EPTI mean it isn't anti-american to be against american wars. You can simply not agree with the war. Just because we're at war doesn't mean every American citizen must be for this war.
Sabotaging Citizenship - Page 3
| Blogs > EtherealDeath |
|
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
I mean it isn't anti-american to be against american wars. You can simply not agree with the war. Just because we're at war doesn't mean every American citizen must be for this war. | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On January 19 2012 10:15 DoubleReed wrote: Wait, I don't understand. Why isn't there an option that you wouldn't support the war because you are worried about the devastation to either country? I mean it isn't anti-american to be against american wars. You can simply not agree with the war. Just because we're at war doesn't mean every American citizen must be for this war. You don't understand, I would be fine with that view. The problem is Person X considers the only correct view to be one of supporting China. Not neutrality - a side is picked - and it is automatically that of the old citizenship. | ||
|
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
On January 19 2012 10:18 EtherealDeath wrote: You don't understand, I would be fine with that view. The problem is Person X considers the only correct view to be one of supporting China. Not neutrality - a side is picked - and it is automatically that of the old citizenship. Well then he probably shouldn't get a security clearance. If they interview you, then just answer honestly. For security clearances, they do ask you questions like "Can you see this person being traitorous to the United States?" and "Does this person have complete devotion to the United States of America" etc. etc. Citizenship is fine though. | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On January 19 2012 10:20 DoubleReed wrote: Well then he probably shouldn't get a security clearance. If they interview you, then just answer honestly. For security clearances, they do ask you questions like "Can you see this person being traitorous to the United States?" and "Does this person have complete devotion to the United States of America" etc. etc. Citizenship is fine though. Yea, that's why I amended my position to being that of only mentioning it in case of being interviewed for Person X's security clearance. My previous view I admit was far too extreme. | ||
|
DoubleReed
United States4130 Posts
| ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
 | ||
|
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On January 19 2012 11:08 Erasme wrote: But, would he give up his chinese nationlity ? If not, in case of trouble before the war, he could leave the US to be back in China ? All in all you should just respond honestly and not trying actively to screw his demand as he would probably help you Sorry but I'm not parsing your statement at all. What do you mean he would help me? What demand? And yea, if you become a naturalized US citizen, in this case one would have to give up chinese nationality. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
| ||
|
canadiancitizenshipe
2 Posts
| ||
|
canadiancitizenshipe
2 Posts
| ||
| ||
