EPTIT'S SO COOL BEING ON THE OTHER END OF THE LAW
Here's to many many more!
Share your IP story, TL.
DMCA
| Blogs > mmp |
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
IT'S SO COOL BEING ON THE OTHER END OF THE LAW Here's to many many more! Share your IP story, TL. | ||
|
TheLOLas
United States646 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Yeah.. bad timing to cut to the quick since Destiny just did his whatever thing with it. | ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
On November 03 2011 09:30 Probe1 wrote: I was trying. I'm usually upset by DMCA, but this is a whole new perspective I've gained.You really couldn't have written that to come off any more coarse if you had tried. | ||
sob3k
United States7572 Posts
This blog is devoid of any actual information | ||
|
oBlade
United States5872 Posts
| ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
On November 03 2011 09:33 sob3k wrote: I'll share if you share first This blog is devoid of any actual information Attn: REDACTED I came across a paper of mine advertised[1] on your site. I was not able to download the paper without being brought to a subscription page, despite the paper being freely available elsewhere[2]. I am the sole author of this paper and hold copyright. I have not authorized, and I do not authorize, REDACTED to sell this paper or to derive paid subscriptions from the advertisement of my paper solely or as part of a ``bundle.'' Please take it down in a timely manner and remove all copies & derived information from your website & any other databases involved (including 3rd-party organizations & individuals). Please additionally inform me of any parties that you have sold this work to, or that have downloaded this document via a REDACTED paid subscription. I do not want my work promoting your paid subscriptions or any advertisement revenue REDACTED may be earning. Please additionally inform me of any other papers or works under my name that your company may be offering through paid subscriptions without my knowledge. You can best contact me by email at REDACTED. This email has been electronically signed[3] by the copyright holder. This statement is offered in good faith that REDACTED is not authorized to derive monetary value from the described work. All of the information presented in this statement is accurate and precise. I am the copyright holder and willing to make these statements in a US court of law under penalty of perjury. Sincerely, - REDACTED [1] REDACTED [2] REDACTED [3] REDACTED | ||
Insane
United States4991 Posts
On November 03 2011 09:31 mmp wrote: What happened to Destiny's stream? I was trying. I'm usually upset by DMCA, but this a whole new perspective I've gained. Destiny's stream got taken down temporarily by a DMCA complaint. At first I thought this was some blog bragging about having taken his stream down temporarily  . You picked a rather poor time to have posted this since that just happened, that's all. | ||
|
LordofAscension
United States589 Posts
~LoA | ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
On November 03 2011 09:48 Insane wrote: Destiny's stream got taken down temporarily by a DMCA complaint. At first I thought this was some blog bragging about having taken his stream down temporarily . You picked a rather poor time to have posted this since that just happened, that's all.Right, but what was the IP that Destiny got called out for? Edit: I suppose I can use the search function. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Well, I apologize for reacting poorly at first! I am glad you stopped someone from scamming money out of people with the help of your work! Cheers man! Sorry again for having a less than polite tone before. | ||
|
Bear4188
United States1797 Posts
| ||
|
gds
Iceland1391 Posts
Can we at least know what your work is about? it piques my curiosity now. | ||
|
actionbastrd
Congo598 Posts
On November 03 2011 10:26 gds wrote: ^i dont think he wants his work to be freely available. Can we at least know what your work is about? it piques my curiosity now. "I came across a paper of mine advertised[1] on your site. I was not able to download the paper without being brought to a subscription page, despite the paper being freely available elsewhere[2]" If you read his statement is appears he doesnt care if its freely available. Just doesnt want people using him for money. :-/ I am curious on what the paper was about aswell. At least we know there are some people out there who do this for good reason. Too bad many company's and people do it for selfish or just plain retarded reasoning. | ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
| ||
|
mmp
United States2130 Posts
On November 03 2011 10:53 Djzapz wrote: Ew, hopefully your DMCA goes through. Best luck. It's not a big deal and they'll probably just ignore it. I just disagree with taking information that's in the public domain and trying to sell it as though it's premium content. All they did was google for pdf files and scrape the results. If they were a site that just aggregated those search hits and directed users to the original content, I wouldn't mind what advertisement they got out of it since they are hypothetically improving access to the information. I don't want my name showing up on this sleazy site. On November 03 2011 10:26 gds wrote: Can we at least know what your work is about? it piques my curiosity now. The paper was on peer-to-peer websocket authentication. I'm too bashful to link here, but if I work out some bugs in the code and integrate some nice PKI you may see it on github in the future. There's probably enough information here to do your own Google search. | ||
| ||
