| Blogs > -_- |
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
http://www.fighterreplays.com/starcraft/replays/90fded Here's the link to the game; I b-a'd his assim early on, he got me with a proxy med/firebat/marine group which I wasn't ready and nearly won (he probably would've if he hadn't pulled scv), but event I expo, macro, attack and win.   | ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
| ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.velocityjournal.com/images/logos/dodge.jpg)  | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:06 clazziquai wrote: Really? Then I am objectively a better person than you :p | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
![[image loading]](http://superbtshirts.com/images/PW-0036-1456.jpg) | ||
|
kdog3683
United States916 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:09 kdog3683 wrote: gosuface i haven't played SC in about a year and I don't have SC installed, but i think i could still beat you. Sure. Wanna grudgematch? Say tommorow. First you have to call me bitchface though. | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
|
masami.sc
United States445 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:14 clazziquai wrote: Wanna play on hamachi then Don't have hamachi, and don't know what it is. I'll play you on Iccup now if you want. | ||
|
Spenguin
Australia3316 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:14 -_- wrote: Don't have hamachi, and don't know what it is. I'll play you on Iccup now if you want. You joined in 2003 but you don't know what hamachi is? What did you do before lan lat came out? | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
I HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE AS A D+ PLAYER | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:15 -orb- wrote: You joined in 2003 but you don't know what hamachi is? What did you do before lan lat came out? Honestly, I'm not good enough to know the difference b/w a little lag and no lag. And I don't think many people here are good enough either, and they're just kidding themselves. | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:15 clazziquai wrote: GO ON ICCUP! ME: Loptomist I HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE AS A D+ PLAYER fuck.. now you get to see my real stats  .............not C......... | ||
|
Oystein
Norway1602 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:16 -_- wrote: Honestly, I'm not good enough to know the difference b/w a little lag and no lag. And I don't think many people here are good enough either, and they're just kidding themselves. lol how do you need to be good to know the difference between lag and no lag??? | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
i said channel: gun on iccup.. DODGE? PUHAHAHSDHSADH :XXXXXXXXXx | ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On November 30 2008 15:16 -_- wrote: Honestly, I'm not good enough to know the difference b/w a little lag and no lag. And I don't think many people here are good enough either, and they're just kidding themselves. You've got to be joking. Maybe you play pure macro style, but if you've ever tried to micro I'm sure you know how ridiculously frustrating it is when you tell a unit to do something and it waits almost a full second before doing it. Here's an example in each race of a strategy/tactic that is pretty much impossible without lan latency: Protoss: Corsair-Reaver vs zerg. Good luck microing that when you tell your reaver to get in the shuttle and it waits for the hydras to snipe it before obliging. Terran: SK Terran. Playing vs zerg with no tanks requires godly micro, and if you tell your marines to split or retreat when lurkers burrow and they wait a second, they'll all be dead. Zerg: Muta micro. Need I say more? | ||
| ||
|
|
|
EPT
