multiple CSU campuses? Long Beach wants to participate, but we're only two so far, and I think a couple other CSUs are in the same boat T_T That would be great... Hopefully someone addresses this. That depends on exactly what CSU is. I presume this is California State University? What is your school like? ie. how often do the different campuses interact with each other / how closely are they related. Applying as a freshman, is it to a specific campus? Is the application for CSU one application, and then you pick which school you want to apply for? Or do you apply for each one separately? How much do the different campuses distinguish from each other? How are they geographically? How likely is it that you would meet someone from another campus and become good friends with them? With 23 campuses, I'd imagine that you guys aren't that closely related, and so, not really eligible to be a joint team, but answer the questions and we'll see.
Edit:
On January 20 2010 16:18 Jonoman92 wrote: Can we pool together nearby Universities? I go to the University which is a fairly small private school. Anyone from the University of Colorado/ at Boulder play sc? Or KU/K-state?
I wanna be a collegiate e-athlete!
No, you aren't allowed to this season. The only scenario for this is if your school is an extension of the school you want to join, and even those cases will be considered carefully and closely.
|
Hey how do we know if our team is successfully registered for the CSL?
|
if you sent an email
|
I just posted an updated list in the op - check that!
|
Registered for Mount Allison!
|
I'm trying to register for Virginia Tech but do you need a specific amount of players by the 30th or just a tentative range?
|
On January 21 2010 13:12 MorningMusume11 wrote: I'm trying to register for Virginia Tech but do you need a specific amount of players by the 30th or just a tentative range?
tentative is ok.
You need 4 players by the time the season starts and player registration closes though. We usually let ppl with too low numbers know that they need more, just in case they didn't know.
|
|
CSU and OSU have been resolved in pm I believe.
On another note, PM me if you wanna join the CSL staff in any way. =D.
|
On January 22 2010 10:43 DarthThienAn wrote: CSU and OSU have been resolved in pm I believe.
On another note, PM me if you wanna join the CSL staff in any way. =D. can I doubly join the CSL staff?
|
only 34 teams???
campaign plzz for more teams
|
up to 39. please - if you've registered and you somehow don't see your name on the list, MSG ME!
there are 3 people going through that email and they don't know my system so it's possible I haven't seen an email or two
|
43 teams - almost surpassing last season's team total! lots of new faces, but there are still many old faces missing... so stop slacking and register!
also, i task the collegiate e-athletes to make sure this thread never gets bumped off the first page again.
gogo!
|
DARRENC I AM CALLING YOU OUT HERE AND NOW :DDD
|
K emal sent haha. Coordinating is gonna be fun ~~
|
|
sending in request tomorrow. Yay Case!
|
i thought i said not to let this bump down to page 2! BMMMMMMMMMMMM
|
On January 25 2010 04:54 Xeris wrote: i thought i said not to let this bump down to page 2! BMMMMMMMMMMMM did you ever get that hype video I sent you or maybe it was mona can't remember
anyway find a way to upload that and make people watch it
|
UCR. ASSEMMMBLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
bump. sent request and am happy I found a team
|
glad to have you on board!
|
i need to get some for SJSU. if anyone is in SJSU plz pm me and add me!!!! ...................................... otherwise screw u csl and everybody in it!
|
44. York University
Is that the York University in Ontario?
|
|
On January 25 2010 13:06 tnt_titan wrote: 44. York University
Is that the York University in Ontario?
Yes it is, that's the only York college/univ in North America to the best of my knowledge...
|
On January 25 2010 13:06 tnt_titan wrote: 44. York University
Is that the York University in Ontario?
yes
|
where the fuck is oberlin -_-
it's just preliminary, right?
|
the fucking problem is that rochester has only 2 ppl on this forum that plays sc. fuck my life i wish more ppl went to UofR
|
On January 26 2010 02:32 d3_crescentia wrote: where the fuck is oberlin -_-
it's just preliminary, right?
If you know your school has enough players but it's not registered yet maybe you could do so? Maybe the previous coordinator (in your case) hasn't done it yet or doesn't plan to but you guys are still interested in fielding a team...
|
|
more team GOGOGO! We should break 60 this season
|
School: University of Western Ontario Tag: [UwO] Number of players: not yet sure but definitely more than 4
Already sent an email with the required info.
UWO FIGHTING!!
|
On January 26 2010 07:13 lMPERVlOUS wrote:University of Ottawa (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) - Currently there are 7 members. Tag is [OU]. I will send out the appropriate emails nearer to the deadline, but this is just to let you guys know that we are in it! http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=108072
email gogo!
|
What a great day folks! We're up to 55 teams! And there are still so many teams from last season who have yet to register, I am quite excited
|
ALSO! If you would like to be involved in the CSL, we are looking for admins.
We need the following:
- News writers - Division admins - Replay team
If you have any interest in the following positions, please PM me! !
|
carleton's on twice
mistake? or carleton, canada and carleton, minnesota?
|
That is one long list of universities.
|
I'm quite excited with so many universities participating! I can't wait till the season starts :D
|
On January 26 2010 12:51 Xeris wrote:ALSO! If you would like to be involved in the CSL, we are looking for admins. We need the following: - News writers - Division admins - Replay team If you have any interest in the following positions, please PM me!  !
can you do this and still be a player for one of the schools?
|
Registered Binghamton University. I hope for more random players this year, and face a RvR this season.
|
On January 26 2010 14:50 Chameleon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 26 2010 12:51 Xeris wrote:ALSO! If you would like to be involved in the CSL, we are looking for admins. We need the following: - News writers - Division admins - Replay team If you have any interest in the following positions, please PM me!  ! can you do this and still be a player for one of the schools?
yes no problem... if you are a division admin, you will just be put in charge of a different division than one your school participates in
|
any word on maps yet? *cough* current Winners League/PL maps *cough*
|
*cough* you'll see soon ^__^!
|
why is everyone getting sick O_O
|
On January 26 2010 13:44 jalstar wrote: carleton's on twice
mistake? or carleton, canada and carleton, minnesota?
Both. I feel sorry for our fellow TL member at Algonquin College. He's right nearby the Carleton and Ottawa universities, but he can't join either team.
|
They're actually not exactly the same. The one in the US is Carelton, the one in Canada is Carleton. The Canadian one is misspelled on the list.
|
Seeing as you got a team together, want to do a mock-CSL set before the real games start?
EDIT - Holy shit, I'm a Hydralisk now!
|
How would we contact the leader of the group for one of the Colleges? I haven't really looked into it much, but I would like to play for the ASU team, just didn't know that they had one.
Anyway of getting information for contacting purposes?
|
On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 06:56 Whiplash wrote: I'm confused about the Exceptions rule because it said (this season only) and I am not sure if that pertains to the 2nd or 3rd season.
Also UCF students contact me if you are reading this! The rules page is old, still for last season. Like it says in the OP, the "mercenaries" rule, or combining with schools when your school doesn't have enough players for its own team, is no longer in effect. All players on your team must currently attend your school. This is for the 3rd season. Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 06:58 LuckyFool wrote: If you go to GMU PM mah, we will be playing this season. ^_^;;
GMU? George Mason? lol.
whats wrong with gmu people visiting Princeton?
edit: I should put up signs advertising gmu CSL
|
On January 27 2010 03:30 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2010 07:03 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 14 2010 06:56 Whiplash wrote: I'm confused about the Exceptions rule because it said (this season only) and I am not sure if that pertains to the 2nd or 3rd season.
Also UCF students contact me if you are reading this! The rules page is old, still for last season. Like it says in the OP, the "mercenaries" rule, or combining with schools when your school doesn't have enough players for its own team, is no longer in effect. All players on your team must currently attend your school. This is for the 3rd season. On January 14 2010 06:58 LuckyFool wrote: If you go to GMU PM mah, we will be playing this season. ^_^;;
GMU? George Mason? lol. whats wrong with gmu people visiting Princeton? edit: I should put up signs advertising gmu CSL
Do ittt
|
Finally got minimum number of players who are interested.
Hope the division works out better than last season;
|
I wonder if we'll get to play Stanford in our division. Seems like we should since they're directly south of Victoria.
|
Just sent a registration email for Valparaiso University. We suck, but this'll be fun. :D
Valpo Fighting!
|
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
can you add ppl to your roster AFTER the deadline for registrations?
Also how do the admins check for eligibility? (as in how do u make sure they're from the college they say they are and not just living there or working there)
|
On January 26 2010 12:41 Xeris wrote:email gogo!
Will do, however, we've already gotten 2 more members since I wrote that.....
|
Quite the huge turnout hmm
|
On January 27 2010 09:09 Live2Win wrote: can you add ppl to your roster AFTER the deadline for registrations?
Also how do the admins check for eligibility? (as in how do u make sure they're from the college they say they are and not just living there or working there)
You'll be able to add players throughout the regular season, but not during playoffs.
We check whether the players have a school email (although this theoretically means that players could be professors...)
|
On January 27 2010 09:35 hazelynut wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2010 09:09 Live2Win wrote: can you add ppl to your roster AFTER the deadline for registrations?
Also how do the admins check for eligibility? (as in how do u make sure they're from the college they say they are and not just living there or working there) You'll be able to add players throughout the regular season, but not during playoffs. We check whether the players have a school email (although this theoretically means that players could be professors...)
don't some universities allow their student to keep their emails? Most universities give out student cards with expiry dates on them too, so if you really need to, you can always request a scan of their ID card. last possible option i'd imagine is sending an email to the univ. admins lol...
|
Anyone here from sac state want to make a team for fun?
|
We've thought about requiring certificates of enrollment (which you can get at the registrar), but it's too much hassle when you think about it. If someone really wanted to cheat, they could just smurf, so unless we can really enforce someone's identity, we're probably not going to require scans of their IDs or anything.
|
I go to a very small school, and I don't think I have much of a chance at finding 3 or more other people that would be interested in playing in something like this. As much as I'd like to do this, I'm guessing I'm out of luck?
|
You're not the only one..... But it looks that way.....
|
Well, Impervious, I'll talk to my team and see if they're interested, but we wouldn't pose much of a challenge to you guys. You've got several C or C- level players. I have myself, a D protoss, and three guys who are highly enthusiastic but absolutely terrible. I mean, when I'm the ace... doesn't say good things about the team.
|
So, I take that as a yes/maybe?
|
On January 27 2010 09:35 hazelynut wrote:
We check whether the players have a school email (although this theoretically means that players could be professors...) imagine finding out some star player is actually a professor of a school LOL.
|
United States10774 Posts
all right boys, oneother bringing you the pre-season predictions *sexy time* almost coming note: there is no bias in my predictions whatsoever. objective thoughts.
pretty good but not quite there = UCSD
what the hell happened to you team = Waterloo
why are you playing in csl team = Georgia Tech
talk so much smack but bad team = UVic
undefeated team = Duke
division winner = Duke
conference winner = Duke
team of the season = Duke
most all-stars = Duke
CSL Season 3 Champion = Duke
|
because that worked out so well for you last season ^__^!
|
DING DING DING... OTTAWA IS THE 60th TEAM!!!
so proud! keep it coming folks
|
btw, can you guys put up a contact next to the schools? some people might want to contact the school manager once they see their school on the list
|
On January 27 2010 13:45 Xeris wrote:DING DING DING... OTTAWA IS THE 60th TEAM!!!so proud! keep it coming folks
YEAH! And we`re gonna make everyone remember our team`s name.
|
Predictions for season 3
pretty good but not quite there = McGill
what the hell happened to you team = Berkeley
why are you playing in csl team = Duke
talk so much smack but bad team = Duke
undefeated team = UVic
division winner = UVic
conference winner = UVic
team of the season = UVic
most all-stars = SKT1
CSL Season 3 Champion = UVic
oh and biggest losers: Duke
|
On January 27 2010 14:40 tnt_titan wrote: Predictions for season 3
pretty good but not quite there = McGill
what the hell happened to you team = Berkeley
why are you playing in csl team = Duke
talk so much smack but bad team = Duke
undefeated team = UVic
division winner = UVic
conference winner = UVic
team of the season = UVic
most all-stars = SKT1
CSL Season 3 Champion = UVic
oh and biggest losers: Duke
You guys didnt have the joy of having them in your division last season, like Duke and Ga. Tech were Yankees / Red Sox, ManU / Chelsea, etc...
|
On January 27 2010 14:04 JiYan wrote: btw, can you guys put up a contact next to the schools? some people might want to contact the school manager once they see their school on the list
I second the motion, but feel the need to say that it will probably be up after the registration period is over.
|
United States10774 Posts
On January 27 2010 14:40 tnt_titan wrote: UVIC IS BUTTHURT oh i thought you were banned, damn. can you go get yourself banned again?
|
United States10774 Posts
On January 27 2010 13:42 Xeris wrote: because that worked out so well for you last season ^__^! hey duran ^_^
|
|
wow awesome it looks like theres going to be a good number more teams than last season... fun! :D
|
i predict 150 campuses by CSL+ 5
|
don't you mean...COCA COLA CSL?
(at least, one day we'll have a sponsor, i hope)
|
On January 27 2010 18:06 hazelynut wrote: don't you mean...COCA COLA CSL?
(at least, one day we'll have a sponsor, i hope) coca cola is known to violently repress unionization of their workers in 3rd world countries and as such Oberlin will not take participation in such a monstrous, egregious, horrendous violation of human rights
however, if pepsi decides to sponsor the CSL I would be very very happy as they have a 100% rating on the Corporate Equality Index (2004) regarding LGBT employment
OR DR PEPPER
(man I love dr pepper)
|
+ Show Spoiler +On January 27 2010 13:04 OneOther wrote: all right boys, oneother bringing you the pre-season predictions *sexy time* almost coming note: there is no bias in my predictions whatsoever. objective thoughts.
pretty good but not quite there = UCSD
what the hell happened to you team = Waterloo
why are you playing in csl team = Georgia Tech
talk so much smack but bad team = UVic
undefeated team = Duke
division winner = Duke
conference winner = Duke
team of the season = Duke
most all-stars = Duke
CSL Season 3 Champion = Duke
I reaaaally want uw vs duke showmatch
just in case, you know, uw isn't slumping
|
On January 28 2010 02:16 monkxly wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 27 2010 13:04 OneOther wrote: all right boys, oneother bringing you the pre-season predictions *sexy time* almost coming note: there is no bias in my predictions whatsoever. objective thoughts.
pretty good but not quite there = UCSD
what the hell happened to you team = Waterloo
why are you playing in csl team = Georgia Tech
talk so much smack but bad team = UVic
undefeated team = Duke
division winner = Duke
conference winner = Duke
team of the season = Duke
most all-stars = Duke
CSL Season 3 Champion = Duke I reaaaally want uw vs duke showmatch just in case, you know, uw isn't slumping
exhibition matches prior to the season will be interesting ^^
|
i think my TA is on my team O.O
|
On January 28 2010 03:45 JiYan wrote: i think my TA is on my team O.O BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHA
|
going to be an interesting season thats for sure xD. can you say office hours?
|
|
wow. 60 teams that is epic
|
On January 27 2010 21:32 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2010 18:06 hazelynut wrote: don't you mean...COCA COLA CSL?
(at least, one day we'll have a sponsor, i hope) coca cola is known to violently repress unionization of their workers in 3rd world countries and as such Oberlin will not take participation in such a monstrous, egregious, horrendous violation of human rights screw oberlin...don't listen to those hippies (yeah im talking to you peter)
|
@OtherOne
When did I post that? o_O I don't think I did.
@Random_korean what happened to our exhibition match? You PM'd me about it and you ran away. good job.
|
United States10774 Posts
On January 28 2010 03:45 JiYan wrote: i think my TA is on my team O.O okay honestly, that's pretty awesome
|
On January 28 2010 03:45 JiYan wrote: i think my TA is on my team O.O
And if your grades go down to the tank I think we'll know why~~
|
|
holy cow, 60 teams. Way to go CSL!
|
Lol you think Georgia Tech will do poorly? Wait till UTennessee gets out there :o
|
Wow 60 teams. To Xeris and everyone involved in organizing this, THANK YOU!!
|
there's definitely gonna be way more teams, I waited till the last minute to re register A&M, I'm sure other teams are procrastinating too.
we might get up to like 80+ teams @_@
season 4, 100!!!
|
On January 28 2010 09:46 OneOther wrote:okay honestly, that's pretty awesome
haha i was kinda JS's TA for comp sci 6... but i wasn't in his section. i did grade his test though :p
|
I for one am excited for Michigan State vs. Michigan. Should be a good match. hehehe
|
2 more days of registration - up to 65 teams !
|
So who's part of the UGA team? I don't remember seeing them in the CSL.
Give me a shout on a pm or something, I might be interested.
|
On January 27 2010 16:21 Zerksys wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2010 14:04 JiYan wrote: btw, can you guys put up a contact next to the schools? some people might want to contact the school manager once they see their school on the list I second the motion, but feel the need to say that it will probably be up after the registration period is over.
and this
|
O come on York shouldn't even be considered to be an university.
|
UC RIVERSIDE STILL LOOKING FOR MORE MEMBERS!
students, TAs, professors, and deans are all welcome!
|
fuck yea! UGA? its my alma mater, can i plaY?
|
Damn, 65 teams and 2 days left. Way to go CSL :D
|
So, when does everything start? I'm starting to get excited to show my (lack of) skills.
|
Is the other OSU (number 65) Oregon State? I know the first one is Ohio State.
On a side note, are we going to have more than 8 divisions this season? With this many teams, the group round is gonna be crazy.
|
yes oregon state , sorry !
|
Well logically there should only be either 8 or 16 divisions. Preferably, id say 8 divisions, play everyone in your division and then have then playoffs. Seems logical to use the time until june anyways instead of trying to squeeze two CSL's between now and then. That gives approximately 5 months for this CSL.
8 groups of 9 (or so), that gives us 8 weeks of season play, 4 weeks of playoffs with plenty of time left over.
|
Logically? Why not East/West, subdivided into 6 divisions each?
Then, 2 from each division go into the playoffs, 12 in east and 12 in west, with the highest 4 in east/west getting a bye. You have 8 on 8 for the first round of the playoffs. Kinda like this:
5 weeks for playoffs, and if you have 5 weeks of the regular season, you can determine the top seeds in each division. 10 weeks is needed. Of course, more is always welcome.
I know, really, really crappy looking. But it should get the point across.
|
Well we are on the assumption that it is already going to be East/West.
What im saying though is that more people can have more matches if there are larger groups. we are all here to have fun in intercollegiate play. If anything i'd think that the participants would rather have a longer season and shorter playoff than a longer playoff. thats what i was thinking when i suggested groups of 9 with 8 weeks of season play.
|
I'd be up for a longer regular season!
(6 games felt a bit short imo)
|
Longer regular season and a shorter playoff sounds a lot more appealing
|
Fair enough, more matches are definitely a good idea. However, it'll be even more difficult to get into the playoffs, since we would have to cut it off sooner, meaning a division with 2 schools which are both very competitive would have to send one packing, without giving them a shot at the playoffs.
I mean, if the playoffs are 32 teams, that wouldn't be too bad. But it would take 5 weeks to go through the playoffs..... And no real benefit of doing really, really well in the round robin games.....
|
in the last season, two teams per division advanced and it worked out well imo.
8 groups of 9 - 2 advance from each division would make it 8 weeks of season play and 4 weeks of playoffs with the top 22% advancing.
makes sense to me.
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
I say we use a combination of polls and computer rankings to determine relative team rankings. Then the top 2 teams will play for the championship while the rest of the teams will play in "Bowl" games.
|
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
lol would be funny if it was divided into the NCAA Divisions like SEC, Big 12, Big 10, Pac 10 etc etc.
as long as we don't do some BCS bull shit....
|
Live2Win
United States6657 Posts
University of Florida has been applied!
Anyone else interested hit me up with a PM!
|
There's more teams this season, which means that the same playoff setup as last season would not work as well..... It will be very difficult to actually get a spot in a competitive division. 16 teams in the playoffs would not be enough this season. 32 is about half, which may be too many..... That's why I suggested a 24 team setup.....
|
Impervious the ideas nice, but i think match count is more important. thats what i was trying to say. we all want t play :D. CSL should be trying to get colleges to play as many games as possible because thats what teams want.
By that logic, a longer season with a stricter playoff might be beneficial.
|
damn whos from DAL?? I live so near there, would be nice to know which SC players are from there.
Unfortunately I dont go there =[
|
the format will likely not change this season unless we approach 80 teams.
|
Who the hell is from the University of Tennessee? I've been trying to find people that play starcraft here for a long time with no success. Whoever formed the UT team, PM me or something, there's not many stracraft fans around here it seem, we need to stick together.
|
Question for Admins of CSL: Is the website going to be updated on Feb 1st?
|
soon enough - don't worry
|
It'll be pretty tough to get a spot in the playoffs. However, playing more games sounds good to me too!
|
well, it is a competitive league - it's not supposed to be easy to get in the playoffs :p
|
who runs university of maryland?
|
Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused
|
If you're looking for a specific school - please pm me and I'll give the contact info... I don't feel like editing my post and adding 66 emails to be put in a public space like that.
|
On January 30 2010 13:10 tnt_titan wrote: Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused hold your horses
you'll see the contact info once it goes up on the site
|
On January 30 2010 14:44 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2010 13:10 tnt_titan wrote: Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused hold your horses you'll see the contact info once it goes up on the site
Also, players have a couple weeks before registration closes for them. Team registrations are what close in a couple of days.
The problem with a longer season is that some schools will no longer be in session after a certain period so...
|
when does the earliest school end? o.o
|
On January 30 2010 15:20 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2010 14:44 d3_crescentia wrote:On January 30 2010 13:10 tnt_titan wrote: Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused hold your horses you'll see the contact info once it goes up on the site Also, players have a couple weeks before registration closes for them. Team registrations are what close in a couple of days. The problem with a longer season is that some schools will no longer be in session after a certain period so... Is there an actual date for the player registration deadline? I'm considering playing (my school has already registered) but I'm not sure yet. Sorry if it's been posted in some obvious location, but I looked around and can't find it.
|
On January 31 2010 05:02 city42 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2010 15:20 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 30 2010 14:44 d3_crescentia wrote:On January 30 2010 13:10 tnt_titan wrote: Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused hold your horses you'll see the contact info once it goes up on the site Also, players have a couple weeks before registration closes for them. Team registrations are what close in a couple of days. The problem with a longer season is that some schools will no longer be in session after a certain period so... Is there an actual date for the player registration deadline? I'm considering playing (my school has already registered) but I'm not sure yet. Sorry if it's been posted in some obvious location, but I looked around and can't find it. there really isn't a point in not, if there comes a weekend where you can't play, just tell your coordinator
|
On January 31 2010 01:43 JiYan wrote: when does the earliest school end? o.o
mine ends like april 30 I think.
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
you guys ready for OREGON STATE?
^_-
|
On January 31 2010 05:02 city42 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2010 15:20 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 30 2010 14:44 d3_crescentia wrote:On January 30 2010 13:10 tnt_titan wrote: Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused hold your horses you'll see the contact info once it goes up on the site Also, players have a couple weeks before registration closes for them. Team registrations are what close in a couple of days. The problem with a longer season is that some schools will no longer be in session after a certain period so... Is there an actual date for the player registration deadline? I'm considering playing (my school has already registered) but I'm not sure yet. Sorry if it's been posted in some obvious location, but I looked around and can't find it.
hey Adam - player registration will open next week and players can be registered up throughout the season (ending before the playoffs)... so there's no rush.
today is the last day!
|
On January 31 2010 05:33 Xeris wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2010 05:02 city42 wrote:On January 30 2010 15:20 DarthThienAn wrote:On January 30 2010 14:44 d3_crescentia wrote:On January 30 2010 13:10 tnt_titan wrote: Xeris, maybe add the contact info beside each university in this post? People who want to join are confused hold your horses you'll see the contact info once it goes up on the site Also, players have a couple weeks before registration closes for them. Team registrations are what close in a couple of days. The problem with a longer season is that some schools will no longer be in session after a certain period so... Is there an actual date for the player registration deadline? I'm considering playing (my school has already registered) but I'm not sure yet. Sorry if it's been posted in some obvious location, but I looked around and can't find it. hey Adam - player registration will open next week and players can be registered up throughout the season (ending before the playoffs)... so there's no rush. today is the last day! Thanks buddy, I'll probably end up giving it a shot.
Great job with this league, by the way. This might be your most ambitious project yet.
|
So Xeris, when we getting out cstarleague.com accounts made hmmmmmmmmmmmm =P
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On January 31 2010 05:28 {88}iNcontroL wrote: you guys ready for OREGON STATE?
^_- Who's in your team?
|
some bad zerg player I heard
|
Can we do new divisions? Fuck UCSD
|
O noes...we passed 64...this is terrible T_T
haha jk
AIM FOR 72 or 80! (8 divisions kekekeke)
|
On January 31 2010 09:30 Saracen wrote:Can we do new divisions? Fuck UCSD 
Yes the divisions will be organized so (hopefully) new teams play each other.
|
On January 31 2010 09:41 Xeris wrote:Yes the divisions will be organized so (hopefully) new teams play each other.
Can we (Ohio State) still be in the same division as Michigan? There's kind of a rivalry between us.
Also, I think it might have been mentioned before, but one division with all of the Big Ten schools would be pretty cool. There's six schools from our conference registered currently: Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Northwestern, Illinois, and Ohio State.
|
On January 31 2010 09:20 MorningMusume11 wrote: So Xeris, when we getting out cstarleague.com accounts made hmmmmmmmmmmmm =P
eventually =].
register more teams!
gogogogogogogoo
|
On January 31 2010 09:56 Albireo wrote: Also, I think it might have been mentioned before, but one division with all of the Big Ten schools would be pretty cool. There's six schools from our conference registered currently: Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Northwestern, Illinois, and Ohio State.
I second the Big Ten grouping!
|
less than 6 hours to go !
|
Really hope UBC is in our division....but that's a given since they're about a ferry ride away.
|
On January 31 2010 09:56 Albireo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2010 09:41 Xeris wrote:On January 31 2010 09:30 Saracen wrote:Can we do new divisions? Fuck UCSD  Yes the divisions will be organized so (hopefully) new teams play each other. Can we (Ohio State) still be in the same division as Michigan? There's kind of a rivalry between us. Also, I think it might have been mentioned before, but one division with all of the Big Ten schools would be pretty cool. There's six schools from our conference registered currently: Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Northwestern, Illinois, and Ohio State. Can we (Caltech) be in the same division as MIT? There's kind of a big rivalry between us.
|
On January 31 2010 05:28 {88}iNcontroL wrote: you guys ready for OREGON STATE?
^_- Nope.
|
REGISTRATION'S ARE CLOSED! Stay tuned for more announcements in the next day or two!
|
|
now theres really no excuse, UC Merced was founded like 3 weeks ago and they managed to get a team together. any school can.
|
Oh dear... Georgia State University... =D
|
On January 31 2010 10:24 Funnytoss wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2010 09:56 Albireo wrote: Also, I think it might have been mentioned before, but one division with all of the Big Ten schools would be pretty cool. There's six schools from our conference registered currently: Michigan, Michigan State, Purdue, Northwestern, Illinois, and Ohio State. I second the Big Ten grouping!
I'm the coordinator for the Illinois team and I really think the Big Ten Division would be hilariously awesome.
|
damn, no Indiana-- I was going to make an Oaken Mouse for Purdue/IU to play for
|
Why don't we have a Big 10 tournament on the side? That would be hella fun. We could do a round robin set up.
|
We have 6 out of the big 10.
U of Michigan Michigan State U of Illinois Purdue Ohio State Northwestern
|
On February 01 2010 06:20 JDPingpong wrote: Why don't we have a Big 10 tournament on the side? That would be hella fun. We could do a round robin set up.
We've talked about that a little bit with our team (Ohio State) before and we're definitely interested in doing that. Depending on how long until the season starts, we could get the tournament in before regular season matches begin. Some of the people on our team mentioned that we could do the All-Kill format since winner's league is on and it would be more exciting. I'm willing to organize something like this if the other Big 10 teams are interested as well.
|
God I don't want Stanford to be in a division with Cal, USC, UCLA, U Wash and Oregon. We'd be 0-5. Throw in lesser Big West teams and Stanford won't win anything.
|
|
On February 01 2010 06:54 Albireo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2010 06:20 JDPingpong wrote: Why don't we have a Big 10 tournament on the side? That would be hella fun. We could do a round robin set up. We've talked about that a little bit with our team (Ohio State) before and we're definitely interested in doing that. Depending on how long until the season starts, we could get the tournament in before regular season matches begin. Some of the people on our team mentioned that we could do the All-Kill format since winner's league is on and it would be more exciting. I'm willing to organize something like this if the other Big 10 teams are interested as well.
Personally, I think just a double elim tournament would be best with each slot as a team, but we could do something special too. I'm the coordinator for the Purdue Team, we should definitely organize something together for big 10. Email me at jctenbar@purdue.edu Our website is www.purdue.edu/starcraftclub
|
Whoa a UGA team? Who, where, and when?!
|
If you are interested in helping out with the CSL - we need you!
Want to know more info, read the spoiler...
+ Show Spoiler [WHAT WE NEED] + 1) Division Admins (2 or 3)
2) Graphics Guy (1 or 2)
3) News Writers (1)
4) Replay Team (**)
Why? With 70+ teams, and just three full time people making things happen, it gets pretty tough. We want to provide awesome coverage, casting, and replays for everyone. In order to maximize the potential of the CSL - we'd love to have some more helping hands. So if you are interested, want to be a part of something big and exciting, PM me!
I've already contacted the few PM's I've gotten, but I'd <3 some more.
|
what would a division admin do?
|
|
Michigan State is probably in for the big 10 matches
|
On February 01 2010 15:51 JiYan wrote: what would a division admin do?
yoo would be my slave.
=D
jk. mostly handling match results in the like (altho maybe not this season) and refereeing, keeping track of the schools in your division to make sure they are alive and staying in contact.
|
whats up with the cstarleague.com site? o.o!
|
On February 02 2010 05:16 JiYan wrote: whats up with the cstarleague.com site? o.o!
wonderful wonderful things - patience
|
I will ask my team if anyone wants to help out.
|
whoa Georgia state AND UGA have a team now??? I think there were only like 20 BW players in GA and 15 of them went to tech lol
|
On February 02 2010 06:14 Ideas wrote: whoa Georgia state AND UGA have a team now??? I think there were only like 20 BW players in GA and 15 of them went to tech lol Haha, UGA has a fair number of SC players. You guys just got the good ones
|
On February 02 2010 06:22 tredmasta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2010 06:14 Ideas wrote: whoa Georgia state AND UGA have a team now??? I think there were only like 20 BW players in GA and 15 of them went to tech lol Haha, UGA has a fair number of SC players. You guys just got the good ones 
omg~ so many georgia schools participating XD
|
Update:
Heads up for those of you who don't know... season scheduled to start on the 13th. Get ready!
Website's almost up as well ^^.
Should be some nice changes this season, not to mention more schools =D (something like 20 more!).
|
might have to back out of div admining due to possible job >_>
I'll continue to contribute writeups/videos whenever I can, but we'll see what happens =[
|
I have a quick question:
I'm trying to register my team, but I have no idea what to put for "Registration Hash." Is that supposed to be there?
|
On February 02 2010 10:10 d3_crescentia wrote: might have to back out of div admining due to possible job >_>
I'll continue to contribute writeups/videos whenever I can, but we'll see what happens =[
noob backer-outter! lol. jk. just lemme know your definite answer soon.
On February 02 2010 11:12 tredmasta wrote: I have a quick question:
I'm trying to register my team, but I have no idea what to put for "Registration Hash." Is that supposed to be there?
Give it another few hours / a day. The Hash will be the passcode we give you. Wait for us to email you with instructions and info - our webmasters are still finishing stuff.
Also:
Can anyone get me in contact with: UWaterloo - Jackass UToronto - JianFei GT - MasterAsia
PM me kthx.
|
Are we supposed to have already received an email regarding CSL? On the website it says that coordinators should receive one with a URL and a password. I am a coordinator and have not yet gotten one.
|
On February 02 2010 11:26 Zerksys wrote: Are we supposed to have already received an email regarding CSL? On the website it says that coordinators should receive one with a URL and a password. I am a coordinator and have not yet gotten one.
Nope, not yet. Site's still under construction - finishing touches.
"Patience is a virtue! Team registration will begin shortly, pending final site updates.
Team registration will proceed in the following manner:"
^^
|
Darth - could you PM me your msn/aim - site registration is ready ~ Need to send an email with the password hash out
|
THE COORDINATORS EMAILS HAVE BEEN SENT!!
I feel like my list was missing one school - and two of my emails failed to deliver. If your school DID NOT get an email - pm me!
|
wooootttt good work Xeris ^^
|
Alright, Augustana is all registered up and ready to get our asses kicked!
|
btw - the rules are updated.. make sure you all read them !
|
*patiently waits for divisions, schedule, map pool*
|
The site looks really nice, awesome work! Registration was really smooth.
|
On February 02 2010 15:21 blabber wrote:*patiently waits for divisions, schedule, map pool* 
SOON MY FRIEND !
|
|
|
universities in toronto (york, ryerson, uoft, even UofW because infinity makes the effort!) should get together for an exhibition LAN! We can organize them like the ones that inifinity have organized at the cyber cafe at yonge and eglinton in toronto...or try a new cybercafe...XD...
|
Xeris, what's the deal on race picking? It's not mentioned anywhere in the rules.
|
On February 02 2010 22:12 reasonOK wrote: Xeris, what's the deal on race picking? It's not mentioned anywhere in the rules.
Your main race can be whatever. It doesn't actually matter. Each week, both teams enter players + their races blind, based on the map pool. There's no "race-picking" a matchup, but you can change your race every week. However, once the lineups are in, that is the race you must play with. Substitutes must be the same race as the person they are substituting for as well. Random is also a legitimate race.
That clear things up, I hope?
|
On February 02 2010 14:58 Thegilaboy wrote: Alright, Augustana is all registered up and ready to get our asses kicked!
I think you speak for most of the teams when you say that.....
|
On February 02 2010 14:58 Thegilaboy wrote: Alright, Augustana is all registered up and ready to get our asses kicked!
ahahah i love the attitude :D
|
On February 02 2010 14:39 Xeris wrote: THE COORDINATORS EMAILS HAVE BEEN SENT!!
I feel like my list was missing one school - and two of my emails failed to deliver. If your school DID NOT get an email - pm me!
yea I didn't get one so I pm'ed you
|
On February 03 2010 00:52 DarthThienAn wrote: Your main race can be whatever. It doesn't actually matter. Each week, both teams enter players + their races blind, based on the map pool. There's no "race-picking" a matchup, but you can change your race every week. However, once the lineups are in, that is the race you must play with. Substitutes must be the same race as the person they are substituting for as well. Random is also a legitimate race.
i like this
|
<3 gogo Case Western
|
When does player registration end?
|
dont think its started yet
|
On February 03 2010 06:24 JiYan wrote: dont think its started yet It started last night.
|
On February 03 2010 04:29 Snipinpanda wrote: When does player registration end?
The rules on the new website say we can add players until the end of the regular season and they are eligible for playoffs.
|
On February 03 2010 06:24 JiYan wrote: dont think its started yet
You can add players as soon as you register your team. It's pretty self-explanatory on the Manage Teams page.
|
site is really nice and easy to use. 2 thumbs up there!
|
Agreed. Very nice work guys!
|
On February 03 2010 06:50 LuckyFool wrote:site is really nice and easy to use. 2 thumbs up there! 
You shoulddd comment on the csl page about that.
Yeah. Our newsposts have comments now. Prettty pwnage. wooot. lol.
|
it's now INTERACTIVE! so hopefully we'll have more communication and happiness on the website itself
|
I am B+ from Ottawa, where can I join this team?
|
|
you have to attend the school though...
|
On February 03 2010 01:10 lMPERVlOUS wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2010 14:58 Thegilaboy wrote: Alright, Augustana is all registered up and ready to get our asses kicked! I think you speak for most of the teams when you say that.....
Putting yourself in a hypothetical situation where you're in a team that's likely to lose a few games? Because uOttawa gonna DOMINATE
|
Oh, I know we will. We've got 2 OSL winners on our team!
|
United States10774 Posts
On February 03 2010 11:04 dRaW wrote: I am B+ from Ottawa, where can I join this team? lol
|
so a map pack was uploaded... Moon Glaive, Outsider, Destination, Fighting Spirit, Heartbreak Ridge, Tornado, Match Point
I was kinda hoping for a stoppage in the trend of using maps right when everyone's ready to move on from them (Outsider, HBR, Destination)
|
people are ready to move on from HBR and Outsider? I can understand Desti's been around for quite a while now but HBR and Outsider are hardly outdated.
This is a very solid map pool imo.
|
On February 03 2010 12:29 blabber wrote: so a map pack was uploaded... Moon Glaive, Outsider, Destination, Fighting Spirit, Heartbreak Ridge, Tornado, Match Point
I was kinda hoping for a stoppage in the trend of using maps right when everyone's ready to move on from them (Outsider, HBR, Destination)
I think Outsider has a lot to offer in terms of creative play... Heartbreak outdated? really? It's still motw like every other / every third week. Still pretty popular imo. Destination was just the "classic" map we kept.
|
On February 03 2010 12:38 LuckyFool wrote: people are ready to move on from HBR and Outsider? I can understand Desti's been around for quite a while now but HBR and Outsider are hardly outdated.
This is a very solid map pool imo. well I like to follow what maps Korean leagues use and none of the leagues use these maps anymore. But that's just me, I always get excited when new maps are made
|
well, the majority are current maps, and we kept the most popular/interesting from the previous iteration
|
On February 03 2010 12:44 azndsh wrote: well, the majority are current maps, and we kept the most popular/interesting from the previous iteration I can see that and the map pool makes sense if that is your goal.
actually I'm just sick and tired of seeing Destination everywhere
|
On February 03 2010 12:47 blabber wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 12:44 azndsh wrote: well, the majority are current maps, and we kept the most popular/interesting from the previous iteration I can see that and the map pool makes sense if that is your goal. actually I'm just sick and tired of seeing Destination everywhere  <3 desti, so im fine with it
|
Awesome map pool, couldn't have picked better myself.
|
On February 03 2010 12:47 blabber wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 12:44 azndsh wrote: well, the majority are current maps, and we kept the most popular/interesting from the previous iteration I can see that and the map pool makes sense if that is your goal. actually I'm just sick and tired of seeing Destination everywhere 
stfu! =P desti rocks
|
On February 03 2010 11:10 lMPERVlOUS wrote: Uottawa or Carleton?
Well, I have special student status, and attending both... I was just wondering how this thing works?
|
On February 03 2010 14:21 dRaW wrote:Well, I have special student status, and attending both... I was just wondering how this thing works?
...
elaborate? o.o
|
Special student status is just where you can attend universities just for select courses, I have student cards from both.
|
the site doesn't save the changes when i try to add players, is this supposed to happen?
|
On February 03 2010 14:57 baronsb wrote: the site doesn't save the changes when i try to add players, is this supposed to happen?
no... you sure you saving and everything? What school are you?
On February 03 2010 14:45 dRaW wrote: Special student status is just where you can attend universities just for select courses, I have student cards from both.
Hmm... That's interesting, never heard of that. In that case, pick a school and stay with it ~
|
just in case not everyone's seen this yet:
|
On February 03 2010 15:04 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 14:57 baronsb wrote: the site doesn't save the changes when i try to add players, is this supposed to happen? no... you sure you saving and everything? What school are you?
Umm, yeah I try to add information then click save but it doesn't go through.
|
On February 03 2010 15:18 hazelynut wrote:just in case not everyone's seen this yet: missing Victoria!
|
On February 03 2010 15:44 baronsb wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 15:04 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 03 2010 14:57 baronsb wrote: the site doesn't save the changes when i try to add players, is this supposed to happen? no... you sure you saving and everything? What school are you? Umm, yeah I try to add information then click save but it doesn't go through.
What school/team?
|
|
On February 03 2010 16:40 baronsb wrote: stonybrook What browser and OS are you using?
|
On February 03 2010 19:05 yenta wrote:What browser and OS are you using? At first guess I'm guessing the culprit is Opera
|
On February 03 2010 19:14 yenta wrote:Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 19:05 yenta wrote:On February 03 2010 16:40 baronsb wrote: stonybrook What browser and OS are you using? At first guess I'm guessing the culprit is Opera
baronsb I think I have fixed the issue, please give it another try. Also if anyone else has problems please let me know!
|
Show nested quote +On February 03 2010 14:45 dRaW wrote: Special student status is just where you can attend universities just for select courses, I have student cards from both. Hmm... That's interesting, never heard of that. In that case, pick a school and stay with it ~
Actually, I talked to Hazelynut about this kind of thing. Carleton University, The University of Ottawa, and Algonquin College are very meshed together, there are a lot of students with this type of multi-school course setup (next year, I may have a course that I have to take at Algonquin.....). Originally, we wanted to form 1 team, but that wasn't allowed.....
Sorry Kuo..... Stuck at Algonquin.....
|
destination? LAAAAAAAME
man a lame map always sneaks into map pool
destination sucked a year ago and it still sucks now.
|
I would think destination is okay if I wasn't completely terrible on it.
|
On February 04 2010 03:07 Ideas wrote: destination? LAAAAAAAME
man a lame map always sneaks into map pool
destination sucked a year ago and it still sucks now.
Well, I'm sure at least one person on your team likes the map ^_^. If not, deal with it =D.
|
tbh i think at least one of destination/python needed to be put in. id say at least 50% of csl players ONLY know those maps.
|
I remember day9 once telling me that, "desti has to be in there 100%" when I tried to replace it with something a little different. Bottom line: it's a good map. Overplayed, yes, but overplayed for a reason.
|
I would venture a guess that Ideas just sucks on that map.
|
|
Out of curiosity, what would you say the typical skill level is of the players in CSL?
|
On February 04 2010 05:19 L_Master wrote: Out of curiosity, what would you say the typical skill level is of the players in CSL? Probably D+ in general, C/C- for playoff teams?
|
apparently admins hate emory. 2 consecutive seasons with duke AND gatech in the same division?
|
well West Division 4 looks to be quite competitive ^^
|
On February 04 2010 04:45 hazelynut wrote: I remember day9 once telling me that, "desti has to be in there 100%" when I tried to replace it with something a little different. Bottom line: it's a good map. Overplayed, yes, but overplayed for a reason.
At the end of ESI Season 2, I watched every single replay over 10 minutes to create a top-ten best-of pack. 8/10 of those games were on destination.
|
General skill level is anywhere from D- to C. The dominant teams that have placed well in the past typically have one or two players beyond C that whip the rest of their team into shape and help plan good strategies.
There are LOTS of low-level rofl encounters, and a simple strategy is often the most effective.
|
On February 04 2010 05:32 Severedevil wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 05:19 L_Master wrote: Out of curiosity, what would you say the typical skill level is of the players in CSL? Probably D+ in general, C/C- for playoff teams?
I'd say D+/C- for regular play, playoff teams are a bit higher - C/C+ at least I think. Exclude Princeton =D.
On February 04 2010 06:05 ziz wrote: apparently admins hate emory. 2 consecutive seasons with duke AND gatech in the same division?
Apparently Emory is in Georgia... and Duke is in NC, which is relatively close to GA. Pretty sure all of the Georgia schools are in that division... don't hear them complaining yet o.O.
Anyway, it's not that we hate emory. We just don't care about them. 70ish schools, we don't really care about any of them except Princeton, but that wasn't even a factor zzz.
On February 04 2010 06:09 blabber wrote: well West Division 4 looks to be quite competitive ^^
Really? You only say that because of UCI and UCSD Most divisions have two or three powerhouse, it's pretty typically. Who else in W4 is in the running?
|
compare east div1, div2 to div3, div4 and tell me that's balanced
UW, UofT, GT, and Duke should be in 4 different divisions plz
div1 is so ez that it's laughable
div2 is where princeton is clear fav and no other team come close
T_T i sense some bias??
|
On February 04 2010 07:12 DarthThienAn wrote:Really? You only say that because of UCI and UCSD  Most divisions have two or three powerhouse, it's pretty typically. Who else in W4 is in the running?
Harvey Mudd and Caltech are pretty good. I think if they were in any other western division last season they would have made the playoffs.
You still also can't count out the Season 1 champions.
|
Anyway, it's not that we hate emory. We just don't care about them. 70ish schools, we don't really care about any of them except Princeton, but that wasn't even a factor zzz.
Thanks for letting me know. That was very insightful.
|
On February 04 2010 07:27 monkxly wrote: compare east div1, div2 to div3, div4 and tell me that's balanced
UW, UofT, GT, and Duke should be in 4 different divisions plz
div1 is so ez that it's laughable
div2 is where princeton is clear fav and no other team come close
T_T i sense some bias??
Well Cornell will be advancing this season. Not sure if you factored that into your bias sense.
|
Yeah the east seems pretty imbalanced ^^. I assume this was done somewhat geographically, but in the playoffs, if east 3 plays east 4 like last season, all the "good" teams are going to be eliminated. UW, UofT and Duke (not sure about Gtech) all have mostly b- or better players in their best lineups. I've also heard that there are other teams like York with B- and better people as well.
|
This being said, Princeton had a hella hard route to the grand finals last season although that was partially due to placing second divisionally.
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
Why is there only 63 teams instead of 71
|
On February 04 2010 07:27 monkxly wrote:
div2 is where princeton is clear fav and no other team come close
o rly
|
Because not all of them have registered their teams on the CSL site yet..... HURRY UP!!!!!
I'm just hoping that we can make a dent in our division..... I know we've got our game against Carleton in the bag, but still.....
|
Yeah I don't mind being with Duke and GT again =P You guys are getting cheesed to hell ^^
|
On February 04 2010 07:27 monkxly wrote: div2 is where princeton is clear fav and no other team come close
who is gmu who is rutgers
I expect luckyfool to lead his team to a playoff spot
|
Whats pissing me off is my school dont even reply to their emails when I ask em if they gonna play or not... (I really do NOT want to play in a lot of matches...)
|
On February 04 2010 08:28 MorningMusume11 wrote: Whats pissing me off is my school dont even reply to their emails when I ask em if they gonna play or not... (I really do NOT want to play in a lot of matches...)
you probably shouldn't be part of the team then
|
I wouldn't say Princeton is the favorite in East Division 2, though they have a good shot at making the playoffs. I don't think Rutgers is as strong as last year, losing fanatacist.
Come on East Division 2, put some randoms in your lineup so that we might have an RvR match against me.
|
On February 04 2010 08:30 Whiplash wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 08:28 MorningMusume11 wrote: Whats pissing me off is my school dont even reply to their emails when I ask em if they gonna play or not... (I really do NOT want to play in a lot of matches...) you probably shouldn't be part of the team then
I mean, this was an ambition that people I talked to last semester wanted to do, so I made it possible (i.e there's a Starcraft Club at VT). We have four (including me) but I wanted to be behind the scenes as much as possible when matches start. Thing is, there ARE players that can be part of it, and even want to but I dunno, its just one of those weeks where I need to hear a reponse from someone (job offer, CSL, etc) and I just don't get em lol.
Main problem I think is that I'm at home (I'm still enrolled cuz I'm taking two distance courses) and everyone else is back at Va. Tech. I mean I got my degree last semester and everything but, being not there it kinda just... bleh.
|
On February 04 2010 08:36 Phelix wrote: I wouldn't say Princeton is the favorite in East Division 2, though they have a good shot at making the playoffs. I don't think Rutgers is as strong as last year, losing fanatacist.
Come on East Division 2, put some randoms in your lineup so that we might have an RvR match against me. if one of their players hadn't gotten into a car accident and forfeitted his match who knows what could've happened last playoffs - and they did that without fana
|
On February 04 2010 07:39 blabber wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 07:12 DarthThienAn wrote:Really? You only say that because of UCI and UCSD  Most divisions have two or three powerhouse, it's pretty typically. Who else in W4 is in the running? Harvey Mudd and Caltech are pretty good. I think if they were in any other western division last season they would have made the playoffs. You still also can't count out the Season 1 champions. Ugh.. don't remind me. Last season our division was so bad for us. UCI and UCSD were the top two teams in West and UC Riverside was also really strong. This season is the same minus riverside. But at least they take top 3 from each division this time. Guess we have to be serious if we want to make playoffs.
|
Wow. If that kind of thing happened against our team, I'm sure we'd be up for allowing a substitution due to extenuating circumstances..... Shitty.....
|
We got kicked out of our division and got put into the one with some strong canadian teams(U of Toronto, UWaterloo, U of West Ontario) T_T
|
On February 04 2010 08:49 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 08:36 Phelix wrote: I wouldn't say Princeton is the favorite in East Division 2, though they have a good shot at making the playoffs. I don't think Rutgers is as strong as last year, losing fanatacist.
Come on East Division 2, put some randoms in your lineup so that we might have an RvR match against me. if one of their players hadn't gotten into a car accident and forfeitted his match who knows what could've happened last playoffs - and they did that without fana
How hurt was he? Did he get ok really soon or did it take a while?
|
On February 04 2010 07:27 monkxly wrote: compare east div1, div2 to div3, div4 and tell me that's balanced
UW, UofT, GT, and Duke should be in 4 different divisions plz
div1 is so ez that it's laughable
div2 is where princeton is clear fav and no other team come close
T_T i sense some bias??
How is Princeton a clear favorite? Princeton is D+/C- players except for one C player -_-. Geography, as usual, was the main factor in deciding divisions, with a secondary "skill level" factor. If two schools are closeby, doesn't it make sense that they would be in the same division? UW and UToronto are basically next to each other in terms of the schools in the league... why would they be in different divisions, unless that was the cutoff life?
If you base it on skill level alone, Princeton never should have beat Duke or UofT last season. But if that's true, then what's the point of playing the matches? JD beat Flash, when Flash was the clear favorite. Jaehoon beat Kal last night, even though I think many would say that Kal is a much more solid player. Things happen... GMU has LuckyFool, who, if he isn't playing like trash, is clearly better than any of Princeton's players. Rutgers, unless they lost the better half their roster, has a shot of 1 or 2 in the division.
Why should UW, UofT, GT, and Duke be in different divisions, but not other schools? Do I sense some bias?? ... Princeton beat two of those schools last playoffs, so shouldn't we put Princeton in a different division too, to "spread out the high-level players"?
Also, div1 might be laughable for you, since your school has a good amount of high-level players. But the majority of the schools in the CSL don't, so, for those schools, it's not really all that laughable. Tufts / Harvard / MIT are all fairly decent, and the other schools I don't know about.
Oh, "Waterloo is a clear favorite in d3, the admins must be biased."
On February 04 2010 08:05 T.O.P. wrote: Why is there only 63 teams instead of 71
Some teams still need to go register ><
|
if the season starts as is with 6 teams in div West-3, do we play teams multiple times? i dont want like 4 bye weeks thats just lame -_- and do top 3 still advance?
|
i think this has already been explained... not all schools are registered yet.
|
yeah pton blows dunno why they made playoffs ;P
|
Last teams please register, I want to generate a schedule!
|
Texas A&M definitely is not in a division
|
On February 04 2010 10:25 SS-guy wrote:Texas A&M definitely is not in a division  Texas A&M needs to register their team on the site so they can be added to their division by a script~~
|
On February 04 2010 09:37 JiYan wrote: if the season starts as is with 6 teams in div West-3, do we play teams multiple times? i dont want like 4 bye weeks thats just lame -_- and do top 3 still advance?
On February 04 2010 09:41 azndsh wrote: i think this has already been explained... not all schools are registered yet.
if the season starts AS IS. meh w/e
|
On February 04 2010 10:56 JiYan wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 09:37 JiYan wrote: if the season starts as is with 6 teams in div West-3, do we play teams multiple times? i dont want like 4 bye weeks thats just lame -_- and do top 3 still advance? Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 09:41 azndsh wrote: i think this has already been explained... not all schools are registered yet. if the season starts AS IS. meh w/e
Then we'll reconfigure the divisions a little bit to compensate.
|
damn where's UBC??? hurry uppp
|
honestly, it doesn't make much sense for emory and duke to be in different divisions. emory, you're going to have play duke at some point, and there's no point in asking us to help you dodge.
when making division 2, i purposely grabbed GMU (Luckyfool!), Rutgers, and Princeton, which are, as far as i know, the better teams around new england. Yale and Cornell aren't bad either.
remember that three out of nine divisions advance. as far as i can tell from my experience with teams, there aren't any divisions that are so imbalanced as to have 4+ reaaally good teams that deserve to get into playoffs.
|
haha yeah, top 3 qualifying is so much better. That way divisions with two clear favorites still stay competitive for the last spot instead of a drop off in interest like last season.
|
oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24...
|
On February 04 2010 12:07 d3_crescentia wrote: oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24...
read the rules kthx 
|
On February 04 2010 11:55 hazelynut wrote: remember that three out of nine divisions advance. as far as i can tell from my experience with teams, there aren't any divisions that are so imbalanced as to have 4+ reaaally good teams that deserve to get into playoffs. West Division 4 ^^
|
rutgers division is ezpz. i cant wait to facesmash pton again
|
Looks like our division is going to be insane again, Waterloo and UofT -.-!!!!
|
lets name the divisions to starcraft planets or something! :D
|
On February 04 2010 12:51 blabber wrote: West Division 4 ^^
Duran requested to be in your division~ I see UCI, UC Berkeley, Caltech, and UCSD as major players, but Berkeley's been off the radar since Yosh hasn't been around.
|
Harvey Mudd should be mentioned as well, especially with qxc's performance in the individual tourney
|
On February 04 2010 13:54 blabber wrote: Harvey Mudd should be mentioned as well, especially with qxc's performance in the individual tourney
Yeah I guess W4 seems to be the most stacked, but that depends a lot on Caltech and Berkeley stepping it up. It's also like... the California division lol.
|
LOL@ West Div3. Time to sweep again
|
On February 04 2010 13:44 hazelynut wrote:... since Yosh hasn't been around ...
hes more than likely smurfing :p i don't think he actually 'quits'
|
On February 04 2010 14:10 tnt_titan wrote: LOL@ West Div3. Time to sweep again
oh really?
|
Universities who have yet to complete registration:
McGill Georgia State Texas A&M U British Columbia UCLA
If you know the coordinators at these schools, yell at them! Thanks!
|
On February 04 2010 19:12 JiYan wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 14:10 tnt_titan wrote: LOL@ West Div3. Time to sweep again oh really?
yeah you suckers better watch out jiyan might get his one win of the season against you
jk yo^^
|
On February 04 2010 12:27 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 12:07 d3_crescentia wrote: oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24... read the rules kthx  wtf is the ro32 when we only have 16 teams participating
unless it goes 16 (2-3) into 8 vs top 8
|
On February 04 2010 22:16 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 12:27 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 04 2010 12:07 d3_crescentia wrote: oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24... read the rules kthx  wtf is the ro32 when we only have 16 teams participating unless it goes 16 (2-3) into 8 vs top 8
Top 3 from 8 divisions = 24 Top 1 from each division gets auto seed to next round (round of 16) which in essence creates 8 "ghost" teams since this is a bye in the round of 32 2-3 from each division get seeded to first round (round of 32)
24 + 8 ghosts = 32
|
On February 04 2010 07:12 DarthThienAn wrote:
Apparently Emory is in Georgia... and Duke is in NC, which is relatively close to GA. Pretty sure all of the Georgia schools are in that division... don't hear them complaining yet o.O.
UGA here.
Our division is quite hard because of GT and Duke.
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
*cracks knuckles*
Time to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of gum.
|
On February 04 2010 22:16 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 12:27 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 04 2010 12:07 d3_crescentia wrote: oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24... read the rules kthx  wtf is the ro32 when we only have 16 teams participating unless it goes 16 (2-3) into 8 vs top 8
peter read the rules like wtfyoubaddivadmin.
The top three teams in each Division will advance to the playoffs. The first place finisher in each Division will be seeded in the Round of 16, while the second and third place finishers will be placed in the Round of 32. The playoffs will be split by East and West Conferences, with the winners of each conference facing off in the Grand Final.
I mean, the wording's not the best in terms of saying "Round of 32", but it's pretty clear =X.
|
If this has already been done, forgive me.
I think the top 8 powerhouses should be in their own division, for the sake of future CSL's.
You can really get a better judge of how good some universities are by trying to guarantee the ro16 seeds to the best colleges, thereby allowing everyone else to figure out how good they are.
For instance, say the 1st and 2nd best teams are in the same divison. The ro16 seed for that division should theoretically go to the #1 team, but then you would have the #2 team destroying everyone else in the ro32, giving less indication as to how good the defeated colleges really are.
Like I said, I don't know if this has been done, this is my first time playing in/following the CSL. I really don't know who the top 8 are.
|
hey DarthThienAn whatever happened to that all-star showmatch this weekend? I emailed you saying masterasia will play in it but I haven't heard back yet :O
(you are running it right? lol)
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On February 05 2010 05:31 FridgeToss wrote: If this has already been done, forgive me.
I think the top 8 powerhouses should be in their own division, for the sake of future CSL's.
You can really get a better judge of how good some universities are by trying to guarantee the ro16 seeds to the best colleges, thereby allowing everyone else to figure out how good they are.
For instance, say the 1st and 2nd best teams are in the same divison. The ro16 seed for that division should theoretically go to the #1 team, but then you would have the #2 team destroying everyone else in the ro32, giving less indication as to how good the defeated colleges really are.
Like I said, I don't know if this has been done, this is my first time playing in/following the CSL. I really don't know who the top 8 are. If the top 8 is in one division, then most of the powerhouses won't make it to the playoffs. If the #2 team destroys everyone in ro32, they get to play the #1 teams, that's how the playoffs work.
|
I really would have liked to see one older, non-standard sort of map make it into the map pool (ie. Hitchhiker, Monty Hall, Troy...) But I don't know, people tend to have different ideas of what's a good map pool...
|
On February 05 2010 06:57 Ideas wrote: hey DarthThienAn whatever happened to that all-star showmatch this weekend? I emailed you saying masterasia will play in it but I haven't heard back yet :O
(you are running it right? lol)
Yeah it's happening. Sunday 9pm EST. I guess Xeris and I should get on that haha.
On February 05 2010 07:06 T.O.P. wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2010 05:31 FridgeToss wrote: If this has already been done, forgive me.
I think the top 8 powerhouses should be in their own division, for the sake of future CSL's.
You can really get a better judge of how good some universities are by trying to guarantee the ro16 seeds to the best colleges, thereby allowing everyone else to figure out how good they are.
For instance, say the 1st and 2nd best teams are in the same divison. The ro16 seed for that division should theoretically go to the #1 team, but then you would have the #2 team destroying everyone else in the ro32, giving less indication as to how good the defeated colleges really are.
Like I said, I don't know if this has been done, this is my first time playing in/following the CSL. I really don't know who the top 8 are. If the top 8 is in one division, then most of the powerhouses won't make it to the playoffs. If the #2 team destroys everyone in ro32, they get to play the #1 teams, that's how the playoffs work.
hmm. I think he might of meant one per division.
Anyway, we can only judge for ourselves who the top 8 are... and we could always be wrong. We though Berkeley would pwn face last season and they failed to meet our expectations. I think the way the divisions are set up now has a generally good balance of good and bad teams and whatnot though..
|
Sorry if this has been answered already, but when do you think the first round of matches will begin?
|
|
Still Looking for A Few Admins!
1) Graphics (1 more)
2) Replays (several more)
... If you're interested, PM Me!! ...
If you PM'd me and I haven't responded, PM me again (I might have missed it the first time). If you PM'd me but I didn't respond, but you just got an email from me... then you're good!
|
On February 05 2010 08:00 Snipinpanda wrote: I really would have liked to see one older, non-standard sort of map make it into the map pool (ie. Hitchhiker, Monty Hall, Troy...) But I don't know, people tend to have different ideas of what's a good map pool... Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated and imbalanced maps, I don't know why the CSL would want to.
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
On February 05 2010 14:56 Severedevil wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2010 08:00 Snipinpanda wrote: I really would have liked to see one older, non-standard sort of map make it into the map pool (ie. Hitchhiker, Monty Hall, Troy...) But I don't know, people tend to have different ideas of what's a good map pool... Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated and imbalanced maps, I don't know why the CSL would want to. Because we're not pros.
|
On February 05 2010 14:56 Severedevil wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2010 08:00 Snipinpanda wrote: I really would have liked to see one older, non-standard sort of map make it into the map pool (ie. Hitchhiker, Monty Hall, Troy...) But I don't know, people tend to have different ideas of what's a good map pool... Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated and imbalanced maps, I don't know why the CSL would want to.
Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated maps because they've been already played a lot.
As for imbalanced, you make it sound like all older maps fall into that category. I don't see how their more imbalanced then the current ones in the map pool. In addition, map imbalanced at the level CSL is played at is probably much less of a factor than at the level pros play at...
Anyways, as I said, I would have liked to see ONE of those maps make it in, just for a change-of-pace sort of map. It's sort of a moot point anyways since they aren't really going to change it...
|
reflecting more I think that this map pool is easily the best CSL has ever had, mostly becuase its all current maps except for outsider/hbr/desti. fortunately outsider and hbr are 2 of the best maps of all time (and literally JUST not current any more). desti is really the only bad map in the pool :D
|
Registration deadline is here, and we seem to be missing a couple schools...
Georgia State UCLA
=[
On another note, we have 70 schools =]
|
UCLA is registering today, don't worry~
|
dude xeris and mark, hype matches are supposed to be hyped. T_T?
|
|
|
On February 05 2010 15:16 Snipinpanda wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2010 14:56 Severedevil wrote:On February 05 2010 08:00 Snipinpanda wrote: I really would have liked to see one older, non-standard sort of map make it into the map pool (ie. Hitchhiker, Monty Hall, Troy...) But I don't know, people tend to have different ideas of what's a good map pool... Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated and imbalanced maps, I don't know why the CSL would want to. Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated maps because they've been already played a lot. As for imbalanced, you make it sound like all older maps fall into that category. I don't see how their more imbalanced then the current ones in the map pool. In addition, map imbalanced at the level CSL is played at is probably much less of a factor than at the level pros play at... Anyways, as I said, I would have liked to see ONE of those maps make it in, just for a change-of-pace sort of map. It's sort of a moot point anyways since they aren't really going to change it...
Having one weird old map isn't a bad idea, but the problem I see is that everyone has a different idea of what a good weird map is, and we would only have one weird map (any more than one would likely piss people off, in fact having only one is already being met with heavy resistance) so while we all love weird maps, having one designated weird map would pretty much guarantee everyone to be pissed off. For example, you listed 3 maps and I hate all 3 of them. I honestly think Hunters and Blood Bath would be welcomed a lot more than maps like Troy
Besides, I'd say Outsider is good enough to fill that hole
|
On February 05 2010 03:40 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 22:16 d3_crescentia wrote:On February 04 2010 12:27 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 04 2010 12:07 d3_crescentia wrote: oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24... read the rules kthx  wtf is the ro32 when we only have 16 teams participating unless it goes 16 (2-3) into 8 vs top 8 peter read the rules like wtfyoubaddivadmin. The top three teams in each Division will advance to the playoffs. The first place finisher in each Division will be seeded in the Round of 16, while the second and third place finishers will be placed in the Round of 32. The playoffs will be split by East and West Conferences, with the winners of each conference facing off in the Grand Final.I mean, the wording's not the best in terms of saying "Round of 32", but it's pretty clear =X. I read it and it's not clear at first glance
drawing a bracket and naming things properly would be helpful
|
can someone refer me to the University of Illinois coach
i've been playing again and I wanna join the team
|
On February 06 2010 05:13 dekuschrub wrote: can someone refer me to the University of Illinois coach
i've been playing again and I wanna join the team
http://www.cstarleague.com/team/37
On February 06 2010 05:10 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2010 03:40 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 04 2010 22:16 d3_crescentia wrote:On February 04 2010 12:27 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 04 2010 12:07 d3_crescentia wrote: oh snap it's 3/9 now? but that makes for a final bracket of 24... read the rules kthx  wtf is the ro32 when we only have 16 teams participating unless it goes 16 (2-3) into 8 vs top 8 peter read the rules like wtfyoubaddivadmin. The top three teams in each Division will advance to the playoffs. The first place finisher in each Division will be seeded in the Round of 16, while the second and third place finishers will be placed in the Round of 32. The playoffs will be split by East and West Conferences, with the winners of each conference facing off in the Grand Final.I mean, the wording's not the best in terms of saying "Round of 32", but it's pretty clear =X. I read it and it's not clear at first glance drawing a bracket and naming things properly would be helpful
We're not gonna put a bracket in the rules section -_-. 1st place in divs will be seeded in the round of 16. That's 8 spots out of 16. The 2nd / 3rd place play for the remaining 8 spots.
|
On February 06 2010 04:29 Purind wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2010 15:16 Snipinpanda wrote:On February 05 2010 14:56 Severedevil wrote:On February 05 2010 08:00 Snipinpanda wrote: I really would have liked to see one older, non-standard sort of map make it into the map pool (ie. Hitchhiker, Monty Hall, Troy...) But I don't know, people tend to have different ideas of what's a good map pool... Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated and imbalanced maps, I don't know why the CSL would want to. Proleague doesn't purposefully run dated maps because they've been already played a lot. As for imbalanced, you make it sound like all older maps fall into that category. I don't see how their more imbalanced then the current ones in the map pool. In addition, map imbalanced at the level CSL is played at is probably much less of a factor than at the level pros play at... Anyways, as I said, I would have liked to see ONE of those maps make it in, just for a change-of-pace sort of map. It's sort of a moot point anyways since they aren't really going to change it... Having one weird old map isn't a bad idea, but the problem I see is that everyone has a different idea of what a good weird map is, and we would only have one weird map (any more than one would likely piss people off, in fact having only one is already being met with heavy resistance) so while we all love weird maps, having one designated weird map would pretty much guarantee everyone to be pissed off. For example, you listed 3 maps and I hate all 3 of them. I honestly think Hunters and Blood Bath would be welcomed a lot more than maps like Troy Besides, I'd say Outsider is good enough to fill that hole 
Blasphemy, no one hates on Monty Hall =P
|
ATTENTION TEAMS
Please head over to schedule your division's standard match time.
The chosen time will be the default for your division, so please cast your vote! You can re-negotiate match times with individual opponents throughout the season, but if neither of you can settle on any given week, this form will decide the default time.
|
|
On February 06 2010 05:10 d3_crescentia wrote: I read it and it's not clear at first glance
drawing a bracket and naming things properly would be helpful
What they should have said is "The top 3 teams move on to the Ro36, with the #1 team from each division getting a first round bye"
|
On February 06 2010 05:28 DarthThienAn wrote: We're not gonna put a bracket in the rules section -_-. 1st place in divs will be seeded in the round of 16. That's 8 spots out of 16. The 2nd / 3rd place play for the remaining 8 spots. what you just said is actually the clearest of them all ~_~ put that up on the site
|
On February 04 2010 13:44 hazelynut wrote:Duran requested to be in your division~ I see UCI, UC Berkeley, Caltech, and UCSD as major players, but Berkeley's been off the radar since Yosh hasn't been around.
Yea...Division 4 is stacked again. Last time UCI and UCSD were the semifinalists. I don't get why they are together...
On February 04 2010 13:54 blabber wrote: Harvey Mudd should be mentioned as well, especially with qxc's performance in the individual tourney
Yep. QXC will now own ACE matches and we will win! =D (we lost a lot in ACE last season)
HMC FIGHTING
|
On February 06 2010 08:21 ReketSomething wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 13:44 hazelynut wrote:On February 04 2010 12:51 blabber wrote: West Division 4 ^^ Duran requested to be in your division~ I see UCI, UC Berkeley, Caltech, and UCSD as major players, but Berkeley's been off the radar since Yosh hasn't been around. Yea...Division 4 is stacked again. Last time UCI and UCSD were the semifinalists. I don't get why they are together... Show nested quote +On February 04 2010 13:54 blabber wrote: Harvey Mudd should be mentioned as well, especially with qxc's performance in the individual tourney Yep. QXC will now own ACE matches and we will win! =D (we lost a lot in ACE last season) HMC FIGHTING
How come he didn't play more last season? O_o
|
so we can have an epic UCI vs UCSD live match.
|
Has the weekly schedule and the map order for each week been released yet? If so, I guess they will be released in the next couple of days ?
|
On February 06 2010 13:00 Nick_54 wrote: Has the weekly schedule and the map order for each week been released yet? If so, I guess they will be released in the next couple of days ?
Nah, soon.
|
I think Saturday at 4 was good for most of us in the east division.
|
On February 06 2010 13:49 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2010 13:00 Nick_54 wrote: Has the weekly schedule and the map order for each week been released yet? If so, I guess they will be released in the next couple of days ? Nah, soon.
Alright because it would help to know the maps for week 1 (next weekend) Thanks for all the work u guys are putting in, I think its gonna be a great season.
|
On February 06 2010 14:20 DragoonPK wrote: I think Saturday at 4 was good for most of us in the east division.
I could be wrong, my brain is kind of fried from playing ladder chess for like 3 hours straight, but didn't our division play games on Sundays?
|
On February 06 2010 14:20 DragoonPK wrote: I think Saturday at 4 was good for most of us in the east division.
"the east division"
there are 4 T_T
On February 06 2010 14:31 jcu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2010 14:20 DragoonPK wrote: I think Saturday at 4 was good for most of us in the east division. I could be wrong, my brain is kind of fried from playing ladder chess for like 3 hours straight, but didn't our division play games on Sundays?
Could be ^^
|
On February 06 2010 14:35 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2010 14:20 DragoonPK wrote: I think Saturday at 4 was good for most of us in the east division. "the east division" there are 4 T_T Show nested quote +On February 06 2010 14:31 jcu wrote:On February 06 2010 14:20 DragoonPK wrote: I think Saturday at 4 was good for most of us in the east division. I could be wrong, my brain is kind of fried from playing ladder chess for like 3 hours straight, but didn't our division play games on Sundays? Could be ^^
Did u send out emails to the people telling them about this survey? Most schools dont know about it! So do send out emails!
|
On January 30 2010 04:03 lMPERVlOUS wrote:I know, really, really crappy looking. But it should get the point across.
itll look kind of like that for those who are visual and are requesting it...
|
Is there anyway we could just set the maps for all of the matches in the near future, instead of week by week? I feel like it can't be too much of a hassle to do (in fact, I'd volunteer to do it if the problem is that no one wants to), and it would probably help a lot of teams plan for matches.
|
On February 08 2010 10:58 TestSubject893 wrote: Is there anyway we could just set the maps for all of the matches in the near future, instead of week by week? I feel like it can't be too much of a hassle to do (in fact, I'd volunteer to do it if the problem is that no one wants to), and it would probably help a lot of teams plan for matches. I'd take a guess and say the map orders for all weeks have been made already
|
On February 08 2010 11:17 blabber wrote:Show nested quote +On February 08 2010 10:58 TestSubject893 wrote: Is there anyway we could just set the maps for all of the matches in the near future, instead of week by week? I feel like it can't be too much of a hassle to do (in fact, I'd volunteer to do it if the problem is that no one wants to), and it would probably help a lot of teams plan for matches. I'd take a guess and say the map orders for all weeks have been made already
From the CSL website: The newest updates to the site include:
Team pages now include a Match Schedule. This match schedule (and the schedule page) link to Match Draw and Results. Automatic schedule generation (yes, you can plan ahead for the entire season). The map pool for the next round will be set every Sunday night.
|
chill out, all the coordinators got the map list already.
Set 1: Fighting Spirit(4) Set 2: Heartbreak Ridge(2) Set 3: Outsider(3) Set 4: Match Point(2) ACE: Moon Glaive(3)
|
On February 08 2010 13:01 AoN.DimSum wrote: chill out, all the coordinators got the map list already.
Set 1: Fighting Spirit(4) Set 2: Heartbreak Ridge(2) Set 3: Outsider(3) Set 4: Match Point(2) ACE: Moon Glaive(3)
The map schedules been made. It'll come out whenever ^^ lol.
|
Sorry, how do you submit lineups? I wasn't coordinator last semester. I'm on the cstarleague.com site now and it doesn't seem immediately obvious unless lineup submission isn't available yet. Just eager to submit lineups before the deadline ^^ so if lineup submission isn't up yet can we get an update of when it will be up?
|
Lineups aren't available yet because the website is literally being built fixture by fixture (yenta's been great about it), so that development's been going stage by stage in order of necessity. Lineups will be up when it's time for them to be up! (aka around today)
|
Okay thanks. Just making sure i wasn't missing something. We have a bad history with last semester ^^
|
Update:
Lineup submission is available. Please read the following post very carefully http://www.cstarleague.com/node/13 and proceed to submit your lineups!
Lineup Submission for Week 1 closes Tuesday, February 9, 2010 11:59:00 PM PST.
Any delays in lineup submission caused by script errors will push the Submission Lock Deadline back accordingly.
|
When will match times be out?
|
On February 09 2010 03:51 Ideas wrote: When will match times be out?
You schedule your own match times; the default match times based on the polls were already sent out in an email o_o.
|
On February 09 2010 03:53 DarthThienAn wrote:You schedule your own match times; the default match times based on the polls were already sent out in an email o_o.
I never got an e-mail about that ( I did however vote in the poll). When was it sent out? In fact, I haven't gotten a CSL email in a few days :O
edit: Oh NOW you put out a news announcement about it
|
Also I'm pretty worried about georgia state. It's still just 1 guy on the roster.
|
I'll also be putting the default times into the schedule tonight to clear up confusion about times.
|
<3 yenta.
This website is totally kickass haha! this is awesomely easy to use and looks great.
East 2 better watch out....
|
On February 09 2010 03:55 Ideas wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2010 03:53 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 09 2010 03:51 Ideas wrote: When will match times be out? You schedule your own match times; the default match times based on the polls were already sent out in an email o_o. I never got an e-mail about that ( I did however vote in the poll). When was it sent out? In fact, I haven't gotten a CSL email in a few days :O edit: Oh NOW you put out a news announcement about it
Well obviously I put it now, since you couldn't find it. I got tired of players who don't talk to their coordinators being uninformed =P. And you weren't emailed, your coordinator was.
On February 09 2010 04:14 yenta wrote: I'll also be putting the default times into the schedule tonight to clear up confusion about times.
That'll be good =P. Everyone should be able to refer to the post I just made though.
|
On February 09 2010 04:32 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2010 03:55 Ideas wrote:On February 09 2010 03:53 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 09 2010 03:51 Ideas wrote: When will match times be out? You schedule your own match times; the default match times based on the polls were already sent out in an email o_o. I never got an e-mail about that ( I did however vote in the poll). When was it sent out? In fact, I haven't gotten a CSL email in a few days :O edit: Oh NOW you put out a news announcement about it Well obviously I put it now, since you couldn't find it. I got tired of players who don't talk to their coordinators being uninformed =P. And you weren't emailed, your coordinator was. Show nested quote +On February 09 2010 04:14 yenta wrote: I'll also be putting the default times into the schedule tonight to clear up confusion about times. That'll be good =P. Everyone should be able to refer to the post I just made though.
I am the coordinator! Lol
|
this new system's sexy. i dig it.
|
Thanks Yenta. It looks good especially given the time constraints.
Edit: I don't think stuff was automated last year so this is going to save so much time and make everything go so much more smoothly.
|
On February 09 2010 05:02 Ideas wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2010 04:32 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 09 2010 03:55 Ideas wrote:On February 09 2010 03:53 DarthThienAn wrote:On February 09 2010 03:51 Ideas wrote: When will match times be out? You schedule your own match times; the default match times based on the polls were already sent out in an email o_o. I never got an e-mail about that ( I did however vote in the poll). When was it sent out? In fact, I haven't gotten a CSL email in a few days :O edit: Oh NOW you put out a news announcement about it Well obviously I put it now, since you couldn't find it. I got tired of players who don't talk to their coordinators being uninformed =P. And you weren't emailed, your coordinator was. On February 09 2010 04:14 yenta wrote: I'll also be putting the default times into the schedule tonight to clear up confusion about times. That'll be good =P. Everyone should be able to refer to the post I just made though. I am the coordinator! Lol
Snap. my bad, I checked, saw your real name + email and like, assumed your name was your id. lol ^_^. But in that case, you got an email ;p
|
|
|
|