EPT[Rant] Dear SC2 forum: WTF? - Page 3
| Blogs > Aylear |
|
Count9
China10928 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
wait..... what? On September 20 2010 11:00 Fritts wrote: Someone should write a code so whenever someone says the word "imbalanced" it is replaced by the word "mysterious" or some other cool adjective. That way we wouldn't have to look at the word and still get lols from awful posts. Terran is so mysterious. omfg r1ch get on it plz, holy shit that would be hilarious | ||
|
T0fuuu
Australia2275 Posts
| ||
|
Aylear
Norway3988 Posts
On September 20 2010 08:30 seRapH wrote: oh wow can i just say that i love the ad on top? i wanna play that :D Thanks, so do I! I wonder if the alpha build still exists on some disc somewhere. Hell, this marks the second time I've dragged the alpha build into one of my blog posts, although this one was way more subtle. Props for noticing that silly detail. On September 20 2010 09:16 Asdkmoga wrote: that baby-crying over marauder picture is now my background lol thank you Hah! You're welcome, but isn't it way too white? On September 20 2010 10:09 kzn wrote: Your footnote made the whole post like 5x better. I was disturbingly pleased with myself over it. I'm glad someone commented. On September 20 2010 11:37 Hesmyrr wrote: Oh man, this is the best idea ever. And I know such word replacement program can actually be written, though I am unsure whether it could be successfully applied to big site such as TL. Those examples were really funny. :D Something Awful has fuck -> gently caress, so it definitely can be applied to a big site. | ||
|
Saracen
United States5139 Posts
When I started playing StarCraft 1, I thought Zerg required less skill because all they did was mass a bunch of units and press the attack button. Did I mention I was Protoss? lol | ||
|
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
 I'd love to be able to read an invite-only or somehow-filtered Strategy section -- 1500 and up or something like that. Not sure how you'd go about it, but find a way. | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
On September 20 2010 14:00 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: would you still be happy to read it if you were unable to post? VERY | ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On September 20 2010 14:00 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: would you still be happy to read it if you were unable to post? Sure. If I want advice on some aspect of gameplay, it'd be nice to just go there and search, then find an answer. Rather than wading through theorycraft and bad ideas. | ||
|
alexpnd
Canada1857 Posts
What I used to do for the bw strat section was simply look for the [G] tag. In those you would typically find an accomplished player spelling out particular nuances in a build or play style along with reps (eg. stylish, walling thread) so that you can learn off of them. Debating over strategy typically leads nowhere as nobody wants to commit to actually improving and showcasing their ability and understanding. | ||
|
Aylear
Norway3988 Posts
On September 20 2010 14:00 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: would you still be happy to read it if you were unable to post? God yes. Really, I don't know how successful you might be in getting really high level players involved, but if anyone can do it, it'd be TeamLiquid. Just imagine the likes of HuK, White-Ra, and (holy mother of god yes) TLO sharing their insight and creativity. That place would be holy ground as far as I'm concerned. | ||
|
acceLL
46 Posts
| ||
| ||
). 
