|
On August 23 2014 14:15 ninazerg wrote:
How do video games have journalism? Is there gonna be a video-game-TMZ that reveals Princess Peach's shocking affair with Kirby!?
You're probably kidding, but just in case, ideally video games journalism follows news in the game dev industry – who's coming out with a new title in their franchise, who's going out of business, whose new game sucks, etc.
Alternately you write a headline about anything controversial Phil Fish said, then sit back and enjoy the page views as everybody argues about whether or not he's an asshole.
|
On August 23 2014 02:53 jinorazi wrote:
barryclimbdown sounds like a cunt. what am i missing here?
Edit: I might not have caught that the article is satirical :D
|
Disclaimers would make sense for this type of cryptic satire. Just saying. I'd make it less confusing and much funnier.
|
On August 24 2014 07:03 ChristianS wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2014 14:15 ninazerg wrote:
How do video games have journalism? Is there gonna be a video-game-TMZ that reveals Princess Peach's shocking affair with Kirby!? You're probably kidding, but just in case, ideally video games journalism follows news in the game dev industry – who's coming out with a new title in their franchise, who's going out of business, whose new game sucks, etc. Alternately you write a headline about anything controversial Phil Fish said, then sit back and enjoy the page views as everybody argues about whether or not he's an asshole.
He is, isn't he?
|
On August 20 2014 22:14 SFDuality wrote:
It's a satirical take on journalism. It point out how "news" sites often use clickbait-y titles/headlines that have almost nothing to do with the actual content of articles, just to get more views. It also calls out journalists for targeting certain celebrities/industry leaders with rumor-mongering/tabloid journalism, hoping to get a rise out of them and thus attract more attention to themselves.
Humorous and accurate, whether applied to e-sports or just journalism in general. 5/5
any chance this can be placed somewhere in the OP or something? because i thought that guy was actually serious until i read this post. i guess you could do that to avoid confusion among other viewers who don't read comments?
just a suggestion. i loved the blog "though"
OOPS I PUT "THOUGH" IN QUOTATIONS AND IT IS NOT A QUOTE.o_O
|
Why isn't my blog featured
|
maybe obvious targets of ridicule shouldn't be satired? or..? idk, i just don't know
|
On August 26 2014 13:24 2primenumbers wrote:
Why isn't my blog featured
WP
|
I thought the satire was pretty obvious, but that may be because I'm familiar with Pyrion. If you see a blog from him on TL/LiquidDota, you can pretty much go ahead and assume it's satire.
dat British humor.
|
On August 20 2014 20:13 HornyHerring wrote:
@HenchNeedly: @TheBarryClimbdown YOU CAN’T PUT SHIT IN QUOTES IF IT’S NOT A FUCKING QUOTE YOU LITTLE CUNT
I agree with him on that
indeed
you come across as a little cunt in this post too.
If he didnt call someone a bitch then he didnt call someone a bitch and saying he did is slander.
I'd be surprised if you got a job in journalism is people knew about that.
your a liability.
But thanks for advertising yourself, i now have another name to avoid.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 28 2014 17:11 MrTortoise wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2014 20:13 HornyHerring wrote:
@HenchNeedly: @TheBarryClimbdown YOU CAN’T PUT SHIT IN QUOTES IF IT’S NOT A FUCKING QUOTE YOU LITTLE CUNT
I agree with him on that indeed you come across as a little cunt in this post too. If he didnt call someone a bitch then he didnt call someone a bitch and saying he did is slander. I'd be surprised if you got a job in journalism is people knew about that. your a liability. But thanks for advertising yourself, i now have another name to avoid.
noun
1.
the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.
2.
a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule.
3.
a literary genre comprising such compositions.
|
"Honey, come to bed now!"
"I can't."
"Why not?"
"Someone is WRONG on the Internet."
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 29 2014 23:36 Nebuchad wrote:
"Honey, come to bed now!"
"I can't."
"Why not?"
"Someone is WRONG on the Internet."
Seems somehow less poignant in an age of ubiquitous smartphone ownership.
|
On August 29 2014 11:00 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2014 17:11 MrTortoise wrote:On August 20 2014 20:13 HornyHerring wrote:
@HenchNeedly: @TheBarryClimbdown YOU CAN’T PUT SHIT IN QUOTES IF IT’S NOT A FUCKING QUOTE YOU LITTLE CUNT
I agree with him on that indeed you come across as a little cunt in this post too. If he didnt call someone a bitch then he didnt call someone a bitch and saying he did is slander. I'd be surprised if you got a job in journalism is people knew about that. your a liability. But thanks for advertising yourself, i now have another name to avoid. noun 1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc. 2. a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule. 3. a literary genre comprising such compositions. Sooo this was all satirical and therefore fictional? What point was attempting to be made? That some girls bait guys into insulting them and then cry misogyny? Or...?
Edit: Apparently the OP is a man..? You know your bad at satire when hardly anyone has a fucking clue whats going on. lol.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 30 2014 08:49 Dazed_Spy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 29 2014 11:00 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On August 28 2014 17:11 MrTortoise wrote:On August 20 2014 20:13 HornyHerring wrote:
@HenchNeedly: @TheBarryClimbdown YOU CAN’T PUT SHIT IN QUOTES IF IT’S NOT A FUCKING QUOTE YOU LITTLE CUNT
I agree with him on that indeed you come across as a little cunt in this post too. If he didnt call someone a bitch then he didnt call someone a bitch and saying he did is slander. I'd be surprised if you got a job in journalism is people knew about that. your a liability. But thanks for advertising yourself, i now have another name to avoid. noun 1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc. 2. a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule. 3. a literary genre comprising such compositions. Sooo this was all satirical and therefore fictional? What point was attempting to be made? That some girls bait guys into insulting them and then cry misogyny? Or...? Edit: Apparently the OP is a man..? You know your bad at satire when hardly anyone has a fucking clue whats going on. lol.
Satirizing gaming journalism...
|
On August 30 2014 08:49 Dazed_Spy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 29 2014 11:00 Liquid`Jinro wrote:On August 28 2014 17:11 MrTortoise wrote:On August 20 2014 20:13 HornyHerring wrote:
@HenchNeedly: @TheBarryClimbdown YOU CAN’T PUT SHIT IN QUOTES IF IT’S NOT A FUCKING QUOTE YOU LITTLE CUNT
I agree with him on that indeed you come across as a little cunt in this post too. If he didnt call someone a bitch then he didnt call someone a bitch and saying he did is slander. I'd be surprised if you got a job in journalism is people knew about that. your a liability. But thanks for advertising yourself, i now have another name to avoid. noun 1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc. 2. a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule. 3. a literary genre comprising such compositions. Sooo this was all satirical and therefore fictional? What point was attempting to be made? That some girls bait guys into insulting them and then cry misogyny? Or...? Edit: Apparently the OP is a man..? You know your bad at satire when hardly anyone has a fucking clue whats going on. lol.
I like to think I understood it well enough. It's always a bit of an odd argument for someone to misunderstand a piece of art and then say "well, if it were any good I wouldn't have misunderstood it." It's not totally false, but also a bit obnoxious to blame other people for your own failure to comprehend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
