EPTFinance and Why I Hate Everything - Page 2
| Blogs > gods_basement |
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
|
gods_basement
United States305 Posts
On August 11 2011 03:33 Probe1 wrote: So is steroid use and selling drugs compared to working at burger king. I'm not going to shit up your thread any more, I apologize. If it's not too much to ask I'd just like to say I think you sound like a undergraduate. Sorry. well that's exactly what i am (hence finance 300), so perhaps you would be so kind as to enlighten me ^^ i don't know you ask to say what you think, or imply that I would not allow such a thing to happen. i also dont know why you're apologizing (either time, really). | ||
|
Riku
United States1064 Posts
On August 11 2011 03:33 Probe1 wrote: Just stop fucking PMing me. You win. Whatever. Probe1 likes to troll people, ignore half of their argument, then runs away and doesn't reply when he's finally beaten thoroughly. I should just ban him from my blogs now that I think about it. | ||
|
Gnial
Canada907 Posts
On August 11 2011 04:17 Riku wrote: Good read, makes me curious to learn more. Probe1 likes to troll people, ignore half of their argument, then runs away and doesn't reply when he's finally beaten thoroughly. I should just ban him from my blogs now that I think about it. Nerd troll vanquished. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://8bitscholar.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/level-up.jpg) I'm looking forward to your political rant OP :D | ||
|
Shiverfish
Canada95 Posts
| ||
|
xarthaz
1704 Posts
On August 10 2011 08:05 gods_basement wrote: To create these suckers, Wall Street has many tools. They have more information and more sophisticated ways to use it. They can hire out "fund managers" to invest sucker's money (yours) and then bet against you. They absorb a disproportionate amount of of the finite possible earnings by standing on the backs of suckers. Laws for insider trading are just to give the illusion of fairness. This is the problem with your logic. All other things being equal, people prefer successful managers to unsuccessful ones. Investment isnt forced onto anyone, people wont willingly choose to get smaller gains than bigger gains. Hence the break down of the modernised conceptulized appeal to marxist class dichotomies. Also, GoP vs Democrats? If youre a real open guy you should be above this, right? | ||
|
gods_basement
United States305 Posts
On August 11 2011 09:38 xarthaz wrote: This is the problem with your logic. All other things being equal, people prefer successful managers to unsuccessful ones. Investment isnt forced onto anyone, people wont willingly choose to get smaller gains than bigger gains. Hence the break down of the modernised conceptulized appeal to marxist class dichotomies. Also, GoP vs Democrats? If youre a real open guy you should be above this, right? never said anything about democrats, and "old" is still capitalized. "successful" managers have portfolios of 100 million or more Hence the break down of the modernised conceptulized appeal to marxist class dichotomies. i know you think that means something, but really, it doesnt. | ||
| ||
