EPT[BR] Mondragon vs KwarK (3500th post) - Page 3
| Blogs > 538 |
|
josemb40
Peru611 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On March 16 2012 06:36 Kyhol wrote: This is back when Starcraft was awesome!!!!!!!!! Great blog. Sc1 Support. "was?" Still is. Also this was pretty cool, dont know how you lost that though! | ||
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
On March 16 2012 06:36 Kyhol wrote: This is back when Starcraft was awesome!!!!!!!!! Great blog. Sc1 Support. You make it sound like it's not awesome anymore  | ||
|
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
| ||
|
GenesisX
Canada4267 Posts
 | ||
|
Pads
England3228 Posts
On March 16 2012 07:54 neobowman wrote: Kinda hard to understand if you aren't familiar with the map. Thankfully, I know every single expo spot and how it looks. Cuz I make maps. Great BR. Edit: FOR THOSE WHO DON'T GET WHY HE GOT DAs. He was on templar tech with zealot speed and he saw or guessed (doesn't show in screenshots) that lurkers are coming. He can either go all the way to robo tech and get observers or just get dark archons and mind control an overlord. He chose the latter. Risky, since scourge can kill overlords without detection, but cool and flashy. Or I could be totally wrong and he got them for some other reason, or as a combination. KwarK is a very reactionary player. They played around 7-8 games in this ladder session, and iirc, Mondi went mutas in the majority of them. A DA with maelstrom and an archon hard counters muta so bad, so he originally got it for that, but when Mondi went for lurker instead of muta, it was just quick thinking to use the DA to mind control and bust the front. To my knowledge this is what happened anyway, he might come here and say I'm wrong, I've talked to him a lot and I know pretty well how he plays though. Still confused how KwarK lost this though heh. | ||
|
Ry-Masta-T
United States478 Posts
| ||
|
mki
Poland882 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
Great work. :D | ||
|
Prof. Protoss
Germany744 Posts
what really would help to understand what's going on would be a picture of the minimap at all panels | ||
|
snively
United States1159 Posts
On March 16 2012 08:27 Jibba wrote: Haha, this is awesome. It's almost like a comic book, and I actually enjoyed spending the extra time to study each scene on my own. Great work. :D its like a comic book, but better! 5/5  | ||
|
Nytefish
United Kingdom4282 Posts
| ||
|
Selth
United States469 Posts
| ||
|
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
| ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
FraCuS
United States1072 Posts
LOL @ the overload getting Mind controlled. | ||
|
FreezingAssassin
United States455 Posts
hahaha | ||
Epoxide
Magic Woods9326 Posts
On March 16 2012 07:38 Praetorial wrote: Wait...KwarK was part of TSL??? The qualifying part for TSL2 was done on iCCup. The players had to use the TSL- / TSL) tag. | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
| ||
|
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17741 Posts
On March 16 2012 08:12 Pads wrote: KwarK is a very reactionary player. They played around 7-8 games in this ladder session, and iirc, Mondi went mutas in the majority of them. A DA with maelstrom and an archon hard counters muta so bad, so he originally got it for that, but when Mondi went for lurker instead of muta, it was just quick thinking to use the DA to mind control and bust the front. To my knowledge this is what happened anyway, he might come here and say I'm wrong, I've talked to him a lot and I know pretty well how he plays though. Still confused how KwarK lost this though heh. I think it wasn't as risky just because Mondragon had no idea Kwark would try to do something like that and thats what made it so brilliant. Kwark didn't go heavy sair so Mondragon had no scourge around and wasn't expecting obs to be out for alittle later so he had no reason to have scourge at the situation. Also Kwark in the rep from what I remember was building his robo or it was done while he was attacking so he was going to have obs coming out anyways so even if Mondragon got to snipe the overlord after he would have lost his nat already and obs would be coming soon. But definitely something that could be done only really once. | ||
| ||
