EPTPj should of won. - Page 2
| Blogs > MoNKeYSpanKeR |
|
fight_or_flight
United States3988 Posts
| ||
|
strongwind
United States862 Posts
On October 08 2007 15:06 MoNKeYSpanKeR wrote: i honestly beleive you should of won, i mean you took down sAviOr... and you couldn't win a PvP vs Stork? *savior fanboy detected* | ||
|
MoNKeYSpanKeR
United States2869 Posts
On October 09 2007 00:26 Chill wrote: You are dumb. One player beating someone in a best of 3 says nothing about the result of a series with a completely different person playing a completely different matchup. Why you think there's any correlation, I don't know. Stork made one mistake the whole series, and it was running his Zealots into PJ's army instead of retreating on Peaks. Other than this he played flawlessly. PJ played incredible well also, and didn't make many mistakes either. It was a small advantage leveraged to a win in both games. You don't even list any arguments about why he should have won, except "ololo savior is monster zvp and pj won". Chill, you are dumb. The fact that they are both progamers, i think that would be a correlation of some sort. And sAviOr is one of the best ZvP players around, i think it's pretty safe to say that. He lost to Pj, that was surprising as hell, i wasn't exspecting it. Here, now try to follow my logic here, i can understand how it can be confusing. Pj's weakest is PvZ, he beat one of the best ZvP players. I took the assumption that it was probably largely due to the inexperience the progamers have on the maps. I read that the progamers didn't have time to practice the maps, so basically they relied on there superior macro and micro skills to carry them throughout the stages. In later stages the better players would have advanced, obviously. Meaning better micro better macro and these players would have known the maps aswel. I guess i am making a lot of assumptions here, but i think it says something, if not a lot, definitly not nothing. and nice quote of me, i also said the map advantage, but i guess it's simple to miss my main point in that, mentioning sAviOr was simply to show that the map differences might of ment more then i originally perceived. @Micronesia, i admit i was lazy as hell with the poll, i didn't feel like adding more options. @strongwind, yes i like sAviOr, he gave me ZvT hope ^^ Fanboy? yes and proud  | ||
|
Scorpion
United States1974 Posts
;O | ||
|
haduken
Australia8267 Posts
| ||
|
geometryb
United States1249 Posts
thinking that because pj beat savior in a bo3 meant that pj was a monster player that would soon be taking down top kespa players is a huge fallacy. the sample size (3 games) is very small which means upsets aren't that unlikely. | ||
|
MoNKeYSpanKeR
United States2869 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On October 09 2007 11:28 Scorpion wrote: If we take into account that sAviOr is also a progamer and Pj beat sAviOr, but StOrk beat Pj, that means that StOrk can beat sAviOr. ;O You'd be awesome at rock paper scissors. Going by your logic: paper>rock, so paper > scissors ? Fail, conclusion: Everyone has their bad days and weak points, not to mention pj training heavily for this while savior also has 2 starleague's to think about. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
Awesome from him that he managed to beat saviOr though. | ||
|
MoNKeYSpanKeR
United States2869 Posts
| ||
| ||
