EPTWhy are people who could easily play C+ with their 250 APM insist on newbbashing D games all the time?
Such BS on ICCup
| Blogs > naventus |
|
naventus
United States1337 Posts
Why are people who could easily play C+ with their 250 APM insist on newbbashing D games all the time? | ||
|
raiame
United States421 Posts
There are some people with APM that high who are legitimate D/D+s. | ||
|
village_idiot
2436 Posts
| ||
|
Durak
Canada3684 Posts
| ||
|
Substandard
Italy270 Posts
| ||
|
Red.Cloud
Canada235 Posts
On October 25 2008 02:00 raiame wrote: Well, not all people with 250 APM are going to be C+... it takes a lot more than just that to get there. There are some people with APM that high who are legitimate D/D+s. no d's at 250 apm unless spaming and to answer question once they reace a certain rank and are not destroying every1 and getting some losses they like to restart and get better stats, but there are people like white-ra who and majesty_cz that play like 1000 a season with no restarts, simple reason they wanna get better most people just like to win and playing vs better people should be good for you since u learn, but it is annoying losing to D players when u know u r a better rank and you are thinking wtf | ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
| ||
|
naventus
United States1337 Posts
On October 25 2008 02:26 fanatacist wrote: That's why if you're smart and are trying to climb the ladder, you don't play D's who have like 5-0 or 0-0 stats. This. There are plenty of C players at D - and they have these sort of accounts. But you can't see their stats unless you check the website. So how are you to know that the 2000 you are playing is like 12-0. | ||
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
| ||
|
Straylight
Canada706 Posts
Jeez man. | ||
|
XCetron
5226 Posts
| ||
|
fanatacist
10319 Posts
On October 25 2008 02:30 naventus wrote: This. There are plenty of C players at D - and they have these sort of accounts. But you can't see their stats unless you check the website. So how are you to know that the 2000 you are playing is like 12-0. Really? Is this a recent change? Because I remember when ICCup worked for me (up until April) you could see stats AND score. | ||
|
-slo.m1ke-
Slovenia352 Posts
| ||
|
iNCuBuS_
United States905 Posts
On October 25 2008 02:50 -slo.m1ke- wrote: i lost vs. a 40apm guy. but i was dumb. No way, replay? lol Also, Im sure a lot of people who might get to D+ or C- (or in your case, C+...) get there and then they start to lose some games or struggle to maintain their rank, so they make a new account to play against people they dont necessarily have to try as hard against. | ||
|
nAi.PrOtOsS
Canada784 Posts
| ||
|
vAltyR
United States581 Posts
On October 25 2008 02:30 naventus wrote: This. There are plenty of C players at D - and they have these sort of accounts. But you can't see their stats unless you check the website. So how are you to know that the 2000 you are playing is like 12-0. Use the /stats command. type "/stats [enter name here]" and it'll show their point ranking. Unfortunately, it won't tell you their record, but you can at least roughly figure it out if you're at a major point deficit. | ||
|
Substandard
Italy270 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
I am at D+ atm and I haven't played a zerg under 300 apm in over a month | ||
|
LemOn
United Kingdom8629 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On October 25 2008 02:50 -slo.m1ke- wrote: i lost vs. a 40apm guy. but i was dumb. Haha I wonder if it was me. I used to smurf D back in the summer when I was C and I'd try to play with as low apm as possible. Me and my friend haemonculus would see how low we could get our APM with still winning a game. The lowest I ever got was 37 apm and still won the game. Highest ratio game (highest enemy apm vs lowest my apm and still winning) was when I had 50 apm and my opponent was 200 apm zerg. lol | ||
| ||
