|
|
|
Canada5155 Posts
EDIT: no longer a great blog; ruined it by adding to it. oh well
|
On July 15 2012 20:35 HawaiianPig wrote:
This is a great blog
I agree,
GMarshal, top blog for your second blog about blogs.
|
No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though 
|
On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though
Haha I knoww I try to think that way... But those eyes man.... the eye shadow/liner gets me every time fuuuuuuuuuu
|
Dude don't post pictures of other people on the internet  You creepy asshole. Even if it's on FaceBook it's not really ok... Especially your ex.
|
On July 15 2012 22:44 Chef wrote:Dude don't post pictures of other people on the internet You creepy asshole. Even if it's on FaceBook it's not really ok... Especially your ex.
rofl wtf? its on facebook its not that big of a deal.... plus we are still friends its not like i have a vendetta against her jesus
Plus thats ME in the picture
|
On July 15 2012 22:44 Chef wrote:Dude don't post pictures of other people on the internet You creepy asshole. Even if it's on FaceBook it's not really ok... Especially your ex.
But if he had posted it a short while ago in the "Post pictures of your boy/ girlfriend" thread, it would be just fine? 
|
I like watching makeup tutorials on youtube. It's like watching bob ross videos. here is a nice one Delicate cherry blossom
|
On July 15 2012 23:05 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2012 22:44 Chef wrote:Dude don't post pictures of other people on the internet You creepy asshole. Even if it's on FaceBook it's not really ok... Especially your ex. But if he had posted it a short while ago in the "Post pictures of your boy/ girlfriend" thread, it would be just fine?
Only if it were with consent? Don't be a dumbass. Obviously an ex is not going to consent to you posting pictures of her on some site while talking trash.
|
If the pictures were already online it's NP, otherwise it's a dick move.
It is my opinion that skilled application of make-up is supposed to look natural -- if someone who doesn't know you can tell you are wearing make-up, it means you did a bad job at putting on make-up.
The exception would be if you have already reached the other side of uncanny valley and are going for a clear "body art" effect. In this case, unskilled use would be when a stranger can't tell if you are wearing make-up or have some sort of unnatural deformity.
|
On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though
so naive it hurts
also op, just LOL
|
On July 16 2012 05:51 polishedturd wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though so naive it hurts also op, just LOL
How is that naive? It's sad that we've come to the point where if a female face not slathered in paint and chemicals, we find it unattractive and not feminine. Billions of dollars are made by perpetuating this concept of "beauty". Health and hygiene > beauty products.
|
Remove those pics man. I made a grave mistake of posting pictures of this girl I was dating, and someone knew her irl. Nonetheless the relationship ended and I was labeled as a creep. Makeup can look good though. I love when my girlfriend gets "sexy", as in does her hair, makeup and wears a dress.
|
On July 16 2012 06:14 Mothra wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 05:51 polishedturd wrote:On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though so naive it hurts also op, just LOL How is that naive? It's sad that we've come to the point where if a female face not slathered in paint and chemicals, we find it unattractive and not feminine. Billions of dollars are made by perpetuating this concept of "beauty". Health and hygiene > beauty products.
Meh... It's naive because if you take away fashion sense, makeup, expensive hair cuts etc etc superficial things, what you're left with is an absolutely tiny portion of the female population who have adjusted poorly to their society (even if such demands are unfair). To say that women who use make up (presumably the op is not talking about a hooker amount of make up, but something relatively normal) are somehow less real or attractive is pretty silly. Most women accept at least some of society's expectations so that they can function properly within it. I think this post is calling it naive because if you did take away all those things women do to play up their feminimity, you would be pretty shocked just how artificial your concept of feminimity is (even beyond the 'billions of dollars' made perpetuating it, but the very foundation of your ideas of what a woman is)... Like if a girl had fritzy hair, no makeup, and hairy legs, you would probably be pretty judgemental. Reason I include all these other things with make up is because they are not much less a product of time spent 'fooling' you.
I'll say that's it's nice to have a moderate perspective of how much time should be put into these things, but it's naive to think you can spend no time and still be functional and attractive in our society.
edit: In the future I'd avoid go-to cliches like CHEMICALS and the man getting rich off our suffering... They make it sound like you don't know what you're talking about. Chemicals are such an offensive buzzword these days, you might as well turn your brain off as soon as you hear it because the next 3 minutes are going to be worthless.
|
On July 16 2012 09:36 Chef wrote:
Meh... It's naive because if you take away fashion sense, makeup, expensive hair cuts etc etc superficial things, what you're left with is an absolutely tiny portion of the female population who have adjusted poorly to their society (even if such demands are unfair). To say that women who use make up (presumably the op is not talking about a hooker amount of make up, but something relatively normal) are somehow less real or attractive is pretty silly. Most women accept at least some of society's expectations so that they can function properly within it. I think this post is calling it naive because if you did take away all those things women do to play up their feminimity, you would be pretty shocked just how artificial your concept of feminimity is (even beyond the 'billions of dollars' made perpetuating it, but the very foundation of your ideas of what a woman is)... Like if a girl had fritzy hair, no makeup, and hairy legs, you would probably be pretty judgemental. Reason I include all these other things with make up is because they are not much less a product of time spent 'fooling' you.
I didn't say women who use makeup are less real or attractive. I said women who don't are perceived as less feminine and attractive. Yes I would be judgmental of a girl with no makeup and hairy legs, but only because of my constant exposure to painted faces and shaved legs.
I'll say that's it's nice to have a moderate perspective of how much time should be put into these things, but it's naive to think you can spend no time and still be functional and attractive in our society.
edit: In the future I'd avoid go-to cliches like CHEMICALS and the man getting rich off our suffering... They make it sound like you don't know what you're talking about. Chemicals are such an offensive buzzword these days, you might as well turn your brain off as soon as you hear it because the next 3 minutes are going to be worthless.
So you're saying basically it is a necessary evil, or at least a necessary facet of society that must be accepted rather than changed. Chemicals is an accurate word, probably moreso than paint. I don't see how pointing out that an industry worth billions owes its existence to the perception that "no-makeup = homely" is some stylistic transgression.
|
Yes I would be judgmental of a girl with no makeup and hairy legs, but only because of my constant exposure to painted faces and shaved legs.
So you're basically saying the real attractive women are not the ones with no makeup and hairy legs. Ok thx, patriarch scum 
|
On July 16 2012 05:51 polishedturd wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though so naive it hurts
so cynical it hurts
Not naive; just fortunate and patient enough to be in a successful relationship that doesn't primarily depend on superficial bullshit
Such men and women do exist, believe it or not.
On July 16 2012 00:19 Chef wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2012 23:05 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On July 15 2012 22:44 Chef wrote:Dude don't post pictures of other people on the internet You creepy asshole. Even if it's on FaceBook it's not really ok... Especially your ex. But if he had posted it a short while ago in the "Post pictures of your boy/ girlfriend" thread, it would be just fine? Only if it were with consent? Don't be a dumbass. Obviously an ex is not going to consent to you posting pictures of her on some site while talking trash.
If it's already on a public website, "consent" is implicit -.-' rofl. Facebook is not sacred, nor is it actually private.
Besides, they're not offensive pics, and the first one is a random date pic. He's not creeping, relax.
|
Wait what? She looks WAY better in the "before" pic.
Unless I didn't understand your blog...
|
On July 16 2012 11:07 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 05:51 polishedturd wrote:On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though so naive it hurts so cynical it hurts Not naive; just fortunate and patient enough to be in a successful relationship that doesn't primarily depend on superficial bullshit Such men and women do exist, believe it or not.
oh, i see the error of my ways now. i think it's beautiful that your girlfriend doesnt shave her pits and wouldn't mind if you showed up to meet her parents in a wife beater and your dick flopping around.
i also think its beautiful how you take an industry of hardworking and passionate individuals and marginalize their achievements as "superficial bullshit". how fucking stupendous of you
|
On July 16 2012 12:32 polishedturd wrote:Show nested quote +On July 16 2012 11:07 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On July 16 2012 05:51 polishedturd wrote:On July 15 2012 22:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:No worries. Real attractive women don't need to drown their faces in make-up every day though so naive it hurts so cynical it hurts Not naive; just fortunate and patient enough to be in a successful relationship that doesn't primarily depend on superficial bullshit Such men and women do exist, believe it or not. oh, i see the error of my ways now. i think it's beautiful that your girlfriend doesnt shave her pits and wouldn't mind if you showed up to meet her parents in a wife beater and your dick flopping around. i also think its beautiful how you take an industry of hardworking and passionate individuals and marginalize their achievements as "superficial bullshit". how fucking stupendous of you
Your sarcasm, hyperbole, and ignorance don't address the fact that much of the beauty industry has become less about making people feel good about themselves, and more about objectification and making them feel like shit, when comparing most fine people with impossibly perfect models (now with photoshop!).
I never said that I don't support people taking care of their bodies or looking good, and your exaggerated rebuttals just make you look foolish. Go back to watching your favorite "next top model" shows or Toddlers & Tiaras, while you ignore the rest of the world's anorexia and bulemia problems.
|
On July 16 2012 12:43 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:I never said that I don't support people taking care of their bodies or looking good, and your exaggerated rebuttals just make you look foolish. Go back to watching your favorite "next top model" shows or Toddlers & Tiaras, while you ignore the rest of the world's anorexia and bulemia problems.
toddlers and tiaras is fucking rad bro
|
Russian Federation748 Posts
Meh... It's naive because if you take away fashion sense, makeup, expensive hair cuts etc etc superficial things, what you're left with is an absolutely tiny portion of the female population
What of it ? Intelligent and mature female compose a tiny portion of the female population as well, shall I therefore start chasing after airheads ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
