|
On December 11 2009 23:42 Xenocide_Knight wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 23:11 RaptorX wrote:On December 11 2009 22:34 DejaVu119 wrote:
What about the CJ shirt lottery, if we make sure the last shirt goes to a staff member, but if we can't give it to a staff member, we burn the shirt? That's not screwing anyone else, its just "adding a shirt to the pool" right?
I think the better comparison of options would be: 1. Have 2 new CJ shirts and give one to staff and one to a random person 2. Have 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member and a random person they will get them, then burn them instead. thats funny, you guys want to change it so it sounds right for your side right? let me add the little twist it needs so it sounds how it really is: 1. Have random people have CJ shirts, then I have 2 more and I will select a specific staff member and a random person to get it... basically letting everybody know that i do have preferences over that staff person since he was not randomly selected. 2. Have the 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member that he should do the random selection as anybody else or I will burn them instead. it doesnt matter how many times you come with the "he told us yes", he said that too quickly and he didnt think some people would have troubles with it. Honestly, get it guys... if we create a team in which their members are not randomly selected is not going to be fair to the other people waiting to enter the tournament. I would fully support the creation of teams 15/16 if the members are randomly selected, because that is the fair thing to do. why is it so difficult to understand? and dont answer "because he told us yes..." please. I just want to say, I feel it is incredibly unfair that team 16 keeps getting lumped in with StorrZerg's team 15. Team 16 is random people ffs. We have just as much right as team 13/14 to be added.
yeah thats true. It sucks that an odd number of teams causes such difficulties 
|
On December 11 2009 23:42 Xenocide_Knight wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 23:11 RaptorX wrote:On December 11 2009 22:34 DejaVu119 wrote:
What about the CJ shirt lottery, if we make sure the last shirt goes to a staff member, but if we can't give it to a staff member, we burn the shirt? That's not screwing anyone else, its just "adding a shirt to the pool" right?
I think the better comparison of options would be: 1. Have 2 new CJ shirts and give one to staff and one to a random person 2. Have 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member and a random person they will get them, then burn them instead. thats funny, you guys want to change it so it sounds right for your side right? let me add the little twist it needs so it sounds how it really is: 1. Have random people have CJ shirts, then I have 2 more and I will select a specific staff member and a random person to get it... basically letting everybody know that i do have preferences over that staff person since he was not randomly selected. 2. Have the 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member that he should do the random selection as anybody else or I will burn them instead. it doesnt matter how many times you come with the "he told us yes", he said that too quickly and he didnt think some people would have troubles with it. Honestly, get it guys... if we create a team in which their members are not randomly selected is not going to be fair to the other people waiting to enter the tournament. I would fully support the creation of teams 15/16 if the members are randomly selected, because that is the fair thing to do. why is it so difficult to understand? and dont answer "because he told us yes..." please. I just want to say, I feel it is incredibly unfair that team 16 keeps getting lumped in with StorrZerg's team 15. Team 16 is random people ffs. We have just as much right as team 13/14 to be added.
Well as it is, there can be no Team 16 without a Team 15. Arb has agreed to coach a possible team but having one C player coach an entire team is a stretch. I'm trying to find him a co-coach ASAP.
|
Gl poke, make sure he pm's l10f on time
|
On December 11 2009 23:11 RaptorX wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 22:34 DejaVu119 wrote:
What about the CJ shirt lottery, if we make sure the last shirt goes to a staff member, but if we can't give it to a staff member, we burn the shirt? That's not screwing anyone else, its just "adding a shirt to the pool" right?
I think the better comparison of options would be: 1. Have 2 new CJ shirts and give one to staff and one to a random person 2. Have 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member and a random person they will get them, then burn them instead. thats funny, you guys want to change it so it sounds right for your side right? let me add the little twist it needs so it sounds how it really is: 1. Have random people have CJ shirts, then I have 2 more and I will select a specific staff member and a random person to get it... basically letting everybody know that i do have preferences over that staff person since he was not randomly selected. 2. Have the 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member that he should do the random selection as anybody else or I will burn them instead. it doesnt matter how many times you come with the "he told us yes", he said that too quickly and he didnt think some people would have troubles with it. Honestly, get it guys... if we create a team in which their members are not randomly selected is not going to be fair to the other people waiting to enter the tournament. I would fully support the creation of teams 15/16 if the members are randomly selected, because that is the fair thing to do. why is it so difficult to understand? and dont answer "because he told us yes..." please.
your failing to realize as of this second there was/is no one to take up the coaching for that slot, thus no on is being cut out. poke is trying to find someone which is great. but you need to calm down srsly.
|
On December 11 2009 23:57 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2009 23:11 RaptorX wrote:On December 11 2009 22:34 DejaVu119 wrote:
What about the CJ shirt lottery, if we make sure the last shirt goes to a staff member, but if we can't give it to a staff member, we burn the shirt? That's not screwing anyone else, its just "adding a shirt to the pool" right?
I think the better comparison of options would be: 1. Have 2 new CJ shirts and give one to staff and one to a random person 2. Have 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member and a random person they will get them, then burn them instead. thats funny, you guys want to change it so it sounds right for your side right? let me add the little twist it needs so it sounds how it really is: 1. Have random people have CJ shirts, then I have 2 more and I will select a specific staff member and a random person to get it... basically letting everybody know that i do have preferences over that staff person since he was not randomly selected. 2. Have the 2 new CJ shirts, tell a staff member that he should do the random selection as anybody else or I will burn them instead. it doesnt matter how many times you come with the "he told us yes", he said that too quickly and he didnt think some people would have troubles with it. Honestly, get it guys... if we create a team in which their members are not randomly selected is not going to be fair to the other people waiting to enter the tournament. I would fully support the creation of teams 15/16 if the members are randomly selected, because that is the fair thing to do. why is it so difficult to understand? and dont answer "because he told us yes..." please. your failing to realize as of this second there was/is no one to take up the coaching for that slot, thus no on is being cut out. poke is trying to find someone which is great. but you need to calm down srsly.
you know that If Pokebunny finds a 2nd coach, then your team 100% won't be in the league right?
|
|
|
iG.rANDY is interested in coaching if u guys still need one =P
hes protoss B/B+ level
|
I didn't get picked, but I still want to join!
If I knew you were starting from the 1st post, looking for replacements i would have posted this much earlier 
|
On December 12 2009 00:10 iG.Zeep wrote:
iG.rANDY is interested in coaching if u guys still need one =P
hes protoss B/B+ level
he needs to pm op
|
storr, I dont care if you are the coach or not... I care that the team is selected from the people who is waiting in the line.
If you want to coach that is perfectly fine by me, but as far as I see in your posts you dont want to coach if it is not a specific list of users which I simply think is unfair, and I usually try to be as fair as possible even if that makes me look "mad" or "annoying"...
I am not mad at you, I am mad that you fail to see that what you want is unfair and that is somewhat stubborn on your part try to have it your way in an event that you didnt organize.
If I made a poll right now and all the users agree that there is no problem with you choosing 6 players I wouldnt mind, but there are people that think that those 6 people shouldnt be preselected but random, including me.
If you fail to get the point this time, I will just quit rambling for no reason here. This is my last post concerning this issue.
I really hope that teams 15/16 are made because it is true what xonocide is saying, it is not fair that because you are stubborn they cant play.
|
On December 12 2009 00:10 iG.Zeep wrote:
iG.rANDY is interested in coaching if u guys still need one =P
hes protoss B/B+ level
I added him to the list,
I will PM l10f to see if he agrees.
can you tell him to contact me and send me his ICCup nick and email adress so I can add it to the info?
|
On December 12 2009 00:14 RaptorX wrote:
storr, I dont care if you are the coach or not... I care that the team is selected from the people who is waiting in the line.
If you want to coach that is perfectly fine by me, but as far as I see in your posts you dont want to coach if it is not a specific list of users which I simply think is unfair, and I usually try to be as fair as possible even if that makes me look "mad" or "annoying"...
I am not mad at you, I am mad that you fail to see that what you want is unfair and that is somewhat stubborn on your part try to have it your way in an event that you didnt organize.
If I made a poll right now and all the users agree that there is no problem with you choosing 6 players I wouldnt mind, but there are people that think that those 6 people shouldnt be preselected but random, including me.
If you fail to get the point this time, I will just quit rambling for no reason here. This is my last post concerning this issue.
I really hope that teams 15/16 are made because it is true what xonocide is saying, it is not fair that because you are stubborn they cant play.
can you srsly shut up?
If 2 coaches come up and talk to op to form team 16 problem solved. if not there is a vote going on.
If i hadn't talked to op, xnonocides team wouldn't of been considered at the start. his team is very likely to get in as of right now with 2 people thinking of being coaches.
|
and that is the answer I get.
|
On December 12 2009 00:12 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 00:10 iG.Zeep wrote:
iG.rANDY is interested in coaching if u guys still need one =P
hes protoss B/B+ level he needs to pm op
Yah, he should PM l10f or find him on iccup on [CPL]l10f in op cpl asap. He could probably either coach with arb or do it solo
|
Idk why anyone else didn't suggest this as an option.... lol
|
On December 12 2009 00:22 Pokebunny wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2009 00:12 StorrZerg wrote:On December 12 2009 00:10 iG.Zeep wrote:
iG.rANDY is interested in coaching if u guys still need one =P
hes protoss B/B+ level he needs to pm op Yah, he should PM l10f or find him on iccup on [CPL]l10f in op cpl asap. He could probably either coach with arb or do it solo
there is no time pressure, I added him to the list. I am just waiting for l10f to agree or not.
I just need few info though.
|
|
|
yea randy sent PM's few mins after i posted ^.- (he bringing Nytefish[mb] to coach also)
|
nice then everyone should be happy and no more arguing should be going on 
|
Ok I can tell arb he's not needed, or do you want him to co coach with someone else or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
