EPTSC buildings - weird looking? - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
QuickStriker
United States3694 Posts
| ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
Cybernetics Core? Way better, almost like the Sydney Opera House. Forge - better. Robo Facility? Much more refined and symmetrical looking. Some of the SC1 buildings I didn't think were supposed to be symmetrical until I saw the SC2 versions. | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On December 21 2009 14:42 jalstar wrote: i agree though, the zerg race embodies feminine concepts and the terrans are masculine protoss are | ||
|
QQplay
United States229 Posts
lool | ||
|
Un Gato
United States123 Posts
On December 21 2009 11:54 infinity21 wrote: so a sunken colony attacking a nydus canal = sex? I really want to paste a NSFW picture relating to that, but I'm going to opt for protecting myself from imminent bans. | ||
|
Probe.
United States877 Posts
| ||
|
GW.Methos
United States249 Posts
On December 21 2009 11:42 majesty.k)seRapH wrote: i remember a feminist article about how zergs were feminine because of their nydus canals and how protoss were masculine because of their pylons. that was pure gold ^_^ xD | ||
|
laLAlA[uC]
Canada963 Posts
On December 21 2009 15:01 Djabanete wrote: Blizzard Employee #1: Hey, did you see this thread? They're talking about why we designed StarCraft buildings the way we did. Blizzard Employee #2: Oh shit. Have they figured it out yet? Blizzard Employee #1: No, but they're getting close. What do we do? Blizzard Employee #2: They're leaving us with no choice. Blizzard Employee #1: I'll take care of it. + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler + Nuclear launch detected. You win this thread. | ||
| ||
