EPT+ Show Spoiler +
Probably. 58.3% 
Tone deaf test - Page 2
| Blogs > Zandar |
|
hypercube
Hungary2735 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
Same as me  Not tone deaf but close. How's your singing? Mine is great, it just comes out of my throat a bit rotten and everyone starts running  Which is, of course, no reason to not sing when I'm drunk, besides the occasional friends lost. | ||
|
Deleted User 135096
3624 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:00 Zandar wrote: Aye lol, I wish we could see a list of recent results to see how many of those 90+ results are actually there On the other hand, maybe we gamers are more adepted to computer tones? Sorry, wan't intending to be a dick. Like monk said, I am a classically trained composer, so I should be scoring well on this kind of test as its very similar to a lot of aural skills testing that musicians do in college. Also its very likely that helps, considering the basic synthesis techniques that have been used from early games. The more familiar you are to these things the more adept you'll probably be at identification. Edit: ok, so I made a more concerted effort to actually listen, and scored %97.2. + Show Spoiler [img] + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ifilTEn.jpg) | ||
|
hypercube
Hungary2735 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:11 Zandar wrote: Same as me Not tone deaf but close. How's your singing? Mine is great, it just comes out of my throat a bit rotten IDK, no one heard it and lived to tell the tale. I guess if singing and music were a core economic subject I would have been considered special. Seriously, I can't sing and can't play any musical insturment | ||
micronesia
United States24701 Posts
| ||
|
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
| ||
|
slowbacontron
United States7722 Posts
| ||
|
phoenixfeather95
665 Posts
I play music, but I'm only a drummer (of ~5 - 6 years) | ||
|
G_G
Canada178 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:15 micronesia wrote: What is the relation between how you do on a test like this, and how your singing is? When I try to sing my voice doesn't sound to me like what it does to someone listening (to their dismay); this is independent of how good I am at recognizing music I listen to that isn't produced within my own body. I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. | ||
|
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:13 wo1fwood wrote: Sorry, wan't intending to be a dick. Like monk said, I am a classically trained composer, so I should be scoring well on this kind of test as its very similar to a lot of aural skills testing that musicians do in college. Also its very likely that helps, considering the basic synthesis techniques that have been used from early games. The more familiar you are to these things the more adept you'll probably be at identification. It's true, but it's also talent. I can play some random keys on the piano and my brother knows which notes/tones they were, just by hearing. I can't even hear if it's false or not. He can explain to me why Bach is so perfect mathematicly, many complex melodies on top of eachother. Perfect harmony. I can understand it, but I cannot hear why it's so perfect. Because I cannot hear it if those melodies together produce false tones or not. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24701 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:20 G_G wrote: I couldn't sing twinkle twinkle little star even half decently to save my life. I don't think it makes a difference. I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer. | ||
|
Iranon
United States983 Posts
I played the flute all through high school, but was never that serious about it; I never practiced outside of school and haven't touched it since. I do listen to a fair amount of classical, though. I'll have my wife try it later, she took classical piano lessons for 8 years or so and always did well at competitions. | ||
|
Iranon
United States983 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:17 Zandar wrote: Because if you are near tone deaf you have a problem to sing the proper tones, so you sing a lot more false tones compared to someone who's not that tone deaf I think. But it doesn't work the other way around -- having perfect pitch won't make you a good singer. | ||
|
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:24 Iranon wrote: But it doesn't work the other way around -- having perfect pitch won't make you a good singer. Yes that's true, only goes the other way. | ||
|
Deleted User 135096
3624 Posts
On February 03 2013 03:22 micronesia wrote: I would guess you are right, but it seems like many people link your abilities on a test like this with your singing abilities... that seems incorrect to me. Maybe being tone deaf in the context of this test can hurt, but I doubt that it's the only factor that contributes to why your singing sounds worse to you then to an observer. Being able to hear these rhythmic/harmonic or timbral differences really well, and being able to reproduce them with accuracy on your voice are somewhat different skills, though there is a lot of overlap (like being able to hear should help in reproduction, but I've known a lot of musicians who can identify these differences, but cant reproduce them vocally). What this guy is testing isn't whether you can sing back pitches accurately, but how well you can recognize the aforementioned changes. | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/iMvGcrg.png) Apparently I'm super talented yet I dont know jackshit about music at all, don't even play any instrument... | ||
|
Zandar
Netherlands1541 Posts
I google translated 'valse toon' and it gave me 'false tone' | ||
|
Thrill
2599 Posts
| ||
|
Sicion
Germany131 Posts
28 years old male with no music experience except singing when i drive to work and back. | ||
|
G_G
Canada178 Posts
I'm starting to think this is like IQ tests, where the more you take, the better you get at them, even though you're not actually getting any smarter in general, just better at IQ tests. | ||
| ||
