EPTSC v/s CS. - Page 2
| Blogs > HeavOnEarth |
|
b3h47pte
United States1317 Posts
| ||
|
JeeJee
Canada5652 Posts
as a result + Show Spoiler [counter nonsense argument] + 1. CS has LAN latency , lan parties, local servers, for middle tier even low skilled players have easy access to this. 1. SC On the other hand, has BNET SERVER Latency ping. People dont even PLAY or stay in game anymore, they just leave the game and hope for a new one . Please dont even try to argue that cause u know that's what you do vs laggers. 2.CS is actually FAST , Reactions please. 2. SC,"Oh look i see a dropship coming to my base and i have 10 billion seconds to react" Let's spam "z" and "d" and then throw down a cannon and build a probe what is that like 5 seconds before i actually have to deal with the drop where in CS can be 0.2 second warning for a headshot 3. Ok they both have mind games, Since i dont play at that tier of SC i wont go into that. (obviously CS>SC however ) 4. Aiming. If u cant do that in CS you lose so hard, so easily. 4. Woww i have a thing called minimap it tells me where everything is , "getting DT dropped is considered noob" where as in CS a sneaky play like that, reflects the skill of the OTHER person cleverly timing his distractions and feints while rushing or planting somewhere important. What do u have in SC" Ohh I SEE YOUR DROPSHIP THAR HI. YOU SEE MY TURRET TOO LOL I could just go on and on, but NOT going to play a game that's as stupid as you look, (SC supporters) , I'm rather going to play 5;5 matches, unlike some people who decide that 5;5 is not a test of skill my nonsense > yours | ||
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
frankbg already posted like a billion points about the skill of cs and difficult points about it yet you still argue -_- they're different games and both very successful esports. that's all their is to it | ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
3. Ok they both have mind games, Since i dont play at that tier of CS i wont go into that. (obviously SC>CS however ) Is this satire? Please tell me it is. | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
CS was pretty fun, especially if you had a team that you'd played with for a while. Same basic principle as SC. Have to know/use map well, execute your shooting/flashbanging and etc right...just not as much stuff that will bite you in the ass if you fuck up is all. | ||
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On May 21 2008 15:59 HeavOnEarth wrote: By popular or rather, unpopular demand, this blog post was deleted banned | ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
Counter-Strike - Have to know the map by heart as in what part is possible to boost your teammate(s). Boosting is when you give a player a boost up onto a box or ledge. Also you need to study angles on how grenades bounce off the walls and such. - Have to execute your grenades perfectly when you're a Terrorist and is about to enter a bomb site - You need to have decent reaction and aim - Have to work together as a team since teamwork + execution on strats > aim - You also have to have ingame smarts like you can't be Rambo and jump out in the open and expect to get more than 2 kills. You have to play it smart and not be impatient, but let the enemy come to you. Starcraft - Micro/macro - Strategy - Intelligence - Timing | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32158 Posts
| ||
|
H
New Zealand6138 Posts
On May 22 2008 23:13 Hawk wrote: source is better if youve got a decent comp imo~ I dunno man. I'm not a CS veteran by any means (I played 1.6 for 9 months) but I really couldn't get into source. The headshots just seemed way too random. | ||
|
Bub
United States3518 Posts
| ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
| ||
|
ToT)OjKa(
Korea (South)2437 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32158 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32158 Posts
| ||
|
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
| ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
| ||
