EPT[CSL+] Powering Up to Playoffs - Page 20
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Plutonium
United States2217 Posts
| ||
|
ImBa_JaCkAsS
Canada200 Posts
On December 07 2009 14:29 DragoonPK wrote: What do you mean ontario for east division? Loo n Toronto are both from Ontario, Canada | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
sup | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On December 07 2009 16:41 randomKo_Orean wrote: On more serious note, GGs to University of Texas. Hopefully, you guys didn't take my trash-talking too seriously  And congratulations to UCI, Princeton, and Waterloo for making it this far. I'd never have imagined that CSL semi-finals that did not include Nony, JF, OneOther, masterasia, Assem, baechigi, Freaky, and other great players from all sorts of schools.I think it just goes to show that the competition was much closer than it looked like on paper at the beginning of the season...and that the individual league is going to produce some freaking sweet games. | ||
|
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
congratulations to all the remaining teams. i must say i am very surprised at some of the playoff results so far. our loss vs princeton was obviously the biggest upset, but i did not expect uvic, toronto, and especially georgia tech to lose before semifinals. i am looking forward to next season. seeking vengeance and you damn know we are going to prepare next time around | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On December 07 2009 17:29 randomKo_Orean wrote: Does that mean I'm not eligible? D: I wanna play! The qualification rules might be subject to some change, but the idea is there, and will be discussed, I think. Rest assured, you're not the only one who just barely missed the qualification mark (zchen had only 3 season wins, but has gone 3-0 in the playoffs--arguably should qualify). | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
shindigs
United States4795 Posts
On December 07 2009 17:31 randomKo_Orean wrote: Fun fact: UCSD, when using A-team lineup, is undefeated. 3-0ed UCRiverside, SDSU, UTexasAustin Did you only drop the game against Irvine? | ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
| ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
duckett
United States589 Posts
On December 07 2009 17:31 randomKo_Orean wrote: Fun fact: UCSD, when using A-team lineup, is undefeated. 3-0ed UCRiverside, SDSU, UTexasAustin so was duke what now | ||
|
HiHiByeBye
Canada365 Posts
On December 07 2009 17:52 mmp wrote: Princeton will win it all. These guys are ON FIRE. They are without Agony so its going to be hard. | ||
|
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
|
Magneus
Canada65 Posts
Depth is the name of the game in the grand final, since the format is to be Bo7, not Bo5. Most teams will be hard-pressed to field six competent players. | ||
|
tnt_titan
Canada194 Posts
You know what else? We're confident vs UCI. They 3-1ed our B/C-team, but no one faced the real wrath of our A-team, with exception of University of Texas. That doesn't mean we're gonna bust our fucking tail practicing. The thing is, nobody got to see what UVic had in store. UCI was just another warm-up match to the finals... | ||
| ||
