Sex and Satanism - Page 2

On May 29 2015 18:06 helpman176 wrote:
This is all part of the elaborate courtship procedure.
His plan is to confuse ninazerg so much that she fall into his arms in the end.
Confusion is a known wooing strategy in the animal kingdom.

On May 29 2015 13:11 ninazerg wrote:
what

the

FUCK

On May 29 2015 19:00 ninazerg wrote:


It didn't work. We just finished playing and I fucked shit up.

On May 29 2015 11:29 YokoKano wrote:

Broken Window Fallacy
Introduced in 1850 the paradox of the broken window fallacy is one of the more intriguing economic questions presented to undergraduates. Having thought about this paradox extensively, I would conclude that it is not really a paradox at all, but that there is an interesting twist, that needles us.

Essentially regarding information, it could be argued Satanism embraces the broken window fallacy to a certain degree. Certain adherents of will to power philosophies (e.g. Nietzsche) famously claim that eliciting pain to inspire motivation or in recompense for failure is the appropriate course of action and represents a "heightened seduction to life". Of course this does lend a certain vitality to the Satanist perspective.

Well, suppose I break a window and it costs $10 to repair the window. If the velocity of money, that is the number of transactions are fairly high. then you might say there is a $5 sunk costs, opportunity costs, that represents dead ends. Then there is $5 repair fee, which is transferred perhaps at 80% return ad infinitum (reiterated until all the money is spent). Then we have something like the positive return $5! = $120 or 5*4*3*2*1, a reasonable approximation of this 80% reinvestment property. Then we adjust basically for various prices, say that there are certain goods that we want costing more than $1 or $2, and cannot be purchased with the "tail end" then perhaps the total value of breaking the window is:

(-$10 + $5!/2) = $50.

So we benefit roughly $50 to break the window, which is the basic motivation for the "mutually antagonistic" will to power of Satanism.

But what if we make a new window without breaking one? We can dispense with the $10 opportunity cost of breaking the window and have $60.

Well it is precisely because this paradox is no paradox at all, but only a paradox of information that one is so tantalized by it. Can we motivate people without breaking the window and recover the lost funds?

In other words, I think the moral of this story is that there are a lot of methods we could employ for getting people to think. But I would challenge ninazerg to answer the question: to what extent is the approach of satanism just black ice? Are we causing unnecessary scar tissue to salt the wounds?